In view of the potentially very large number of organic pollutants which are likely to enter the Baltic Sea via land run-off, precipitation, from ships, or as a result of past and present dumping, the number of organic substances actually measured on a scale sufficiently large for an overall assessment is rather small. These substances are: mineral oil, chlorinated hydrocarbon pesticides, polychlorinated biphenyls. It is recognized, of course, that these substances, especially in the case of mineral oil, consist of a multitude of individual chemical components, but this is not the point. Rather there may be many more chemically quite different organic substances with potentially harmful effects present in the Baltic Sea which are measured only occasionally, such as phthalate ester plasticizers 0Ehrhardt & Derenbach, 1980); others whose existence is known, but which are not measured in the Baltic, such as halogenated paraffins (Jernel0v et al., 1972); and still others which have not yet been detected in seawater (e.g. components of pulp mill effluents, non-halogenated hydrocarbon pesticides, degration products of contaminants). Thus, it appears to be fairly difficult to assess the degree of pollution of the Baltic Sea by organic substances, because any estimation of the relative hazard to the ecosystem of the small number of frequently measured organic substances must be regarded as little more than an educated guess. The question arises: Why has the attention of organic marine chemists been focused on mineral oil (hydrocarbons) and chlorinated hydrocarbons? For several reasons: the amount of material introduced into or transported across the Baltic, known toxicities, the obvious ecological impact of large scale oil contamination which, although the Baltic Sea has been spared a catastrophe so far, is an ever present threat, and the relative ease with which these substances are analysed. It is no secret that a flame ionization detector equipped gas chromatograph is an instrument as ideally suited for hydrocarbon trace analysis as a GC furnished with an electron capture detector for the detection and measurement of chlorinated hydrocarbons. However, the almost exclusive emphasis on hydrocarbons and chlorinated hydrocarbons in no way reflects an indolence on the part of the analyst, it merely accentuates the fact that marine organic trace analysis remains a formidable challenge in spite of all improvements made in the recent past. It is important to recognize that here a gap exists of unknown magnitude and significance concerning possible organic contaminants of the Baltic Sea and their ecological impact. This gap, which is not unique to the situation in the Baltic but to some degree exists in every ocean environment, may 210 be closed by a careful search for organic trace constituents of seawater. In this search, difficulties are encountered less with methods of analysis which have been developed to a fairly high degree of sophistication, e.g. computerized gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, than with the very low concentrations of organic substances in seawater, whether indigenous or man-made. Successful attempts have been made to overcome this problem (Ahnoff & Josefsson, 1974; Osterroht, 1974; Ehrhardt, 1978) which should lead to a broader understanding of marine organic chemistry in general and the degree of pollution of the Baltic in particular. After these introductory remarks I shall now try and assess the situation in the Baltic with respect to pollution by mineral oil (fossil hydrocarbons), chlorinated hydrocarbon type pesticides, and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs).