Foraminal Stenosis Research Articles

Contralateral Sublaminar Approach in Lumbar Spine With Unilateral Biportal Endoscopy

Unilateral biportal endoscopy (UBE) can be used to treat common lumbar pathologies, such as synovial facet cysts, foraminal disc herniations, and foraminal stenosis via a contralateral sublaminar approach. Due to the ultra-minimally invasive technique, UBE can reduce damage to anatomical structures, thereby reducing postoperative pain and allowing faster recovery. The patient is placed prone on a Wilson frame or bolsters. Fluoroscopy is used to identify the midline and medial pedicle line in the anterior-posterior projection. Spinal needles can aid to identifying portals’ trajectory in the lateral fluoroscopic projection. The procedure is performed via 2 separate portal incisions. The endoscope is introduced through the viewing portal and the surgical instruments through the working portal. Soft tissue dissector is used to create a working area over the spinous process-lamina junction. Bony shaving and drilling start at the target area and continue medially underneath the base of the spinous process until the midline and contralateral ligamentum flavum are identified. Contralateral ligamentum flavum is excised, exposing thecontralateral thecal sac, traversing nerve root, and lateral recess. The contralateral disc space, annulus, and superior articulating process are then identified and the offending pathology can be addressed under direct visualization. Meticulous hemostasis and close attention to outflow should be maintained to reduce the risk of complications. The steps of this procedure closely resemble those of traditional microscopic “over-the-top” techniques, including the surgical instruments used through the working portal. In this video, authors present the surgical technique of the contralateral sublaminar approach in the lumbar spine with UBE.

Cervical Myeloradiculopathy With Bilateral Foraminal Stenosis Treated by Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression with Alternating Hemilaminectomy and Bilateral foraminotomy: A Case Report and Technical Note

Cervical myeloradiculopathy is a debilitating condition characterized by progressive spinal cord dysfunction commonly caused by degenerative changes in the cervical spine. It typically exhibits an insidious onset and progressive functional decline, along with multiple exiting nerve root entrapments bilaterally in some patients. Traditional surgical interventions, such as discectomy and fusion, are associated with some complications and limitations. Unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression can have significant advantages over traditional techniques when cervical central and bilateral foraminal decompression is required. In this case report and technical note, we describe our experience with this novel surgical technique for the treatment of cervical myelopathy. A 67-year-old patient presented with progressive neck pain; bilateral upper extremity radiculopathy; loss of power and sensation in the C5, C6, and C7 nerve root distribution; gait imbalance, and spasticity. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed multilevel cervical spondylosis with central canal and bilateral foraminal stenosis. The patient underwent UBE central and bilateral foraminal decompression. At a 9-month follow-up visit, he was able to walk unassisted, his reflexes had returned to normal, no spasticity was observed, and he had good grip strength in both hands. This is a novel technique of UBE decompression with bilateral foraminotomy at the C4–5, C5–6, and C6–7 levels and laminectomy named “the floating tip technique.” The procedure involved bilateral 3-level lamino-foraminotomy and hemilaminotomy on both C5 and C6. A hemilamina was removed on the opposite sides, and flavectomy was performed. Postoperative computed tomography findings showed an intact, complete muscular mass with an intact central spinous process. Therefore, this method was labelled the “floating tip technique.”

Comparison of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) in patients with degenerative scoliosis and patients with normal alignment

Objectives Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (TELF) is a well-described method of treating foraminal stenosis. However, there is little literature examining the usage of TELF to treat foraminal stenosis in patients with degenerative scoliosis. TELF is an attractive option for such patients as it results in lesser blood loss, shorter recovery time, and lower infection rates as compared to fusion surgery. However, TELF neither corrects the deformity nor alters the natural history of the disease. Therefore, the outcomes of TELF in patients with degenerative scoliosis may be worse than those without deformities. This study aims to compare the outcomes of TELF in these two groups of patients. Material and Methods This is a retrospective study of 19 patients who underwent TELF from July 2012 to April 2015. Eight patients had degenerative scoliosis, and 11 were without scoliosis. Visual analog scale and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were collected at 3 months postsurgery. Patient outcomes were graded as excellent, good, fair, and poor using a modified MacNab’s criteria. Results Both groups had significant improvements in back pain, leg pain, and ODI scores postoperatively. There were no differences between the two groups when comparing the preoperative and postoperative back pain, leg pain, and ODI scores. The majority of patients rated their outcomes as excellent or good. Conclusion The short-term outcomes of TELF in patients with degenerative scoliosis are comparable to those without scoliosis. Improvements in back and leg pain after surgery are expected. We recommend it as a palliative treatment for patients who are unable to undergo major surgery.

A case report on dilated engorged epidural vein causing sciatica

Sciatica is most of the time due to lumbar disc herniation. Some other pathologies such as aneurysmal bone cysts, proximal femur osteomyelitis, arachnoid cysts, facetal cysts, giant cell tumours, and pyriformis syndrome mimic sciatica are termed sciatica mimickers in literature. In this case report, we present a 66-year-old man with low back pain and left sciatica and neurogenic claudication who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion L4–5. In magnetic resonance imaging, the finding was degenerative changes with foraminal stenosis of L4–L5, but intraoperatively, we found an engorged epidural vein causing the compression of L4 exiting nerve root. The engorged epidural vein sometimes can cause sciatica which mimics the disc herniation.

Predictors of time to achieve clinically significant improvements following lateral lumbar interbody fusion

BackgroundAs lateral lumbar interbody fusions (LLIF) are increasingly performed, our understanding of postoperative clinical trajectories is important in informing preoperative patient expectations. While minimum clinically important difference (MCID) rates are widely utilized in spine surgery literature, there is less published on how long it takes for patients to achieve MCID following LLIF. ObjectiveTo evaluate the length of time it takes for patients to report MCID achievement for back pain, leg pain, disability, and physical function and evaluate predictors of time to achieve MCID. MethodsPatients undergoing elective LLIF by the senior author with baseline and postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) recorded were retrospectively identified. Data on potential predictors of time to MCID achievement were gathered including demographics, comorbidities, diagnostic information, and baseline PROs. MCID achievement rates for Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale-Back (VAS-Back), VAS-Leg, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF) were calculated at six-, twelve, 6 month- 1 year- and 2-year postoperative timepoints. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to determine the proportion of patients achieving MCID at each time point. A multivariate Cox regression determined predictors of time to MCID achievement. ResultsOne hundred-five patients were included in the analysis. The mean time to achieve MCID for PROMIS-PF was 44.7 weeks, for VAS-Back was 38.5 weeks, for VAS-Leg was 36.7 weeks, and for ODI was 38.3 weeks. Worse baseline VAS-Back significantly predicted earlier MCID achievement for VAS-Back (HR: 1.55), while diabetes was predictive of later MCID achievement (HR: 0.21). Higher body mass index and worse preoperative ODI predicted earlier MCID achievement for ODI (HR: 1.04–1.08), and higher VAS-Leg score and two-level fusion were predictive of later MCID achievement for ODI, (HR:0.26–0.81). Worse preoperative VAS-Leg, isthmic spondylolisthesis, and three-level fusion were predictors of earlier achievement of MCID for VAS-Leg (HR: 1.27–6.47). Herniated nucleus pulposus and foraminal stenosis were early predictors (HR: 2.92–3.23) and workers’ compensation was a late predictor of MCID attainment for PROMIS-PF (HR: 0.13). ConclusionSelect demographic variables, comorbidities, spinal pathology, and preoperative PROs influenced the time it took for patients to report clinically significant improvements in pain, disability, and physical function scores. These findings can be used to prognosticate outcomes for patients undergoing LLIF and inform patient expectations of postoperative recovery.

Clinical and radiological comparisons between oblique lumbar interbody fusion combined with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a 2-year follow-up study

Adult isthmic spondylolisthesis(AIS) results in the anterior translation of the vertebral body with neural encroachment. Although oblique lumbar interbody fusion(OLIF) is minimally invasive technique that use a retroperitoneal plane to achieve indirect decompression compared to transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF), research on OLIF for AIS remains limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of these two surgical techniques for AIS. We analyzed the details of 62patients with AIS who were treated with either OLIF(n=26) or TLIF(n=36) between 2019 and 2022, with a minimum 2-year follow-up. The two surgical techniques were compared in terms of perioperative surgical, radiological, and clinical outcomes. The correlation between the severity of foraminal stenosis and clinical outcomes was evaluated. The OLIF group experienced significantly less blood loss, shorter operative times, and shorter hospital stay than the TLIF group. Radiological assessments showed no significant preoperative differences in disc height or slippage ratios, but postoperative slippage correction was significantly greater in the OLIF group than in the TLIF group(13.5±8.0 versus 5.0±8.9; p<0.001). The clinical outcome improvement ratios did not differ significantly between the two groups. The correlation between preoperative severity of foraminal stenosis and clinical outcomes in the OLIF group was not significant. OLIF is more advantageous than TLIF in terms of blood loss, operative time, hospital stay and anterolisthesis correction. In addition, good clinical outcomes were obtained with indirect decompression alone, regardless of the severity of foraminal stenosis. Therefore, OLIF is a good surgical option for the treatment of AIS.

External Validation of SpineNetV2 on a Comprehensive Set of Radiological Features for Grading Lumbosacral Disc Pathologies

BackgroundIn recent years, the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models has revolutionized the diagnosis of Low Back Pain (LBP) and associated disc pathologies. Among these, SpineNetV2 stands out as a state-of-the-art, open-access model for detecting and grading various intervertebral disc pathologies. However, ensuring the reliability and applicability of AI models like SpineNetV2 is paramount. Rigorous validation is essential to guarantee their robustness and generalizability across diverse patient cohorts and imaging protocols. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective analysis of MRI images of 1747 lumbosacral intervertebral discs (IVDs) from 353 patients (mean age, 54 ± 15.4 years, 44.5% female) with various spinal disorders, collected between September 2021 and February 2023 at X-Ray Service s.r.l. The SpineNetV2 system was used to grade 11 distinct lumbosacral disc pathologies, including Pfirrmann grading, disc narrowing, central canal stenosis, spondylolisthesis, (upper & lower) endplate defects, (upper & lower) marrow changes, (right & left) foraminal stenosis, and disc herniation, using T2-weighted sagittal MR images. Performance metrics included accuracy, balanced accuracy, precision, F1 score, Matthew's Correlation Coefficient, Brier Score Loss, Lin's concordance correlation coefficients, and Cohen's kappa coefficients. Two expert radiologists provide annotations for these discs. The evaluation of SpineNetV2′s grading is compared against expert radiologists' assessments. ResultsSpineNetV2 demonstrated strong performance across various metrics, with high agreement scores (Cohen's Kappa, Lin's Concordance, and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient exceeding 0.7) for most pathologies. However, lower agreement was found for foraminal stenosis and disc herniation, underscoring the limitations of sagittal MR images for evaluating these conditions. ConclusionsThis study highlights the importance of external validation, emphasizing the need for comprehensive assessments of deep learning models. SpineNetV2 exhibits promising results in predicting disc pathologies, with findings guiding further improvements. The open-source release of SpineNetV2 enables researchers to independently validate and extend the model's capabilities. This collaborative approach promotes innovation and accelerates the development of more reliable and comprehensive deep learning tools for the assessment of spine pathology.

To validate and correlate radiologic grading of central and foraminal stenosis post-surgical decompression on degenerative lumbar canal stenosis

Background: Lumbar canal stenosis (LCS) is characterized as a narrowing of the canal diameter with age, which can lead to degenerative bone and soft-tissue changes. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study is to validate the radiologic grading of central and foraminal through correlation with outcome after surgical decompression in degenerative LCS. Materials and Methods: A total of 23 patients with degenerative LCS who satisfied inclusion criteria and consented to participate in the study were selected and their Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg pain were recorded and their magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was graded. Results: LCS is the reduction in the dimension of the central or lateral lumbar canal that occurs most frequently as a result of chronic degenerative changes at the lumbar motion segments. In our study, ODI has comparable improvement in all groups and it does not correlate with the severity of stenosis. However, VAS for leg pain has a greater prevalence in the shorter durations group (&lt;60 months) which had an average of 8.0. If VAS for leg pain was more preoperatively, a better outcome was seen postoperatively. Conclusion: Decompression surgery for degenerative LCS shows significant improvement in ODI and VAS for back pain and leg pain irrespective of the severity of the stenosis by MRI grading or the severity of symptoms as assessed by VAS or ODI.

Could indirect decompression occur for cord compression by the ligamentum flavum with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?

Cord compression by the ligamentum flavum (CCLF) has been reported to adversely affect the clinical outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). While indirect decompression does occur for foraminal stenosis with ACDF, whether ACDF could improve CCLF with the distraction of disc space remains unclear. This study aimed to identify 1) whether indirect decompression occurs for CCLF with ACDF, and 2) risk factors that hinder the improvement of CCLF. This retrospective cohort study included 119 patients who underwent ACDF for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and CCLF was detected on preoperative MRI. Patients who demonstrated improvement in CCLF grade after ACDF were included in the improved group, while those who did not show improvement were classified as the unimproved group. Patient characteristics, cervical sagittal parameters, neck and arm pain visual analog scale score, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were assessed. A comparison between the improved and unimproved groups was performed. Regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with CCLF grade improvement. Overall, 58.0% (69/119) of patients showed improvement in CCLF grade after ACDF. CCLF grade did not improve in the remaining 42.0% (50/119) of patients, and 3.4% (4/119) of patients experienced aggravation of CCLF after ACDF. Preoperative spondylolisthesis (OR 0.252, 95% CI 0.090-0.711; p = 0.009) and greater segmental lordosis 3 months postoperatively (OR 0.835, 95% CI 0.731-0.953; p = 0.008) were the factors that hindered the improvement of CCLF after ACDF. Furthermore, patients with higher pre- or postoperative CCLF grades showed significantly less improvement in JOA score 2 years postoperatively. Indirect decompression for CCLF with ACDF is not reliable because 42.0% of patients did not demonstrate improvement in CCLF grade after the operation. Preoperative spondylolisthesis and postoperative increased segmental lordosis were risk factors for failure of CCLF improvement. Both pre- and postoperative higher CCLF grades were associated with poor neurological recovery 2 years postoperatively.

Clinical Outcomes and Complications of Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With a Comparison to Full-Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

The unilateral biportal endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy (UBE-PCF) has been recently adopted for unilateral radiating arm pain due to cervical herniated intervertebral disc or foraminal stenosis. We systematically meta-analyzed clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and compared them with those of full-endoscopic PCF (FE-PCF). We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until February 29, 2024. Clinical outcomes and complications of the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were collected and analyzed using the fixed-effect or random-effects model. Clinical outcomes of the UBE-PCF were compared with minimal clinically important difference (MCID) following PCF to evaluate the efficacy of UBE-PCF. Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis. In the random-effects meta-analysis, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), visual analogue scale (VAS) neck, and VAS arm were significantly decreased after the UBE-PCF (p<0.001). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were significantly higher than MCID (p<0.05). The improvement of NDI, VAS neck, and VAS arm were not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p>0.05). Overall incidence of complications of the UBE-PCF was 6.2% (24 of 390). The most common complication was dura tear (2.1%, 8 of 390). The incidence in overall complications was not significantly different between the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF (p=0.813). We found that the UBE-PCF significantly improved clinical outcomes. Regarding clinical outcomes and complications, the UBE-PCF and FE-PCF were not significantly different. Therefore, the UBE-PCF would be an advantageous surgical option comparable to FE-PCF for unilateral radiating arm pain.

Validation of a Novel Provocative Examination Maneuver for the Diagnosis of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Through Selective Nerve Root Block Outcomes

Validation of a Novel Provocative Examination Maneuver for the Diagnosis of Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis Through Selective Nerve Root Block Outcomes

Preoperative Factors on Loss of Range of Motion after Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

Background and Objectives: Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) aims to resolve cervical radiculopathy while preserving range of motion (ROM). However, its effectiveness in maintaining ROM is uncertain. This study investigates the changes in ROM after PCF and identifies preoperative factors that influence ROM reduction post surgery. Materials and Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated at our hospital from August 2016 to September 2021. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the neck disability index (NDI). Radiological outcomes included the segmental angle (SA), cervical angle (CA), C2-C7 SVA, Pfirrmann grade, extent of facetectomy, foraminal stenosis, and ROM. Patients were categorized into two groups based on segmental ROM changes: decreased (Group D) and maintained (Group M). Radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for ROM loss after PCF. Results: 76 patients were included: 34 in Group D and 42 in Group M, with no demographic differences. Preoperatively, Group D had significantly larger flexion segmental and cervical angles than Group M (segmental, p < 0.001; cervical, p = 0.001). Group D also had a higher Pfirrmann grade (p = 0.014) and more bony bridge formations (p = 0.004). While no significant differences were observed in arm pain VAS and NDI scores, Group D exhibited worse neck pain VAS at the last follow-up (p = 0.03). Univariate linear regression indicated that preoperative segmental ROM (p < 0.001, B = 0.82) and bony bridge formation (p = 0.046, B = 5.33) were significant predictors of ROM loss post PCF. Conclusions: Patients with higher preoperative flexion angles and Pfirrmann grades at the operative level are at an increased risk for ROM loss and neck pain and often exhibit bony bridge formation. Accounting for these factors can improve surgical planning and patient outcomes.

Shoulder Traction as a Possible Risk Factor for C5 Palsy in Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Cadaveric Study.

Background and Objectives: Many risk factors for postoperative C5 palsy (PC5P) have been reported regarding a "cord shift" after a posterior approach. However, there are few reports about shoulder traction as a possible risk factor of anterior cervical surgery. Therefore, we assessed the stretched nerve roots when shoulder traction was applied on cadavers. Materials and Methods: Eight cadavers were employed in this study, available based on age and the presence of foramen stenosis. After dissecting the sternocleidomastoid muscle of the cadaver, the shoulder joint was pulled with a force of 2, 5, 8, 10, 15, and 20 kg. Then, the stretched length of the fifth nerve root was measured in the extra-foraminal zone. In addition, the same measurement was performed after cutting the carotid artery to accurately identify the nerve root's origin. After an additional dissection was performed so that the superior trunk of the brachial plexus could be seen, the stretched length of the fifth and sixth nerve roots was measured again. Results: Throughout the entire experiment, the fifth nerve root stretched out for an average of 1.94 mm at 8 kg and an average of 5.03 mm at a maximum force of 20 kg. In three experiments, the elongated lengths of the C5 nerve root at 8 kg and 20 kg were 1.69/4.38 mm, 2.13/5.00 mm, and 0.75/5.31 mm, respectively, and in the third experiment, the elongated length of the C6 nerve root was 1.88/5.44 mm. Conclusions: Although this was a cadaveric experiment, it suggests that shoulder traction could be the risk factors for PC5P after anterior cervical surgery. In addition, for patients with foraminal stenosis and central stenosis, the risk would be higher. Therefore, the surgeon should be aware of this, and the patient would need sufficient explanation.

Spinal magnetic resonance imaging in cats: differences in clinical significance of intervertebral disk extrusion, intervertebral disk protrusion, and degenerative lumbosacral stenosis.

To determine the occurrence of degenerative changes affecting the vertebral column in cats, assess their clinical significance, and determine the occurrence in cats with intervertebral disk herniation compared to other spinal diseases. 114 client-owned cats. Hospital records were retrospectively reviewed for cats with suspected myelopathy that had undergone spinal MRI. Signalment; history; neurological examination; neurolocalization; primary diagnosis; presence, type, and location of intervertebral disk herniation; and presence and location of other degenerative spinal changes (intervertebral disk degeneration [IVDD], spondylosis deformans [SD], end plate changes, dorsal compressions [DC], and foraminal stenosis [FS]) were recorded. 70% of cats showed at least 1 spinal degenerative change. The most common change was IVDD, followed by SD and intervertebral disk protrusion (IVDP), while intervertebral disk extrusion (IVDE), end plate changes, DC, and FS were uncommon to rare. Primary complaint was attributed to a degenerative condition in 22% of cats, including 100% with IVDE, 9% with IVDP, and 43% with degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS). The occurrence of degenerative spinal changes and number of intervertebral disks affected by IVDD significantly increased with age and body weight. Age was positively correlated with the occurrence of SD and DLSS. Intervertebral disk degeneration, IVDP, SD, DC, and FS were more prevalent in the lumbosacral junction. Cats with IVDD were significantly more likely to show IVDE and IVDP. This study revealed that in a population of cats presenting for signs of myelopathy, IVDE was always responsible for the clinical presentation, DLSS was commonly considered incidental, and IVDP was infrequently related to neurological signs.

Deep learning model for automated diagnosis of degenerative cervical spondylosis and altered spinal cord signal on MRI

BACKGROUND CONTEXTA deep learning (DL) model for degenerative cervical spondylosis on MRI could enhance reporting consistency and efficiency, addressing a significant global health issue. PURPOSECreate a DL model to detect and classify cervical cord signal abnormalities, spinal canal and neural foraminal stenosis. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective study conducted from January 2013 to July 2021, excluding cases with instrumentation. PATIENT SAMPLEOverall, 504 MRI cervical spines were analyzed (504 patients, mean=58 years±13.7[SD]; 202 women) with 454 for training (90%) and 50 (10%) for internal testing. In addition, 100 MRI cervical spines were available for external testing (100 patients, mean=60 years±13.0[SD];26 women). OUTCOME MEASURESAutomated detection and classification of spinal canal stenosis, neural foraminal stenosis, and cord signal abnormality using the DL model. Recall(%), inter-rater agreement (Gwet's kappa), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated. METHODSUtilizing axial T2-weighted gradient echo and sagittal T2-weighted images, a transformer-based DL model was trained on data labeled by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist (12 years of experience). Internal testing involved data labeled in consensus by two musculoskeletal radiologists (reference standard, both with 12-years-experience), two subspecialist radiologists, and two in-training radiologists. External testing was performed. RESULTSThe DL model exhibited substantial agreement surpassing all readers in all classes for spinal canal (κ=0.78, p<0.001 vs. κ range=0.57-0.70 for readers) and neural foraminal stenosis (κ=0.80, p<0.001 vs. κ range=0.63-0.69 for readers) classification. The DL model's recall for cord signal abnormality (92.3%) was similar to all readers (range: 92.3-100.0%). Nearly perfect agreement was demonstrated for binary classification (normal/mild vs. moderate/severe) (κ=0.95, p<0.001 for spinal canal; κ=0.90, p<0.001 for neural foramina). External testing showed substantial agreement using all classes (κ=0.76, p<0.001 for spinal canal; κ=0.66, p<0.001 for neural foramina) and high recall for cord signal abnormality (91.9%). The DL model demonstrated high sensitivities (range:83.7%–92.4%) and specificities (range:87.8%–98.3%) on both internal and external datasets for spinal canal and neural foramina classification. CONCLUSIONSOur DL model for degenerative cervical spondylosis on MRI showed good performance, demonstrating substantial agreement with the reference standard. This tool could assist radiologists in improving the efficiency and consistency of MRI cervical spondylosis assessments in clinical practice.

Lumbar foraminal stenosis was associated with back pain and leg pain: epidemiological evidence from a population-based cohort.

To determine the characteristics of lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) on magnetic resonance (MR) images and their association with back pain and radiating leg pain in a population-based sample of Chinese subjects. This study was an extension of the Hangzhou Lumbar Spine Study, a cross-sectional study focusing on back pain and lumbar spine MR imaging findings. Questionnaire data, including demographics, lifestyle, occupational exposures, back pain and radiating leg pain were included. On lumbar spine MR images, disc degeneration was assessed using Pfirrmann grade and Modic changes were evaluated. Using Lee's scale, the L3-S1 intervertebral foramina were evaluated, with grade 2-3 representing substantial LFS and grade 0-1 no LFS. Characteristics of LFS were noted, and associations of LFS with back pain and radiating leg pain were examined. Among the 644 study subjects, 141 (21.9%) had at least one LFS, and its occurrence was associated with greater age (OR = 1.93 for each 10 years, p < 0.001). Substantial LFS was associated with the presence of back pain (OR = 1.92, p = 0.001) and the intensity of the worst back pain (Coef = 8.30, p < 0.001) over the past 12 months, and disabling back pain during their lifetime (OR = 2.25, p < 0.001). Substantial LFS was also associated with leg pain (OR = 14.27, p < 0.001), with a sensitivity of 75.7% for the presence of radiating leg pain and a specificity of 81.4%. Substantial LFS on MR images was a common age-related degenerative phenotype in adults, and appears to be an independent risk factor for back pain and leg pain.

Risk factors for extended hospital stay following minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

BackgroundPrior literature has examined predictors of length of stay (LOS) for lumbar fusion broadly, grouping multiple surgical approaches into one sample. Evaluating minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) specifically can reduce variability introduced by other approaches to effectively identify predictors of LOS. The purpose of this study is to evaluate preoperative predictors of extended LOS in patients undergoing MIS-TLIF. MethodsMIS-TLIF patients were identified from a spine surgeon’s database. Preoperative predictors of LOS, including demographics, comorbidity data, spinal pathology, patient-reported back pain, leg pain, physical function, disability, general physical health, mental health, and depressive burden scores were analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of LOS ≥ 48 and LOS ≥ 72 h, a multivariate analysis confirmed significance. Eight-hundred-one patients were included. ResultsAfrican-American patients were 4.3 times more likely to have a LOS≥48 h compared to Caucasians (p ≤ 0.001). Diagnosis of herniated nucleus pulposus and foraminal stenosis were negative predictors of an LOS ≥ 72 h (p ≤ 0.014, both). Self-identified African American patients were approximately twice as likely to have a LOS ≥ 72 h compared to Caucasians. Preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) was positively correlated with LOS ≥ 48 h (p = 0.008). Other baseline patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were not predictive of LOS ≥ 48 or 72 h (p > 0.050, all). ConclusionsFurther research should explore why different demographic characteristics may be associated with extended postoperative LOS to target interventions toward potential health disparities. Understanding preoperative risk factors can help target increased healthcare costs and improve patient care through tailored interventions and future research.

Relationship between Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis and Multifidus Muscle Atrophy - A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

Retrospective cross-sectional study. To evaluate the relationship between lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) and multifidus muscle atrophy. The multifidus muscle is an important stabilizer of the lumbar spine. In LFS, the compression of the segmental nerve can give rise to radicular symptoms and back pain. LFS can impede function and induce atrophy of the segmentally innervated multifidus muscle. Patients with degenerative lumbar spinal conditions who underwent posterior spinal fusion for degenerative lumbar disease from December 2014 to February 2024 were analyzed. Multifidus fatty infiltration (FI) and functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) were determined at the L4 upper endplate axial level on T2- weighted MRI scans using dedicated software. Severity of LFS was assessed at all lumbar levels and sides using the Lee classification (Grade: 0 - 3). For each level, Pfirrmann and Weishaupt gradings were used to assess intervertebral disc disease (IVDD) and facet joint osteoarthritis (FJOA), respectively. Multivariable linear mixed models were run for the LFS grade of each level and side separately as the independent predictor of multifidus FI and fCSA. Each analysis was adjusted for age, sex, BMI, as well as FJOA and IVDD of the level corresponding to the LFS. A total of 216 patients (50.5% female) with a median age of 61.6 years (IQR=52.0 - 69.0) and a median BMI of 28.1kg/m2 (IQR=24.8 - 33.0) were included. Linear mixed model analysis revealed that higher multifidus FI (Estimate [Confidence interval]=1.7% [0.1 - 3.3], P=0.043) and lower fCSA (-18.6mm2 [-34.3 - -2.6], P=0.022) were both significantly predicted by L2-L3 level LFS severity. The observed positive correlation between upper segment LFS and multifidus muscle atrophy points towards compromised innervation. This necessitates further research to establish the causal relationship and guide prevention efforts.

Uniportal Full-endoscopic Foraminotomy for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis: Clinical Characteristics and Functional Outcomes.

Uniportal full-endoscopic foraminotomy offers a promising alternative to conventional surgical methods for individuals afflicted by lumbar foraminal stenosis. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and clinical outcomes of uniportal full-endoscopic foraminotomy in patients diagnosed with lumbar foraminal stenosis. A comprehensive retrospective analysis was conducted on individuals who underwent full-endoscopic foraminotomy in our medical center, between January 2018 and December 2019. The investigation encompassed the demographic data of patients and key clinical metrics such as the visual analogue scale of leg (VAS-L) and back pain (VAS-B), Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, the Short Form-36 Health Survey physical component summary (SF-36 PCS) and the mental component summary (SF-36 MCS), as well as modified MacNab grades, were systematically assessed and compared. Furthermore, radiological parameters: Coronal Cobb angle (CCA), Intervertebral angle changes (IAC), Disc height index (DHI), the foraminal cross-sectional area (FCSA) and the FCSA enlargement ratio were also compared. A variety of statistical analyses including Student t-test, chi-square tests, Fisher's exact tests, Pearson's and Spearman's correlation analyses, and Interclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs) were employed. 64 patients, including 34 males and 30 females were enrolled. The mean follow-up period extended to 22.66 ± 7.05 months. Distribution by affected segments revealed 26.6% at L4-5, 67.1% at L5-S1 level, and 6.25% at both L4-L5 and L5-S1 levels. At the final follow-up, VAS-L decreased from 7.26 ± 1.19 to 1.37 ± 1.25, while VAS-B decreased from 6.95 ± 0.54 to 1.62 ± 1.13 (p < 0.001). ODI score also demonstrated a substantial decrease from 74.73 ± 8.68 to 23.27 ± 8.71 (p < 0.001). Both SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS scores improved significantly (p < 0.001). Modified MacNab criteria revealed 58 excellent-good patients (90.7%), and 6 fair-poor patients (9.3%). No significant differences were founded in the CCA (p = 0.1065), IAC (p = 0.5544), and DHI (p = 0.1348) between pre-operation and the final follow-up. However, the FCSA significantly increased from 73.41 ± 11.75 to 173.40 ± 18.62 mm2 (p < 0.001), and the enlargement ratio was 142.9% ± 49.58%. Notably, the final follow-up FCSA and the FCSA enlargement ratio were found to be larger in the excellent and good group compared to the fair and poor group, according to the modified MacNab criteria. The utilization of uniportal full-endoscopic foraminotomy has demonstrated its safety and efficacy in addressing lumbar foraminal stenosis. The clinical success of this procedure appears to be closely associated with the radiological decompression of the intervertebral foramen area. Importantly, the application of this technology does not seem to compromise the overall stability of the lumbar region.

Fully Endoscopic Transforaminal Approach for L5–S1 Foraminal Stenosis: A Narrative Review

Lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) is a fairly common degenerative condition of the spine that can often occur in the L5–S1 segment. Traditional surgical approaches for LFS can be categorized into microscopic foraminotomy via the Wiltse approach and interbody fusion. Microscopic foraminotomy via the Wiltse approach was previously considered the gold standard for treating LFS. However, with advancements in endoscopic equipment and techniques, fully endoscopic foraminotomy through various approaches is now widely performed for the treatment of LFS. Among these approaches, endoscopic foraminotomy via the transforaminal approach offers many advantages, but difficulties may be encountered when there are anatomical barriers, which are often present in the L5–S1 segment. This study aimed to explore the overall clinical outcomes and complications of transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy, as well as the challenges specific to the L5–S1 segment and techniques to overcome them.