The emphasis of the twelve essays in this well-deserved Festschrift in honour of Rhoads Murphey is on the history of Ottoman Greece and Cyprus between the fourteenth and nineteenth centuries. This is not only appropriate—Rhoads was a member of the Centre for Byzantine, Modern Greek and Ottoman Studies in the University of Birmingham from 1992 until his retirement—but also very welcome. As the editor points out in the cogent introduction to his own contribution (‘Between the Porte and the Lion: identity politics and opportunism in seventeenth century Cyprus’), it is only recently that historians have begun not simply to question but to abandon the nationalist paradigm which had effectively prevented any intelligent study of the tourkokratia. This volume continues on this pioneering path. The first essay in the volume, by Hasan Çolak, does not discuss the ‘Greek lands’ in particular, but is rather a study of the persistence and transformation of Byzantine titulature in the Ottoman Empire (‘Tekfur, fasilyus and kayser: disdain, negligence and appropriation of Byzantine imperial titulature in the Ottoman world’), whether applied to the Byzantine emperors before 1453 or adopted by the Ottoman sultans themselves after the fall of Constantinople. Still in the early Ottoman period, Konstantinos Moustakas presents a study of Ottoman slave labour (‘Slave labour in the early Ottoman rural economy: regional variations in the Balkans during the 15th century’), largely in the areas of Thessaly and south-eastern Macedonia which saw large-scale Muslim settlement in the immediate post-conquest period. The major sources for this study are the surviving tahrir defters of the region, which unexpectedly reveal the existence—although with an infuriating lack of detail—of slave-holding peasants in the area. The defters also form one of the sources for Ourania Bessi’s investigation of the development of Ottoman Dimetoka, from the time of Murad I (1362–1389) to the sixteenth century (‘The topographic reconstruction of Ottoman Dimetoka: issues of periodization and morphological development’). Dr Bessi takes as her starting point Gilles Veinstein’s description of what he saw as the characteristics of a ‘typical Ottoman town’, showing how Veinstein’s observations apply to Dimetoka, and demonstrates how the Ottomans transformed the Byzantine town with the settlement of the wealthier inhabitants in the area outside the walls (varoş), rather than in the citadel as had been the case in Byzantine times. The study is amply illustrated with maps, historic photographs and tables, extracted from the defters, showing the tax-paying population of each quarter between 1485 and 1570. From the sixteenth century, the articles in the volume covering the tourkokratia skip to the time of the Greek war of independence. Katerina Stathi’s ‘The Carta Incognita of Ottoman Athens’ is an account of the author’s chance discovery of an Ottoman map of Athens in the Hatt-i hümayun collection in the Başbakanlık Archives in Istanbul, and a description and an analysis of the map itself, leading her to the conclusion that it was produced for the use of the Ottoman military during the siege of the Acropolis in 1826-7. Sophia Laiou’s article (‘Entre les insurgés reaya et les indisciplinés ayan: la revolution grecque et la réaction de l’État’) is, as the title suggests, as much about the Ottoman authorities’ reaction to the rebellion of the Samiots and their plundering of the coasts of Anatolia, during the Greek war of independence, as it is about the rebels themselves, showing how it was, in most cases, the protection of their own lands and revenues that guided their actions in the face of insurgency. The last paper with a Greek theme is Michael Ursinus’ ‘Regional reform as an ambition: Charles Blunt Sen., His Majesty’s consul in Salonica, during his early years in the Ottoman Empire (1835–39)’. Describing the consul’s service in Salonica in the years immediately before the announcement of the Tanzimat reforms, the article demonstrates the close involvement of a foreign consul in the affairs of an Ottoman region, and what might be described as the mutually dependent relationship between the consul and the local authorities in effecting administrative improvements. As an example of how the British attempted to establish an ‘informal Empire’, the article is as much of interest to English, as it is to Ottoman, historians.
Read full abstract