Forest Floor Removal Research Articles

Soil disturbance, amelioration and rehabilitation affect forest growth, health, soil carbon and chemistry on five long-term soil productivity (LTSP) sites in southeastern British Columbia

Soil disturbance amelioration affected tree survival, growth, health, mineral soil chemistry, and their covariation on five Long-Term Soil Productivity (LTSP) sites in southeastern British Columbia. The two most different LTSP treatments (baseline disturbance of no compaction / all organic matter left, versus most severe of heavy compaction / forest floor removed) were compared to five amelioration treatments: rehabilitation of most severe LTSP treatment (soil tillage with or without incorporation of removed forest floor [Rehab + FF]), root disease (Armillaria ostoyae (Romagn.) Herink) amelioration treatments (stump removal or biological with Hypholoma fasiculare), and enhancement of soil organic matter (tilling extra forest floor into mineral soil). Treatment significantly (p < 0.05) affected 10-year mineral soil carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, mineralizable nitrogen, and potassium, which were lower on forest floor removal treatments and higher on forest floor addition treatments (27 to 97% of baseline versus 78 to 183% of baseline, respectively). Western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl. ex D.Don) 15-year productivity (m3/ha) was significantly affected by treatment (Rehab + FF yielding a 10 fold increase in productivity versus the poorly growing baseline treatment), with treatment also significant when total disease was a covariate and for average and total volume when mineral soil Ca:Al ratio was a marginally significant (p < 0.1) covariate, and for survival when the incidence of total disease or white pine blister rust (Cronartium ribicola) were significant covariates; or with mineral soil C:N ratio as a significant covariate. The incidence of blister rust and total disease were significantly influenced by treatment when C:N was a significant covariate. For 20-year lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. Ex Loud) there were no direct relationships apparent, but western gall rust (Endocronartium harknessii) had treatment significant when total sulfur was a significant covariate. Fifteen- and twenty-year Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca [Beissn.] Franco) had no significant relationships. Results demonstrate that restoring or adding extra organic matter (forest floor) into mineral soil increased soil carbon and related nutrients and can increase above ground carbon (forest productivity). Conversely, removing forest floor lowered mineral soil carbon and generally lowered tree volume. Varied effects due to growth limiting factors like frost and competing vegetation affected results on a few plots. Recommendations include leaving or enhancing organic matter onsite for soil carbon, nutrients, forest health and site productivity. Further analysis with the larger LTSP dataset and ongoing monitoring is encouraged to determine if the results persist in the long-term and to better understand the significant covariate relationships.

Boreal forest soil biotic communities are affected by harvesting, site preparation with no additional effects of higher biomass removal 5 years post-harvest

The market for forest products has diversified to include biomass energy products sourced from materials that were typically left on-site after harvest. In this study we examined whether intensified biomass removal following harvest will effect site soil biological diversity and metabolic functioning, and how decisions surrounding sampling, in sites prepared with disc-trenching soil scarification, influence the effect assessment of harvesting activities. We compared the influence of harvesting, below-ground biomass removal, stem only versus full tree harvesting, micro-topographic features and seasonal effects on soil biota. We assessed soil biotic changes using potential enzyme activity assays and metabarcoding using targeted primers for four groups (arthropods, bacteria, fungi and broad eukaryotes). We found that harvesting and forest floor removal had strong influences on soil biotic communities, with changes that generally favoured more general soil saprotrophy and reductions in plant-associated organisms. Disc-trenching created differences between micro-topographic features where organic soil was redistributed and trenches, where it was removed. We found no significant difference to how seasonal variation effected communities in harvested sites, compared to unharvested sites. These results show that there is significant site heterogeneity due to disc scarification, and that the sampling micro-topographic features should be considered during study design. Additional studies are needed to assess the effects of higher biomass removal on these features as these sites age.

Wildfire loss of forest soil C and N: Do pre-fire treatments make a difference?

Losses of C and N from the forest floor and top 20-cm of soil were estimated following separate severe wildfires at two Long-Term Soil Productivity sites in the Sierra Nevada of California, USA. Experimental treatments applied 20 years prior to the wildfires included factorial combinations of 1) organic matter (OM) removal following clear-cut harvesting (SO, stem only harvest, WTH, whole-tree harvest, and WTH + FF, WTH plus the forest floor removal), 2) soil compaction (three levels of intensity), and 3) with and without understory vegetation control. Wildfires caused complete losses of the forest floor in all treatments and also oxidized varying portions of OM in the topsoil. As such, pre-fire forest floor measures were used as an estimate of forest floor C and N loss, and post-fire soil measures of C and N were compared to pre-fire soil data to estimate of mineral soil losses. Averaged over all treatments, the less-productive site that also had lesser accumulations of detritus (Wallace) lost 35.1 Mg C ha−1, or 25 % of its original C stores, while the more-productive site with greater detritus (Rogers) lost 18.4 Mg C ha−1, or 20 % of its original. The SO treatments that left harvest residue on site ended up with much greater losses of C: 36 % versus 15 and 17 % for WTH and WTH + FF, respectively. The SO also yielded the largest losses (25–30 %) of C in the top 10-cm of soil. The other treatments had smaller or inconsistent effects (understory vegetation control) or no effect (soil compaction). Our results suggest that potential benefits from SO by leaving residue on site to soil C and N accumulation can also be readily eliminated by wildfire which commonly occurs at these fire-prone forest ecosystems.

Harvest impacts to stand development and soil properties across soil textures: 25-year response of the aspen Lake States LTSP installations

In addition to long-standing concerns about sustaining forest productivity, maintaining forest ecosystems under changing conditions and emerging threats has become increasingly important when planning forest management. With the aim of understanding effects of management on both productivity and recovery, we quantified the 25-year impact of varying degrees of organic matter (OM) removal and soil compaction on above-ground biomass, soil carbon and nutrients, soil bulk density, and stand development in aspen-dominated forests in the upper Lake States region of the US. Treatment impacts were assessed at three different sites with comparable overstory composition, but with varying soil texture, site quality, and climate. Across all sites, soil C and N generally decreased with increasing OM removal, and bulk density increased with increasing compaction; 25-year observations indicate recovery of bulk density at the surface (0–10 cm) but not at deeper portions of the soil profile. At the most productive site (loamy soils) with favorable initial soil porosity, severe compaction decreased mean aboveground biomass (-46%), particularly of trees (-73%). Biomass at 25 years did not differ among organic matter removal treatments (e.g. stem-only harvest), but a greater increase in soil C occurred with stem-only harvest relative to whole-tree harvest plus forest floor removal. In contrast, at a less productive site with sandy soils poorly buffered to nutrient and C removals, whole-tree harvest reduced biomass by 25% (tree biomass declined 35%) relative to stem-only harvest while compaction treatments did not differ in effects on biomass production, soil C or soil N. On clay soils, compaction treatments did not significantly impact biomass production, but whole-tree harvest plus forest floor removal reduced tree biomass by 47% relative to whole-tree harvest alone. Assessment of mean relative density indicates canopy closure has not yet occurred at the least productive site (clay soils) or the more severely disturbed stands at the intermediate site (sandy soils), suggesting the possibility for treatment impacts not yet discernible to become more pronounced as stands develop and nutrient uptake continues in the future. Our results align with concepts of soil quality and texture-specific limitations to growth, underlying a need to understand key soil limitations when considering forest management impacts to aboveground structure and productivity.

Fifteen-year tree growth on standard long-term soil productivity trials and various adjacent amelioration treatments at Interior Cedar-Hemlock sites in southeastern British Columbia and northern Idaho

Understanding the relationship between soil disturbance and tree growth is key to sustainable forest management. We report fifteen-year tree growth results of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca [Beissn.] Franco) and western white pine (Pinus monticola Dougl. ex D.Don) growth following clearcut harvesting and installation of three replicates of the international Long-Term Soil Productivity (LTSP) trial protocols. Additional amelioration plots were also established on each replicate site to study rehabilitation of the most severe disturbance, treatment of Armillaria root disease, and enhancement of soil organic matter. Stark differences were found among the various treatments and species. Vegetation control resulted in significantly better growth for both tree species across the core LTSP treatments and amelioration treatments. On the core LTSP treatments, organic matter removal had a significant negative effect on Douglas-fir growth. Amelioration treatments resulted in similar survival and similar or better volume growth than the core LTSP treatments, with the exception of poor volume growth after compaction rehabilitation with no organic matter returned into the soil. Compaction significantly influenced Douglas-fir survival and was often higher on moderate compaction plots. On some sites there was decreased survival and growth associated with heavy compaction that will likely influence longer-term outcomes with a more variable and changing climate. Overall, results to date on the core LTSP treatments, amelioration treatments, and adjacent miniplots reported elsewhere suggest that forest floor removal causes negative growth and, combined with severe compaction, caused both negative growth and poor survival. In the Interior Northwest it is still prudent to minimize soil disturbance and leave organic matter onsite unless there is site specific evidence to the contrary. Additional work is required to reap the full, long-term benefit of the installations. Recommendations are provided highlighting the critical work that should be completed in the near future before biological evidence is lost to decay, including suggestions for further data analysis and extension, the need to continue LTSP core, amelioration and miniplot measurements to demonstrate and calibrate sustainable forest resource management. Our data suggest considering changes to current soil disturbance policy and forest operations based on the current results regarding forest floor displacement.

Impact of the Disturbances for Forest Grazing on Flora Composition in a Natural Forest

Daegwallyeong is a mountain pass at an altitude of 832 m, which has been designated a conservation area because of its essential role in Korea’s forest ecosystem. Simultaneously, this area is considered a suitable place for forest grazing due to the cool temperature during the summer. Some areas have been converted to grassland for livestock feeding, and the scale has continued increasing. Although livestock in a forest area is more ecofriendly than industrialized facilities, it could impact the native ecosystem, especially in terms of the flora and vegetation. We investigated the changes in flora and vegetation of Daegwallyeong before and after the grassland formation. The total number of vascular plant species changed throughout the survey period. It was decreased by thinning and forest floor removal in 2015. However, it bounced back to the original number in 2016, even after grazing. However, there was a dramatic decrease after the second forest floor removal and 3 months of grazing in 2017. The number of flora slightly increased after the fallow of grazing in 2019, but it did not fully recover. Although the number of flora seemed back to normal, the composition of the flora in 2019 was significantly changed from the forest without disturbance in 2014. First, there was the invasion of naturalized plants such as Taraxacum officinale and Barbarea vularis, as well as ecosystem-disturbing flora such as Carex callitrichos var. nana and Rumex acetosa. Second, the coverage of those species expanded after thinning and grazing. Most importantly, we lost five valuable rare species, Anemone koraiensis, Viola diamantiaca, Chionanthus retusus, Scopolia japonica, and Streptopus ovalis, from the area. Additionally, the ground condition of the area was severely damaged, and plants no longer grow in some areas. The survey and analysis of plants in this study showed the adverse effects of forest grazing practices on rare plants in Daegwallyeong. Forest grazing practices should be carefully conducted to preserve vulnerable plant species and a healthy ecosystem.

Wood stake decomposition twenty years after organic matter removal at the Lake States LTSP sites

Organic matter (OM) is an integral part of site productivity for a forest, and understanding the effects of OM removal on various forms of carbon (C) cycling is important for land managers and for policy makers. In this study, we utilized the Lake States Long-Term Soil Productivity (LTSP) study sites, located along a gradient in soil texture (clay, silt loam and sand) and high to low productivity, to evaluate the impacts of two OM removal treatments on belowground wood decomposition. In 2013, approximately 20 years after the LTSP treatments had been installed, we placed standardized aspen and loblolly pine wood stakes in the mineral soil of plots receiving the bole only harvesting treatment (BO) and the whole tree harvesting with forest floor removal treatment (WT + FF), and in plots in an adjacent unharvested reference area (1350 wood stakes total). Soil was also sampled to characterize the microbial community composition in the various treatments. From 2014 to 2018, wood stakes were removed from each treatment, and mass loss determined. We found significant differences in wood stake decomposition among the three sites, and between the two wood species, but little impact of timber harvesting and surface OM removals on decomposition. Soil microbial composition also reflected site differences in stake decomposition. We conclude that clearcut harvest and surface OM removal had little effect on stake mass loss in the mineral soil 20 years after the treatments were initiated, and the inherent soil factors are now controlling decomposition.

Early rotation biomass and nutrient accumulation of Pinus radiata forests after harvest residue management and fertiliser treatment on contrasting types of soil

The productivity of planted forests depends upon the maintenance of soil fertility and an understanding of the relationships between site fertility and stand productivity. The effects of harvest residue and forest floor management, and fertiliser additions on ecosystem biomass, carbon and nutrient accumulation were evaluated 5 years after establishment of Pinus radiata stands growing on four contrasting soil types at Woodhill, Tarawera, Kinleith, and Golden Downs forest in New Zealand. The harvest residue removal treatments were stem only harvest, whole tree harvest, and whole tree harvest combined with forest floor removal, all with and without mostly urea-nitrogen fertiliser additions (cumulative range across the four sites 400–1150 kg N ha−1). Woodhill forest biomass and nutrient stock results at age 5 years have been previously reported and were added to with new carbon and nitrogen analysis. The results showed for all sites except on recent sands at Woodhill, where soil nutrients were very low, that harvest residue and forest floor removal had limited impact on 5 year old P. radiata productivity, above ground live biomass and nutrient accumulation, and mineral soil nutrient concentrations. Across all sites the whole tree harvest combined with forest floor removal negatively impacted the 5 year old forest floor biomass and nutrient stocks, with variable impact due to whole tree only removal. The addition of large experimental amounts of mineral nitrogen fertiliser increased tree productivity across sites, which was reflected in tree biomass for all sites except Tarawera. Based on these relatively short-term findings, when P. radiata forests in New Zealand are experiencing a peak nutrient demand (highest nutrient demand amount per year), there were limited negative impacts of harvest residue and forest floor removal on forest productivity, tree biomass and nutrient accumulation, and mineral soil nutrient concentrations. The exception was for a sand dune derived soil that had very low soil nutrients resulting in a greater proportion of the forest ecosystem nutrient pool to be held within the tree and forest floor biomass, emphasising the importance of harvest residue and forest floor retention at low nutrient sites.

Long-term effects of organic matter removal, compaction, and vegetation control on tree survival and growth in coarse-textured, low-productivity soils

The Long-Term Soil Productivity Network is providing a systematic examination of the effects of organic matter removal and compaction on a variety of different soils and forest types across North America. Here we report on the 22nd-year survival and height growth of white oak (Quercus alba), northern red oak (Q. rubra), and shortleaf pine (Pinus echinata) on rocky, nutrient-poor soils that have a low to moderate water holding capacity in the Missouri Ozark Highlands. Treatments included three levels of organic matter removal (sawlog, whole tree, and whole-tree plus forest floor) and three levels of soil compaction (none: bulk density = 1.34 g cm−3; moderate: bulk density = 1.65 g cm−3; and severe: bulk density = 1.78 g cm−3) each with and without vegetation control. Following treatments, bareroot, 1–0 white oak, northern red oak, and shortleaf pine seedlings were planted at a 3:3:1 ratio, approximating the distribution of these species in this region. Within half of each plot, a vegetation control treatment was applied for the first 10 years by treating competing vegetation with herbicide. After 22 years, vegetation control significantly increased biomass and height of all planted species. The average height for northern red oak with vegetation control treatments was 884 cm with vs. 606 cm without; white oak was 837 cm with vs. 424 cm without; shortleaf pine was 1339 cm with vs. 1220 cm without. Moderate compaction increased average white oak height by 15% and severe compaction increased average height by 18% compared to no-compaction treatments. Compaction was not a significant treatment for red oaks or for shortleaf pines. However, the coarse fragments in the study soils appear to have muted much of the compaction to the soil’s fine-earth fraction and may have had the unintended effect of providing partial vegetation control. Whole-tree removal reduced average shortleaf pine heights by 6% vs. sawlog-only removal, while whole-tree + forest floor removal increased heights 3% compared to sawlog harvests. Organic matter removal was not a significant treatment for either oak species. Red oak survival probability was 0.79 with vegetation control vs. 0.34 without; white oak was 0.81 with vs. 0.65 without; shortleaf pine was 0.49 with vs. 0.45 without. Overall, vegetation control was the dominant factor driving survival and growth of oaks, and to a lesser degree, growth of shortleaf pine. Organic matter removal and compaction treatments had relatively little negative effect on height, indicating the resilience of these species to harvest-related disturbances in Ozark Highlands soils.

Effects of Rhododendron removal on soil bacterial and fungal communities in southern Appalachian forests

Rhododendron maximum, a native ericaceous evergreen shrub, is expanding in forests of the southern Appalachian region following eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) mortality due to hemlock woolly adelgid (Adelges tsugae) infestations. The goal of our study was to examine soil microbial community responses to experimental R. maximum removal treatments. The experiment was implemented as a 2 × 2 factorial design, including two R. maximum canopy removal levels (cut vs. not cut) combined with two forest floor removal levels (burned vs. not burned). These treatments were designed as potential management strategies to facilitate hardwood tree establishment in forests that have experienced T. canadensis declines. We sampled soils after removals and characterized bacterial and fungal communities using amplicon sequencing. Shrub removal did not affect bacterial or fungal α diversity but did affect both bacterial and fungal community composition. Relative abundances of bacterial phyla and fungal classes exhibited no differences among R. maximum removal treatments. However, specific bacterial and fungal taxa that were responsive to R. maximum removal (i.e., differentially abundant sequences) did exhibit clear patterns at high taxonomic levels. Specifically, taxa that responded negatively to R. maximum removal were found primarily in two bacterial phyla (Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes) and one fungal class (Archaeorhizomycetes) while positive responders were clustered in several other bacterial phyla (e.g., Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, Cyanobacteria). Fungal functional guilds also responded to R. maximum removal, including negative responses of ericoid mycorrhizae and positive responses of arbuscular mycorrhizae and wood saprotrophs. Effects of R. maximum removal on soil microbial communities were minor overall, but clear effects on some key functional groups were evident (i.e., mycorrhizal fungi), suggesting that microbial responses to R. maximum removal may influence recovery of forests in the southern Appalachian region.

Soil compaction and organic matter removal effects on soil properties and tree growth in the Interior Douglas-fir zone of southern British Columbia

Silviculture systems and associated forest harvesting practices that affect the level of soil compaction and organic matter retained on a site will cause changes to soil properties and processes that may affect the growth of planted trees. We present results for soil conditions and tree growth after 15 years for 6 Long-term Soil Productivity Study (LTSP) installations in 2 distinct regions of the Interior Douglas-fir (IDF) biogeoclimatic zone in southern British Columbia (BC). In a 3 × 3 factorial design, three levels of compaction and organic matter removal were replicated in two distinct IDF regions that varied in parent material, but with similar climates. Each treatment was then split and planted with two different species, Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine. In each region, three unique sites (block), all within a radius of 50 km from one other, were installed with the same combination of treatment and species for a total of six replicates, three in each of two regions. Across IDF regions, tree heights on calcareous soils in the Rocky Mountains of south-eastern BC were 36% lower for Douglas-fir and 23% lower for lodgepole pine than on more acidic soils on the Thompson Plateau. There were varying differences across treatments in soil and foliar nutrient concentrations between IDF regions, primarily from regional parent material differences. However, nutrient deficiencies were apparent in both regions and may have limited growth, especially on the more calcareous sites. Increases to soil bulk density (27%) 1 year after compaction did not impact tree survival, height at Year-15, or chemical properties in foliar tissue or soil. Fewer growing season frost events and increased soil water availability during the seedling establishment period was a likely reason for a 25% increase in Douglas-fir survival at Year-15 with the whole tree + forest floor removal (OM3) treatment. However, whole tree + forest floor removal (OM3) also produced a 13–19% reduction in soil N, S, K, and mineralizable N when compared to both stem-only (OM1) and whole tree (OM2) harvesting treatments that kept the forest floor intact. Effects on forest productivity from soil compaction after 15 years appear to be overshadowed by the more prominent effect of organic matter removal treatments during stand establishment and early growth. Future work at these installations focusing on nutrient budget, forest health, and ecosystem carbon stock differences across treatments will provide valuable insight into silviculture and harvesting practices for different species and regions in the dry forests of southern BC.

Impacts of forest harvest removal and fertiliser additions on end of rotation biomass, carbon and nutrient stocks of Pinus radiata

Forest harvesting practices remove tree biomass and the nutrients that they contain. There is uncertainty around the impact of this nutrient removal on the long-term sustainable production of forests over multiple rotations. To explore the impact of harvest management practices on planted forest sustainability, three long-term trials in Pinus radiata D. Don forests were assessed at the end of their second rotation of 26 to 27 years to determine the impact of harvest residue removal and fertiliser additions on sustainable forest productivity. The harvest residue removal treatments were stem only (SO), whole-tree (WT), and whole-tree plus forest floor (FF) removal with and without urea-nitrogen fertiliser additions (cumulative range across three sites 950 – 3200 kg N ha−1) from early rotation out to mid-rotation (last fertiliser application age range across sites 8 – 22 years). The FF removal treatment reduced soil carbon and nitrogen stocks throughout the subsequent rotation, whereas forest floor carbon and nutrient stocks had recovered from the FF removal treatment by the end of the rotation. Forest productivity was reduced at one site with the FF removal treatment, taking 3 years longer for stems to reach 35 cm diameter at breast height than other residue removal treatments. Between WT and SO harvest residue treatments there were very limited impacts on soil carbon and nutrient stocks, no impact on forest floor mass, carbon and nutrient stocks and the sum of the above ground live biomass, carbon and nutrient stocks or tree productivity. Across all harvest removal treatments fertiliser addition increased soil carbon and nitrogen stocks for sites with low initial soil stocks. The increased soil carbon and nitrogen stocks from fertiliser addition were associated with forest productivity gains with the time to reach 35 cm (diameter at breast height) for one site reduced by 3 – 5 years. Fertiliser addition to sites with FF removal was able to mitigate soil carbon and nitrogen stocks only when very large amounts of fertiliser were added (cumulative amounts of 1150 and 3200 kg N ha−1). The end of rotation results from this long-term study demonstrate the importance of harvest residues and forest floor material at low fertility sites for long-term nutrient sustainability in planted forests.

Effects of forest harvesting and biomass removal on soil carbon and nitrogen: Two complementary meta-analyses

Forest residues and logging slash from pre-commercial forest thinning and regeneration harvests are a potential feedstock for bioenergy production but there has been a concern about the impact of residue removal on forest soil C and N. This study aimed to address such by conducting two meta-analyses using the data available from published literature and an independent dataset compiled from the North American Long-Term Soil Productivity (LTSP) study.For the meta-analysis using literature, we categorized forest harvesting and biomass removal into i) no harvest control, ii) bole-only (BO, partial or clearcut) regular harvests, iii) BO with partial removal of logging slash and/or O horizon (BO+Removal), iv) whole tree harvests (WTH), and v) WTH with slash and O horizon removal (WTH+Removal). Accordingly, we compiled soil C and N data and key statistics (e.g., standard deviation) from 142 scientific articles published since 1979. We compared the results from this meta-analysis with data from 22 installations of the LTSP study where three levels of organic matter removal - BO, WTH, and WTH plus forest floor (+FF, O horizon) removal - as well as an additional vegetation control (+VC) were measured for two decades in either completely randomized or randomized block design.In the literature meta-analysis, BO+Removal (-19.2%), WTH (-15.4%) and WTH+Removal (-24.9%) contained significantly less soil C than no-harvest controls across combined soil depths, while BO had no difference. Within individual mineral soil horizons, only BO+Removal and WTH+Removal treatments contained significantly less carbon than controls. There was a high degree of heterogeneity in treatment response between studies in the literature. The analyses from the LTSP dataset showed no significant difference in combined soil depths for WTH or WTH+VC relative to BO harvest, but there was significantly less soil C in BO+VC (-3.6%), WTH+FF (-8.5%) and WTH+FF+VC (-15.3%). These treatment effects declined over time since harvest, particularly the most intensive treatments. Soil N results largely mirrored soil C in both meta-analyses with smaller estimated effects for most treatments at equivalent depths (except for WTH+Removal and WTH+FF+VC, which remain about the same). There were no significant differences in soil N for combined soil depths between WTH and no-harvest control (in the literature analysis) or BO harvest (for both analyses).Since the most severe losses of soil C and N involved FF removal, WTH that accounts for modest removals (<80%) of harvesting residues may provide a sustainable source of biomass for bioenergy production without additional soil impacts compared to BO harvesting practices.

Removing riparian Rhododendron maximum in post-Tsuga canadensis riparian forests does not degrade water quality in southern Appalachian streams

In the past century, the evergreen woody shrub, Rhododendron maximum, has experienced habitat expansion following foundational tree species die-off in eastern US deciduous forests. Rhododendron can potentially alter stream chemistry, temperature, trophic dynamics, and in-stream decomposition rates, given its dominance in riparian areas. Here we conducted two operational-scale (3 ha) riparian treatments that removed rhododendron through cutting alone (CR, canopy removal), or removing both the rhododendron canopy and forest floor using cutting and prescribed fire (CFFR, canopy and forest floor removal). We expected that rhododendron shrub removal, with or without soil organic horizon removal, would increase soil nutrient availability and subsequently alter stream pH, acid neutralizing capacity (ANC), inorganic nitrogen (NO3-N, NH4-N), total dissolved inorganic nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), calcium (Ca), potassium (K), and magnesium (Mg). We hypothesized that responses would occur more quickly in the CFFR treatment. Treatments reduced shrub-, but not tree basal area. Treatments lowered soil N, but not C. Stream chemistry responses to treatments varied between CR and CFFR and were transient, generally with pH, N, and some cations declining, and aluminum (Al) and DOC showing a pulse increase. By removing rhododendron, the remaining deciduous trees likely accelerated N uptake as soil moisture availability increased. This could partially explain why we observed lower than expected stream nutrients (NO3-N, Ca, and Mg) after treatments. Initial rhododendron slash on the forest floor coupled with incomplete consumption of the O-horizon on the CFFR treatment likely elevated DOC in the upper soil horizons and mobilized Al. From a management perspective, using these treatments to restore structure and function to riparian forests in the wake of eastern hemlock mortality, with or without fire, would most likely not result in short-term diminished water quality that is common when overstory trees are harvested and may even lower stream NO3-N concentrations long term.

Ontario, Canada’s LTSP Experience: Forging Lasting Research Partnerships and the Adaptive Management Cycle in Action

Abstract In this paper, we summarize Ontario’s Long-term Soil Productivity (LTSP) experience focusing on our efforts to forge lasting research partnerships, highlight the approaches we feel were effective in getting emerging science into forest policy within an adaptive management (AM) framework, and describe the future direction of Ontario’s LTSP program as new policy issues are emerging as part of the continuous AM cycle. Fourteen installations were established on nutrient-poor, conifer-dominated sites, considered to be the most sensitive to increased biomass removals. From 1993 to 1995, all sites were clearcut-harvested, with replicated (three reps per site) biomass removal treatments that included: stem only, full-tree, and full-tree + forest floor removal. Routine (every 5 years) measurements have been carried out to track changes in soil carbon and nutrient levels, as well as stand- and individual-tree growth and development metrics and foliar nutrition. The published results from Ontario’s LTSP program, in combination with the North American-wide LTSP synthesis outputs, have suggested that these nutrient-poor, conifer-dominated sites are less sensitive to biomass (nutrient) removals than previously thought. The evidence provided through peer-reviewed publications, conference and workshop presentations, and field tours was substantive and led to a review and revision of the full-tree logging direction within Ontario’s guidelines. We conclude with a set of recommendations (lessons learned) for the successful delivery of any new long-term, interdisciplinary research projects examining the sustainability of forest-management practices.

¿Es sustentable el aprovechamiento de tierra de hoja en bosques de encino?

Se investigó si el esquema actual con el que se realiza el aprovechamiento de tierra de hoja es sustentable. Con este fin se evaluó la producción de hojarasca en un bosque de encino con aprovechamiento de tierra de hoja bajo tres condiciones: sin aprovechamiento (C1), aprovechamiento en los últimos dos años (C2) y aprovechamiento de más de dos años (C3). Se estimó la cantidad anual de nutrientes (N, P, K, Ca, Mg y S) que regresa al piso forestal mediante la caída de hojarasca. Se emplearon trampas de hojarasca de 0.5 m2 de área. La producción de hojarasca fue mayor en C2 y C3 [(9.36 ± 0.64; 10.04 ± 1.92) Mg ha-1 año-1, respectivamente], en comparación con C1 [(6.74 ± 0.45) Mg ha-1 año-1]. La cantidad de nutrientes que regresa al piso forestal es 40% mayor en los sitios bajo aprovechamiento que en los sitios sin aprovechamiento. Los resultados sugieren que el aprovechamiento de tierra de hoja estimula la producción de hojarasca. Sin embargo, aun cuando pueda haber un proceso de estimulación en la producción, se debe tener cuidado con el tiempo que se deja descansar un área bajo aprovechamiento, ya que, de acuerdo con los resultados de este estudio, se requieren 14 años de descanso para aprovechar en forma sustentable un mismo sitio; es decir, un tiempo al menos dos veces y media mayor al que se da actualmente. Un esquema sustentable implica que el tiempo entre dos fechas de aprovechamiento es igual al tiempo requerido para formar la capa orgánica retirada.

Long term effects of intensive biomass harvesting and compaction on the forest soil ecosystem

Forest soil ecosystems can be negatively affected by intensive biomass harvesting due to losses of organic inputs and soil compaction, ultimately leading to reduced forest productivity. In this research, we revisited a site from the North American Long-Term Soil Productivity study located on a sandy Spodosol within the Huron National Forest in Michigan, USA, to measure the effects of aboveground organic matter removal of different intensities (three levels: bole only; whole tree harvest; or whole tree harvest and forest floor removal) and soil compaction (2 levels: no or moderate compaction) nearly 20 years following the initial treatments. The effects of harvesting on the soil microbial community in surface and subsurface soils and on soil nutrient availability in surface soils were evaluated. Additionally, patterns of carbon and nitrogen distribution among soil organic matter pools in surface and subsurface soils were compared using a physical fractionation approach to isolate a free – light fraction of particulate organic matter external to aggregates, an occluded – light fraction, which represents particulate organic matter released from the disruption of soil aggregates, and a heavy or mineral-associated fraction. Whole-tree harvests had significantly different microbial community compositions than bole-only harvests (P = 0.02), a result driven by significantly lower abundance of arbuscular mycorrhizae and greater gram positive bacterial abundance in the whole-tree harvest relative to bole-only harvest conditions. Few differences in soil nutrient availability were apparent 20 years after organic matter manipulations, with the exception of reduced calcium availability where organic matter was removed. Soil compaction resulted in greater microbial biomass (0.19 versus 0.14 μmol g−1 soil), which may have also led to a reduced C:N ratio in the heaviest and oldest soil component and increased P availability as well. Nitrogen concentrations and stocks were greatest at the surface (0–10 cm depth) for the free and light soil fractions in bole-only removal treatments, in contrast to whole-tree harvest treatments where C and N concentrations and C stocks were greater in the subsurface soil (free - light fraction at 20–30 cm depth). The soil microbial community, soil fraction size, and soil C and N stocks differed between surface and subsurface soils, highlighting the soil forming processes at work in this Spodosol, and the importance of sampling multiple depths to address research questions. These results demonstrate the long-term effects of forest management on soil biological, physical, and chemical properties and are useful in evaluating sustainable biomass harvesting practices for comparable forests.

The importance of harvest residue and fertiliser on productivity of Pinus patula across various sites in their first, second and third rotations, at Usutu Swaziland

BackgroundConcern is growing about the future of forestry productivity due to intensive nutrient removal, as a result of different harvesting operations. This study aimed to determine the effects on forest productivity when using different slash-retention scenarios with the recommended amounts of mineral fertiliser in Usutu forest. Usutu is a plantation forest that grows mostly softwood where the predominant species is Pinus patula Schiede ex Schltdl. & Cham.MethodsThe first trial series (F) comprised of one trial located in each of five forest blocks. It was established in 1971 and compared the effects of various site preparation scenarios (slash removal, slash retention and cultivation) on the early growth of Pinus patula for adjacent first (F1R) and second rotation (F2R) sites (i.e. grassveld and clearfelled first-rotation sites). The second (S) trial series was re-established in April 1991 on exactly the same position as the first trial series, and involved second (S2R) and third rotation (S3R) sites. Three main treatments, standard pitting through harvest residue (control); manual pitting after removal of harvest residue and forest floor (cleared); and manual pitting and broadcast application of dolomitic lime (2 t ha− 1) over the slash (lime), were undertaken in factorial combination with the application of phosphate and potassium fertiliser. The data reported here are for tree volume productivity across the five sites of the first trial series up to age 10 years and three of the five sites of the second trial series up to age 9 years.ResultsSlash removal decreased volume productivity by 9 and 13% in the F1R and F2R at 10 years of age and further by 21 and 33% in S2R and S3R, respectively at 9 years of age. However, fertiliser application increased volume productivity by 14 and 15% in the F1R and F2R at 10 years age and further by 18 and 10% in the S2R and S3R, respectively at 9 years of age.ConclusionsIn order to sustain or increase productivity, it is recommended that harvest residue slash should be conserved and fertiliser containing phosphate and potassium be applied at planting at Usutu.

Effect of vegetation control, harvest intensity, and soil disturbance on 20-year jack pine stand development

Currently, there are uncertainties regarding the impacts and (or) efficacy of biomass harvesting and silvicultural practices on stand production on coarse-textured boreal soils. Replicated factorial field experiments examining effects of complete vegetation control (repeated glyphosate application) following operational stem-only harvest with disc trenching (SOT), operational whole-tree harvest with (WTT) and without (WT) disc trenching, and whole-tree harvest with complete forest floor removal by blading (WTB) and blading followed by compaction (WTBC) were installed on four sandy northern Ontario jack pine (Pinus banksiana Lamb.) sites. Over 20 years, WTB improved planted-tree survival but decreased longer term stand productivity in comparison with other harvest intensity – soil disturbance treatments. Vegetation control improved tree growth and stand productivity initially, but over time, benefits declined substantially. SOT and WTT had similar impacts on stand production. Disc trenching improved initial planted-tree growth (WTT vs. WT), particularly without vegetation control. Jack pine natural regeneration was greatest with SOT, accounting for 25% of stand biomass at year 20. Stand structure effects included increased size inequality of naturals with WTB and reduced size inequality and asymmetry of naturals with vegetation control. Overall, impacts of forest floor removal and natural regeneration on stand development have become increasingly important over time compared with those of vegetation control.

Long-term effects of biomass removal on soil mesofaunal communities in northeastern Ontario (Canada) jack pine (Pinus banksiana) stands

In North American boreal forests, woody biomass is increasingly becoming an attractive bioenergy feedstock as it represents a more renewable, and low carbon alternative to fossil fuel. However, concerns over the ecological sustainability of an intensification of biomass harvesting over the long term remain. We assessed the effects of a gradient of biomass removal established 20 years ago in five jack pine (Pinus banksiana) stands across northeastern Ontario on the taxonomic and functional structure of ground-dwelling Collembola and Oribatida communities. Essential to soil functioning, these two major taxa of mesofauna are dependent on microhabitats and food supply such as fungi provided by woody debris. Three treatments were considered including stem-only harvesting, whole-tree harvesting (stem, tops and branches removed), and blading (whole-tree harvesting plus removal of stump and forest floor). Adjacent uncut mature (±90 year-old) stands were considered as reference state conditions (i.e. the endpoint of stand development following stand replacing disturbance). Soil mesofauna were collected and environmental variables measured across all treatments. We identified species of both taxa and measured a suite of functional response traits such as body length and reproduction strategy. Compared to mature uncut forests, soil mesofaunal communities remained modified 20 years after biomass harvesting, notably in the most intense practice (blading). Treatment effects were more evident in Oribatida communities both taxonomically (lower density, biomass, species diversity and shifted composition) and functionally (lower diversity and modified trait composition resulting from fewer surface-dwelling, fast-dispersing and micro-detritivorous species) than in Collembola communities. This taxa-specific response may reflect generally shorter lifespans, higher reproduction rates and faster dispersal of Collembola than Oribatida. Incomplete recovery of mesofauna was consistent with persistent modifications of soil environmental conditions in harvested plots, notably after blading. Modifications included a reduced organic cover (ground vegetation, mosses and woody debris) as well as lower organic soil thickness and moisture, which likely resulted in fewer suitable microhabitats for many species. Using complementary taxonomic and trait-based approaches to highlight the underlying mechanisms of mesofaunal responses, our study revealed that recovery is incomplete within 20 years after intensive biomass removal in these boreal conifer-dominated stands, and is likely linked to stand development and associated processes. As a result, longer-term monitoring will be required to track mesofaunal community recovery through these later developmental stages.