Fractional Laser Research Articles

Evaluation of Skin Recovery after Fractional CO2 Laser Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Using Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography

Evaluation of Skin Recovery after Fractional CO2 Laser Treatment of Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus Using Multimodal Optical Coherence Tomography

Comparative study in treatment of acne scars fractional carbon dioxide laser versus micro needling fractional radio frequency - A retrospective study.

Efficacy of fractional carbon dioxide laser and microfractional radiofrequency in treatment of acne scars is well substantiated. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of carbon dioxide laser versus microfractional radiofrequency in treatment of acne scars in skin type 3,4. Thirty-two patients of skin types 3-4 with grade 3 and 4 atrophic acne scars, of which 16 were treated with fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser and 16 were treated with microfractional radiofrequency were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received either treatment 4 sessions at an interval of 4-6 weeks. Objective assessment was done with qualitative and quantitative Goodman and baron acne scar grading system by assessment of photographs at baseline and 3 months after last session. All the data collected were entered in a Microsoft Excel worksheet and analyzed using R Software R-4.2.1. The study variables acne scar grades were described using frequency with percentage, acne scar scores were described using Mean with Standard deviation, and Median with interquartile range (IQR) (Q1-Q3). Since the data were ordinal, which is non-normal, hence, non-parametric tests are applied. To compare grades between the groups, Mann-Whitney U-test was applied. There was no difference in the last session (after the treatment) between the groups, the Mann- Whitney U-test was 109.5 with P-value of 0.484 >0.05. Therefore, there was no statistically significant difference between the microfractional radiofrequency and carbon dioxide laser group. There were 2 (12.5%) cases reported with post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation in the CO2 laser group and zero cases in the microfractional radiofrequency group.

Experimental Study of Ultra-Pulsed CO 2 Fractional Laser Combined With Recombinant Human Epidermal Growth Factor Gel in the Treatment of Eyelid Keloid.

Keloid (KD) and hypertrophic scars are prevalent and result from excessive growth of dermal tissue after skin damage. This review focused on the clinical application of the ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with recombinant human epidermal growth factor (rHEGF) gel in patients with eyelid KD. Patients (N = 98) with KD who underwent surgery were randomly divided into a study group (ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel therapy, N = 49) and a control group (ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser therapy, N = 49). Besides, 5 cases dropped out of the study, including 2 cases in the study group and 3 cases in the control group. Finally, 47 cases of the study group and 46 cases of the study group were included in the analysis. The clinical baseline data such as sex, age, body mass index, scar area, etiology, Vancouver Scar Scale score, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, four-item itch questionnaire score, serum interleukin-6 (IL-6), IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α level expression were recorded in the study group (N = 47) and the control group (N = 46). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, scar area, etiology, Vancouver Scar Scale score, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale score, 4-item itch questionnaire score, IL-6, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor-α levels between the patients treated with ultra-pulse CO 2 fractional laser + rHEGF gel and those only treated with ultra-pulse CO 2 fractional laser ( p > 0.05). Vancouver Scar Scale scores, Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale scores, and four-item itch questionnaire scores of patients with eyelid KD decreased to a greater extent than those treated with ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel ( p <0.01). Compared with ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser treatment, ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel was more efficacious in treating patients with eyelid KD, with a lower incidence of adverse effects and a 1-year recurrence rate. Ultra-pulsed CO 2 fractional laser combined with rHEGF gel can significantly improve the scar status and scar itching in patients with eyelid KD, with an obvious therapeutic effect, a low incidence of adverse effects, a 1-year recurrence rate, and high safety, which is worthy of popularization and application.

Nonablative Fractional Diode Laser Resurfacing (1440 nm and 1927 nm) for Photoaged Skin.

Nonablative lasers treat photoaged skin and stimulate new collagen formation while sparing epidermal damage. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of nonablative fractional diode combination laser skin resurfacing treatment (1440 and 1927 nm) in mild-to-moderate photoaged skin. The entire face was treated with both 1440-nm and 1927-nm wavelengths per treatment, with a total of 4 treatments spaced 1 month apart. Follow-up occurred at 1 and 3 months post-treatment. Outcomes were improvement in the appearance of ≥1 measure of photodamage (rhytides, skin texture, dyschromia/pigment, skin radiance, pore size, and overall appearance) at the 3-month (primary) and 1-month (secondary) follow-up visits. Safety was monitored throughout the study. Participants (N = 28; 89% female; mean age, 40 years) experienced significant mean improvement from baseline in all measures of photodamage with combination laser treatment at 1 and 3 months post-treatment (all p < .001). No serious adverse events occurred. Post-treatment erythema and edema were minimal, and pain levels remained consistent throughout treatment. Most participants (96.4%) considered their overall appearance as improved and expressed satisfaction with treatment outcomes. Nonablative combination laser skin resurfacing treatment was well tolerated and significantly improved measures of photodamage in photoaged skin across diverse skin types.

Intradermal Delivery of Calcium Hydroxylapatite With Fractionated Ablation.

The absorption of biostimulatory particulate matter following its application to fractional skin defects remains poorly understood, and even less is known about its in vivo impact in terms of tissue integration. The objectives of this study are twofold: (1) to evaluate the potential of calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA) to penetrate through skin treated with a fractional laser; and (2) to assess the effectiveness of clinical laser scanning microscopy technologies in monitoring the effects of such treatment over time. One area on a volunteer's arm was treated with a fractional erbium laser (Sciton Inc., Palo Alto, CA), while a second area received the same laser treatment followed by CaHA topical application. We used reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) and multiphoton microscopy (MPM) to noninvasively image beneath the surface of the treated skin to study and monitor the effects of these treatments within 1 h of treatment and at four additional time points over a 6-week period. One hour posttreatment, at different depths beneath the skin surface, MPM and RCM provided similar visualizations of laser-induced channels. In skin treated by both laser and CaHA, these two imaging methods provided complementary information. RCM captured the lateral and depth distribution of CaHA microspheres and were seen as bright spheres as they became incorporated into the healing tissue. MPM, meanwhile, visualized the CaHA microparticles as dark shadow spheres within the laser-induced channels and encroaching healing tissue. Furthermore, MPM provided critical information about collagen regeneration around the microspheres, with the collagen visually marked by its distinct second harmonic generation (SHG) signal. This observational pilot study demonstrates that CaHA, a collagen stimulator used as a dermal filler, can not only be inserted into the dermis after fractional laser treatment but remains in the healing skin for at least 6 weeks posttreatment. The noninvasive imaging techniques RCM and MPM successfully captured the presence of CaHA microspheres mid-dermis during the healing phase. They also demonstrated new collagen production around the microspheres, highlighting the effectiveness of these imaging approaches in monitoring such treatment over time.

Advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation: A comprehensive review of efficacy and safety.

Laser technology has fundamentally transformed the landscape of dermatology, offering nuanced solutions for skin rejuvenation and resurfacing. This paper aims to explore the spectrum of laser technologies, from ablative to non-ablative and fractional lasers, their mechanisms, benefits, and tailored applications for diverse skin conditions. As we delve into the intricacies of each technology, we also consider the scientific advancements that have made these treatments safer and more effective, promising a new horizon in skin rejuvenation. This comprehensive analysis seeks to evaluate recent advancements in laser technology for skin rejuvenation, focusing on efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction. The selection criteria for studies in this publication focused on recent, peer-reviewed articles from the last 20 years, emphasizing advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation. Our comprehensive review involved searches in PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus and Google Scholar using keywords like "skin rejuvenation," "laser technology," "efficacy," "safety," and "dermatology." This approach focused on inclusion of recent research and perspectives on the efficacy and safety of laser treatments in the field of dermatology. Our literature review reveals advancements in laser skin resurfacing technologies, notably fractional lasers for minimal downtime rejuvenation, ablative lasers for precise tissue vaporization, and non-ablative lasers for coagulation effect promoting collagen with reduced recovery. Hybrid and picosecond lasers are highlighted for their versatility and effectiveness in addressing a wide array of skin concerns. The findings also emphasize the development of safer treatment protocols for ethnic skin, significantly reducing risks like hyperpigmentation and scarring, thus broadening the scope of effective dermatological solutions. This extensive review of advancements in laser technologies for skin rejuvenation underscores a remarkable evolution in dermatological treatments, offering an expansive overview of the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction associated with these interventions. Furthermore, the exploration of combination treatments and laser-assisted drug delivery represents a frontier in dermatological practice, offering synergistic effects that could amplify the therapeutic benefits of laser treatments.

Utility of prostaglandin analogues and phosphodiesterase inhibitors as promising last resorts for the treatment of vitiligo: A systematic review, from mechanisms of action to mono-, combination and comparative therapies.

The treatment of vitiligo is a persistent challenge in dermatology. New treatments are being offered and studied in this field for those resistant to or intolerant of classical therapies. In this systematic review, we study the use of prostaglandin analogues (PGAs) and phosphodiesterase inhibitors (PDEIs) in the treatment of vitiligo, as they are known for their pigmentation inducing effects through activating melanocytes. We searched four main online databases with the keywords "Vitiligo", "Prostaglandin analogue" and "Phosphodiesterase inhibitor". A total of 42 articles were included, with 1027 cases, studying drugs like bimatoprost, latanoprost, travoprost, dinoprostone, apremilast, crisaborole, etc. Among the included studies, the treatment regimens are commonly once or twice daily for 12-48 weeks, with a mean of 20.61 weeks, and the routes of administration are mainly topical gels or ophthalmic solutions and oral tablets. Side effects are mild and tolerable, namely erythema, itching or burning sensations at application site for topicals, or gastrointestinal problems with apremilast. Repigmentation results are significant in both adult and pediatric patients and progressive or stable vitiligo. PGAs and PDEIs outperform many classical therapies, for example, narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy (NB-UVB), tacrolimus, mometasone or methylprednisolone mini-pulse. PGAs or PDEIs are usually used in combination therapies to either cause synergism or increase drug delivery, and almost always enhance repigmentation, for example, with NB-UVB, fractional CO2 laser, microneedling, and mometasone. Monotherapy or add-on PGAs and PDEIs can be considered effective treatments for vitiligo and promising last resorts for those resistant to other therapies.

Successful Treatment of Darier-White Disease with Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser.

We present this as the fourth published case of Darier disease treated successfully with ablative fractional carbon dioxide laser.

Advances in the Management of Localized Scleroderma: A Systematic Review of Laser Therapy and Injectable Filler Approaches.

Localized scleroderma (LS), commonly known as morphea, presents a significant clinical challenge due to its chronic, inflammatory nature affecting the skin and potentially underlying tissues. This systematic review explores the innovative approach of combining laser therapy and injectable fillers, specifically hyaluronic acid, for the treatment of LS. We conducted a comprehensive literature review following PRISMA guidelines, examining articles from MEDLINE/PubMed to assess the combined efficacy of these treatments in improving both esthetic and functional outcomes for LS patients. The search yielded 64 articles, with six selected for in-depth analysis for a total of nine patients, covering a range of patient demographics and treatment types. Our review highlights cases where fractional CO2 laser therapy promoted long-term tissue remodeling and instances where hyaluronic acid fillers effectively addressed skin atrophy and volume loss, enhancing both immediate and long-lasting esthetic improvements. The synergy between these treatments suggests a promising dual approach, aiming to maximize esthetic outcomes and to improve the quality of life for LS patients. This review underscores the necessity of further research to establish a comprehensive, evidence-based clinical pathway integrating both treatments for managing LS, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction and addressing the multifaceted nature of this challenging dermatological condition.

Comparative Efficacy of Fractional CO2 Laser Combined with Topical Steroid Cream versus Solution for Post-Thyroidectomy Scar Treatment: A Prospective Study.

Post-thyroidectomy scarring is a common illness impacting patient quality of life. Fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers and topical steroids delivered via laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD) have shown potential for scar treatment. However, ideal steroid formulations (cream vs. solution) when combined with laser therapy remain unclear. This study included 12 patients receiving fractional CO2 laser on post-thyroidectomy scars. After laser treatment, one scar half received topically applied steroid cream, while the other half received steroid solution. The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) was used to measure the scar conditions at the time prior to the first treatment and one year later by the patients themselves and by the surgeon who did the laser treatment. Scar appearance was photographically assessed at baseline and 6 months post-treatment by four blinded evaluators using scales. This study discovered a modest improvement in the appearance of post-thyroidectomy scars when combining fractional CO2 laser treatment with either topical steroid cream or solution. Patients and treating physicians examined the POSAS scores one year after treatment found significant improvements in all aspects of the scar conditions, with high efficacy and satisfaction levels reported by patients. Fractional CO2 laser combined with topical steroid delivery, either cream or solution form, significantly enhanced post-thyroidectomy scar appearance with modest effect and high patient satisfaction. This approach may represent a promising scar management strategy along with current scar treatment for the post-thyroidectomy scar.

Devices for treatment of nail psoriasis

IntroductionNail psoriasis (NP) affects a significant proportion of patients with cutaneous psoriasis patients, often leading to functional impairment and psychosocial distress. Despite available treatment options, challenges persist in achieving efficacy and with drug delivery, prompting investigation into novel therapeutic devices.Areas coveredA literature search was performed using the PubMed database for devices and lasers for NP on 17 October 2023 using the following search terms: device OR laser AND "nail psoriasis". Twenty-two articles were included describing treatment with pulsed dye laser, fractional CO₂ laser, long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser, excimer laser, photodynamic therapy, intense pulsed light, and microneedling device. Expert opinionWhile some recent studies on use therapeutic devices have shown promising results for NP treatment, current evidence supports an algorithmic approach including topical therapies, intralesional Kenalog injections, and systemic therapies depending on number of nails affected, presence of psoriatic arthritis, cutaneous psoriasis, comorbidities, and effect on quality of life. Laser therapy, although promising, requires further validation through extensive randomized trials before its inclusion in treatment regimens.These exploratory findings highlight emerging therapies that may expand the spectrum of options available. Use of lasers for NP treatment could provide dermatologists with a broader arsenal for customizing treatment plans that address individual patient needs, taking into account comfort, cost, and compliance to enhance overall patient outcomes.

Follicular unit extraction combined with fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy for post-traumatic eyebrow scar with defects: A prospective and comparative study.

Eyebrows play a crucial role in the human body. While Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) is a widely utilized and highly effective treatment for typical eyebrow deficiencies, it may not yield satisfactory outcomes for patients with post-traumatic eyebrow scars and defects. A prospective comparative clinical study was conducted to explore the treatment outcomes of post-traumatic eyebrow scars accompanied by defects using a combination of ablative fractional CO2 laser therapy with FUE. Between January 2019 and January 2023, we enrolled 30 patients with post-traumatic eyebrow scars and accompanying eyebrow defects, randomly assigning them to experimental and control groups. Patients in the control group received FUE treatment exclusively, whereas patients in the experimental group underwent CO2 fractional laser therapy on the eyebrow scars prior to FUE treatment. Alongside the patients' baseline data and the quantity of transplanted follicular units during surgery, we will compare the follicular survival rates between the two groups at 6 and 12 months post-treatment. Prior to FUE, there were no notable variances in baseline data between the two-patient groups. At 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the follicular survival rate in the experimental group was significantly higher compared to the control group. Additionally, patients in the control group were more prone to experiencing postoperative asymmetry between their eyebrows and developing curly hair. For patients with post-traumatic eyebrow scars accompanied by eyebrow defects, we applied ablative fractional CO2 laser therapy in combination with FUE treatment. This approach not only resulted in a higher follicular survival rate postoperatively but also led to the achievement of a well-defined eyebrow shape.

Fractional CO2 Laser Versus Microneedling Combined with Narrowband Ultraviolet and Topical Steroid for Treating Non-Segmental Vitiligo in Treatment-Resistant Localizations: A Comparative Randomized Clinical Trial Study.

Introduction: Vitiligo poses a significant challenge, particularly in treatment-resistant areas such as acral regions. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining fractional CO2 laser and microneedling with conventional therapies for non-segmental vitiligo in resistant areas. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with a paired design was conducted on 84 individuals with non-segmental vitiligo and treatment-resistant lesions. Participants in two separate groups received various combinations of interventions, including narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) and topical steroid (Clobetasol ointment) as conventional treatments, with fractional CO2 laser or microneedling as add-ons for four symmetrical treatment-resistant lesions. The treatment duration was 16 weeks, followed by observation until six months post-intervention for each patient, and it focused on assessing the percentage of repigmentation, safety, patient satisfaction, and potential adverse effects. Results: The results of the study revealed a significant difference in average efficacy, with treatments involving fractional CO2 laser and microneedling compared with other interventions without them showing a higher percentage of repigmentation. No notable distinction in repigmentation patterns was observed, except for slightly higher marginal repigmentation with microneedling. Side effects, including pain, burning sensation, and erythema, were more frequent, with no significant difference between the groups. Itching and crusting had a significant difference in the two groups. Patient satisfaction levels were comparable, with the first group slightly more than the second. Conclusion: In conclusion, combining NB-UVB and topical steroid therapies with the fractional CO2 laser or microneedling seems to be effective for vitiligo treatment in resistant areas. Attention to variations in patients' characteristics and specific body locations is necessary when applying these modalities. This study provides valuable insights into novel approaches for managing vitiligo and highlights the potential benefits of these innovative treatments in combination with conventional therapy.

Efficacy of Photodynamic Therapy in the Treatment of Actinic Keratosis: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK) and uses different light sources as well as photosensitizers. In addition, PDT is often combined with other physical therapies or drugs. This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of different PDTs against AK lesions based on Complete Response (CR) by conducting a network meta-analysis (NMA). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using PDT for AK were screened and a Bayesian model was developed to perform an NMA of CR at 3 months after the first treatment. Twenty-six trials involving 2285 patients and 14 treatments were included. The treatments were broadly divided into mono-PDT and combination therapy. The photodynamic monotherapies included methyl 5-aminolevulinic acid (MAL)-daylight (DL)-PDT, MAL-light-emitting diode (LED)-PDT, 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA)-LED-PDT, etc. Combination therapies included ablative fractional laser (AFL)-assisted MAL-LED-PDT, calcipotriol (CAL)-assisted MAL-LED-PDT, and 5-fluorouracil (5-Fu)-assisted MAL-DL-PDT. The results of the NMA showed that there is a high probability that AFL-MAL-LED-PDT is the most effective treatment option, followed by CAL-MAL-LED-PDT and ALA-LED-PDT. The subgroup analysis showed that MAL-based PDT had better efficacy when using LED versus other light sources, while LED-based PDT was likely to have better efficacy when using ALA versus other photosensitizers. The results of this NMA suggest that AFL-MAL-LED-PDT may be the superior choice for achieving complete clearance of AK lesions. PDT using LED as the light source and ALA as the photosensitizer may be more effective for the treatment of AK. However, more RCTs are needed to verify the results of this analysis.

Physical Treatments and Therapies for Androgenetic Alopecia.

Androgenetic alopecia, the most common cause of hair loss affecting both men and women, is typically treated using pharmaceutical options, such as minoxidil and finasteride. While these medications work for many individuals, they are not suitable options for all. To date, the only non-pharmaceutical option that the United States Food and Drug Administration has cleared as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia is low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Numerous clinical trials utilizing LLLT devices of various types are available. However, a myriad of other physical treatments for this form of hair loss have been reported in the literature. This review evaluated the effectiveness of microneedling, pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), fractional laser therapy, and nonablative laser therapy for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). It also explores the potential of multimodal treatments combining these physical therapies. The majority of evidence in the literature supports LLLT as a physical therapy for androgenetic alopecia. However, other physical treatments, such as nonablative laser treatments, and multimodal approaches, such as PEMF-LLLT, seem to have the potential to be equally or more promising and merit further exploration.

A faster CO2 fractional scanner system mode for skin rejuvenation. A clinical study.

The market requires ever-faster techniques, in particular for pre-rejuvenation condition. The purpose of this study was to assess if a fractional CO2 scanner modality (called moveo) results in a faster full-face rejuvenation treatment in comparison to the standard mode, currently existing in the scanner system. A total of 12 female patients affected by fine lines participated in a split-face clinical investigation and underwent to two sessions with a fractional CO2 laser system equipped with an existing and a faster dedicated scanner units. Pain was assessed using VAS. Three-dimensional clinical photographs were captured before, immediately after, 3 days, 14 days after the first treatment and immediately after the second treatment and 1 months after the last one. The uniformity and aesthetic coverage of treatments were assessed using dermatoscopy. Global aesthetic improvement scale (GAIS) was used. The time taken to treat the two sides of the face and all possible side effects were monitored. Following only two treatment session with both scanner modes, the patient's skin texture improved significantly, with fine lines reduction. There is no statistically significant difference in perceived pain between patients. The GAIS score showed satisfactory results following both modalities. The time parameters indicated that with the faster scanner mode the full-face treatment time was reduced by 30% compared to the standard one. No adverse effects were observed. The moveo modality provide faster treatment and a better final dermal aesthetic outcome than the standard procedure while maintaining the same safety profile.

Prophylactic Antibiotics are Unnecessary for Routine CO2 Laser Burn Scar Treatment.

CO2 ablative fractional laser (CO2 AFL) therapy is a safe and effective procedure when used in the treatment of hypertrophic scars for burn patients. It has a high patient satisfaction rate and a minimal side effect profile, typically consisting of postoperative pain, irritation, surgical site inflammation, and, in rare cases, infection. Although prophylactic antibiotics have historically been recommended, there is a paucity of literature on the topic and recent studies indicate that they may be unnecessary in routine cases. In this retrospective, single center descriptive study, 230 cases in patients with hypertrophic burn scars treated with CO2 AFL therapy were compared. 28 cases were with the use of prophylactic antibiotics and 201 cases were without the use of prophylactic antibiotics. We found that there was no significant association between the use of antibiotics and the prevention of topical skin infection in cases treated with CO2 AFL therapy (p=1). Therefore, we conclude that the omission of prophylactic antibiotics is not associated with an increased risk of infection and recommend that prophylactic antibiotics should not be indicated in the setting of routine CO2 AFL therapy for patients with hypertrophic burn scars.

Evaluation of Ultrasound Changes With the Use of Microneedling Versus Fractional CO2 Laser in Atrophic Acne Scars.

Atrophic acne scarring, a common sequela of acne, can be treated by different interventions, including microneedling and laser resurfacing. We sought to evaluate the comparative efficacy of microneedling versus fractional CO2 laser in treating atrophic acne facial scars using imaging with high and ultra-high frequency ultrasound. Participants received 2 sessions, separated by 1 month, of microneedling on the left side of the face and fractional CO2 laser on the right. Color Doppler ultrasound evaluations (24 and 70 MHz) were conducted at baseline and 3 months after treatment. Each patient completed questionnaires on satisfaction, pain, and adverse effects. Nine subjects were enrolled. The frequency order of scar types was boxcar, ice-pick, and rolling. At 3 months, using the acne scar clinical evaluation scale, a decrease in scar scores of both methods was observed for total scars (P = 0.0005), ice-pick scars (P = 0.0128), and rolling scars (P = 0.0007). Twenty-two scars analyzed by ultrasound demonstrated a trend to decrease in size; however, no significant changes were observed for either microneedling or CO2 laser treatments. Moreover, there were no significant differences between these methods. Both treatments were rated as good or very good by patient assessments. There was a low frequency of pain and hyperpigmentation reported with both modalities, albeit somewhat higher with microneedling. Both microneedling and CO2 laser improved atrophic acne scars. Ultrasound did not show significant differences between these modalities.

Efficacy of Fractional Versus Fully Ablative CO2 Laser for Distolateral Onychomycosis: Experience With 20 Patients.

Oral antifungals are the treatment choice for onychomycosis, and topical therapies are favored in cases of limited nail involvement. Recently, carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment has emerged as an option to enhance the effectiveness of topical therapies. Our objective was to compare the efficacy of fractional ablative and fully ablative CO2 laser treatments for distolateral subungual onychomycosis affecting a single toenail and caused by dermatophytes. The records of 10 patients treated with a single fully ablative CO2 session were matched with those of 10 patients who underwent a single CO2 fractional treatment. All had previously failed topical antifungal lacquers and were discharged with the prescription of topical ciclopirox nail lacquer (8%) for 3 months. The clinical response rates were 80% for the fully ablative group and 60% for the fractional group. Additionally, the mean reduction in Onychomycosis Severity Index from baseline to 8.6±1.6 weeks after treatment completion was 6.9±5.4 in the fully ablative group and 3.6±6.6 in the fractional group. The relapse rate among responders was 12.5% in the fully ablative and 33.3% in the fractional group after a mean follow-up time of 29.4±2.3 weeks. Fractional and fully ablative CO2 laser in combination with ciclopirox lacquer could increase the response rate in onychomycosis resistant to topical antifungals when systemic therapy is contraindicated or not yet pursued. Fully ablative mode therapy is significantly more effective than fractional (P < 0.05). Further studies are needed to identify prognostic response factors and assess the long-term effectiveness of CO2 laser treatment.

Study of different pre-treatments in the comparison of the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for moderate to severe acne vulgaris

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of CO2 fractional laser and microneedling pretreatment combined with ALA-PDT for moderate-to-severe acne, aiming to optimize clinical treatment. MethodsPatients were randomly divided into three groups: Group A (CO2 fractional laser + ALA-PDT), Group B (microneedling + ALA-PDT), and Group C (ALA-PDT). Each group underwent photodynamic therapy once a week for 3 weeks. Efficacy was assessed at the end of the 4th week, and recurrence was assessed at the end of the 12th week. ResultsA total of 150 patients with moderate to severe acne were included in this study, with 50 patients in each group. Four weeks after the end of treatment, the effective rates were 88 % for Group A, 62 % for Group B, and 36 % for Group C. Statistically significant differences were found between the groups (P < 0.05), with Group A showing superior efficacy compared to Group B (P < 0.05). No serious systemic or local adverse reactions were observed in any group. No recurrence was seen in any group 12 weeks after the end of treatment, and some patients continued to show improvement in skin lesions over time. ConclusionBoth the CO2 fractional laser group and the microneedling group improved the efficacy of photodynamic therapy for moderate to severe acne compared to the control group, with the CO2 fractional laser group demonstrating better efficacy and fewer adverse effects.