Foreign Medical Graduates Research Articles

Letter to the Editor Regarding “The Path to U.S. Neurosurgical Residency for Foreign Medical Graduates: Trends from a Decade 2007–2017”

Letter to the Editor Regarding “The Path to U.S. Neurosurgical Residency for Foreign Medical Graduates: Trends from a Decade 2007–2017”

Japanese International Medical Graduates and entrance into US clinical training: Challenges and methods to overcome them.

IntroductionEntering US clinical training requires completing requirements and navigating an application process differing from the Japanese system. Additionally, increases to the number of US medical school graduates have increased competition for US residency positions. We examined profiles of Japanese International Medical Graduates (IMGs) who completed US clinical training, the timelines to securing US clinical positions, and the greatest challenges during this process and methods to overcome them.MethodsIndividual semistructured interviews were conducted with 35 purposively sampled Japanese IMGs. We performed exploratory thematic analysis using iterative data collection and constant comparison.ResultsTwenty percent of participants lived in a native English‐speaking country during childhood. The United States Medical Licensing Examinations were completed at ages 25‐40 years. Challenges were categorized as: (1) English communication, (2) understanding the application process, (3) motivation to persevere through the process, (4) time management to complete Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates requirements, (5) receiving letters of recommendation and overcoming competition for US residency positions, (6) financial cost of the process. Pragmatic generally self‐dependent methods helped overcome challenges 1‐4 and 6. Participants detailed personal or, more commonly, institutional connections to US training programs required to overcome challenge 5.ConclusionsJapanese IMGs pursue US clinical training from diverse backgrounds commonly without the advantage of prior English fluency. Amidst increased competition internationally to enter US residency coupled with cultural and linguistic differences making this challenge often greater for Japanese IMGs, the competition to participate in institutionalized connections to US training programs is anticipated to increase.

The Path to U.S. Neurosurgical Residency for Foreign Medical Graduates: Trends from a Decade 2007–2017

The increasing competitiveness of the neurosurgical residency match has made it progressively difficult for foreign medical graduates (FMGs) to match in neurosurgery. We compared FMG to U.S. medical graduate (USMG) match rates in neurosurgery and identified factors associated with match outcomes for FMGs in neurosurgery. Retrospective review of American Association of Neurological Surgeons membership data and Association of American Medical Colleges Charting the Outcomes match reports (2007-2017). Across 1857 neurosurgical residents (USMG: 91.1%, FMG: 8.9%), average FMG match rates were 24% (range, 15%-35%) versus 83% (range, 75%-94%; P < 0.001) for USMG. FMGs were more male (89.5% vs. 82.0%, P= 0.016), older (33.9 vs. 31.8 years, P= 0.008), and more likely to take research year(s) before matching (95.8% vs. 78.5%, P < 0.001). FMGs had greater publications (5 vs. 2, P < 0.001) and H-indices (3 vs. 1, P < 0.001). The number of matched USMGs increased by 3.3 annually, whereas that of matched FMGs remained unchanged (β= 0.07). Compared with USMGs, FMGs were less likely to match to National Institutes of Health (NIH) Top 40 (32.7% vs. 47.5%, P < 0.001) and Doximity Top 20 (20.0% vs. 29.0%, P= 0.014) programs. FMGs with prior U.S. neurosurgery program affiliation were more likely to match at NIH and Doximity Top 20 programs (P < 0.05). For NIH programs, FMGs were older (35.3 vs. 32.0, P= 0.011), had higher H-indices (5 vs. 2, P < 0.001), publications (7 vs. 2, P < 0.001), and were more likely to take research year(s) (94.4% vs. 76.0%, P= 0.002) than USMGs. FMGs had similar patterns for matching into Doximity Top 20 programs. Although FMGs have lower match rates into U.S. neurosurgery residencies than USMGs, several demographic, professional, and academic factors could increase the chances of successful FMG neurosurgical match.

Canadians studying medicine abroad and their journey to secure postgraduate training in Canada or the United States.

BackgroundFrom national and international workforce perspectives, Canadians studying medicine abroad (CSAs) are a growing provider group. Some were born in Canada whereas others immigrated as children. They study medicine in various countries, often attempting both American and Canadian medical licensure pathways.MethodsUsing data from the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) and the Medical Council of Canada (MCC), we looked at CSAs who attempted to secure residency positions in both Canada and the United States. We detailed the CSAs’ countries of birth and medical education. We tracked these individuals through their postgraduate education programs to enumerate their success rate and categorize the geographic locations of their training.ResultsThe majority of CSAs study medicine in one of 10 countries. The remainder are disbursed across 88 other countries. Most CSAs were born in Canada (62%). Approximately 1/3 of CSA from the 2004-2016 cohort had no record of entering a residency program in Canada or the United States (U.S.). Recently graduated CSAs were most likely to secure residency training in Ontario and New York.ConclusionMany CSAs attempt to secure residency training in both Canada and the U.S. Quantifying success rates may be helpful for Canadians thinking about studying medicine abroad. Understanding the educational pathways of CSAs will be useful for physician labour workforce planning.

The International Medical Graduate

International medical graduates (IMGs) are graduates of medical schools located outside the United States (U.S.) and Canada. IMGs face various challenges on the road to U.S. residency training. These challenges include sitting for the United States Medical Licensing Examinations (USMLEs) to obtain certification from the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG). After that, IMGs are faced with a foreign application process whereby they must apply for and secure a position in a residency program through the Electronic Residency Application System (ERAS) and the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP). Once accepted into a residency program, IMGs who are not US citizens or legal permanent residents are challenged with securing a visa to be able to practice in the U.S. In this article, we elaborate on these processes and highlight the challenges IMGs may face along the way.

The International Medical Graduate and Emergency Medicine.

International medical graduates (IMGs) are medical graduates who have received their degree from international medical schools. IMGs must undertake a 3-step process to apply to the National Residency Matching Program match. First, they must obtain a valid standard certificate from the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. Following certification, they must apply for and secure a position in a residency training program. Third, they must obtain a visa that would enable them to commence their training. In this article, we delve thoroughly into these stepladders to provide IMGs with a clear roadmap of the process as well as contacts to key agencies that may provide more comprehensive assistance.

Implication of the 2023 education commission for foreign medical graduates policy changes for medical education in developing countries

Implication of the 2023 education commission for foreign medical graduates policy changes for medical education in developing countries

Advancing the Quality of Medical Education Worldwide: ECFMG's 2023 Medical School Accreditation Requirement

ABSTRACT Certification by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG®) is required for international medical graduates (IMGs) to enter U.S. graduate medical education (GME). As a gatekeeper to the U.S. health care system, ECFMG has a duty to verify that these individuals have met minimum standards for undergraduate medical education. Historically, ECFMG has focused on evaluating individual graduates, not medical schools. However, in response to the rapid growth of medical schools around the world and increasing physician migration, ECFMG decided in 2010 to institute medical school accreditation as a future requirement for ECFMG certification. More specifically, beginning in 2023, individuals applying for ECFMG certification will be required to be a student or graduate of a medical school that is accredited by an agency recognized by the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME). By requiring accreditation by an agency that has met WFME's standards, ECFMG seeks to improve the quality, consistency and transparency of undergraduate medical education worldwide. The 2023 Medical School Accreditation Requirement is intended to stimulate global accreditation efforts, increase the information publicly available about medical schools, and provide greater assurance to medical students, regulatory authorities, and the public that these future physicians will be appropriately educated.

Specialty Choice and Labor Market Outcomes of Foreign Medical Graduates

I analyze the labor market outcome of foreign medical graduates (FMGs) in the US. I look at the institutional bottlenecks these physicians face to enter the US and its impact on their labor market outcome. I use the Community Tracking Survey’s Physician survey data to compare earnings of the two groups of physicians using regression analysis. My analysis shows the importance of specialty sorting in determining the income profile of a physician, and in particular the reason for the higher likelihood of FMGs to be in primary care specialty and the resulting lower earnings for a FMG.

1376. Physician Practice Patterns for Screening and Treatment of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in the South Asian Population in Central New Jersey

BackgroundNew Jersey (NJ) has a significant burden of tuberculosis (TB) cases (ranked 8th in the United States) and 22% of the cases are among foreign-born (FB) individuals. We have approximately 33% FB residents in our targeted counties in Central NJ of whom 43% are originally from high TB burden areas of South Asia. Central NJ is home to the county with the second highest TB case rate in NJ. Latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) treatment remains a key component of the World Health Organization TB elimination strategy. We sought to survey community physicians about their LTBI screening and treatment practices in South Asian (SA) patients.MethodsAn IRB-approved anonymous survey was distributed online to practicing staff physicians at local hospitals over a 2-month period. The primary outcome measure was whether physicians appropriately screen for LTBI. A secondary outcome measure was whether follow-up after medication initiation was provided. Predictors measured included: age, gender, self -identification of physician as SA, years in practice, and if they were a foreign medical graduate (FMG). Descriptive statistics were provided using counts and proportions. Chi-square tests were used for bivariate analyses to look for factors associated with LTBI screening and treatment.ResultsA total of 218 physicians responded to the survey; of whom, 137 identified themselves as primary care physicians (i.e., pediatrics (62%), internal medicine (30%), or family medicine (8%)). About half of them were FMG and 40% identify themselves as SA. Three out of four of these physicians (n = 101) indicated they routinely screen their patients for LTBI. Bivariate analyses using chi-square did not find any statistically significant associations with LTBI screening. A quarter of the physicians screened with an IGRA and 60% reported always offering treatment for LTBI. Isoniazid was the most common medication prescribed. A majority of respondents did not report prescribing Rifampin or Rifapentine. Follow-up after initiation of treatment was provided at least every other month by 52.7% of physicians.ConclusionThere is wide variability in LTBI screening, treatment, and follow-up among our physician sample. Physicians have not yet adopted newer treatment regimens suggesting the need for an educational intervention.Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

Pathologists’ Participation and Performance in the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System

Abstract Objectives Public reporting of quality metrics has become increasingly important for pathologists to demonstrate excellence of care and to secure value-based payments from both public and private payers. This study evaluated the participation and performance of pathologists in the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Methods This study conducted a retrospective review of the Physician Compare data files from 2016. Specifically, pathologists enrolled in the Physician Compare Initiative were identified and merged with quality data using uniquely assigned National Provider Identifiers. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression were performed using Stata (version 12.1) statistical software (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results Among the 11,637 pathologists identified in the Physician Compare Initiative, 8,408 pathologists (73.3%) participated in the PQRS. Regression analysis indicated that female gender, foreign medical graduate (FMG), and a larger number of employees in the affiliated organization were associated with a lower likelihood of participating in the PQRS. To protect patient privacy, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) only released the quality metrics of 353 pathologists, which were computed based on 20 or more Medicare beneficiaries. The three most commonly reported quality metrics included PQRS#249 Barrett’s Esophagus, PQRS#395 Lung Cancer Reporting (Biopsy/Cytology Specimens), and PQRS#397 Melanoma Reporting. The mean performance rates for the three most common metrics were 98.8% (SD 8.3%), 96.8% (SD 11.9%), and 97.4% (SD 6.9%), respectively. Conclusion A majority of pathologists participated in the Medicare PQRS program in 2016. The performance rates of public available quality metrics remained at high levels with significant variations in some metrics. Future research should examine the quality performance of pathologists as they transition from the PQRS to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) under the Quality Payment Program.

Examining the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates Announcement Requiring Medical School Accreditation Beginning in 2023.

In 2010, the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) announced that, beginning in 2023, graduation from a formally accredited medical school would be necessary for an international medical graduate (IMG) to be eligible for ECFMG certification. The announcement is notable because ECFMG certification is required for graduate medical training and practice in the United States. Graduating from a school accredited by an agency formally recognized by the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME), which has been formally evaluating and recognizing accrediting agencies since 2012, would fulfill the new ECFMG requirement. In 2015, ECFMG applicants came from 1,141 medical schools located in 139 countries or territories. As of December 2018, the WFME had formally recognized 14 accrediting agencies, which would cover only approximately a third of these recent ECFMG-certified IMGs. In this Perspective, the author compares the context of the ECFMG announcement to the beginning of accreditation in the United States so as to provide insight into the challenges the WFME faces as it seeks to evaluate and recognize what could ultimately be over 100 more accrediting authorities. The author then explores the possible effects of the requirement-specifically, its potential to restrict the ECFMG applicant pool-on the quantity and quality of the U.S. physician workforce. The author ends the Perspective by considering the implications of three broad policy options that the ECFMG could consider starting in 2023: implementation as announced, maintenance of the status quo, or a policy modified from the original announcement.

A Further Examination of Previous and Future Policy Opportunities of the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates.

The Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) has a distinguished history of providing high-quality, innovative products and services to international medical graduates (IMGs) seeking to study and practice medicine in the United States. In 2010, the ECFMG board introduced a policy stating that, starting in 2023, all IMGs applying to the ECFMG for credentialing must have graduated from a medical school that has been accredited by an internationally recognized accrediting body akin to the Liaison Committee on Medical Education in the United States or the World Federation for Medical Education. In this issue of Academic Medicine, Tackett reviews the reasons for the policy and its adoption worldwide. After eight years, the number of schools meeting the new standard is modest. He is concerned about the negative effect a continuing low rate of adoption will have on U.S. postgraduate medical education programs and workforce supply. The author of this Invited Commentary offers three perspectives: an overview of the ECFMG's successes, alternative measurement tools to ensure the quality of IMGs entering the United States, and frameworks by which an organization like the ECFMG can refine its policy positions and processes for the future. Academia can expect the ECFMG, given its history of successful collaboration and public accountability, to continue using best practices and to adjust policies according to evidence. As a publicly accountable authority, the ECFMG should debrief key stakeholders on current policies, track IMG practice patterns, and share the resulting data with stakeholders to inform their IMG-related planning decisions.

Predictors for Failing the American Board of Radiology Core Examination.

OBJECTIVE. Since the American Board of Radiology (ABR) instituted its new board certification pathway, our residency program has had more residents fail the core examination than was typical with the prior pathway. We performed a single-center retrospective study to evaluate predictors of ABR core examination failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Data regarding U.S. Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) steps 1 and 2, ACR diagnostic radiology in-training examinations, the number of image interpretations, academic degree (doctor of medicine or doctor of osteopathy), status as an American or foreign medical graduate, and Alpha Omega Alpha national medical honor society status were gathered and evaluated through logistic regression and generalized additive logistic regression. Data were gathered for all residents who took the ABR core examination from 2013 to 2017. RESULTS. Six of 30 residents (20%) failed the ABR core examination on the first attempt. The ACR in-training examination scores for 1st- and 3rd-year residents were significantly related to ABR core examination failure (p = 0.027 and p = 0.035, respectively), with significant nonlinearity (p = 0.037 and p = 0.033, respectively). The suggested baseline percentile score was the 30th percentile for 1st-year residents and the 20th percentile for 3rd-year residents. USMLE step 1 and 2 scores were significantly related to ABR core examination failure (p = 0.041 and p = 0.043, respectively), without significant nonlinearity (p = 0.35 and p = 0.09, respectively). However, residents with scores of less than 220 on USMLE steps 1 and 2 seemed to be at risk. CONCLUSION. Low scores on USMLE steps 1 and 2 and 1st- and 3rd-year ACR in-training examinations were associated with ABR core examination failure. If validated more broadly, these cutoffs may serve as predictors of ABR core examination failure and may facilitate identification and remediation of at-risk residents.

The Implications of the Current Visa System for Foreign Medical Graduates During and After Graduate Medical Education Training.

The current and projected deficit in the physician workforce in the US is a challenge for primary care and specialty medical settings. Foreign medical graduates (FMGs) represent an important component of the US graduate medical education (GME) training pathway and can help to address the US physician workforce deficit. Availability of FMGs is particularly important to the internal medicine community, as recent data demonstrate that internal medicine is the specialty with the highest number of FMGs. System-based and logistical inefficiencies in the current US visa system represent significant obstacles to FMG trainees and have important psychological, emotional, and logistical consequences to FMG engagement and participation in US GME training and in the post-training workforce. In this article, we review the contemporary structure, process, and challenges of obtaining a visa for GME training. The H1B and J1 visa programs are compared and contrasted, with an emphasis on logistical specifics for FMG GME trainees and training programs. The process of and options for J1 visa waivers are reviewed. These considerations are specifically reviewed in the context of recent policy decisions by the Trump administration, with emphasis on the effects of these decisions on FMGs in medical training and practice.

The contribution of Chinese-educated physicians to health care in the United States.

BackgroundMigration of physicians has been a cause for global concern. In China, reforms of the higher education and healthcare systems have led to a shortage of postgraduate training positions relative to the number of medical graduates. Medical graduates opt for non-clinical roles or move abroad to pursue further training and practice opportunities. The impact of this physician migration is not known. This study quantifies where Chinese migrant physicians to the U.S. were educated, where they went to practice, and how these trends have changed over time.MethodsWe combined data on physician characteristics from the 2008 and 2017 American Medical Association Physician Masterfiles with demographic information from the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates. Using a repeated cross-sectional approach, we reviewed the available data, including citizenship at entry to medical school, medical school attended, practice specialty, and practice location.ResultsThe number of Chinese-educated physicians (CEPs) to the United States (US) has increased over the past 10 years, from 3,878 in 2008 to 5,355 in 2017 (+38.1%). The majority held Chinese citizenship at entry to medical school (98.4% vs 97.1%) with the remainder being citizens of other East Asian nations. Of the Chinese citizens identified in 2008, 913 (19.3%) attended medical school outside of China; in 2017, 376 (6.7%) attended medical school outside of China, representing a decrease of 58.8%. Overall, in 2017, four Chinese medical schools provided 32.1% of all Chinese-educated physicians in the US. Over 50% of the CEPs were practicing in Internal Medicine, Anatomic/ Clinical Pathology, Anesthesiology, Family Medicine or Neurology. Compared with all IMGs, CEPs are more likely to be Anatomic/ Clinical Pathologists and Anesthesiologists. CEPs were concentrated in several states, including New York, California and Massachusetts. In 2017, a lower proportion of CEPs in the US healthcare workforce were in residency training, compared to 2008 (13.2% vs 22.8%).ConclusionsUnlike trends from some other South Asian countries, the number of CEPs in the US has increased over the past 10 years. Migration trends may vary depending on citizenship and country of medical school training. The majority of Chinese-educated graduates come to the US from relatively few medical schools. Fewer CEPs currently in residency training might indicate lower success rates in securing GME training in the US.

Supply, distribution and characteristics of international medical graduates in family medicine in the United States: a cross-sectional study

BackgroundTo describe the supply, distribution, and characteristics of international medical graduates (IMGs) in family medicine who provide patient care in the U.S.MethodsA cross-sectional study design, using descriptive statistics on combined data from the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates and the American Medical Association, including medical school attended, country of medical school, and citizenship when entering medical school.ResultsIn total, 118,817 physicians in family medicine were identified, with IMGs representing 23.8% (n = 28,227) of the U.S. patient care workforce. Of all 9579 residents in family medicine, 36.0% (n = 3452) are IMGS. In total, 35.9% of IMGs attended medical school in the Caribbean (n = 10,136); 19.9% in South-Central Asia (n = 5607) and 9.1% in South-Eastern Asia (n = 2565). The most common countries of medical school training were Dominica, Mexico, and Sint Maarten. Of all IMGs in family medicine who attended medical school in the Caribbean, 74.5% were U.S. citizens. In total, 40.5% of all IMGs in family medicine held U.S. citizenship at entry to medical school. IMGs comprise almost 40% of the family medicine workforce in Florida, New Jersey and New York.ConclusionsIMGs play an important role in the U.S. family medicine workforce. Many IMGs are U.S. citizens who studied abroad and then returned to the U.S. for graduate training. Given the shortage of family physicians, and the large number of IMGs in graduate training programs, IMGs will continue to play a role in the U.S. physician workforce for some time to come. Many factors, including the supply of residency training positions, could eventually restrict the number of IMGs entering the U.S., including those contributing to family practice.

African Forum for Research in health (AFREhealth) student exchange pilot: an impact assessment

Abstract Background For many medical and allied health students from African countries, the opportunity to undertake a global health elective abroad is unaffordable or inaccessible. Therefore, an imbalance has emerged where many African institutions host students from developed countries but their own students rarely go on electives in developed countries. Global Educational Exchange in the Medical and Health professions (GEMx), a service programme of the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG) partnered with the African Forum for Research in Health (AFREhealth) to implement a south-to-south student exchange pilot through intra-institutional partnerships. The aim was to provide affordable global-health learning opportunities to African students. Methods 13 medical and nursing institutions in eight African countries participated in the AFREhealth pilot. Institutions entered into a multilateral agreement. The GEMx web-based system was used to centralise elective placements where students gained access to opportunities and applied online. Host institutions waived their administrative fees and provided a manager to support incoming students. ECFMG hired a contractor to do partnership development and work with students and leaders at participating institutions. ECFMG GEMx provided student mini-grants to cover travel, accommodation, and living expenses. We used SurveyMonkey to collect feedback from students, institutions, and AFREhealth leadership and to run descriptive analysis. Findings Between April, 2017, and June, 2018, GEMx facilitated 48 student exchanges in medicine, nursing, and pharmacy in Ghana, Kenya, Malawi, South Africa, Tanzania, Uganda, Zambia, and Zimbabwe. 20 students (42%) reported that they had not previously gone on an elective exchange in another country and that this opportunity would not have been possible without GEMx. The most common learning experiences reported by institutions were that students: learned about and compared different health systems; improved clinical skills and gained knowledge that is applicable back home; increased confidence; developed professional networks; and managed and cared for patients who differed from those in their previous educational experience. These findings correlated with feedback collected from students. Interpretation Translation and implementation for impact in global health requires models that provide opportunities for global exposure to various health-care settings. With little global exposure for African medical and allied health professional training students, the south-to-south model provides a suitable and cost-effective platform to address the gap. Outcomes from the pilot showed a strong commitment from intra-institutional partners within AFREhealth to the south-to-south model. Although ECFMG GEMx funding made student exchanges possible for the AFREhealth student exchange pilot, additional funding contributions are needed to expand the south-to-south student exchange programme. Funding ECFMG Challenge Grant.

The Pivotal Role of the International Medical Graduate.

* Abbreviations: AAP — : American Academy of Pediatrics ECFMG — : Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates IMG — : international medical graduate The American Medical Association Physician Masterfile reveals 26 000 physicians who attended medical school outside the United States and Canada and who are not currently in residency, declaring pediatrics as their specialty. According to the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates (ECFMG), in 2015, 3 countries (India, Canada, and Pakistan) contributed the highest numbers of non–US-born international medical graduates (IMGs) receiving ECFMG certification. However, there were also a sizable number of certificate holders from Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa (Nigeria).1 Non–US-born pediatricians inherently offer a broad cultural, linguistic, and ethnic diversity; as such, they may contribute to the goal in our pediatric specialty to improve workforce diversity and culturally effective health care.2,3 IMGs (including US-born IMGs) comprise >26% of the entire physician workforce in the United States. Forty-one percent of practicing IMGs are in primary care disciplines as defined by the Association of American Medical Colleges.4 They play a vital role in the care of vulnerable populations in both rural and urban underserved areas.2,5 Non–US-born IMGs also constitute a disproportionate number of subspecialists … Address correspondence to Rana Chakraborty, MD, MSc, FRCPCH, FAAP, FPIDS, PhD, Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905. E-mail: chakraborty.rana{at}mayo.edu

Sexual healthcare knowledge, attitudes, and practices among primary care physicians in Trinidad and Tobago.

Background:Our understanding of healthcare professionals’ competence level in both their sexual history taking practices and their attitudes in addressing sexual health concerns of patients in middle and old age is lacking. This research aimed to assess primary care physicians’ (PCPs) knowledge, attitudes, and sexual healthcare practices toward patients who are ≥45 years in Trinidad and Tobago.Materials and Methods:A self-reported survey instrument assessing clinical sexual health knowledge, attitudes, and practices was administered nationwide to all registered PCPs (n = 155) in the public healthcare service. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were conducted using STATA.Results:PCPs, who were foreign medical graduates, middle-aged, male, and worked in urban centers, had improved odds of discussing sexual health with middle-aged and older patients. PCPs with any training in sexual health communication or sexual history taking were three times more likely to initiate a sexual health discussion or take a sexual history. Over 90% of physicians reported taking a sexual history only if the discussion was patient initiated and over 50% of PCPs indicated they will not ask these older patients about their sexual orientation, sexual partners, sexual abuse, or violence.Conclusions:Even though PCPs reported having a positive willing attitude toward offering sexual health care to these patients, they had a low level of knowledge of sexual function in later life and inconsistent sexual history taking practices. There is a great need for training physicians’ on sexual health communication and history taking and on sexual function in older adults.