Objective To evaluate the efficacy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis versus resection arthroplasty for rheumatoid forefoot deformity.Methods Randomized controlled studies in the first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis versus resection arthroplasty for rheumatoid forefoot deformity were collected in data bases like Cochrane library (Issue 3,2011),OVID (from January 1996 to June 2012),PubMed (from January 1990 to June 2012),CNKI (from January 1990 to June 2012),CBM,EMBASE (from January 1966 to June 2012) and Wanfang (from January 1990 to June 2012).Software RevMan 5.1 was used to analyze the trials included in terms of patient satisfaction,hallux area weight-bearing,AOFAS score,FFI score,HAV angle,IMA angle,operative time and complications.Results The totals of 5 RCTs were included in the study which involved 285 patients.The results of meta-analysis showed that the efficacy of the arthrodesis group was superior to that of the arthroplasty group in footwear (MD=-0.88,95%CI [-1.55,-0.22],P=0.010)and alignment (MD=-5.04,95%CI [-8.94,-1.14],P=0.01) significantly.The arthrodesis group also has an advantage of IMA and HAV angle correction (MD=1.43,95%CI [0.37,2.48],P=0.008; MD=13.27,95%CI [11.44,15.09],P< 0.00001).Significant difference was found between the two groups in the rate of complications.The rate of complication in the arthrodesis group was lower than that of the arthroplasty group (OR=2.32,95%CI [1.06,5.05],P=0.03).No significant difference was found between the two groups in patient satisfaction and FFI score.Conclusion Compared with resection arthroplasty,first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis could be a better choice.It alleviates the pain effectively,improves the appearance and functions of the foot,and has a lower rate of postoperative complications. Key words: Arthritis, rheumatoid; Metatarsophalangeal joint; Arthrodesis; Arthroplasty; Meta-analysis
Read full abstract