Since the second half of last year, large-scale Jeonse lease fraud cases called “Villa King” and “Villa God” have been revealed one after another. The term “rental fraud” can be understood as “an act of stealing a lease deposit by deceiving a tenant (tenant) by those involved in a lease contract, such as a landlord (tenant), a builder, a broker, or a sales agent”. Most of the so-called “King of Villas” and “Billasin” defrauded tenants of their Jeonse lease deposits in a similar way, mainly targeting new villas or tenants of multi-family homes. The large-scale Jeonselease fraud occurred because of the difficulty in grasping the market price of new villas, the corruption of pre-sale agencies and licensed real estate agents, and the loopholes in the Jeonse lease loan and Jeonse lease guarantee insurance system. The problem of Jeonse lease fraud has existed before, but in recent years, Jeonse lease fraud has occurred nationwide and systematically because a large number of pre-sale agents, unqualified licensed real estate agents, and brokerage assistants have actively attracted tenants. Due to this Jeonse lease fraud, the Certified Brokerage Act was revised to prevent unqualified licensed real estate agents from operating, but there are no measures or regulations for sale agencies and real estate consulting companies. Therefore, it is hoped that the legislation for the sale agency business and real estate consulting business will be reorganized as soon as possible so that those with expertise and responsibility can mediate and protect the property of the people. The recent large-scale lease fraud is a complicated combination of insufficient tenant protection, guarantee insurance and lease loan system weaknesses, and legal and institutional problems of licensed real estate agents and real estate consulting companies. The large-scale Jeonse lease fraud has caused great pain and confusion, especially to the common people, and it also makes us think about the principles of private autonomy and the limitations of government intervention. The principle of private autonomy means that individuals can make their own decisions on matters related to them by respecting human dignity and values, and are also responsible for the decisions they have made. But no individual, no organization, no state is complete, and is free from unreasonable decision-making and unethical deviations and corrupt practices. And it grows through trial and error such as unreasonable decisions and corruption. I sincerely hope that the pain and confusion experienced by our society will be an opportunity to sublimate into an advanced housing welfare system and real estate transaction system.
Read full abstract