Fracture Risk Assessment Tool Research Articles

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (Frax Tool) Scores in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients in Haji Hospital Medan

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a metabolic disease characterized by chronic hyperglycemia resulting from defects in insulin secretion and/or insulin action. Bone fragility in T2DM, which mirrored bone mineral density and bone mass reduction. Classical diagnosis of osteoporosis in T2DM is performed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and the risk of fracture can be assessed using the FRAX tool (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool). The purpose of the study was to assess the risk of osteoporosis using FRAX tool calculation (without BMD) in T2DM patients at the endocrine metabolic clinic of Haji Hospital Medan. Method: Descriptive observational with a cross-sectional study approach using primary and secondary data from the medical records of the Endocrine and Metabolic Clinic of Haji Hospital Medan in September-October 2023.Results: Of the 80 respondents with a risk of major osteoporosis, there were 77 respondents (96.3%) with low risk, 3 respondents (3%) with moderate risk, and no respondents with high risk (0%). The FRAX score for the risk of hip fracture received a low risk of 72 respondents (90%). At the same time, the high-risk was 8 respondents (10%).Conclusion: The majority of T2DM patients at Haji Hospital Medan are at low- risk for major osteoporosis and hip fracture

Management of Vertebral Fragility Fracture in Older People: Recommendations from a Spanish Consensus of Experts.

Vertebral fragility fractures (VFF) pose a challenge for appropriate care. The aim of this study was to develop consensus recommendations for the management of VFF in older people from a multidisciplinary approach. Specialists in osteoporosis belonging to different scientific societies reviewed the main clinical practice guidelines published in Spain in 2014. Thirty-five recommendations for the management of VFF were evaluated by seven experts using an anonymous survey. Consensus was defined as 80% of responses of 8 (agree) and 9 (strongly agree) on a Likert scale. Consensus was achieved in 22 recommendations (62.8%). The experts agreed on the need for anamnesis, clinical assessment, and laboratory tests, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate, proteinography, and the assessment of levels of calcium, vitamin D, alkaline phosphatase, and thyroid-stimulating hormone. Optional tests, such as bone turnover markers (BTMs), magnetic resonance imaging, bone scintigraphy, or using a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX®), did not achieve an agreed consensus. Also, there was consensus regarding the administration of calcium/vitamin D supplements, the withdrawal of toxic habits, and personalized physical exercise. Participants agreed on the administration of teriparatide for 24 months and then a switch to denosumab or bisphosphonates in patients at high risk of fracture. Specialists in osteoporosis, primary care physicians, and geriatricians should be involved in the follow-up of patients with VFF. Although there was multidisciplinary agreement on diagnostic tests and non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment in frail older people, therapeutic objectives should be individualized for every patient. In addition to the specific recommendations, close collaboration between the geriatrician and the primary care physician is essential for the optimal chronic management of frail patients with fragility fractures.

Development and Comparison of Treatment Decision Tools for Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis.

Long-term Glucocorticoid (GC) use results in compromised bone strength and fractures, and several treatment recommendations have been developed to prevent fractures, but none have been validated in a real-world setting. This study aims to create a treatment decision tool and compares this tool to the treatment suggestions from the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), International Osteoporosis Foundation and European Calcified Tissue Society (IOF-ECTS), and GC-adjusted Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (GC-FRAX), above the intervention threshold. We utilized registry data gathered at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Kaohsiung, Taiwan, between September 2014 and April 2021. This research is a single-center, observational, and case-controlled study. We recruited participants using prednisone for at least 2.5 mg/day or the equivalent dose for over 3 months, excluding those younger than 40, those with malignancies, or those currently undergoing anti-osteoporosis therapy. The primary endpoint was new fragility fractures within 3 years, including morphometric vertebral fractures detected at baseline and with a follow-up thoracic-lumbar spine X-ray. Participants were randomly allocated into derivation and validation sets. We developed the Steroid-Associated Fracture Evaluation (SAFE) tool in the derivation cohort by assessing the weights of exploratory variables via logistic regression. Prediction performance was compared in the validation set by the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under the curve (AUC), and sensitivity and specificity. A total of 424 treatment-naïve subjects were enrolled, and 83 (19.6%) experienced new fractures within 3 years. The final formula of the SAFE tool includes osteoporosis (1 point), an accumulated GC dose ≥ 750 mg within 6 months (or equivalent prednisolone of ≥4.5 mg/day for 6 months) (1 point), a BMI ≥ 23.5 (1 point), previous fractures (1 point), and elderliness of ≥70 years (2 points). In the validation set, a treatment decision based on the SAFE ≥ 2 points demonstrated an AUC of 0.65, with a sensitivity/specificity/accuracy of 75.9/54.0/58.9, with an ACR of 0.56 (100.0/11.0/31.0), IOF-ECTS 0.61 (75.9/46.0/52.7), and GC-FRAX 0.62 (82.8/42.0/51.2). Among current GIOP recommendations, the SAFE score serves as an appropriate treatment decision tool with increased accuracy and specificity.

Real world fracture prediction of fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and one-minute osteoporosis risk test: An 11-year longitudinal study

IntroductionFractures affect people's quality of life especially in the elders. One of the most important risk factors is osteoporosis. There are many screening tools to predict osteoporosis and fractures. We aimed to compare the predictive validity of three commonly used screening tools: fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX), osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) and one-minute osteoporosis risk test. Among them, OSTA and one-minute osteoporosis risk test were originally developed to predict osteoporosis risks and FRAX was to predict fracture risks. MethodsThis is an 11-year longitudinal study. We enrolled 708 senior people from health examinees in Taiwan in 2010. A standardized questionnaire and blood tests were provided. Annual telephone interview was conducted to assess the real fracture status. We calculated risk scores of FRAX, OSTA, and one-minute osteoporosis risk test and compared with real-world fracture records. ResultsThe mean age of the participants were 74.9 (SD 6.4). There were 356 (50.3 %) men. From 2010 to 2020, a total of 105 (14.8 %) persons suffered from fractures. Compared to people without fractures, people with fractures had higher FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk scores (14.0 % ± 7.6 % vs.11.3 % ± 5.7 %), higher hip fracture risk scores, and higher OSTA risk (5.9 % ± 1.4 % vs. 5.3 % ± 1.3 %). Cox regression analysis showed that hazard ratios for fracture of high FRAX risk was 1.53 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.05–2.21), and for high OSTA risk was 1.37 (95 % CI 1.04–1.82). ConclusionsOnly OSTA and FRAX scores were satisfactory in predicting 10-year fractures.

Probability of the 10-year Risk of Hip and Major Osteoporotic Fracture in Non-radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Fracture risk in non-radiographic spondyloarthritis is underestimated. A reliable tool such as the Fracture Risk Assessment tool (FRAX) may assess this risk probability. This study aimed to assess the fracture risk by the FRAX score in patients with nr-axSpA and to determine factors associated with high fracture risk. We conducted a retrospective study of nr-axSpA patients meeting the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) classification criteria for spondyloarthritis. All patients had Bone Mineral Density (BMD) by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The 10- year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) was calculated using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). Among 40 patients with nr-axSpA, 27 were women (67.5%). Their mean age was 43.7 ± 12.1 years. The mean disease duration was 3.15 ± 2.7 years. Eighteen patients (45%) had osteopenia, and 12 patients (30%) had osteoporosis. The median HF FRAX was 0% [0-1.2]. The median MOF FRAX was 0.5% [0.3-1.8]. MOF FRAX was positively correlated with age (p = 0.002), disease onset age (p = 0.006), disease duration (p = 0.024), and the modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS) (p < 0.0001), and negatively correlated with daily calcium intake (p < 0.0001). HF FRAX was positively correlated with mSASSS (p < 0.0001) and negatively correlated with daily calcium intake (p = 0.005). Our study confirmed the frequency of bone loss during nr-axSpA and showed that osteoporotic risk fracture was related not only to traditional risk factors for osteoporosis but also to disease-related factors.

Management of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis by Moroccan General Practitioners: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Despite the existence of effective treatments and prescribed therapeutic protocols, there is a lack of management of osteoporosis, resulting in increased secondary morbidity and mortality. The general practitioner (GP) is the first-line practitioner for the detection and management of osteoporosis. This study was conducted to explore the practices, knowledge, and difficulties in postmenopausal osteoporosis management reported by GPs. An anonymous questionnaire (19 questions) was created via Google Forms and distributed to 300 GPs via social networks (WhatsApp, Facebook, and Gmail). The survey results were automatically calculated on "Google Forms" and checked using SPSS.20 software. A total of 129 responses were received, representing a response rate of 43%. The majority of respondents were women (67.2%). The definition of osteoporosis was variable, with 51.6% defining it as a T-score of ≤-2.5 SD, 25.8% defining it as diffuse bone demineralization, and 12.1% defining it as a fracture after falling with low energy. Prolonged corticosteroid therapy was the most commonly indicated reason for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) (81.39%). The calcium phosphate balance was the most requested (90.1%). Vitamin D and calcium supplementation were reported by 74.41% and 54.26% of GPs, respectively. Fracture of the upper end of the femur was the main therapeutic indication (65.11%). Most GPs surveyed (73.3%) were unfamiliar with the fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Most of the GPs gave advice on fall prevention to their patients (83.72%), and 62.5% of GPs monitored their patients' height. Anti-osteoporosis treatment was maintained for 3 to 5 years by 44.96% of GPs. Our survey found that the practices and knowledge of GPs on osteoporosis vary widely and often deviate from the recommended standards. This highlights the need for more excellent education of GPs, due to their vital role in the management of osteoporosis.

Hemoglobin is associated with BMDs and risk of the 10-year probability of fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

This study aimed to investigate the associations between hemoglobin (HGB) levels and bone mineral density (BMD) and fracture risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM) population of different ages. This cross-sectional study included 641 patients with T2DM (57.9% males). BMD of the femoral neck (FN), total hip (TH), and lumbar spine (LS) were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The 10-year probability of fracture was assessed using a fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). HGB and other biochemical indices were measured in a certified laboratory at our hospital. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 26.0 and R language (R version 4.1.0). Generalized additive models (GAMs) were used to identify the associations between HGB and BMD and fracture risk. Patients with osteoporosis have lower HGB levels than the non-osteoporotic population and lower FN BMD in patients with anemia than in the non-anemic population. In patients with T2DM, there was sex- and age-related variability in the correlation between HGB levels and BMDs and fracture risk. In older men, HGB level was an independent determinant of BMD and was positively correlated with FN and TH BMD. In non-older women, HGB level was an independent determinant of BMD and fracture risk, positively associated with BMDs and negatively associated with 10-year probability of fracture risk. GAMs revealed a positive linear association between HGB level and BMDs in non-older female patients but not in older male patients. Our study provides a new perspective on the association of HGB level and BMDs with fracture risk. Relatively high HGB levels are a protective factor for bone quality in patients with T2DM. However, the bone-protective effect of HGB is influenced by age and sex and persists only in older men and non-older women with T2DM.

Association of secondhand smoke with fracture risk in community-dwelling nonsmoking adults in Korea.

Although the detrimental effects of active smoking on bone health have been widely recognized, the impact of secondhand smoke exposure on fracture risk in non-smokers remains less understood. A total of 4843 nonsmokers aged 40-69yr, who participated in the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study from 2001 to 2018, were analyzed. The participants were categorized into two groups based on their exposure status to secondhand smoke: currently exposed and unexposed. The exposure group was subsequently divided into two subgroups based on the median weekly exposure time (high vs low). The incidence of new fractures was determined using self-reported questionnaires. The identified fractures were categorized according to the fracture site: overall, vertebral, hip, non-vertebral, and non-vertebral non-hip fractures. The mean age of the participants was 52.4yr (84.1% women). Exposure to secondhand smoke was associated with an increased risk of fracture (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.27, P =0.028) after adjusting for multiple covariates including age, sex, BMI, household income, bone density of mid-shaft tibia, C-reactive protein, alcohol consumption, and fracture history. Secondhand smoke remained as a significant risk factor for fracture, independent of the major osteoporotic fracture probabilities estimated using a fracture risk assessment tool (aHR: 1.24, P =0.038). The high exposure group had higher risk of fracture than that of the unexposed group (aHR: 1.33, P =0.025), whereas the fracture risk did not differ significantly between low exposure and unexposed groups (aHR: 1.18, P =0.253), suggesting a potential dose-response relationship. Secondhand smoke showed robust association with increased risk of non-vertebral (aHR: 1.37, P =0.008) or non-vertebral non-hip fractures (aHR: 1.36, P =0.013), while its association with vertebral fracture was attenuated (aHR: 1.03, P =0.908). Secondhand smoke was associated with an elevated risk of fracture in nonsmokers, independent of clinical risk factors.

Risk factors for osteoporotic hip fracture among community-dwelling older adults: a real-world evidence study

BackgroundHip fractures in the older adults lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Although a low bone mineral density is considered the leading risk factor, it is essential to recognize other factors that could affect the risk of hip fractures. This study aims to evaluate the contribution of clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes, and muscle and aerobic capacity for hip fractures in community-dwelling older adults.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study with real world-data from subjects ≥ 60 years old attending an outpatient clinic in Minas Gerais, Brazil, from May 1, 2019, to August 22, 2022. Data about clinical characteristics (multimorbidity, medications of long-term use, sedative and or tricyclic medications, number of falls), patient-reported outcomes (self-perception of health, self-report of difficulty walking, self-report of vision problems, and self-report of falls) and muscle and aerobic capacity (calf circumference, body mass index, and gait speed) were retrieved from an electronic health record. The association of each potential risk factor and hip fracture was investigated by a multivariable logistic regression analysis adjusted for age and sex.ResultsA total of 7,836 older adults were included with a median age of 80 years (IQR 72–86) and 5,702 (72.7%) were female. Hip fractures occurred in 121 (1.54%) patients. Multimorbidity was associated with an increased risk of hip fracture (OR = 1.12, 95%CI 1.06–1.18) and each episode of fall increased the chance of hip fracture by 1.7-fold (OR = 1.69, 95%CI 1.52–1.80). Patient-reported outcomes associated with increased fracture risk were regular or poor self-perception of health (OR = 1.59, 95%CI 1.06–2.37), self-report of walking difficulty (OR = 3.06, 95%CI 1.93–4.84), and self-report of falls (OR = 2.23, 95%CI 1.47–3.40). Body mass index and calf circumference were inversely associated with hip fractures (OR = 0.91, 95%CI 0.87–0.96 and OR = 0.93, 95%CI 0.88–0.97, respectively), while slow gait speed increased the chance of hip fractures by almost two-fold (OR = 1.80, 95%CI 1.22–2.66).ConclusionOur study reinforces the importance of identified risk factors for hip fracture in community-dwelling older adults beyond bone mineral density and available fracture risk assessment tools. Data obtained in primary care can help physicians, other health professionals, and public health policies to identify patients at increased risk of hip fractures.

The Fracture Risk of Elderly Patients With Atopic Dermatitis.

Background: A higher fracture risk has been reported previously in patients with atopic Dermatitis (AD). The bone mineral density (BMD) was not accounted for in these studies. Objective: To investigate the fracture risk in AD patients after adjustment for factors including BMD. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed AD patients (≥45 years) who underwent BMD examination at our hospital from July 2010 to February 2023. Individuals who received BMD examinations during a health checkup were identified as the controls. We documented their clinical characteristics, BMD, 10-year risk for a major fracture based on FRAX (Fracture Risk Assessment Tool), and development of osteoporotic fractures. Patients were followed until development of new onset fracture or the end of the study period. A cross-sectional comparison of BMD between AD patients and controls at baseline was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test after propensity score matching (PSM). Their fracture risks were compared using the multivariate Cox regression model. BMD and fracture risk were also compared between AD patients who received systemic therapy and those who did not. Results: A total of 50 AD patients and 386 controls were enrolled. The median age was older in AD patients when compared with controls (70 years vs 60 years). Their BMD at all sites was similar after PSM. After a median follow-up of 1.7-2.0 years, 13 osteoporotic fractures were identified. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, AD was not associated with new onset fractures of all sites (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-9.01) but was significantly associated with new onset vertebral fractures (aHR 6.80, 95% CI 1.77-26.17). The BMD and incidence of fractures were similar between AD who received systemic therapy and those who did not. Conclusions: Elderly AD patients had similar BMD but a higher short-term risk for vertebral fractures when compared with the controls.

Fat Body Mass and Vertebral Fracture Progression in Women With Breast Cancer

Women with early breast cancer (EBC) exposed to aromatase inhibitors (AIs) may experience fragility fractures despite treatment with bone-active drugs. Risk factors for fractures in patients receiving AIs and denosumab have not been explored to date. To evaluate whether an association exists between dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-measured fat body mass (FBM) and vertebral fracture (VF) progression in postmenopausal women with EBC undergoing adjuvant therapy with AIs in combination with denosumab and to examine whether VF was associated with common risk factors for bone fracture and parameters of body composition other than FBM. For this prospective, single-center, cohort study, 237 patients with EBC who were undergoing adjuvant treatment with AIs and denosumab (60 mg every 6 months) were enrolled at the Breast Unit of the ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia from September 2014 to June 2018. Data analysis was conducted in June 2022. Body composition parameters, bone mineral density, and morphometric VFs were assessed by DXA at study entry and after 18 months of therapy. VF progression, defined as either new or worsening of preexisting VFs, between the 2 time points. Of the 237 patients enrolled (median [range] age, 61 [28-84] years), 17 (4.4%) reported VF progression. Univariable analysis found an association between VF progression and a history of clinical fractures (odds ratio [OR], 3.22; 95% CI, 1.19-8.74; P = .02), Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score for major fractures (OR, 4.42; 95% CI, 1.23-13.79; P = .04), percentage of FBM (OR, 6.04; 95% CI, 1.69-21.63; P = .006), and android fat (OR, 9.58; 95% CI, 1.17-78.21; P = .04) and an inverse association with appendicular lean mass index-FBM ratio (OR, 0.25, 95% CI, 0.08-0.82; P = .02). Multivariable analysis revealed percentage of FBM (OR, 5.41; 95% CI, 1.49-19.59; P = .01) and FRAX score (OR, 3.95; 95% CI, 1.09-14.39; P = .04) as independent variables associated with VF progression. The findings of this study suggest that baseline FBM is an independent factor for VF progression in patients with EBC treated with adjuvant AIs and denosumab. This observation is new and indicates that diet and exercise may synergize with denosumab in the management of bone health in this patient setting.

Use of Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in clinical practice and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool future directions.

Fracture Risk Assessment Tool is a free, online fracture risk calculator which can be used to predict 10-year fracture risk for women and men over age 50 years. It incorporates seven clinical risk factors and bone density to give a 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture. This dynamic tool can be used with patients at the bedside to help guide treatment decisions. There are some limitations to Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, with the most central limitation being the fact that inputs are binary. Much research has been done to try to refine Fracture Risk Assessment Tool to allow for more accurate risk prediction, and this article describes the data for adjusting Fracture Risk Assessment Tool depending on the clinical scenario such as the dose of glucocorticoid use, presence of diabetes and others. Recently, the new FRAXplus tool has been developed to address many of these concerns and will likely replace the old Fracture Risk Assessment Tool in the future. At the current time, it is available in beta form.

Relationship Between Overactive Bladder and Bone Fracture Risk in Female Patients.

Overactive bladder (OAB) has recently been recognized as an independent risk factor for falls and fractures. This study aimed to predict fracture risk in female patients with OAB symptoms. We assessed and compared the fracture risk in newly diagnosed female patients with OAB to those without OAB using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), and investigated the relationship between fracture risk and OAB severity. The present single-center, cross-sectional study included 177 female participants (79 with OAB, 98 without OAB). The OAB group was older (p=0.033) and shorter (p=0.010) compared to the non-OAB group. Compared to the non-OAB group, the OAB group had more patients with hypertension (p<0.001) and diabetes mellitus (p=0.011), as well as higher risks for major fractures (non-OAB group: 15.2±13.2%; OAB group: 23.6±14.1%; p<0.001) and hip fractures (non-OAB group: 6.3±11.0%; OAB group: 10.6±10.0%; p=0.007). In addition, those with moderate/severe OAB had the most significantly elevated risks for both major fractures (non-OAB group: 15.2±13.2%, mild-OAB: 17.6±12.5%, moderate/sever-OAB: 26.4±14.0%; p<0.001) and hip fractures (non-OAB group: 6.3±11.0%, mild-OAB: 6.5±7.6%, moderate/sever-OAB: 12.5±10.4%; p<0.001). Among the OAB symptoms, nocturia had the strongest correlation with fracture risk (major fracture, ρ=0.534; hip fracture, ρ=0.449; all p<0.001). Patients with severe OAB, and particularly severe nocturia, should be closely monitored with timely and aggressive symptom management; however, an interventional study incorporating the management of OAB symptoms is required to confirm whether the proactive management of OAB symptoms reduces the risk of fractures in older females.

Assessment, Prevalence, and Correlates of Frailty among Moroccan People Aged 50 and above Living with HIV.

Persons living with HIV experience many challenges, such as premature aging and geriatric syndromes. Frailty has become an important determinant of a series of adverse health outcomes. This research aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors for frailty in this population. A cross-sectional outpatient investigation was conducted in an urban HIV clinic. Patients aged 50 and older living with HIV were included. Frailty phenotype was evaluated using the original Fried criteria, and we calculated the Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool scores, and Mini-mental State Exam scores. One hundred and nine individuals were studied. Ninety-two (84.4%) were men, with a mean age of 57.65.2 years. Fourteen (12.8%) participants were frail. Frail participants were older (P = 0.001) and less likely to be virally suppressed (P = 0.01). Having ≥3 comorbidities, VACS index, polypharmacy, and 5-year mortality risk was significantly greater in the frail group. Frailty was significantly associated with poorer quality of life (P = 0.02). The cognitive impairment, falls, and malnutrition risk were significantly associated with a risk to manifest a frail phenotype. Frailty is common among Moroccans with HIV, and it is associated with greater morbidity and mortality rates. Our findings should serve as a warning sign to standardize frailty and geriatric syndrome screening in this population.

The risk of fractures after entering long-term care facilities

BackgroundStratifying residents at increased risk for fractures in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) can potentially improve awareness and facilitate the delivery of targeted interventions to reduce risk. Although several fracture risk assessment tools exist, most are not suitable for individuals entering LTCF. Moreover, existing tools do not examine risk profiles of individuals at key periods in their aged care journey, specifically at entry into LTCFs. PurposeOur objectives were to identify fracture predictors, develop a fracture risk prognostic model for new LTCF residents and compare its performance to the Fracture Risk Assessment in Long term care (FRAiL) model using the Registry of Senior Australians (ROSA) Historical National Cohort, which contains integrated health and aged care information for individuals receiving long term care services. MethodsIndividuals aged ≥65 years old who entered 2079 facilities in three Australian states between 01/01/2009 and 31/12/2016 were examined. Fractures (any) within 365 days of LTCF entry were the outcome of interest. Individual, medication, health care, facility and system-related factors were examined as predictors. A fracture prognostic model was developed using elastic nets penalised regression and Fine-Gray models. Model discrimination was examined using area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) from the 20 % testing dataset. Model performance was compared to an existing risk model (i.e., FRAiL model). ResultsOf the 238,782 individuals studied, 62.3 % (N = 148,838) were women, 49.7 % (N = 118,598) had dementia and the median age was 84 (interquartile range 79–89). Within 365 days of LTCF entry, 7.2 % (N = 17,110) of individuals experienced a fracture. The strongest fracture predictors included: complex health care rating (no vs high care needs, sub-distribution hazard ratio (sHR) = 1.52, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.39–1.67), nutrition rating (moderate vs worst, sHR = 1.48, 95%CI 1.38–1.59), prior fractures (sHR ranging from 1.24 to 1.41 depending on fracture site/type), one year history of general practitioner attendances (≥16 attendances vs none, sHR = 1.35, 95%CI 1.18–1.54), use of dopa and dopa derivative antiparkinsonian medications (sHR = 1.28, 95%CI 1.19–1.38), history of osteoporosis (sHR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.16–1.27), dementia (sHR = 1.22, 95%CI 1.17–1.28) and falls (sHR = 1.21, 95%CI 1.17–1.25). The model AUC in the testing cohort was 0.62 (95%CI 0.61–0.63) and performed similar to the FRAiL model (AUC = 0.61, 95%CI 0.60–0.62). ConclusionsCritical information captured during transition into LTCF can be effectively leveraged to inform fracture risk profiling. New fracture predictors including complex health care needs, recent emergency department encounters, general practitioner and consultant physician attendances, were identified.

Prediction of fragility fractures in men with prostate cancer under androgen deprivation therapy: the importance of a multidisciplinary approach using a mini-invasive diagnostic tool.

Bone fragility in men who are treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has a complex pathophysiology that differs from that of primary and post-menopausal osteoporosis. Fracture risk assessment based on bone mineral density (BMD) and Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) score might not be effective in this patient setting, since high frequency of fragility fractures has been reported even in subjects with low FRAX risk and normal BMD. In this paper we want to emphasize the importance in the individual assessment of bone fragility and prediction of fractures by measuring parameters of bone quality, assessing morphometric vertebral fractures and evaluating body composition that in subjects under hormone-deprivation therapies can play a crucial role. Noteworthy, a single mini-invasive diagnostic tool, i.e., the dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan, offers the opportunity to evaluate reliably parameters of bone quality (e.g., trabecular bone score) and body composition, besides measurement of BMD and assessment of vertebral fractures by a morphometric approach. This article highlights the values and cost-effectiveness of this mini-invasive tool in the context of multidisciplinary approach to subjects with prostate cancer under ADTs.

Fracture risk prediction in old Chinese people-a narrative review.

With aging, the burden of osteoporotic fracture (OF) increases substantially, while China is expected to carry the greatest part in the future. The risk of fracture varies greatly across racial groups and geographic regions, and systematically organized evidence on the potential predictors for fracture risk is needed for Chinese. This review briefly introduces the epidemiology of OF and expands on the predictors and predictive tools for the risk of OF, as well as the challenges for their potential translation in the old Chinese population. There are regional differences of fracture incidence among China. The fracture incidences in Hong Kong and Taiwan have decreased in recent years, while it is still increasing in mainland China. Although the application of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is limited among old Chinese in the mainland, bone mineral density (BMD) by DXA has a predictive value similar to that worldwide. Other non-DXA modalities, especially heel QUS, are helpful in assessing bone health. The fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX) has a good discrimination ability for OFs, especially the FRAX with BMD. And some clinical factors have added value to FRAX, which has been verified in old Chinese. In addition, although the application of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool for Asians (OSTA) in Chinese needs further validation, it may help identify high-risk populations in areas with limited resources. Moreover, the translation use of the muscle quality and genetic or serum biomarkers in fracture prediction needs further works. More applicable and targeted fracture risk predictors and tools are still needed for the old Chinese population.

Bone mass, fracture risk, and associated factors in postmenopausal women living with HIV.

The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of low bone mass (osteopenia/osteoporosis), the factors associated with low bone mass, and the risk of fractures in Brazilian postmenopausal women living with HIV (WLH) in the Amazon region. This is a cohort study with a cross-sectional assessment at baseline conducted between March 2021 to August 2022 with 100 postmenopausal WLH undergoing antiretroviral therapy (ART) between 45 and 60 years of age and 100 age-matched HIV-negative women. Data on bone mineral density in the lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) were collected using dual x-ray absorptiometry and the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fractures was assessed using the Fracture Risk Assessment tool (FRAX). The age of menopause onset occurred earlier in WLH ( P < 0.001). No differences in prevalence of osteoporosis and osteopenia in LS and FN were observed except for a lower T score in FN in WLH ( P = 0.039). The FRAX for major osteoporotic fracture and hip fracture were low in both groups, despite the mean of both FRAX scores was higher in WLH ( P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that years since menopause onset, higher body mass index and higher FRAX major osteoporotic fracture were associated with the WLH group, while a higher frequency of physical activity was registered in the HIV-negative group. Multivariate analysis also showed that in WLH, a lower T score in FN was associated with years since menopause onset and body mass index and that the number of years since menopause onset was associated with a lower T score in the LS and a higher score in the FRAX hip fracture. Our findings show a high prevalence of low bone mass (osteopenia/osteoporosis) in Brazilian postmenopausal women from the Amazon region. Women living with HIV have higher FRAX scores than HIV-negative women and a lower T score in the FN.

HIV and fracture: Risk, assessment and intervention.

With management of comorbidity in people living with HIV (PLWH) a key component of clinical care, early loss of bone integrity and clinical fracture are recognized as important issues. This review aims to describe the epidemiology of fracture in PLWH, as well as summarizing the relative balance of factors that contribute to fracture. We also aim to describe fracture risk assessment and interventional strategies to modify the risk of fracture in this population. Data from recent meta-analyses show that PLWH have significantly more fractures than the general population, with men and injecting drug users at higher risk. Modifiable factors that contribute to fracture risk in this cohort include body mass index (BMI), drug use, concurrent medications, frailty, and hepatitis C virus infection. Relating to antiretroviral therapy, current or ever tenofovir exposure has been identified as predictive of fracture but not cumulative use, and a potentially modest protective effect of efavirenz has been observed. Fracture Risk Assessment Tool scores underestimate fracture risk in PLWH with improved accuracy when HIV is considered a cause of secondary osteoporosis and bone mineral density (BMD) included. Early consideration of risk, prompting evaluation of modifiable risk factors, frailty and falls risk with bone density imaging and prompt intervention may avert fracture in PLWH. Guidance on screening and lifestyle modification is available in international guidelines. Bisphosphonates are safe and effective in PLWH, with limited data for other agents.

Screening of Fracture Risk and Osteoporosis Among Older Long-term Care Residents: A Prospective Study.

This prospective study assessed the effectiveness of screening older long-term care residents (LTCRs) for fracture risk and osteoporosis in Taiwan. Fracture risk screening was done using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX), and those with high or moderate risk were offered osteoporosis workup and treatment at the hospital. Among 785 LTCRs screened, 338 men (mean age 75.6) and 447 women (mean age 81.2) were included. Only 5.2% of women and no men were using anti-osteoporosis medication. Based on the Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation (BHOF) recommendations, 69.2% of men and 92.6% of women were classified as high fracture risk. In 110 participants willing to receive bone mineral density examination, osteoporosis was diagnosed in 86.2% of women and half of men. FRAX could effectively differentiate fracture risk in 648 LTCRs who completed 2-year follow-ups; no fracture occurred in the low-risk group. The study emphasizes the importance of fracture risk screening to enhance osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment among LTCRs.