Full Outline Of Unresponsiveness Score Research Articles

Elucidating Anomalous Intensity Ratios in Chlorine L-Edge X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy: Multiplet Effects and Core Rydberg Transitions.

A relativistic core-valence-separated equation-of-motion coupled cluster (CVS-EOM-CC) study of chlorine L2,3-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra using CH3Cl and CH2ICl as representative molecules is reported. The nearly identical intensity for the main features in the L2- and L3-edge XANES spectra is attributed to multiplet effects and the overlap between core-valence and core Rydberg transitions. The multiplet effects originating from the interaction between the core hole and the C-Cl σ* orbitals account for around half of the deviation of the L3 and L2 intensity ratio from the 2:1 ratio of the numbers of 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 electrons. The 2p3/2 → 4s core Rydberg transitions are shown to overlap with the 2p1/2 → σ* transitions and contribute to the other half of the intensity anomaly. We demonstrate that triple excitations in CVS-EOM-CC calculations play important roles in accurate simulation of the overlap between the 2p1/2 → σ* and 2p3/2 → 4s transitions.

Development and Validation of a Risk Score for Predicting ICU Admission in Adults with New-Onset Encephalitis.

Timely intensive care unit (ICU) admission for patients with encephalitis is associated with better prognosis. Therefore, our aim was to create a risk score predicting ICU admission in adults with encephalitis, which could aid in optimal management and resource allocation. We initially identified variables that would be most predictive of ICU admission among 372 patients with encephalitis from two hospital systems in Houston, Texas (cohort 1), who met the International Encephalitis Consortium (IEC) criteria from 2005 to 2023. Subsequently, we used a binary logistic regression model to create a risk score for ICU admission, which we then validated externally using a separate cohort of patients from two hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland (cohort 2), who met the IEC criteria from 2006 to 2022. Of 634 patients with encephalitis, 255 (40%) were admitted to the ICU, including 45 of 113 (39.8%) patients with an autoimmune cause, 100 of 272 (36.7%) with an infectious cause, and 110 of 249 (44.1%) with an unknown cause (p = 0.225). After conducting a multivariate analysis in cohort 1, we found that the presence of focal neurological signs, new-onset seizure, a Full Outline of Unresponsiveness score ≤ 14, leukocytosis, and a history of chronic kidney disease at admission were associated with an increased risk of ICU admission. The resultant clinical score for predicting ICU admission had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.77 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.82, p < 0.001). Patients were classified into three risk categories for ICU admission: low risk (score 0, 12.5%), intermediate risk (scores 1-5, 49.5%), and high risk (scores 6-8, 87.5%). External validation in cohort 2 yielded an AUROC of 0.76 (95% CI 0.69-0.83, p < 0.001). ICU admission is common in patients with encephalitis, regardless of etiology. Our risk score, encompassing neurologic and systemic factors, may aid physicians in decisions regarding intensity of care for adult patients with encephalitis upon hospital admission.

Prevalence and Impact of Malnutrition Risk on Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury and Stroke: A Retrospective Cohort Study Using Electronic Health Records.

Malnutrition is a critical concern in ICU settings. It is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, yet its prevalence and impact on clinical outcomes in patients with stroke and traumatic brain injury (TBI) remain underexplored. To evaluate the prevalence and impact of malnutrition risk on clinical outcomes in ICU patients with TBI, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke, and to identify key risk factors associated with malnutrition risk. This retrospective cohort study utilized electronic health records encompassing ICU admissions from 2017 to 2023. Patients with either stroke or TBI were included, with malnutrition risk assessed using the prognostic nutritional index. Data were extracted and analyzed to determine patient characteristics, clinical and laboratory parameters, and outcomes. This study included 1352 patients (267 TBI, 825 ischemic stroke, and 260 hemorrhagic stroke patients, >30% with pneumonia at admission). Severe malnutrition risk at admission was observed in over 60% of patients. Stroke patients, particularly those with hemorrhagic stroke, exhibited a higher risk of malnutrition compared to TBI patients. Malnutrition risk was associated with significantly higher hospital mortality and increased need for mechanical ventilation. Predictive factors for malnutrition risk included advanced age, higher SOFA scores, lower FOUR and GCS scores, and the presence of pneumonia at admission. Risk of malnutrition is highly prevalent among ICU patients with TBI, ischemic, and hemorrhagic stroke, significantly impacting mortality and other clinical outcomes. Identifying and managing malnutrition early in the ICU setting is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Further prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and develop effective interventions.

Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation for consciousness recovery in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness (TAVREC): study protocol for a multicenter, triple-blind, randomized controlled trial in China

IntroductionProlonged disorders of consciousness (pDoC) are a catastrophic condition following brain injury with few therapeutic options. Transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS), a safe, non-invasive intervention modulating thalamo-cortical connectivity and...

Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) Scale: a Multicenter Validation Study of the Psychometric Properties of the Approved Russian Version

Assessment of the individual level of consciousness on admission of a patient with brain injury to the intensive care unit (ICU) is a priority task and a mandatory step in the overall assessment of neurological status. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) scale, developed at the Mayo Clinic (USA) in 2005, is a widely used tool for comprehensive assessment of patients with altered state of consciousness. The lack of a validated Russian-language version of the FOUR scale has hindered its widespread use in clinical practice. Therefore, the official Russian version of the FOUR scale was developed and adapted for use in Russia after the first stage of the validation study (linguistic and cultural adaptation).Aim. To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Russian version of the FOUR scale for comprehensive assessment of patients in altered state of consciousness.Materials and Methods. As part of a prospective multicenter validation study, the psychometric properties of the scale (reliability, validity, and sensitivity) were evaluated in a group of 171 adult patients with altered conscious state of various etiologies, such as ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, neuroinflammatory conditions, and traumatic brain injury. Patients’ responses were assessed on the first day of ICU stay and 2-3 days later by two ICU neurologists with at least three years of experience.Results. High levels of validity and reliability were obtained for the Russian version of the FOUR scale for comprehensive assessment of unresponsive patients, including Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient r=0.99 (P&lt;0.0001), Cohen’s κ=0.77 (P&lt;0.001), Cronbach’s α=0.87 (P&lt;0.0001). Regarding the sensitivity of the FOUR scale, no significant changes were found after comprehensive assessment of unresponsive patients on day 1 in the ICU and 2-3 days later (Wilcoxon test, P=0.906). There was a good correlation between the FOUR and Glasgow Coma Scale scores used to assess patients with altered state of consciousness, confirming the validity of the test with r=0.91 (P&lt;0.0001).Conclusion. The Russian version of the FOUR scale for comprehensive assessment of unresponsive patients is a valid, reliable, and sensitive clinical tool. Sufficiently verified level of psychometric properties allows its authorized use in Russia and other Russian-speaking countries. The scale is available for download via QR code and at the website of the International Scales and Questionnaires Validation Group at the Scientific Center of Neurology.

The effect of amantadine treatment on neurological outcome and mortality in mechanically ventilated severe head trauma patients in intensive care unit.

This study aims to investigate the effect of amantadine use on neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) (Glasgow coma score [GCS] between 3 and 8) who have been followed up on mechanical ventilators in the intensive care unit (ICU). Data from the hospital's electronic records were retrospectively searched. Patients over 18 years of age, with severe brain trauma (GCS between 3-8), who were treated with endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation at admission to the ICU, and who were treated with Amantadine hydrochloride at least once in the first week of follow-up were included in the study. To evaluate the patients' neurological outcomes, the GCS and FOUR scores were used. GCS and FOUR scores were recorded on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th days of the first week. In addition, the score difference between the 1st and 7th day was calculated for both scores. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those receiving amantadine treatment (Group A, n = 44) and the control group (Group C, n = 47). The median age of all patients was 39 (18-81) (P = .425). When Group A and Group C were compared, no statistically significant results were found between the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day GCS values (P = .474, P = .483, and P = 329, respectively). However, the difference in GCS values between day 1 and day 7 (∆ GCS 7-1) was statistically significant (P = .012). Similarly, when Group A and Group C were compared, no statistically significant results were found between the 1st, 3rd, and 7th day FOUR score values (P = .948, P = .471, and P = .057, respectively). However, the FOUR score values between day 1 and day 7 (∆ FOUR score 7-1) were statistically significant (P = .004). There was no statistically significant difference among the groups in terms of ICU length of stay, duration of non-ICU hospital stay, and length of hospital stay (P = .222, P = .175, and P = .067, respectively). Amantadine hydrochloride may help improve neurological outcomes in patients with severe TBI. However, further research is needed to investigate this topic.

Evaluation of Prognostic Scores in Patients with Head Trauma in the Emergency Department

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Glasgow coma scale (GCS), GCS-motor component (mGCS), and FOUR (Full Outline of Un-responsiveness) Scores in predicting the prognosis of patients who presented to the emergency department with head trauma. Methods: In this prospective cross-sectional study, was obtained to collected data of patients with head trauma, who presented to the emergency department. Participants’ demographic data, medical history, GCS, FOUR scores, the duration of emergency department stays, as well as 24-hour, 7-day, and 28-day mortality rates were recorded on the case report forms. Results: Data from 302 patients were used to develop a risk score for detecting significant brain pathology via computed tomography (CT) scans. The regression model, incorporating total GCS and sex-based variables, explained 22.5% of variance and accurately classified 91.1% of cases. The model's area under the curve for detecting significant pathology via CT was 0.714. Conclusion: GCS, mGCS, and FOUR scores did not achieve the necessary the diagnostic performance benchmark to be used alone to predict or exclude clinically significant brain injury in patients with head trauma.

Comparison of the Prognostic Accuracy of Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) Score with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) Score among Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury in a Tertiary Care Center

Abstract Objectives The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is widely used and considered the gold standard in assessing the consciousness of patients with traumatic brain injury. However, some significant limitations, like the considerable variations in interobserver reliability and predictive validity, were the reason for developing the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score. The current study aims to compare the prognostic accuracy of the FOUR score with the GCS score for in-hospital mortality and morbidity among patients with traumatic brain injury. Materials and Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted, where 237 participants were selected by consecutive sampling from a tertiary care center. These patients were assessed with the help of GCS and FOUR scores within 6 hours of admission, and other clinical parameters were also noted. The level of consciousness was checked every day with the help of GCS and FOUR scores until their last hospitalization day. Glasgow Outcome Scale was used to assess their outcome on the last day of hospitalization. The GCS and FOUR scores were compared, and data were analyzed by descriptive and inferential statistics. The chi-square test, independent Student's t-test, and receiver operating characteristic analysis were used for inferential analysis. Results The area under the curve (AUC) for the GCS score at the 6th hour for predicting mortality was 0.865 with a cutoff value of 5.5, and it yields a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 64%. The AUC for FOUR scores at the 6th hour for predicting the mortality was 0.893, with a cutoff value of 5.5, and it yields a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 73%. Conclusion The current study shows that, as per the AUC of GCS and FOUR scores, their sensitivity was equal, but specificity was higher in the FOUR score. So, the FOUR score has higher accuracy than the GCS score in the prediction of mortality among traumatic brain injury patients.

Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score versus Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Altered Mental Status.

Full outline of unresponsiveness (FOUR) score has advantages over Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS); as it can be used in intubated patients and provides greater neurological details. It has been studied mainly in the trauma and neuroscience setting. Our primary objective was to compare the FOUR versus GCS score as predictors of mortality at 30 days and poor functional outcome at 3 months among nontrauma patients in the emergency department (ED). This prospective observational study was conducted on adult patients presenting with altered mental status (duration <7 days) in the ED (March 2019-November 2020). Data collection included demographic and clinical features, the GCS and FOUR scores, the feasibility of acquiring and interpreting FOUR on a Likert scale, duration of hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and functional outcome at 3 months on the modified Rankin Scale. Trained emergency medicine residents managing the patient collected the data. The area under receiver's operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was used to compare the accuracy of the GCS and FOUR scores in predicting outcomes. The FOUR score equivalent of GCS cutoffs for categorizing neurological impairment (mild, moderate, and severe) was also investigated. Two hundred and ninety-one patients were included, with a mean age of 50.3 years and 67.4% males. Most patients (40.2%) had altered mental status for 1-3 days and hepatic encephalopathy was the most common ED diagnosis. The mortality at 30 days was 66.7% (194 of 291), and 88% (256 of 291) of patients had poor functional outcomes at 3 months. The AUROCs for predicting 30-day mortality were similar for both the scores (GCS: 0.70, FOUR: 0.71, and the P value for difference: 0.9). Similarly, the AUROCs for predicting 3-month poor functional outcome were 0.683 and 0.669 using GCS and FOUR, respectively, with a nonsignificant difference (P = 0.82). The FOUR score strata of 14-16, 11-13, and 0-10 were found to be equivalent to the GCS scores of 13-15 (mild), 9-12 (moderate), and 3-8 (severe). The feasibility of acquiring and interpreting GCS and FOUR scores on the Likert scale was found to be "easy." The FOUR score is similar to GCS in predicting mortality at 30 days and poor neurological outcomes at 3 months among nontrauma patients of ED. Moreover, it was found that the FOUR score is "easy" to assess and interpret by the emergency residents.

Utility of the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score in children with altered sensorium: A single-center prospective observational study

Background: Recent studies on the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score suggest that it can overcome the limitations of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Hence, this study was planned to predict the outcome of children with altered sensorium using the FOUR score and to compare it with the GCS score. Subjects and Methods: This was a single-center prospective observational study conducted in children in the age group of ≥2 months–12 years with altered sensorium included in this study. Admission GCS and FOUR scores were collected. Data were analyzed to compare the FOUR score to GCS in relation to outcome (survivors/nonsurvivors). Results: Out of 90 cases with altered sensorium, 12 expired (13.3%). The mean (standard deviation [SD]) of age (years) was 4.69 (3.72) and the maximum in the age group of 1–5 years (n = 42). The mean (SD), median (interquartile range), and range for GCS at admission for survivors versus nonsurvivors were 11.58 (1.62) versus 6.08 (1.08), 12 (11–13) versus 6 (5.75–7), and 7–17 versus 4–8, and for FOUR score, 13.51 (1.46) versus 8.67 (1.50), 13 (13–15) versus 8 (7.75–10), and 9–16 versus 7–11 were observed, P &lt; 0.001. Admission GCS score of ≤8 (12 out of 15) and FOUR score &lt;11 (10 out of 12) died, P &lt; 0.001. ROC curve analysis for mortality prediction, the area under the curve for GCS (cutoff of 8) was 0.992, and for the FOUR score (cutoff of 11), 0.989 was observed, P &lt; 0.001. Conclusions: Admission FOUR and GCS scores are comparable for the prediction of mortality in children with altered sensorium. The FOUR score of ≤11 strongly correlated with mortality.

Beyond the GCS: an integrative review of new tools for neurological assessment in the intensive care unit for adult patients

The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a widely used clinical tool for assessing impaired consciousness, but concerns arise when applied to intubated patients or those receiving analgesics, sedatives, and paralytics because verbal scores are not evaluable. Furthermore, the GCS does not differentiate the neurological status of the patient once intubated, resulting in poor reliability in neurological assessment, and clinical indicators that may reflect the severity of the coma are not included in the GCS. This study explores alternative tools for neurological assessment in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) when GCS is impractical. Conducting an integrative review of studies from 2018 to 2022, we identified seven relevant papers. Results indicate the FOUR score as a promising GCS alternative, particularly in cases where the GCS is unavailable. Automated pupillometry also demonstrated the potential for monitoring neurologically impaired ICU patients. These tools, independent of verbal responses and applicable to sedated patients, offer improved accuracy in assessing consciousness. The study emphasizes the importance of adopting such alternatives, and addressing GCS limitations, and highlights the need for further research and implementation to enhance patient care in ICU settings.

Evaluating GCS and FOUR Score in Predicting Mortality of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients (TBI): A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital of South Malabar

ABSTRACT Objective: This study evaluated the full outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to predict traumatic brain injury (TBI) outcomes. Methods: Among 107 patients, FOUR and GCS grading systems analyzed emergency department patients within 24 hours. FOUR and GCS were assessed simultaneously. Patients were followed for 15 days/discharge/death to evaluate the results. Modified Rankin scores measured in-hospital mortality, morbidity, and stay. Results: 65.42% of patients were 25–65. 10% were under 25, and 25% were over 65. Patients were 81% male. Road traffic accidents (RTAs) (90%), falls (7.48%), and assaults (1.47%) caused TBI. 19.62% died. 85.7% of 21 non-survivors had GCS &lt;5 and FOUR &lt;4. GCS mortality sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were 85.71%, 93.02%, 75, and 96.4 (P &lt; 0.0001). FOUR score mortality sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were 85.71%, 96.51%, 85.7, and 96.5 (P &lt; 0.0001). GCS and FOUR AUCs matched (P = 0.52). The unadjusted model reduced in-hospital mortality by 14% for every one point increase in GCS. Every 1-point FOUR score increase reduced in-hospital mortality by 40% in the unadjusted model. GCS and FOUR scored 0.9 Spearman. Conclusion: The FOUR score was comparable in the prediction of mortality in these patients.

The predictive validity of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score in the intensive care unit: a systematic review

The predictive validity of the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score in the intensive care unit: a systematic review

Comparison of Full Outline of UnResponsiveness Score and Glasgow Coma Scale in Predicting the Outcome of Children aged 3 to12 Years with Altered Level of Consciousness Admitted to the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit

Introduction: The commonly used Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score for assessing consciousness has several shortcomings, especially in intubated patients. Recently, the Full Outline UnResponsive Score (FOUR) has been validated as an alternative to the GCS due to its additional benefits in evaluating brainstem reflexes and respiratory patterns. The use of the FOUR score can overcome the shortcomings of the GCS and aid in prognosticating patients with altered sensorium. Aim: To compare the FOUR score with GCS score to find a better scoring system for predicting outcomes among children aged 3-12 years with non-traumatic causes of Altered Level Of Consciousness (ALOC) in the hospital. Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on a total of 100 children with ALOC in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of Gandhi Medical College and Hospital, Telangana, from December 2020 to November 2021. FOUR and GCS assessments were performed simultaneously within two hours of admission. For statistical analysis, continuous variables are expressed as mean±standard deviations. The predictive values of the GCS score and FOUR score were established using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, by calculating the Area Under the Curve (AUC) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI). Results: The mean age of the study population was 7.3±5.2 years, and the mean duration of hospital stay was 7.5±6.74 days. In-hospital mortality was 34%, and the survival rate was 66%. The mean FOUR score for in-hospital mortality and survival was 8.47±3.01 and 12.24±1.46, respectively (p-value &lt;0.001). The mean GCS scores were 11.35±1.64 in survivors and 7.45 ±2.63 in non-survivors (p-value &lt;0.001). A FOUR score of &lt;10 was associated with higher mortality than a FOUR score of &gt;10 (p&lt;00.05). The Area Under Curve (AUC) for the FOUR score was 0.862 with a 95% CI (0.774 to 0.95) in the ROC curve (p-value &lt;0.001), and for the GCS score, the AUC was 0.822 with a 95% CI (0.723 to 0.92) and p-value &lt;0.001. The FOUR Score has a higher AUC than the GCS in the ROC curve, indicating that the FOUR Score has better discrimination than the GCS in outcome assessment. Conclusion: FOUR score and GCS score were comparable for predicting outcomes in children with ALOC. However, the FOUR score showed better discrimination than the GCS; hence, the FOUR score can be used as an alternative tool to the GCS for prognosis.

Correlation between Serum S100β Protein Levels and Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury as measured by the FOUR Score and Rotterdam CT Score

Correlation between Serum S100β Protein Levels and Severity of Traumatic Brain Injury as measured by the FOUR Score and Rotterdam CT Score

Comparative study of the diagnostic power of full outline of unresponsiveness score and Glasgow coma scale in patients with traumatic brain injury in an emergency department

Background: The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) is the most commonly used scale, and the full outline of unresponsiveness (FOUR) score is new validated coma scale as an alternative to GCS to measure the level of consciousness and evaluate the severity of the injury in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients. Aims and Objectives: The present study compared the performance of FOUR scores and GCS in outcome predictions of TBI cases. Materials and Methods: This prospective and cross-sectional study was conducted over a year by the Emergency Department of a tertiary care hospital, Kovai Medical Center and Hospital, Coimbatore, India. Of 159, 123 patients were recruited from intensive care unit (ICU), and 36 from the ward were included in this study. Data were collected using an observation checklist to determine the similarities and differences in predicting outcomes using the two assessment scales (GCS and FOUR). Results: Most patients were 51–60 years (38%), with a mean age of 41.57. About 82% were male, 18% were female, and 31% had comorbidity of hypertension. Data analysis showed a significant statistical difference in mean FOUR and GCS scores between ICU and ward admission. A multivariate logistic regression study revealed that the probability of ICU admission in trauma patients from the emergency department was associated with a decline in GCS and FOUR scores. The range of predicted ICU admission was similar in both GCS and FOUR score models. Conclusion: Although both scores are good predictors of TBI patients, we concluded that the FOUR score is a recommended predictive model for patients admitted to the medical ICU.

Correlation between bispectral index and FOUR score in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study

ABSTRACT Introduction For neurological testing and monitoring of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients whose verbal component of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) cannot be assessed, the Full Outline of Unresponsiveness (FOUR) score has been established. In order to determine the degree of awareness in patients with traumatic brain injury, this study will correlate the FOUR score with the bispectral index (BIS) and global consciousness score (GCS). Methods Twenty TBI patients with traumatic brain injury who were hospitalised to the surgical ICU at Cairo University Hospital participated in our prospective observational research. An observer who was blind to the BIS values assessed each of the FOUR scores and GCS (Covidien BIS complete monitoring system, Mansfield, MA, USA). Each patient provided four sets of readings. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to perform a correlation between the FOUR score, GCS, and BIS (r). Results There was a significant correlation between BIS and FOUR score (r = 0.854, 95% confidence interval: 0.780–0.904) (P < 0.001). There was also a significant correlation between BIS and GCS (r = 0.864, 95% confidence interval: 0.795–0.911) (P < 0.001). Conclusion There is a strong correlation between FOUR score, GCS, and BIS values in patients with traumatic brain injury. FOUR score seems a reliable alternative for GCS and BIS in the assessment of degree of consciousness, especially in intubated patients.

Differential Diagnosis and Management of Disturbance of Consciousness:Approach to Comatose Patients

Disorders of consciousness are among the most common symptoms in neurosurgery. A coma is an acute dysfunction of the nervous system that governs arousal and awareness and represents a medical emergency. Prompt evaluation and treatment of comas are fundamental in clinical practice. The first step is stabilizing the airway, breathing, and circulation while protecting the cervical spine to prevent secondary neurological injury. Subsequently, a focused neurological examination is performed. The level of consciousness, brainstem reflexes, respiratory patterns, motor responses, and muscle tone should be evaluated. Any asymmetry should be carefully considered. Acute disturbances of consciousness primarily impair arousal. The Japan and Glasgow Coma Scales are the most commonly used. The Emergency Coma Scale was designed by incorporating the advantages of each. The Full Outline of UnResponsiveness score incorporates brainstem reflexes and breathing patterns. Clinicians must have an organized approach to detect remediable causes, prevent neurological injury, and determine a hierarchical course of diagnostic testing, treatments, and neuromonitoring.

424 Comparison Between Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in Prediction of Trauma Patients' Outcome in Intensive Care Units

424 Comparison Between Glasgow Coma Scale and Full Outline of Unresponsiveness Score in Prediction of Trauma Patients' Outcome in Intensive Care Units

Development and validation of a novel score to predict brain death after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Background and objectivesBrain death (BD) occurs in 9–24% of successfully resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). To predict BD after OHCA, we developed a novel brain death risk (BDR) score. MethodsWe identified independent predictors of BD after OHCA in a retrospective, single academic center cohort between 2011 and 2021. The BDR score ranges from 0 to 7 points and includes: non-shockable rhythm (1 point), drug overdose as etiology of arrest (1 point), evidence of grey-white differentiation loss or sulcal effacement on head computed tomography (CT) radiology report within 24 hours of arrest (2 points), Full-Outline-Of-UnResponsiveness (FOUR) score of 0 (2 points), FOUR score 1–5 (1 point), and age <45 years (1 point). We internally validated the BDR score using k-fold cross validation (k = 8) and externally validated the score at an independent academic center. The main outcome was BD. ResultsThe development cohort included 362OHCA patients, of whom 18% (N = 58) experienced BD. Internal validation provided an area under the receiving operator characteristic curve (AUC) (95% CI) of 0.931 (0.905–0.957). In the validation cohort, 19.8% (N = 17) experienced BD. The AUC (95% CI) was 0.849 (0.765–0.933). In both cohorts, a BDR score >4 was the optimal cut off (sensitivity 0.903 and 0.882, specificity 0.830 and 0.652, in the development and validation cohorts respectively). DiscussionThe BDR score identifies those at highest risk for BD after OHCA. Our data suggest that a BDR score >4 is the optimal cut off.