Fosphenytoin Research Articles

Physical compatibility of various drugs with neonatal total parenteral nutrient solution during simulated Y-site administration

The physical compatibility of various drugs with neonatal total parenteral nutrient (TPN) solution during simulated Y-site administration was evaluated. Study drugs were selected based on the lack of compatibility data with them and neonatal TPN solution and the frequency of use in a local neonatal unit. These drugs included amiodarone, caffeine citrate, clindamycin, enalaprilat, epinephrine, fluconazole, fosphenytoin sodium, hydrocortisone, metoclopramide, midazolam, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, and rifampin. Equal volumes of neonatal TPN solution or sterile water for injection were combined with study drugs or sterile water for injection at concentrations used clinically in neonates. Each test was performed in triplicate. The samples were examined via turbidimetric analysis and visually against light and dark backgrounds immediately after mixing and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 hours after mixing. Analysis of variance was used to determine statistically significant differences between the test and control solutions. Many of the drugs studied exhibited no visual or turbidimetric evidence of incompatibility when combined with neonatal TPN solution for up to three hours in a simulated Y-site injection. Pentobarbital, phenobarbital, and rifampin formed visible precipitation immediately after mixing with the neonatal TPN solution. Caffeine citrate, clindamycin, enalaprilat, epinephrine, fluconazole, fosphenytoin sodium, hydrocortisone, metoclopramide, and midazolam exhibited no visual or turbidimetric evidence of incompatibility when combined with a neonatal TPN solution for up to three hours in a simulated Y-site injection. Amiodarone, pentobarbital, phenobarbital, and rifampin were not compatible with the neonatal TPN solution and should not be coadministered via Y-site injection.

Bioavailability of intravenous fosphenytoin sodium in healthy Japanese volunteers.

To compare and evaluate the bioavailability for intravenous fosphenytoin sodium with that of intravenous phenytoin sodium in Japanese subjects. In study 1, healthy Japanese male volunteers received a 30-min infusion of 375 mg fosphenytoin sodium or an equimolar dose of 250 mg phenytoin by a double-blind, crossover method. In study 2, other healthy Japanese male volunteers received a 30-min or 10-min infusion of 563 mg fosphenytoin sodium, followed by a dose of 750 mg after 2 weeks in an unblinded manner. Comparing with 250 mg phenytoin sodium, 375 mg fosphenytoin sodium exhibited lower total plasma phenytoin C max, whereas the geometric mean ratio of the AUC of total and free phenyotoin for fosphenytoin sodium at a dose of 375 mg was very similar to phenytoin sodium at a equimolar dose of 250 mg (AUC0–t ratio: 0.98 and 1.02, respectively). Therefore, fosphenytoin is almost completely converted to phenytoin in subjects. Fosphenytoin sodium was rapidly converted to phenytoin at doses of 375, 563, and 750 mg. The maximum concentration (C max) of total plasma phenytoin increased in a dose-dependent manner. The area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) increased slightly more than proportionally with the administered dose, and clearance (CL) decreased with increasing dose. Pain and other infusion-site reactions were reported by all 12 subjects with phenytoin sodium, whereas very few symptoms were observed with fosphenytoin sodium. In conclusion, fosphenytoin sodium is considered to be a useful substitute for phenytoin sodium with almost no associated injection-site reactions.

Population pharmacokinetics of phenytoin after intravenous administration of fosphenytoin sodium in pediatric patients, adult patients, and healthy volunteers

PurposeWe performed a population pharmacokinetic analysis of phenytoin after intravenous administration of fosphenytoin sodium in healthy, neurosurgical, and epileptic subjects, including pediatric patients, and determined the optimal dose and infusion rate for achieving the therapeutic range.MethodsWe used pooled data obtained from two phase I studies and one phase III study performed in Japan. The population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using NONMEM software. The optimal dose and infusion rate were determined using simulation results obtained using the final model. The therapeutic range for total plasma phenytoin concentration is 10–20 μg/mL.ResultsWe used a linear two-compartment model with conversion of fosphenytoin to phenytoin. Pharmacokinetic parameters of phenytoin, such as total clearance and central and peripheral volume of distribution were influenced by body weight. The dose simulations are as follows. In adult patients, the optimal dose and infusion rate of phenytoin for achieving the therapeutic range was 22.5 mg/kg and 3 mg/kg/min respectively. In pediatric patients, the total plasma concentration of phenytoin was within the therapeutic range for a shorter duration than that in adult patients at 22.5 mg/kg (3 mg/kg/min). However, many pediatric patients showed phenytoin concentration within the toxic range after administration of a dose of 30 mg/kg.ConclusionsThe pharmacokinetics of phenytoin after intravenous administration of fosphenytoin sodium could be described using a linear two-compartment model. The administration of fosphenytoin sodium 22.5 mg/kg at an infusion rate of 3 mg/kg/min was optimal for achieving the desired plasma phenytoin concentration.

Blood pressure changes after intravenous fosphenytoin and levetiracetam in patients with acute cerebral symptoms

To study the incidence and extent of the occasionally noted hypotension after intravenous (IV) infusions of fosphenytoin (FOS) and levetiracetam (LEV) in patients presenting with acute cerebral symptoms. Retrospective data collection of consecutive patients with acute cerebral symptoms who received IV infusions of a single dose of 750 mg or more of either fosphenytoin or levetiracetam and had documented blood pressure values in the 2h prior and the 2h after their IV infusion. More than 10 mmHg drop in the systolic, diastolic and MBP was observed in the FOS group following the IV infusion (-16.82 mmHg, -11.60 mmHg, and 13.34 mmHg, respectively). However, there was not a significant change in the MBP after LEV infusion (1.54 mmHg, 1.84 mmHg, and 1.74 mmHg for systolic, diastolic and MBP change, respectively). The difference in the systolic, diastolic and MBP changes between the two groups was statistical significant (all p values are <0.0001) after adjusting for age, clinical presentations of the patients and if they were on any antihypertensive medication in the hospital. Sixty two percent of patients who received FOS had >10 mmHg decrease in their MBP. In the LEV group, only 2 of the 50 patients (4%) had >10 mmHg decrease in their MBP. The difference in proportion of the patients with >10 mmHg drop in MBP between the two study groups is also statistically significant (p<0.001) for age, clinical presentations of the patients and if they were on any antihypertensive medication in the hospital. IV infusion of FOS in subjects presenting with acute cerebral symptoms may cause significant decreases in their blood pressure. This was not seen in patients receiving IV LEV infusions. Since maintaining adequate cerebral perfusion pressure is a key point in the management of patients with acute cerebral symptoms, the results of this study may carry a clinical impact on the management of this subgroup of patients.

Pharmacokinetics of Phenytoin: Reminders and Discoveries

Phenytoin Half-Life and Clearance during Maintenance Therapy in Adults and Elderly Patients with Epilepsy. Ahn JE, Cloyd JC, Brundage RC, Marino SE, Conway JM, Ramsay RE, White JR, Musib LC, Rarick JO, Birnbaum AK, Leppik IE. Neurology 2008;71(1):38–43. BACKGROUND: Phenytoin (PHT) is widely used to treat epilepsy in elderly patients, but information on its pharmacokinetics in this population is limited. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of age and sex on PHT pharmacokinetics using stable-labeled (SL) isotopes of PHT or fosphenytoin (FOS) administered IV or IM while patients remained on their oral maintenance regimen. METHODS: Subjects were patients 18 years or older with epilepsy, but otherwise healthy, on a maintenance regimen of PHT who were not taking interacting medications. Subjects were given a single injection of a 100 mg dose of SL-PHT or SL-FOS followed by their usual morning PHT dose less 100 mg. Serial blood samples were collected up to 196 hours after the SL dose. Plasma PHT and SL-PHT concentrations were measured by a gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay. PHT pharmacokinetics were characterized using a population-based, nonlinear, mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Sixty-three subjects completed the study, 45 of whom were 65 years or older. There was no difference between adult and elderly or men and women in PHT clearance, distribution volume, and elimination half-life. The mean elimination half-life was 40 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Healthy elderly adults appear to have the same phenytoin (PHT) pharmacokinetics as younger adults. Reduced PHT dosage requirements may be due to age-related changes in patients’ sensitivity to the therapeutic and toxic effects of the drug. The prolonged elimination half-life suggests that most patients can take PHT once daily and the time to reach steady-state may extend to 2–3 weeks.

Resistance to antiepileptic drugs and expression of P-glycoprotein in two rat models of status epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency, characterized by continuous or intermittent seizures without full recovery of consciousness between seizures, which can result in death or neurological sequelae. In about one third of patients, SE is unresponsive to sequential treatment with first- and second-line antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). At least in part, this drug resistance may be due to AED target alterations induced by SE, such as reduced membrane expression of GABA(A) receptors. Apart from target alterations by receptor trafficking, SE is known to increase the brain expression of drug efflux transporters such as P-glycoprotein (Pgp), which might reduce concentrations of AEDs at their brain targets. However, it is not known whether overexpression of Pgp develops rapidly enough after onset of SE to be of any functional consequence for drug treatment. Therefore, we studied whether overexpression of Pgp at the blood-brain barrier is involved in refractory SE. Two rat SE models were used, the lithium/pilocarpine model and induction of SE by sustained electrical stimulation of the basolateral amygdala (BLA). Four AEDs, diazepam (DZP), phenobarbital (PB) and phenytoin (PHT) or fosphenytoin (FPHT) were administered at different times after onset of SE. In the pilocarpine model, once self-sustained SE was established, none of the AEDs alone was effective in terminating SE, but sequential injection of PB and DZP stopped SE. Administration of the Pgp inhibitor tariquidar did not prevent or counteract resistance to AEDs. In the BLA model, DZP and PB terminated SE in the majority of rats, whereas PHT or FPHT were ineffective. Immunohistochemical staining of Pgp did not indicate any increase of Pgp expression in brain capillary endothelial cells during SE, whereas significant overexpression was determined in both models 48 h after SE. The data suggest that, at least under the conditions of the present study, alterations in Pgp are not critically involved in refractory SE.

Novel Synthesis of Fosphenytoin: Anti-Convulsant Prodrug

A simple, new synthesis of fosphenytoin sodium 1, a prodrug, via imidate ester and employing mild reaction conditions is described.

Phenytoin half-life and clearance during maintenance therapy in adults and elderly patients with epilepsy

Phenytoin (PHT) is widely used to treat epilepsy in elderly patients, but information on its pharmacokinetics in this population is limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of age and sex on PHT pharmacokinetics using stable-labeled (SL) isotopes of PHT or fosphenytoin (FOS) administered IV or IM while patients remained on their oral maintenance regimen. Subjects were patients 18 years or older with epilepsy, but otherwise healthy, on a maintenance regimen of PHT who were not taking interacting medications. Subjects were given a single injection of a 100 mg dose of SL-PHT or SL-FOS followed by their usual morning PHT dose less 100 mg. Serial blood samples were collected up to 196 hours after the SL dose. Plasma PHT and SL-PHT concentrations were measured by a gas chromatographic-mass spectrometric assay. PHT pharmacokinetics were characterized using a population-based, nonlinear, mixed-effects model. Sixty-three subjects completed the study, 45 of whom were 65 years or older. There was no difference between adult and elderly or men and women in PHT clearance, distribution volume, and elimination half-life. The mean elimination half-life was 40 hours. Healthy elderly adults appear to have the same phenytoin (PHT) pharmacokinetics as younger adults. Reduced PHT dosage requirements may be due to age-related changes in patients' sensitivity to the therapeutic and toxic effects of the drug. The prolonged elimination half-life suggests that most patients can take PHT once daily and the time to reach steady-state may extend to 2-3 weeks.

Fosphenytoin may cause hemodynamically unstable bradydysrhythmias

The prodrug fosphenytoin (FOS) was recently introduced as an alternative to phenytoin (PTN) and has since become a first line therapy for status epilepticus. Unlike PTN, FOS generally has been considered to be safe from cardiac toxicity. To better characterize cardiac toxicity associated with FOS administration, we performed a review of the Food and Drug Administration’s Adverse Event Reporting System databank for reports of possible FOS toxicity from 1997–2002. There were 29 applicable reports of adverse cardiac events likely related to FOS infusion, including 10 cardiac deaths. Among survivors, there were four cases of high-grade atrioventricular block, and five cases of transient sinus arrest. Our data suggest that FOS may produce more cardiac toxicity than previously thought. Clinicians should consider administering intravenous FOS in a monitored setting for selected high-risk patients.

Is Propofol Effective and Safe for Treating Refractory Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus is termed refractory (RSE) when clinical or electrographic seizure activity does not respond to first- and second-line treatments, typically an intravenous benzodiazepine followed by a loading dose of phenytoin or fosphenytoin. Treatment of RSE consists of mechanical ventilation in an intensive care unit (ICU) while coma and a burst-suppression EEG pattern are induced with an anesthetic agent. Traditionally, barbiturates such as pentobarbital …

Pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of phenytoin and fosphenytoin in children with severe malaria and status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus is common in children with severe falciparum malaria and is associated with poor outcome. Phenytoin is often used to control status epilepticus, but its water-soluble prodrug, fosphenytoin, may be more useful as it is easier to administer. We studied the pharmacokinetics and clinical effects of phenytoin and fosphenytoin sodium in children with severe falciparum malaria and status epilepticus. Children received intravenous (i.v.) phenytoin as a 18 mg kg-1 loading dose infused over 20 min followed by a 2.5 mg x kg(-1) 12 hourly maintenance dose infused over 5 min (n = 11), or i.v. fosphenytoin, administered at a rate of 50 mg x min(-1) phenytoin sodium equivalents (PE; n = 16), or intramuscular (i.m.) fosphenytoin as a 18 mg x kg(-1) loading dose followed by 2.5 mg x kg(-1) 12 hourly of PE (n = 11). Concentrations of phenytoin in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), frequency of seizures, cardiovascular effects (respiratory rate, blood pressure, trancutaneous oxygen tension and level of consciousness) and middle cerebral artery (MCA) blood flow velocity were monitored. After all routes of administration, a plasma unbound phenytoin concentration of more than 1 microg x ml(-1) was rapidly (within 5-20 min) attained. Mean (95% confidence interval) steady state free phenytoin concentrations were 2.1 (1.7, 2.4; i.v. phenytoin, n = 6), 1.5 (0.96, 2.1; i.v. fosphenytoin, n = 11) and 1.4 (0.5, 2.4; i.m. fosphenytoin, n = 6), and were not statistically different for the three routes of administration. Median times (range) to peak plasma phenytoin concentrations following the loading dose were 0.08 (0.08-0.17), 0.37 (0.33-0.67) and 0.38 (0.17-2.0) h for i.v. fosphenytoin, i.v. phenytoin and i.m. fosphenytoin, respectively. CSF: plasma phenytoin concentration ratio ranged from 0.12 to 0.53 (median = 0.28, n = 16). Status epilepticus was controlled in only 36% (4/11) following i.v. phenytoin, 44% (7/16), following i.v. fosphenytoin and 64% (7/11) following i.m. fosphenytoin administration, respectively. Cardiovascular parameters and MCA blood flow were not affected by phenytoin administration. Phenytoin and fosphenytoin administration at the currently recommended doses achieve plasma unbound phenytoin concentrations within the therapeutic range with few cardiovascular effects. Administration of fosphenytoin i.v. or i.m. offers a practical and convenient alternative to i.v. phenytoin. However, the inadequate control of status epilepticus despite rapid achievement of therapeutic unbound phenytoin concentrations warrants further investigation.

A comparison of central brain (cerebrospinal and extracellular fluids) and peripheral blood kinetics of phenytoin after intravenous phenytoin and fosphenytoin

Phenytoin (PHT) is a first-line drug in the treatment of status epilepticus. However, the parenteral PHT formulation is associated with administration difficulties and therefore fosphenytoin (FosPHT), a PHT pro-drug, has been developed. As the peripheral (blood) and central (cerebrospinal fluid [CSF] and brain extracellular fluid [ECF]) kinetic inter-relationship of PHT after i.v. FosPHT administration is unknown we sought to ascertain the relationship and to compare it to that of i.v. PHT. A freely behaving rat model, which allows for the concurrent and temporal sampling of blood (jugular vein), CSF (cisterna magna) and brain ECF (frontal cortex and hippocampus), was used. PHT and FosPHT were administered by i.v. infusion and blood, CSF and microdialysate samples collected at timed intervals up to 6 hours. The pharmacokinetic parameters in plasma of PHT after PHT and FosPHT (30 and 60 mg/kg) administration were indistinguishable. The PHT plasma free fraction (free/total concentration ratio) was 0.25–0.31 and 0.26–0.31 for PHT and FosPHT, respectively. Mean PHT T max values for CSF were 9–13 minutes. The equivalent values in the frontal cortex and hippocampal ECF were 29–34 minutes. C max values increased dose-dependently and were independent of whether PHT or FosPHT was administered. Furthermore the kinetic profiles of PHT for the frontal cortex and hippocampus were indistinguishable suggesting that PHT distribution in the brain is not brain region specific. Thus, overall, the central and peripheral kinetics of PHT are indistinguishable after PHT and FosPHT.

Pharmacokinetics of phenytoin following intravenous and intramuscular administration of fosphenytoin and phenytoin sodium in the rabbit.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare plasma phenytoin concentration versus time profiles following intravenous (i.v.) and intramuscular (i.m.) administration of fosphenytoin sodium with those obtained following administration of standard phenytoin sodium injection in the rabbit. Twenty-four adult New Zealand White rabbits (2.1 +/- 0.4 kg) were anaesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone (30 mg/kg) followed by i.v. or i.m. administration of a single 10 mg/kg phenytoin sodium or fosphenytoin sodium equivalents. Blood samples (1.5 ml) were obtained from a femoral artery cannula predose and at 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90, 120, 180, 240 and 300 min after drug administration. Plasma was separated by centrifugation (1000 g; 5 min) and fosphenytoin, total and free plasma phenytoin concentrations were measured using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Following i.v. administration of fosphenytoin sodium plasma phenytoin concentrations were similar to those obtained following i.v. administration of an equivalent dose of phenytoin sodium. Mean peak plasma phenytoin concentrations (Cmax) was 158% higher (P = 0.0277) following i.m. administration of fosphenytoin sodium compared to i.m. administration of phenytoin sodium. The mean area under the plasma total and free phenytoin concentration-time curve from time zero to 120 min (AUC(0-120)) following i.m. administration was also significantly higher (P = 0.0277) in fosphenytoin treated rabbits compared to the phenytoin group. However, there was no significant difference in AUC(0-180) between fosphenytoin and phenytoin-treated rabbits following i.v. administration. There was also no significant difference in the mean times to achieve peak plasma phenytoin concentrations (Tmax) between fosphenytoin and phenytoin-treated rabbits following i.m. administration. Mean plasma albumin concentrations were comparable in both groups of animals. Fosphenytoin was rapidly converted to phenytoin both after i.v. and i.m. administration, with plasma fosphenytoin concentrations declining rapidly to undetectable levels within 10 min following administration via either route. These results confirm the rapid and complete hydrolysis of fosphenytoin to phenytoin in vivo, and the potential of the i.m. route for administration of fosphenytoin delivering phenytoin in clinical settings where i.v. administration may not be feasible.

Anticonvulsant efficacy of topiramate in phenytoin-resistant kindled rats.

We evaluated the anticonvulsant efficacy of topiramate (TPM), a structurally novel antiepileptic drug (AED), in amygdala kindled rats that had been preselected with respect to their response to phenytoin (PHT). Anticonvulsant response was tested by determining the afterdischarge threshold (ADT; i.e., a sensitive measure for drug effects on focal seizure activity). By repeated testing with the PHT prodrug fosphenytoin (FOS) three groups of kindled rats were separated: rats in which consistent anticonvulsant effects were obtained (PHT responders), rats that showed no anticonvulsant response (PHT nonresponders), and rats with variable responses (variable PHT responders). The latter, largest group was used to evaluate at which doses and pretreatment times TPM exerted significant anticonvulsant effects on ADT. For this purpose, TPM was tested at four doses (20, 40, 80, 160 mg/kg i.p.) and two pretreatment times (1 and 4 h). The most effective treatment protocol was then used for TPM testing in PHT responders and nonresponders. TPM proved to be an effective AED in the kindling model. At 40 mg/kg, significant ADT increases were obtained after both 1 and 4 h after administration. In addition to the effect on focal seizure threshold, seizure severity and duration recorded at ADT were decreased by TPM, indicating that this drug acts on both seizure threshold and seizure spread. In PHT nonresponders, TPM significantly increased ADT, which is in line with its proven efficacy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy in whom phenytoin has failed. However, TPM was more efficacious in increasing ADT in PHT responders than in nonresponders, substantiating that the difference between these groups of kindled rats extends to other AEDs. Repeated testing of kindled rats with TPM indicated that, similar to PHT, there are individual kindled rats without anticonvulsant response to TPM (i.e., TPM nonresponders). The data of this study substantiate that PHT nonresponders are a unique model for the search of new AEDs with improved efficacy in refractory partial epilepsy.

Phenytoin vs. Fosphenytoin for Nonemergency Use

Three physicians and 4 pharmacists address a controversy: should parenteral phenytoin products be used for patients who present with seizure clusters that fall short of full-blown status epilepticus? To aid in the decision-making process, this manufacturer-supported panel developed an algorithm that attempts to balance the lower adverse-side-effect profile of fosphenytoin against the lower cost of phenytoin. The incidence of serious adverse events is probably …

Phenytoin penetration into brain after administration of phenytoin or fosphenytoin.

This study was designed to measure the brain penetration of phenytoin (PHT) after intravenous (i.v.) administration of either standard PHT or fosphenytoin (FPHT), a PHT prodrug. The study was formulated to answer the question whether the time required for FPHT to be converted to PHT in the bloodstream would delay the accumulation of PHT in brain. Four rats were sampled at various times after intravenous infusion of 30 mg/kg PHT i.v. or 30 mg/kg PHT equivalents of FPHT i.v. PHT was measured in serum, protein-free ultrafiltrate, and in brain, by using high-performance liquid chromatography. Although the initial PHT-free fraction was significantly higher for FPHT-treated rats than it was for PHT-treated rats, brain PHT levels were significantly reduced after infusion of FPHT. When FPHT is used for treatment of generalized status epilepticus, it should be anticipated that lower initial brain PHT levels will be achieved than are typically found with standard PHT.

Stability of fosphenytoin sodium with intravenous solutions in glass bottles, polyvinyl chloride bags, and polypropylene syringes.

To determine the stability of fosphenytoin sodium admixtures with NaCl 0.9% injection and dextrose 5% (D5W) injection when stored in glass or polyvinyl chloride (PVC) containers, to evaluate the compatibility of fosphenytoin with 11 other intravenous solutions, and to determine the stability of fosphenytoin repackaged in polypropylene syringes. Dilutions of fosphenytoin sodium 1, 8, and 20 mg phenytoin sodium equivalents (PE)/mL were prepared in NaCl 0.9%, D5W, and 11 other intravenous fluids. Aliquots of each solution in NaCL 0.9% or D5W were transferred to three glass bottles for storage at 25 degrees C and 21 PVC bags for storage at 25, 4, or -20 degrees C. Aliquots of each admixture with the other intravenous fluids were transferred to three PVC bags and stored at 25 degrees C for 7 days. In addition, 63 syringes were filled with fosphenytoin sodium 50 mg PE/mL (undiluted) and stored at 25, 4, or -20 degrees C. Samples of each solution from the three containers were analyzed for visual compatibility, pH, and fosphenytoin concentration initially and at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 7, 14, and 30 days during storage at 25 and 4 degrees C and at 1, 7, 14, and 30 days during storage at -20 degrees C. Following removal of containers from the freezer, additional samples were obtained after 7 days at 4 or 25 degrees C, and 7 days at 25 degrees C, and then 7 days at -20 degrees C. No visible precipitation or change in color or clarity was observed in any of the fosphenytoin solutions during the study. The concentration of fosphenytoin at each sampling time remained within 97-104% of initial concentration, regardless of container, concentration, intravenous admixture, or storage temperature. Fosphenytoin sodium, either undiluted in polypropylene syringes or diluted with NaCl 0.9% or D5W in PVC bags, remains stable for at least 30 days at room temperature, under refrigeration, or frozen. After removal from the freezer, fosphenytoin can be thawed, kept at 4 or 25 degrees C for 7 days, and then returned to the freezer for another 7 days. Admixtures of fosphenytoin sodium in various other intravenous fluids are stable for at least 7 days at room temperature.

Fosphenytoin available soon in the US

Fosphenytoin available soon in the US

Pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of fosphenytoin

Fosphenytoin sodium, a phosphate ester prodrug of phenytoin, was developed as a replacement for parenteral phenytoin sodium. Unlike phenytoin, fosphenytoin is freely soluble in aqueous solutions, including standard i.v. solutions, and is rapidly absorbed by the i.m. route. Fosphenytoin is metabolized (conversion half-life of 8 to 15 min) to phenytoin by endogenous phosphatases. Therapeutic free (unbound) and total plasma phenytoin concentrations are consistently attained after i.m. or i.v. administration of fosphenytoin loading doses. Fosphenytoin has fewer local adverse effects (e.g., pain, burning, and itching at the injection site) after i.m. or i.v. administration than parenteral phenytoin. Systemic effects related to the CNS are similar for both preparations, but transient paresthesias are more common with fosphenytoin.