Free-breathing Technique Research Articles

Good agreement between cardiac magnetic imaging protocols using free-breathing and breath-holding techniques for flow quantification in valvular heart disease

Abstract Background Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluation of valvular heart disease is an important diagnostic tool when echocardiography is inconclusive. Flow quantification is usually performed during breath hold, which can be challenging in valvular heart disease patients often suffering from dyspnea and heart failure. Purpose The purpose of the present study is to evaluate a free-breathing protocol of flow measurement in the aortic, pulmonary and tricuspid valves in healthy subjects (HS) and patients with tricuspid regurgitation (TR). Methods Phase contrast flow volume measurements were performed in 20 HS and 25 patients with TR using standard breath-holding (BH) and a free-breathing (FB) technique. Two venc-adjusted volume acquisition were acquired in the aortic, pulmonary and tricuspid valve during BH and one during FB. Mean, standard deviation (SD) and limits of agreement (LoA) for aortic forward flow volume (AoFF), pulmonary forward flow volume (PuFF) and tricuspid inflow volume (TrIF) were evaluated. Results Figure 1 presents flow volume (ml) of AoFF, PuFF and TrIF during BH (mean of 2 measurements) and FB. Conclusions The present study demonstrated good agreements between phase contrast flow measurements using FB and BH techniques. These parameters are used in the evaluation of aortic, mitral, pulmonary and tricuspid regurgitations using CMR imaging. Thus, free-breathing CMR acquisition can be an important complement in the assessment of valvular heart disease and may be applied in patients with difficulty to hold their breath.

Comparative analysis of clinical treatment outcomes: Breath-hold vs. free-breathing techniques in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy.

The aim of this study was to clarify the safety and efficacy of breath-hold irradiation in liver stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). A retrospective analysis was conducted on 57 consecutive patients who received SBRT for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases between 2013 and 2021. Breath-hold irradiation was implemented for patients treated after April 2020. The median follow-up period for all patients was 16.4 months (IQR: 7.36-20.9). The 2-year overall survival rate was 64.4% (95% CI: 47.4-77.2), and the local control rate was 84.3% (95% CI: 69.7-92.3) for all patients. The 1-year overall survival was 80.0% (95% CI: 60.8-90.5) versus 82.0% (95% CI: 53.5-93.9) in the free-respiratory (FR) group versus the breath-hold (BH) group, respectively (P = 0.60). The 1-year local control rates were 78.1% (95% CI: 57.5-89.5) in the FR group and 95.7% (95% CI: 72.9-99.4) in the BH group, respectively (P = 0.16). Radiation-induced liver injury, defined by an escalation of ≥2 in Child-Pugh score, was observed in four patients within each group (FR 13% vs. BH 15%). There were no gastrointestinal adverse events of Grade 3 or higher. Breath-hold irradiation can be safely administered and has demonstrated clinical potential in improving local control. Further research into dose escalation using breath-hold techniques is warranted.

How Effective is Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Minimizing Cardiac Doses During Hybrid Radiotherapy Treatment for Left-Sided Breast Cancer with Comprehensive Regional Nodes?

In the context of left breast cancer radiotherapy, long term cardiopulmonary toxicity has been well-documented, significant efforts have been undertaken to mitigate such toxicity by using 4D gating, deep inspiration breath-hold(DIBH) and active breath control(ABC) techniques. To evaluate and compare the cardio-pulmonary radiation doses incurred during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT) in two distinct breathing conditions such as DIBH and Free Breathing (FB), with a specific focus on the left chest wall with comprehensive regional nodal irradiation. A prospective dosimetric study was conducted on 15 patients who received adjuvant loco-regional radiotherapy of chest-wall (CW), supraclavicular fossa(SCF), and internal mammary region(IMC), with or without axilla. Two sets of planning CT scans were taken in DIBH and FB conditions. The dosimetric difference between DIBH CT and FB CT plans analyzed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test, employing SPSS software version 21.0. Comparison of DIBH and FB parameters for target coverage revealed a statistically significant advantage with DIBH in SCF(D95, V90, p<0.017) and IMC(D98, V90 & V95, p<0.03). Dosimetric characteristics of heart and LAD exhibited statistically significant lower doses with DIBH (V20, V25, and Dmean, p<0.001) compared to FB plans. Lung doses were similar with no discernible advantage of one technique over the other. Other OARs such as contralateral breast (p=0.027) and esophagus (p=0.001) received lower doses with the DIBH technique while the spinal cord (p=0.691) and thyroid(p=0.496) showed no significant difference. Maximum heart distance (p= 0.001), central lung distance (p= 0.011) and Haller index (p= 0.001) exhibited statistical significance between the two techniques, whereas chest wall separation showed no significant statistical difference (p=0.629). DIBH demonstrates a substantial reduction in cardiac and LAD doses compared to the FB technique. This study underscores the efficacy of DIBH as a viable strategy for mitigating cardiac and LAD radiation doses in left-sided breast cancer patients undergoing PMRT of chest wall with comprehensive regional nodes.

Free-breathing MRI techniques for fat and R2* quantification in the liver.

To review the recent advancements in free-breathing MRI techniques for proton-density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* quantification in the liver, and discuss the current challenges and future opportunities. This work focused on recent developments of different MRI pulse sequences, motion management strategies, and reconstruction approaches that enable free-breathing liver PDFF and R2* quantification. Different free-breathing liver PDFF and R2* quantification techniques have been evaluated in various cohorts, including healthy volunteers and patients with liver diseases, both in adults and children. Initial results demonstrate promising performance with respect to reference measurements. These techniques have a high potential impact on providing a solution to the clinical need of accurate liver fat and iron quantification in populations with limited breath-holding capacity. As these free-breathing techniques progress toward clinical translation, studies of the linearity, bias, and repeatability of free-breathing PDFF and R2* quantification in a larger cohort are important. Scan acceleration and improved motion management also hold potential for further enhancement.

Deep Inspiration Breath Hold in Left-Sided Breast Radiotherapy: A Balance Between Side Effects and Costs

BackgroundDeep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is an effective technique for reducing heart exposure during radiotherapy for left-sided breast cancer. Despite its benefits, cost considerations and its impact on workflow remain significant barriers to widespread adoption. ObjectivesThis study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of DIBH and compare its operational, financial, and clinical outcomes with free breathing (FB) in breast cancer treatment. MethodsTreatment plans for 100 patients with left-sided breast cancer were generated using both DIBH and FB techniques. Dosimetric data, including the average mean heart dose, were calculated for each technique and used to estimate the cardiotoxicity of radiotherapy. A state-transition microsimulation model based on SCORE2 (Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation) algorithms projected the effects of DIBH on cardiovascular outcomes and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were calculated from a provider perspective using time-driven activity-based costing, applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of €40,000 for cost-effectiveness assessment. A discrete event simulation model assessed the impacts of DIBH vs FB on throughput and waiting times in the radiotherapy workflow. ResultsIn the base case scenario, DIBH was associated with an absolute risk reduction of 1.72% (95% CI: 1.67%-1.76%) in total cardiovascular events and 0.69% (95% CI: 0.67%-0.72%) in fatal cardiovascular events over 20 years. Additionally, DIBH was estimated to provide an incremental 0.04 QALYs (95% CI: 0.05-0.05) per left-sided breast cancer patient over the same time period. However, DIBH increased treatment times, reducing maximum achievable throughput by 12.48% (95% CI: 12.36%-12.75%) and increasing costs by €617 per left-sided breast cancer patient (95% CI: €615-€619). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was €14,023 per QALY. ConclusionsDespite time investments, DIBH is cost-effective in the Belgian population. The growing adoption of DIBH may benefit long-term cardiovascular health in breast cancer survivors.

Evaluation of Tumor Control and Normal Tissue Complication Probabilities in Patients Receiving Comprehensive Nodal Irradiation for Left-Sided Breast Cancer.

Women with left-sided breast cancer receiving adjuvant radiotherapy have increased incidence of cardiac mortality due to ischemic heart disease; to date, no threshold dose for late cardiac/pulmonary morbidity or mortality has been established. We investigated the likelihood of cardiac death and radiation pneumonitis in women with left-sided breast cancer who received comprehensive lymph node irradiation. The differences in dosimetric parameters between free-breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) techniques were also addressed. Based on NTCP calculations, the probability of cardiac death was significantly reduced with the DIBH compared to the FB technique (p < 0.001). The risk of radiation pneumonitis was not clinically significant. There was no difference in coverage between FB and DIBH plans. Doses to healthy structures were significantly lower in DIBH plan than in FB plan for V20, V30, and ipsilateral total lung volume. Inspiratory gating reduces the dose absorbed by the heart without compromising the target range, thus reducing the likelihood of cardiac death.

Effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction for improvement of image quality and liver tumor detectability in the hepatobiliary phase of gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

To evaluate the effectiveness of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) in improving image quality and tumor detectability of isovoxel high-resolution breath-hold fat-suppressed T1-weighted imaging (HR-BH-FS-T1WI) in the hepatobiliary phase (HBP) of Gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (Gd-EOB-MRI). This retrospective evaluated 42 patients with 98 liver tumors who underwent Gd-EOB-MRI between March 2023 and May 2023 using three techniques based on HBP imaging: isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI reconstructed (1) with DLR (BH-DLR +) and (2) without DLR (BH-DLR -) and (3) HR-FS-T1WI scanned with a free-breathing technique using a navigator-echo-triggered technique and DLR (Navi-DLR +). The three techniques were qualitatively and quantitatively compared by the Friedman test and the Bonferroni post-hoc test. Tumor detectability was compared using the McNemar test. BH-DLR + (3.85, average score of two radiologists) showed significantly better qualitative scores for image noise than BH-DLR - (2.84) and Navi-DLR + (3.37) (p < 0.0167), and Navi-DLR + showed significantly better scores than BH-DLR - (p < 0.0167). BH-DLR + (3.77) and BH-DLR - (3.77) showed significantly better qualitative scores for respiratory motion artifact than Navi-DLR + (2.75) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in scores between BH-DLR + and BH-DLR - (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (0.32) and Navi-DLR + (0.33) showed significantly higher lesion-to-nonlesion CR than BH-DLR - (0.29) (p < 0.0167), but there was no significant difference in lesion-to-nonlesion CR between BH-DLR + and Navi-DLR + (p > 0.0167). BH-DLR + (89.8%) showed significantly better tumor detectability than BH-DLR - (76.0%) and Navi-DLR + (77.6%) (p < 0.05). The use of DLR for isovoxel HR-BH-FS-T1WI was effective in improving image quality and tumor detectability.

Deep inspiratory breath-hold radiotherapy on a Helical Tomotherapy unit: Workflow and early outcomes in patients with left-sided breast cancer

IntroductionThe clinical implementation of deep inspiratory breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy to reduce cardiac exposure in patients with left-sided breast cancer is challenging with helical tomotherapy(HT) and has received little attention. We describe our novel approach to DIBH irradiation in HT using a specially designed frame and manual gating, and compare cardiac substructure doses with the free-breathing (FB) technique. Material and methodsThe workflow incorporates staggered junctions and a frame that provides tactile feedback to the patient and monitoring for manual cut-off. The treatment parameters and clinical outcome of 20 patients with left-sided breast cancer who have undergone DIBH radiotherapy as a part of an ongoing prospective registry are reported. All patients underwent CT scans in Free Breathing (FB) and DIBH using the in-house Respiframe, which incorporates a tactile feedback-based system with an indicator pencil. Plans compared target coverage, cardiac doses, synchronizing treatment with breath-hold and avoiding junction repetition. MVCT scans are used for patient alignment. ResultsThe mean dose (Dmean) to the heart was reduced by an average of 34 % in DIBH-HT compared to FB-HT plans (3.8 Gy vs 5.7 Gy). Similarly, 32 % and 67.8 % dose reduction were noted in the maximum dose (D0.02 cc) of the left anterior descending artery, mean 12.3 Gy vs 18.1 Gy, and mean left ventricle V5Gy 13.2 % vs 41.1 %, respectively. The mean treatment duration was 451.5 sec with a median 8 breath-holds; 3 % junction locations between successive breath-holds were replicated. No locoregional or distant recurrences were observed in the 9-month median follow-up. ConclusionOur workflow for DIBH with Helical-Tomotherapy addresses patient safety, treatment precision and challenges specific to this treatment unit. The workflow prevents junction issues by varying daily breath-hold durations and avoiding junction locations, providing a practical solution for left-sided breast cancer treatment with HT.

Dosimetric Impact of Voluntary Deep Inspiration Breath Hold (DIBH) in Mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphomas: A Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Delivery Methods Using Voluntary DIBH and Free Breathing Techniques.

Hodgkin lymphomas are radiosensitive and curable tumors that often involve the mediastinum. However, the application of radiation therapy to the mediastinum is associated with late effects including cardiac and pulmonary toxicities and secondary cancers. The adoption of conformal IMRT and deep inspiration breath- hold (DIBH) can reduce the dose to healthy normal tissues (lungs, heart and breast). We compared the dosimetry of organs at risk (OARs) using different IMRT techniques for two breathing conditions, i.e., deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing. Twenty-three patients with early-stage mediastinal Hodgkin lymphomas were accrued in the prospective study. The patients were given treatment plans which utilized full arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (F-VMAT), Butterfly VMAT (B-VMAT), and fixed field IMRT (FF-IMRT) techniques for both DIBH and free breathing methods, respectively. All the plans were optimized to deliver 95% of the prescription dose which was 25.2 Gy to 95% of the PTV volume. The mean dose and standard error of the mean for each OAR, conformity index (CI), and homogeneity index (HI) for the target using the three planning techniques were calculated and compared using Student's t-test for parametric data and Wilcoxon signed-rank test for non-parametric data. The HI and CI of the target was not compromised using the DIBH technique for mediastinal lymphomas. The mean values of CI and HI for both DIBH and FB were comparable. The mean heart doses were reduced by 2.1 Gy, 2.54 Gy, and 2.38 Gy in DIBH compared to FB for the F-VMAT, B-VMAT, and IMRT techniques, respectively. There was a significant reduction in V5Gy, V10Gy, and V15Gy to the heart (p < 0.005) with DIBH. DIBH reduced the mean dose to the total lung by 1.19 Gy, 1.47 Gy, and 1.3 Gy, respectively. Among the 14 female patients, there was a reduction in the mean right breast dose with DIBH compared to FB (4.47 Gy vs. 3.63 Gy, p = 0.004). DIBH results in lower heart, lung, and breast doses than free breathing in mediastinal Hodgkin Lymphoma. Among the different IMRT techniques, FF-IMRT, B-VMAT, and F-VMAT showed similar PTV coverage, with similar conformity and homogeneity indices. However, the time taken for FF-IMRT was much longer than for the F-VMAT and B-VMAT techniques for both breathing methods. B-VMAT and F-VMAT emerged as the optimal planning techniques able to achieve the best target coverage and lower doses to the OARs, with less time required to deliver the prescribed dose.

COMPARING MAGNETIC RESONANCE ENTEROGRAPHY AND ENDOSCOPY FINDINGS TO QUANTATATIVE MAGENTIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN PEDIATRIC CROHN’S DISEASE

Abstract BACKGROUND In pediatric Crohn’s disease, endoscopy has remained the gold standard for diagnosis; however, Magnetic Resonance Enterography (MRE) is able to show inflammation of the bowel that a gastroenterologist cannot reach with endoscopy. For a standard MRE, a patient needs to ingest oral contrast, receive intravenous (IV) contrast and a spasmolytic agent, and hold his/her breath during portions of the study, which can be challenging in younger children. As shown in previous studies, quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can evaluate bowel motility in children with Crohn’s disease, showing that as motility decreases in the bowel, inflammation increases. A motility score obtained from GIQuant software (Motilent, UK) may allow existing MRE protocols to be shortened and can be done with free-breathing techniques and without IV contrast and the spasmolytic agent. AIM Our primary aim is to demonstrate that quantitative MRI, which uses the cine image to develop a motility score from GIQuant software, is as effective as standard MRE in assessing inflammation of the bowel. We secondarily hypothesize that the motility score will inversely correlate to the Endoscopic Biopsy Acute Histologic Inflammatory Score (eAIS), the Crohn’s Disease Endoscopic Index of Severity (CDEIS) score, and the MR Index of Activity (MaRIA) score. METHODS This was a retrospective study of 50 pediatric patients from Children’s Wisconsin with ileal and/ or cecal Crohn’s disease who underwent endoscopy and MRE within 7 days of each other without exposure to therapy. Cine images were used from patients’ previously obtained MREs to obtain a motility score using GIQuant. A cine image and GIQuant map example is shown in Figure 1. The relationships between motility score and MaRIA, eAIS, and CDEIS were then calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (ρ). RESULTS MaRIA and motility scores inversely correlated (ρ = -0.66, p &amp;lt;.0001), which is seen in Figure 2. MaRIA positively correlated with CDEIS (ρ = 0.30, p= 0.03) and eAIS (ρ = 0.26, p = 0.07). The motility score showed a non-significant negative correlation with CDEIS (ρ = -0.17, p = 0.24) and eAIS (ρ = -0.23, p =0.11). CONCLUSION Quantitative MRI is as effective as standard MRE in identifying inflammation of the bowel in Crohn’s disease. The cine image is obtained much faster than standard MRE and without the use of intravenous contrast, spasmolytic agent, and breath-holding techniques, which is crucial for children who are too young to cooperate with current MRE protocols. Figure 1 MRE cine image with the Region of Interest in the terminal ileum identified via the polygon and the resulting Motility Map produced by GIQuant Figure 2 MaRIA and Motility scores of each patient in our cohort

Advanced Abdominal MRI Techniques and Problem-Solving Strategies.

MRI plays an important role in abdominal imaging because of its ability to detect and characterize focal lesions. However, MRI examinations have several challenges, such as comparatively long scan times and motion management through breath-holding maneuvers. Techniques for reducing scan time with acceptable image quality, such as parallel imaging, compressed sensing, and cutting-edge deep learning techniques, have been developed to enable problem-solving strategies. Additionally, free-breathing techniques for dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging, such as extra-dimensional-volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, golden-angle radial sparse parallel, and liver acceleration volume acquisition Star, can help patients with severe dyspnea or those under sedation to undergo abdominal MRI. We aimed to present various advanced abdominal MRI techniques for reducing the scan time while maintaining image quality and free-breathing techniques for dynamic imaging and illustrate cases using the techniques mentioned above. A review of these advanced techniques can assist in the appropriate interpretation of sequences.

A retrospective comparison of setup accuracy from CBCT and SGRT data in breast cancer patients

IntroductionBoth cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) are used for breast patient positioning verification before treatment delivery. SGRT may reduce treatment time and imaging dose by potentially reduce the number of CBCT needed. The aim of this study was to compare the displacements resulting in positioning from the Image Guided Radiation Therapy (IGRT) 3D and SGRT methods and to design a clinical workflow for SGRT implementation in breast radiotherapy to establish an imaging strategy based on the data obtained. MethodsFor this study 128 breast cancer patients treated with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions using 3D conformal radiotherapy with free breathing technique were enroled. A total of 366 CBCT images were evaluated for patient setup verification and compared with SGRT. Image registrations between planning CT images and CBCT images were performed in mutual agreement and in online mode by three health professionals. Student's paired t‐test was used to compare the absolute difference in vector shift, measured in mm, for each orthogonal axis (x, y, z) between SGRT and CBCT methods. The multidisciplinary team evaluated a review of the original clinical workflow for SGRT implementation and data about patients treated with the updated workflow were reported. ResultsComparison of the shifts obtained with IGRT and SGRT for each orthogonal axis (for the x-axes the average displacement was 0.9 ± 0.7 mm, y = 1.1 ± 0.8 mm and z = 1.0 ± 0.7 mm) revealed no significant statistical differences (p > 0.05). Using the updated workflow the difference between SGRT and IGRT displacements was <3 mm in 91.4 % of patients with a reduction in total treatment time of approximately 20 %, due to the reduce frequency of the CBCT images acquisition and matching. ConclusionsThis study has shown that IGRT and SGRT agree in positioning patients with breast cancer within a millimetre tolerance. SGRT can be used for patient positioning, with the advantages of reducing radiation exposure and shorter overall treatment time.

52P A comparative study to assess volumetric and dosimetric profile of heart and lung in patients undergoing left sided post mastectomy radiotherapy: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus free breathing (FB) techniques

52P A comparative study to assess volumetric and dosimetric profile of heart and lung in patients undergoing left sided post mastectomy radiotherapy: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus free breathing (FB) techniques

The Effect of Deep Inspiration Breath-Hold Technique on Right Coronary Artery, Heart, and Liver Doses in Right Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

The deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) approach has been thoroughly researched with the aim of reducing radiation exposures to normal tissues in breast cancer patients. Although heart and lung toxicity are widely addressed in many literature, radiation-associated liver toxicity and dose constraints for the right coronary artery (RCA) are not well studied in relation to breast radiotherapy. Additionally, very few studies have investigated the relationship between doses to cardiac substructures. This study aimed to determine the effect of the DIBH technique on the right coronary artery (RCA) region, cardiac substructures, and liver dose in right breast cancer irradiation. Between January 2022 and December 2022, thirty-five right breast cancer patients who previously received breast-surgery underwent computed tomography (CT) simulation with both free-breathing (FB) and DIBH techniques. Patients were contoured by a radiation oncologist on the scans using the Treatment Planning System. For cardiac substructures, reference atlas contours were used for accurate delineation and to reduce inter-observer variation. Each patient underwent two treatment plans for both the DIBH and FB datasets. The plan comprised the FB and DIBH techniques, and the doses to the cardiac substructures, ipsilateral lung, RCA region, and liver were compared using a two-tailed paired t-test. Radiotherapy was delivered with a Linac with the prescription dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. For both FB and DIBH irradiation groups, the mean radiation doses to the ipsilateral lung, heart, and RCA region in patients with FB and DIBH techniques were; 14.67 Gy, 2.33 Gy, 4.88 Gy and 12.05 Gy, 1.34 Gy and 3.29 Gy respectively. The mean radiation doses to the cardiac substructures; for the left ventricle, right ventricle, left atrium, and right atrium for the FB were 1.08 Gy, 1.79 Gy, 4.11 Gy, and for DIBH, 0.49 Gy, 1.49 Gy, 0.95 Gy, and 2.61 Gy, respectively. For the DIBH group, the liver maximum dose (p<0.01), right lung mean dose (p = 0.001), heart maximum dose (p = 0.009), RCA mean dose (p = 0.020), RCA maximum dose (p = 0.008), RCA V5 dose (p = 0.035), right atrium maximum dose (p = 0.009) and right ventricle mean dose (p = 0.040) were significantly lower than in patients treated in the non-gated group. DIBH resulted in considerable displacement of the liver away from the high-dose target region, such that the volume of liver in the high-dose region was reduced. Additionally, the use of the DIBH technique in right breast cancer irradiation effectively reduces the radiation doses to the cardiac substructures, such as the left ventricle, right ventricle, left atrium, right atrium, RCA region, and lungs. DIBH could lead to substantial sparing of these structures with the right breast cancer radiotherapy. Future prospective studies are required to determine whether improvements to dose-distribution will translate into improved toxicity outcomes.

Evaluation of Daily Patient Position Accuracy and Calculation of Setup Errors with Skin Markers and Surface-Guided Radiotherapy (SGRT) in Breast Cancer

This study aims to compare the inter-fractional patient positioning errors between the use of skin markers and SGRT in patients receiving breast radiotherapy. It also includes calculating the inter- and intra-fractional PTV margins required for free breathing (FB) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques due to setup uncertainties. The treatment data of a total of 2209 fractions from 80 patients who received whole breast or chest wall radiotherapy at an institution between March 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. In the first group of patients, the skin markers placed in the Computed Tomography (CT) scan with the FB technique were aligned and positioned with the room lasers in the Elekta Versa HD, and plan-specific shifts were made. The optical surface scanning procedure was applied to the second group of patients with the Sentinel™ system for FB or DIBH techniques in simulation. Patients were positioned for treatment by matching reference surface images with real-time images from the Catalyst™ HD surface imaging system. Positions of all patients were verified with kilovoltage or cone-beam CT imaging systems, and 3D shift vectors were recorded daily. To compare both setup methods, PTV margins including mean positioning shifts (MPS), the vector length of the shifts and setup errors were calculated from van Herk's formulas. The MPS of all patients using skin markers were 0.20±0.85 cm, 0.32±1.55 cm, and 0.18±0.44 cm in the vertical, longitudinal and lateral directions, respectively. Then, these values given above were found to be 0.12±0.15 cm, 0.06±0.17 cm, 0.07±0.23 cm for FB using Catalyst™ HD, and 0.34±0.30 cm, 0.29±0.26 cm, 0.23±0.30 cm for DIBH. In different setup techniques, no statistically significant difference was found between the 3D shift vectors in any direction with Wilcoxon signed-rank test (p>0.05). The mean standard deviation values in all directions were calculated as 1.22 cm and 0.61 cm, respectively, in patients using skin markers and SGRT. This study indicates a significant difference between the positioning shifts of patients positioned with skin markers and SGRT. The surface imaging system is an advantageous non-invasive method that increases setup accuracy and reproducibility in breast radiotherapy.

Early Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Hypofractionated Radiotherapy after Breast Conserving Surgery: Analysis of a Prospective Study

To evaluate the early cardiotoxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in patients with left-sided breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery, and to investigate the correlation between cardiotoxicity and cardiac dose. A total of 103 women from 2017 to 2018 who received left-sided whole-breast with or without regional nodal irradiation either using deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) or free-breathing (FB) technique were prospectively enrolled. N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), electrocardiogram, and radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging were conducted before and after HFRT. Logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association of cancer treatment, cardiac dose, and cardiovascular risk factors with cardiotoxic effects. The mean dose (Dmean) of the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), left ventricular (LV), and right ventricular (RV) in all patients was 403 cGy, 1685 cGy, 627 cGy, and 444 cGy, respectively. In comparison to FB, DIBH significantly reduced cardiac dose (heart Dmean 250 cGy vs. 570 cGy, LAD Dmean 1250 cGy vs. 2170 cGy, LV Dmean 420 cGy vs. 850 cGy, RV Dmean 260 cGy vs. 650 cGy; all p<0.001). With a median follow-up of 49 months (range, 2-65 months), no patients had clinical cardiac abnormalities or cardiac-related symptoms, but 42 (41%) patients had subclinical cardiac events. Among them, 41 were electrocardiogram changes, and one had LV ejection fraction decreased by 10% compared with the baseline level. Twenty-five (60%) recovered during follow-up, of which 17 (40%) experienced subclinical changes only once. The mean value of NT-proBNP did not change significantly before and after HFRT. In univariate analyses, DIBH technique significantly decreased the risk of subclinical cardiac events compared with FB (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.14-0.71; p = 0.006); however, higher mean doses of heart and LV, anthracycline-based chemotherapy, obesity, and hypertension were associated with increased risk of subclinical cardiac events (all p<0.05). Early subclinical cardiac damage after HFRT in left-sided breast cancer is dose-related, and mostly manageable and reversible without medical intervention.

Impact of breath hold on regional nodal irradiation and heart volume in field in left breast cancer adjuvant irradiation.

Compared to the free-breathing technique, adjuvant left breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy using the breath-hold method significantly reduces the heart mean dose, Left anterior descending artery, and ipsilateral lung doses. Movement with deep inspiration may also reduce heart volume in the field and regional node doses. Pre-radiotherapy planning CT was performed in the free-breathing, and breath-hold techniques using RPM, demographic information, clinicopathological data, heart volume in the field, heart mean dose, LAD mean dose, and regional nodal doses were calculated in both free breathing and DIBH. Fifty patients with left breast cancer receiving left breast adjuvant radiation were enrolled. There was no significant difference in axillary LN coverage between the two techniques, except for SCL maximum dose, Axilla I node maximum dose, and Axilla II minimum dose in favor of the breath hold technique. The mean age was 47.54years, 78% had GII IDC, 66% had positive LVSI results, and 74% of patients had T2. The breath hold strategy resulted in considerably decreased mean heart dose (p = 0.000), LAD dose (p = 0.000), ipsilateral lung mean dose (p = 0.012), and heart volume if the field (p = 0.013). The mean cardiac dosage and the dose of the LAD were significantly correlated (p = 0.000, R = 0.673). Heart volume in the field and heart mean dosage was not significantly correlated (p = 0.285, r = -0.108). When compared to free breathing scans, DIBH procedures result in considerably reduced dosage to the OAR and no appreciable changes in dose exposure to regional lymph node stations in patients with left-sided breast cancer.

Abdominal Diffusion-Weighted MRI With Simultaneous Multi-Slice Acquisition: Agreement and Reproducibility of Apparent Diffusion Coefficients Measurements.

Simultaneous multi-slice diffusion-weighted imaging (SMS-DWI) can shorten acquisition time in abdominal imaging. To investigate the agreement and reproducibility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from abdominal SMS-DWI acquired with different vendors and different breathing schemes. Prospective. Twenty volunteers and 10 patients. 3.0 T, SMS-DWI with a diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging sequence. SMS-DWI was acquired using breath-hold and free-breathing techniques in scanners from two vendors, yielding four scans in each participant. Average ADC values were measured in the liver, pancreas, spleen, and both kidneys. Non-normalized ADC and ADCs normalized to the spleen were compared between vendors and breathing schemes. Paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed rank test; intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC); Bland-Altman method; coefficient of variation (CV) analysis; significance level: P < 0.05. Non-normalized ADCs from the four SMS-DWI scans did not differ significantly in the spleen (P = 0.262, 0.330, 0.166, 0.122), right kidney (P = 0.167, 0.538, 0.957, 0.086), and left kidney (P = 0.182, 0.281, 0.504, 0.405), but there were significant differences in the liver and pancreas. For normalized ADCs, there were no significant differences in the liver (P = 0.315, 0.915, 0.198, 0.799), spleen (P = 0.815, 0.689, 0.347, 0.423), pancreas (P = 0.165, 0.336, 0.304, 0.584), right kidney (P = 0.165, 0.336, 0.304, 0.584), and left kidney (P = 0.496, 0.304, 0.443, 0.371). Inter-reader agreements of non-normalized ADCs were good to excellent (ICCs ranged from 0.861 to 0.983), and agreement and reproducibility were good to excellent depending on anatomic location (CVs ranged from 3.55% to 13.98%). Overall CVs for abdominal ADCs from the four scans were 6.25%, 7.62%, 7.08, and 7.60%. The normalized ADCs from abdominal SMS-DWI may be comparable between different vendors and breathing schemes, showing good agreement and reproducibility. ADC changes above approximately 8% may potentially be considered as a reliable quantitative biomarker to assess disease or treatment-related changes. 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Dosimetric Comparison Study Between Free Breathing and Breath Hold Techniques in Patients Treated by Liver-Directed Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy.

Background Breathing motion management is the key to delivering stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver lesions. This study aimed to compare the dosimetric parameters of liver SBRT using two different techniques: free breathing and breath hold. Method The study included 11 patients with liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver-directed SBRT. A dosimetric comparison was performed using dose-volume histogram analysis, evaluating parameters such as the maximum dose to 5 cc of bowel volume, mean liver dose (MLD), and liver V20and V30. Statistical analyses were performed to compare results. Results The findings revealed that the breath hold technique resulted in significantly lower doses to the bowel and smaller volumes of normal liver tissue receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 30 Gy (V30) than the free breathing. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the MLD between the two techniques, the breath hold technique resulted in a lower MLD. Conclusion This dosimetric comparison study suggests that the breath hold technique is associated with lower radiation exposure to the bowel and normal liver tissues. Although this may not be feasible for all patients, it may be an appropriate procedure for selected individuals. Further research is needed to validate these findings in different patient populations and explore their impact on clinical outcomes and patient-reported quality of life.

Dosimetric comparison of breath-hold and free-breathing techniques in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with proton pencil beam scanning

Dosimetric comparison of breath-hold and free-breathing techniques in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with proton pencil beam scanning