Abstract “Miss Sophia’s Diary” 莎菲女士的日記, Ding Ling’s 丁玲 (1904–1986) debut on the literary stage in 1928, made her a nationally recognized figure. The first-person narrative and diary form of this iconic text is most representative of May Fourth intellectuals’ incessant quest for modernity and a modern selfhood through self-conscious experimentation with forms and genres.Yet previous scholarship on “Miss Sophia’s Diary” paid little attention to the use of “I” as well as the formal and generic characteristics of the diary form. Drawing on the sociolinguistic theory on the intersubjective, social and performative nature of the “I,” existing discussions of formal features of the diary, and a poststructualist reading of autobiography as a figure that precedes and produces the self, this paper examines the use of “I” and the formal and generic features of the diary form. It is my contention that the formal and generic multiplicity of the diary narrative written in the first-person perspective problematizes subject formation and attests to the difficulty and even impossibility of representing the self and rendering it intelligible. The formal and generic multiplicity produces a performative, fragmented and contradictory selfhood, which in turn resists any fixed subject position. This paper reveals not only the limits of the autonomous, bounded selfhood modeled on Western Enlightenment epistemology but also the complicated processes of how the concepts of the self and subjectivity, as discursive constructs, are contested and negotiated in particular historical and social conditions.
Read full abstract