Cretaceous fossil wood assemblages provide important evidence about the early evolution of angiosperms. However, the utility of these fossils is limited by two systematic problems: morphotaxa are generally over-split and in many cases cannot be securely assigned to extant families or orders. To address these problems we employed a 16-character Principal Component Analysis (PCA) to critically assess fossil wood systematics and investigate family/order affinity. In the first part of our study, we analyzed a large dataset of woods from extant trees. This served as a test of the PCA method, demonstrating a capability for clustering specimens into natural groups at species, genus, and to a more limited extent, family/order level. Having confirmed the validity of our approach, we then applied it to mid-Cretaceous fossil woods of icacinoid/platanoid and phyllanthoid types. Our PCAs support the distinctiveness of these groups, and most morphogeneric concepts contained therein, but raise significant questions about the uniqueness of many morphospecies. In particular, analyses highlight intra-specific variability as a major problem in delineating morphospecies and confirm suspicions that many taxa are over-split. Comparison of fossil specimens with extant structural and phylogenetic analogues also allows the probable affinity of morphotaxa to be assessed. Among the taxa analyzed, Cretaceous icacinoid/platanoid woods are similar to members of the Icacinaceae and Platanaceae, respectively, but an affinity with the Chloranthaceae or some other basal groups cannot be ruled out. In contrast, phyllanthoid fossil woods may be associated with magnoliid stem of the Laurales and Magnoliales. We argue that our PCA methodology offers a more rigorous and repeatable approach to fossil angiosperm wood systematics compared to those used in earlier studies.
Read full abstract