Football Helmet Research Articles

An Experimental Platform Generating Simulated Blunt Impacts to the Head Due to Rearward Falls.

Impacts to the back of the head due to rearward falls, also referred to as "backfall" events, represent a common source of TBI for athletes and soldiers. A new experimental apparatus is described for replicating the linear and rotational kinematics of the head during backfall events. An anthropomorphic test device (ATD) with a head-borne sensor suite was configured to fall backwards from a standing height, inducing contact between the rear of the head and a ground surface simulant. A pivoting swing arm and release strap were used to generate consistent and realistic head kinematics. Backfall experiments were performed with the ATD fitted with an American football helmet and the resulting linear and rotational head kinematics, as well as calculated injury metrics, compared favorably with those of football players undergoing similar impacts during games or play reconstructions. This test method complements existing blunt impact helmet performance experiments, such as drop tower and pneumatic ram test methods, which may not be able to fully reproduce head-neck-torso kinematics during a backfall event.

The Influence of Neck Stiffness on Head Kinematics and Maximum Principal Strain Associated With Youth American Football Collisions

Understanding the relationship between head mass and neck stiffness during direct head impacts is especially concerning in youth sports where athletes have higher proportional head mass to neck strength. This study compared 2 neck stiffness conditions for peak linear and rotational acceleration and brain tissue deformations across 3 impact velocities, 3 impact locations, and 2 striking masses. A pendulum fitted with a nylon cap was used to impact a fifth percentile hybrid III headform equipped with 9 accelerometers and fitted with a youth American football helmet. The 2 neck stiffness conditions consisted of a neckform with and without resistance in 3 planes, representing the upper trapezius, the splenius capitis, and the sternocleidomastoid muscles. Increased neck stiffness resulted in significant changes in head kinematics and maximum principal strain specific to impact velocity, impact location, and striking mass.

Head shape analysis of National Football League Players

Understanding the size and shape variations of the head is important to the design of football helmets used to mitigate the risk of head injury. Current guidelines for selecting helmets use only the circumference of the player’s head to determine an appropriate size that may not offer the best fit and protection for every player. The goal of this study was to quantify key measurements of head shape to sufficiently characterize variability among players in the National Football League (NFL), focusing on the shape variation of the cranial region. Statistical shape analysis was performed on three-dimensional head scans of 87 contemporary NFL players to identify key features of head shape variability among the players’ heads. The principal component analysis revealed two factors that explained 87% of the head shape variance: (1) height and length of the head in the sagittal plane and (2) prominent back of the head with an oval shape in the transverse plane versus prominent forehead with a round shape. Four head shape measurements (circumference, length, breadth, and height) were then defined and quantified to describe the first two principal components. This information can facilitate improvements in the design of football helmets.

Mechanical characterization of athletic helmet shells

ABSTRACT Our purpose was to compare the mechanical properties of the protective outer shells of various athletic helmets in their final, fully manufactured form. Sections were taken from 3 different helmet shells (Bauer RE-AKT hockey helmet, Cascade R lacrosse helmet, and Riddell Speedflex football helmet) at 4 different locations (front, side, top, and rear) for a total of 12 test specimens. The 4 specimens from each helmet shell were potted together in epoxy resin moulds and mechanically polished. The hardness, elastic modulus and phase angle were measured using dynamic nanoindentation performed at 100 Hz with an oscillation amplitude of 1 nm (rms). Repeated ANOVA analysis was used to compare each of the dependent variables for each of the 3 helmets across the 4 different locations. The interaction between helmet type and location was significant for hardness (F6,63 = 2.84, P = 0.032, Pη2 = 0.21), elastic modulus (F6,63 = 6.412, P < 0.001, Pη2 = 0.38), and phase angle (F6,63 = 7.65, P < 0.001, Pη2 = 0.42). Polycarbonate has a higher ability to dissipate mechanical energy making it the recommended superior choice for helmet shells. In addition, the results lead us to speculate that manufacturing causes changes in the molecular weight or the distribution of fillers across locations for polyethylene but not for polycarbonate since mechanical properties are fairly uniform over the surface of football helmets, at least within a given helmet.

Analysis of HIC and Hydrostatic Pressure in the Human Head during NOCSAE Tests of American Football Helmets.

Brain damage is a serious economic and social burden. Contact sports such as American football, are one of the most common sources of concussions. The biomechanical response of the head–helmet system caused by dynamic loading plays a major role. The literature has focused on measuring the resultant kinematics that act on the head and helmet during tackles. However, few studies have focused on helmet validation tests, supported by recent findings and emerging numerical approaches. The future of helmet standards could benefit from insights at the level of injury mechanisms, using numerical tools to assess the helmets. Therefore, in this work, a numerical approach is employed to investigate the influence of intracranial pressure (ICP) on brain pathophysiology during and after helmeted impacts, which are common in American football. The helmeted impacts were performed at several impact locations according to the NOCSAE standard (configurations A, AP, B, C, D, F, R, UT). In order to evaluate the ICP levels, the αHEAD finite element head and brain model was combined with a Hybrid III-neck structure and then coupled with an American football helmet to simulate the NOCSAE impacts. In addition, the ICP level was analyzed together with the resulting HIC value, since the latter is commonly used, in this application and others, as the injury criterion. The obtained results indicate that ICP values exceed the common threshold of head injury criteria and do not correlate with HIC values. Thus, this work raises concern about applying the HIC to predict brain injury in American football direct head impacts, since it does not correlate with ICP predicted with the FE head model.

A Computational Study of Liquid Shock Absorption for Prevention of Traumatic Brain Injury.

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), more colloquially known as concussion, is common in contact sports such as American football, leading to increased scrutiny of head protective gear. Standardized laboratory impact testing, such as the yearly National Football League (NFL) helmet test, is used to rank the protective performance of football helmets, motivating new technologies to improve the safety of helmets relative to existing equipment. In this work, we hypothesized that a helmet which transmits a nearly constant minimum force will result in a reduced risk of mTBI. To evaluate the plausibility of this hypothesis, we first show that the optimal force transmitted to the head, in a reduced order model of the brain, is in fact a constant force profile. To simulate the effects of a constant force within a helmet, we conceptualize a fluid-based shock absorber system for use within a football helmet. We integrate this system within a computational helmet model and simulate its performance on the standard NFL helmet test impact conditions. The simulated helmet is compared with other helmet designs with different technologies. Computer simulations of head impacts with liquid shock absorption predict that, at the highest impact speed (9.3 m/s), the average brain tissue strain is reduced by 27.6% ± 9.3 compared to existing helmet padding when tested on the NFL helmet protocol. This simulation-based study puts forth a target benchmark for the future design of physical manifestations of this technology.

Brain response of a computational head model for prescribed skull kinematics and simulated football helmet impact boundary conditions

Computational human body models (HBM) present a novel approach to predict brain response in football impact scenarios, with prescribed kinematic boundary conditions for the HBM skull typically used at present. However, computational optimization of helmets requires simulation of the coupled helmet and HBM model; which is much more complex and has not been assessed in the context of brain deformation and existing simplified approaches. In the current study, two boundary conditions and the resulting brain deformations were compared using a HBM head model: (1) a prescribed skull kinematics (PK) boundary condition using measured head kinematics from experimental impacts; and (2) a novel detailed simulation of a HBM head and neck, helmet and linear impactor (HBM-S). While lateral and rear impacts exhibited similar levels of maximum principal strain (MPS) in the brain tissue using both boundary conditions, differences were noted in the frontal orientation (at 9.3 m/s, MPS was 0.39 for PK, 0.54 for HBM-S). Importantly, both PK and HBM-S boundary conditions produced a similar distribution of MPS throughout the brain for each impact orientation considered. Within the corpus callosum and thalamus, high MPS was associated with lateral impacts and lower values with frontal and rear impacts. The good correspondence of both boundary conditions is encouraging for future optimization of helmet designs. A limitation of the PK approach is the need for experimental head kinematics data, while the HBM-S can predict brain response for varying impact conditions and helmet configurations, with potential as a tool to improve helmet protection performance.

Brain Injuries in American Football: Understanding the Injury, Difficulty in Helmet Optimization, and Current Communication Practices – A Narrative Review

Background: Over 2.7 million people suffer traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) annually in the United States. TBI involves the application and generation of external forces and impulse loads respectively to the head whereby the brain moves relative to the skull. Despite numerous studies, further understanding of TBIs is necessary, requiring consistent attention. Objective: The purpose of this article is to investigate the history of American football helmets and provide an academic and practitioner review as it relates to TBIs. This study is a literature review that also considers perspectives from an autoethnographic frame. Method: An extensive literature review was performed to assess the history of TBI as it relates to American football. This article evaluates helmet design optimization and American football safety as well as an exploration into the sports’ education methods for players and staff alike. Results: Despite developing helmet designs that can better attenuate impact forces, reducing linear and rotational movement, the skull and brain move very differently relative to one another. Helmet designs and tools for measuring forces require further validation techniques to determine resultant forces and movement for the brain. Current biomechanics research lacks sufficient methodology for defining TBI thresholds, making helmet optimization difficult. Conclusion: According to past research, no helmet can eliminate all TBI risk; however, processes are in place lead by the National Football League (NFL) and NFL Players Association to educate players, coaches, and staff at all levels of competition of the protective capabilities of available helmet options.

Effect of foam densification and impact velocity on the performance of a football helmet using computational modeling

The NFL recently released validated helmet-impact models to study the performance of currently used helmets. This study used the model of a Riddell Speed Classic helmet to determine the influence of the properties of protective foam padding on acceleration and deformation at two common impact locations to cause concussions. The performance of the helmet was measured before and after manipulating the material properties of the protective foam liner material using FEA software. The densification strain was adjusted by using the scale factor tool in LS-DYNA to create four material categories – soft, standard, stiff, and rigid. The helmet was tested under side and rear impacts using the four material properties at 2.0, 5.5, 7.4, 9.3 and 12.3 m/s impact speeds using the NOCSAE linear impactor model. This study suggests that the standard foam material compresses to a range that could be considered to have “bottomed out” at impact speeds at 5.5 m/s for side impacts. Despite testing a wide range of material properties, the measured accelerations did not vary dramatically across material properties. Rather, impact speed played the dominant role on measured acceleration. This is the first study to demonstrate how open-source impact models can be used to run a design of experiments and investigate the role between different materials used inside a helmet and football helmet performance.

Relating on-field youth football head impacts to pneumatic ram laboratory testing procedures.

A youth-specific football helmet testing standard has been proposed to address the physical and biomechanical differences between adult and youth football players. This study sought to relate the proposed youth standard-defined laboratory impacts to on-field head impacts collected from youth football players. Head impact data from 112 youth football players (ages 9-14) were collected through the use of helmet-mounted accelerometer arrays. These head impacts were filtered to only include those that resided in corridors near prescribed National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) impact locations. Peak linear head acceleration and peak rotational head acceleration magnitudes collected from pneumatic ram impactor tests as specified by the proposed NOCSAE youth standard were compared to the distribution of on-field head impacts. All laboratory impact tests were among the top 10% in terms of magnitude for Severity Index and peak rotational acceleration of matched location head impacts experienced by youth football players. As concussive head impacts are among the most severe impacts experienced on the field, a safety standard geared toward mitigating concussion should assess the most severe on-field head impacts. This proposed testing standard may be refined as more becomes known regarding the biomechanics of concussion among youth athletes.

The relationship between directional components of dynamic response and maximum principal strain for impacts to an American football helmet

Impact parameters used to design the American football helmet and the parameters associated with mechanisms of concussive injury are not consistent. Head impacts resulting in concussive injury in football are characterized as events creating rotational motion of the head that generate brain tissue strain. The extent of tissue strain influences the resulting severity of injury. Helmet technology aimed to decrease brain tissue strain by reducing the extent of brain motion could help reduce injury risk. Current helmet performance and evaluation measures, such as peak resultant of linear and rotational acceleration, do not fully define directional brain motion and therefore cannot provide sufficient information for this type of improvement. This study was conducted to determine whether coordinate components (X, Y, and Z) of linear and rotational acceleration would correlate with maximum principal strain, a common measure of brain injury risk. Coordinate components define directional motion of the head and offer a specific design parameter more easily reduced using engineered structures than peak resultant acceleration. In addition to coordinate components, this study introduces the dominant component, defined as the coordinate component with the highest contribution to the resultant acceleration, for additional evaluation. The results show that the relationship between the X, Y, and Z coordinate components of acceleration and maximum principal strain is location- and direction-dependent. The study indicates a strong relationship between the peak resultant and dominant components of acceleration to maximum principal strain. Because the dominant component of acceleration accounts for direction and location, identifying the relationship between dominant acceleration and maximum principal strain demonstrates the potential use of this metric to improve future helmet innovation aimed at reducing tissue strain.

Evaluation of Impulse Attenuation by Football Helmets in the Frequency Domain.

Design of helmets used in contact sports has been driven by the necessity of preventing severe head injuries. Manufacturing standards and pass or fail grading systems ensure protective headgear built to withstand large impacts, but design standards do no account for impacts resulting in subconcussive episodes and the effects of cumulative impacts on its user. Thus, it is important to explore new design parameters, such as the frequency-domain measures of transmissibility and mechanical impedance that are based on energy absorption from a range of impact loads. Within the experimentally determined frequency range of interest (FROI), transmissibilities above unity were found in the 0-40 Hz range with the magnitude characteristics varying considerably with impact location. A similar variability with location was observed for the mechanical impedance, which ranged from 9 N/m to 50 N/m. Additional research is required to further understand how changes in the components or materials of the components will affect the performance of helmets, and how they may be used to reduce both transmissibility and dynamic impedance.

Quantifying Youth Football Helmet Performance: Assessing Linear and Rotational Head Acceleration.

Youth football helmet testing standards have served to largely eliminate catastrophic head injury from the sport. These standards, though, do not presently consider concussion and do not offer consumers the capacity to differentiate the impact performance of youth football helmets. This study adapted the previously developed Summation of Tests for the Analysis of Risk (STAR) equation for youth football helmet assessment. This adaptation made use of a youth-specific testing surrogate, on-field data collected from youth football players, and a concussion risk function developed for youth athletes. Each helmet is subjected to 48 laboratory impacts across 12 impact conditions. Peak linear head acceleration and peak rotational head acceleration values from each laboratory impact are aggregated into a single STAR value that combines player exposure and risk of concussion. This single value can provide consumers with valuable information regarding the relative performance of youth football helmets.

Finite Element Model of a Deformable American Football Helmet Under Impact.

Despite the use of helmets in American football, brain injuries are still prevalent. To reduce the burden of these injuries, novel impact mitigation systems are needed. The Vicis Zero1 (VZ1) American football helmet is unique in its use of multi-directional buckling structures sandwiched between a deformable outer shell and a stiff inner shell. The objective of this study was to develop a model of the VZ1 and to assess this unique characteristic for its role in mitigating head kinematics. The VZ1 model was developed using a bottom-up framework that emphasized material testing, constitutive model calibration, and component-level validation. Over 50 experimental tests were simulated to validate the VZ1 model. CORrelation and Analysis (CORA) was used to quantify the similarity between experimental and model head kinematics, neck forces, and impactor accelerations and forces. The VZ1 model demonstrated good correlation with an overall mean CORA score of 0.86. A parametric analysis on helmet compliance revealed that the outer shell and column stiffness influenced translational head kinematics more than rotational. For the material parameters investigated, head linear acceleration ranged from 80 to 220g, whereas angular velocity ranged from 37 to 40rad/s. This helmet model is open-source and serves as an in silico design platform for helmet innovation.

3D Printed Elastomeric Lattices With Embedded Deformation Sensing

New durable elastomeric materials are commercially available for 3D printing, enabling a new class of consumer wearable applications. The mechanical response of soft 3D printed lattices can now be tailored for improved safety and comfort by (a) leveraging functional grading and (b) customizing the outer envelope to conform specifically to the anatomy of the subject (e.g. patient, athlete, or consumer). Furthermore, electronics can be unobtrusively integrated into these 3D printed structures to provide feedback relating to athletic performance or physical activity. A proposed sensor system was developed that weaves unjacketed wires at two distinct layers in a lattice to form a complex capacitor; the capacitance increases as the lattice is compressed and can detect lattice deformation. A structure was fabricated and demonstrated with both static compression as well as low-velocity impact to highlight the utility for wearable applications. This work is focused on improving the performance of American football helmets as highlighted by the National Football League (NFL) Helmet Challenge Symposium; however, the lattice sensing concept can be extended to metal and ceramic lattices as well - relevant to the automotive and aerospace industries.

Reduction of Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries

Participation in football has skyrocketed in the last two decades. With this influx of participation, there is increased research going into sports-related mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) or sports-related concussions. The use of aftermarket external padding for football helmets is examined concerning impact force accelerations and impact severity. In each study examined, there were no live patients but instead, the use of sensors and mannequin heads to fill different helmets. The use of inner helmet telemetry systems was used to obtain the data in both studies. In these studies, the data collected indicated a reduction in either force or impact severities. In higher velocities, there was a significant change in the Gadd Severity Index (GSI) with or without the Guardian-Cap and where the impact took place (Bowman, Breedlove, Breedlove, Lininger, &amp;amp; Nauman, 2017). With both studies showing significant findings with confidence intervals (CI) in the 95th percentile, there is a need for further evaluation of the topic and lager scale studies for a more powerful significance.

Correction to: Development and Multi-Scale Validation of a Finite Element Football Helmet Model.

This correction is to add the middle initials of all authors, which were inadvertently omitted from the original article.

A modular impact diverting mechanism for football helmets

To mitigate the injurious effect of the rotational acceleration of the brain, a modular Impact Diverting Mechanism (IDM) has been developed. The IDM can replace stickers (decals) that normally attach to the exterior of a football helmet. The IDM decals reduce friction and catch points between the covered area with the IDM on the outer shell of the helmet and the impacting surface, thereby decreasing rotational acceleration acting on the player’s head. A Riddell Speed helmet’s exterior was prepared with the IDM and outfitted to a headform equipped with linear accelerometers and gyroscopes. The helmets were tested at an impact velocity of 5.5 m/s at 15°, 30°, and 45° to the vertical: on the front, side, and back of the helmet. Results of 135 impact tests in the lab show that the IDM decal, when compared to helmets without it, reduced the rotational acceleration, rotational velocity, SI, HIC, and RIC ranging from 22% to 77%, 20% to 74%, 13% to 68%, 7% to 68%, 31% to 94%, respectively. Protection against rotational acceleration from oblique impacts is not prioritized in modern football helmets, as evident by current standard helmet testing protocols. This study demonstrates that the inclusion of the IDM decals in football helmets can help reduce the effects of rotational acceleration of the head during oblique impacts.

Helmet Prototype Response Time Assessment using NCAA Division 1 Collegiate Football Athletes

Background: With advances in concussion research, an increasing amount of resources are being allocated to advancing football helmet technology. Objective: This study assesses the claim that a new modified helmet prototype provides greater field of view for the user as compared to a commonly worn helmet by players. Method: The helmets—Riddell SpeedFlex and the modified helmet—were compared based on user response time while performing a response test task using the FITLIGHT Trainer system, actual helmet field of view blockage, users’ subjective perception of field of view, and balance tests. Eighteen National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division 1 American football student-athletes completed the response test task and questionnaire. Results: The results demonstrate evidence that the SpeedFlex helmet provided by the equipment staff significantly increases wearers’ response times, F(2,20) = 5.646, p &lt; 0.05. Also, while the quantification of the field of view perception was similar across helmet types, the student-athlete participants perceived the modified helmet to have significantly more field of view while performing the response test task, 1.56 v. 2.56; p &lt; 0.05 for frontal vision and 2.83 v. 5.39; p &lt; 0.05 for peripheral vision. Conclusion: In addition to the findings, this study also lays out a response time test protocol using the FITLIGHT Trainer system that can be used for assessment of response time testing of football and other helmets in future studies.

New Analysis Suggests There Is No Such Thing as Harmless Head Contact in Football

New Analysis Suggests There Is No Such Thing as Harmless Head Contact in Football