Moving needed funds into and out of subsidiaries in countries where exchange regulations and balance of payments weakness are prevalent has always been much more of an art than a science. This paper is not intended to diminish the artistic component of this critical task, which consists in locating and defining the various and sometimes devious methods of inserting and extracting the right amount at the right time. Rather, it is sought to strengthen the skill of the artiste in determining which of several possible channels for funds flow should be used. To provide a framework of practicality for the discussion to follow, suppose the corporate treasurer of XYZ Corporation needs to provide his subsidiary in the country of Parcheesi 10,000,000 Parcheesian rupees (Ru) for a one year period. The local treasurer of the Parcheesian subsidiary proposes that this be funded by a parent company loan of Ru 8,000,000 at 15% per annum and a parent guaranteed loan of $1,000,000 (Ru 1 = US $0.50) from the local branch of a U.S. bank. This funding proposal is referred to as Package 1. Upon checking with another banking connection, the treasurer finds that the possibility exists for the parent to engage in a link financing arrangement. The parent company places $5,000,000 on deposit at 4% per annum with the head office of the bank, whose branch in Parcheesi simultaneously loans the subsidiary Ru 10,000,000 at 21% per annum. This proposal is designated Package 2. All loans and deposits under both financing packages are for a one year term, with interest payable at the end of the period. Both packages result in the provision of exactly Ru 10,000,000 to the subsidiary. Package 1, however, requires that the parent itself provide only $4,000,000, in contrast to the link financing alternative, which requires $5,000,000. The parent company will find whatever funding is required in the Eurodollar market at 9% per annum. Interest income and foreign exchange gains are taxable, and interest income and foreign exchange losses are tax deductible for both the parent and the subsidiary; the marginal tax rate in the United States is assumed to be 50% and in Parcheesi, 10%. For purposes of exposition, the marginal tax rate on foreign source income to XYZ is the same as that on domestic source income, although the approach developed here is extended at a later point in the paper to handle differential tax rates. No market for the forward rupee exists, and thus neither XYZ nor its subsidiary may cover their loan positions by forward operations. The basic decision problem thus becomes the selection of one of the two competing financing alternatives, and the primary factor complicating the problem is uncertainty