Food And Drug Administration Adverse Event Research Articles

Exploring Adverse Events and Utilization of Topical Hemostatic Agents in Surgery.

Background and Objectives:This retrospective study provides preliminary qualitative assessment of the adverse events (AEs), focusing on pelvic and abdominal AEs and patient outcomes reported for three hemostatic agents used in gynecologic surgery.Methods:Utilization rates for oxidized regenerated cellulose powder (ORC), polysaccharide powder (PSP), and fibrin sealant solution (FSS) were obtained from hospitals via the Premier Healthcare databases for all surgical procedures from January 1, 2018 to September 30, 2020. All reported cases were extracted from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database for ORC and PSP and from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database for FSS. Distributions of AEs by anatomical site (MAUDE/FAERS) and surgical procedures by specialty (Premier) were evaluated for each product. Number of cases and number and types of AEs were compared to the total utilization for each product.Results:PSP was the most used product during the period analyzed (n = 126,509 uses), followed by FSS (n = 80,628 uses), and ORC (n = 41,583 uses). Distribution of surgical procedures by anatomical site varied significantly between hemostatic agents (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with more patient cases with AEs and numbers of reported AEs compared with PSP and FSS (p < 0.001). ORC was associated with higher number of infections than PSP (p < 0.001) and FSS (p < 0.001).Conclusion:These findings suggest that ORC use in abdominal and pelvic surgery may result in more postoperative complications compared with non-ORC hemostatic agents. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare efficacy and safety of these products.

Multiple Sclerosis immunotherapies and COVID-19 mortality: an analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

Background:Evidence on mortality risks associated with MS-immunotherapies during the SARS-CoV2 pandemic derived thus far mainly from single country experiences.Objective:In this analysis, we aim to determine the frequency of COVID-19 associated fatality reports of patients receiving an MS-immunotherapy as reported to the international Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from February 2020 to March 2021.Methods:In all, 1071 cases for this cross-sectional analysis were retrieved from FAERS and a multivariable logistic regression was performed. We adjusted for sex, age, region, month of report to FDA, immunotherapy-class and additionally for healthcare-system and pandemic-related metrics.Result:Anti-CD20 therapies (60%) followed by sphingosine-1 phosphate modulators (12%) and dimethylfumarat (10%) were reported most frequently. In 50% of the cases, MS-phenotype is not reported, relapsing MS in 35% and progressive MS in 15%. Besides older age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–1.13; p < 0.01), anti-CD20 therapies were significantly associated with a higher risk of death (OR: 4.1; 95% CI: 1.17–14.46; p = 0.03), whereas female sex was associated with a reduced mortality risk (OR: 0.4, 95% CI: 0.22–0.72; p < 0.01).Conclusion:Using international open access data and a multidisciplinary approach for risk prediction, we identified an increased mortality risk associated with anti-CD20 therapies, which is in line with national and multi-national cohort studies.

How routine pharmacovigilance failed to identify finasteride's persistent sexual side effects.

How routine pharmacovigilance failed to identify finasteride's persistent sexual side effects.

The association between GLP-1 receptor agonist and diabetic ketoacidosis in the FDA adverse event reporting system

Background and aimsIn 2019, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) of the United Kingdom (UK) and food and drug administration (FDA) of the United States of America (US) suggested that the relationship between glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) deserved attention. This study is aiming to assess the association between GLP-1RA and DKA/ketosis in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Methods and resultsUsing FAERS database, we firstly extract the number of DKA reports from the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2019 and calculate proportional reporting ratios (PRRs). We then mined each FAERS file from 2004 Q1 to 2020 Q4 and obtained detailed information on DKA reports. From the first quarter (Q1) of 2004 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2019, there are 1382 DKA cases (1491 ketosis cases) associated with GLP-1RA in the FAERS database. There was a slight disproportionate reporting of DKA associated with overall GLP-1RA (PRR 1.49, 95%CI 1.24–1.79, p < 0.001) after excluding the impact of SGLT2i, T1D and insulin. Any disproportionality disappeared after selecting the GLP-1RA combined with insulin for comparison. ConclusionsWhen GLP-1RA not combined with insulin, the disproportionality of DKA reports associated with GLP-1RA was observed. Our analysis mined the FAERS database to provide evidence and highlight the potential association between DKA adverse events and GLP-1RA therapy that clinicians tend to overlook.

218 Online Social Listening Surveillance for Earlier Insights About Loperamide Abuse/Misuse, 2015-2021

Loperamide (LOP) is a safe, effective antidiarrheal medication available over-the-counter (OTC) for over 30 years with a maximum dose of 8 mg/day for adults. Intentional LOP abuse/misuse (ingesting 70-200 mg/day to self-treat opioid withdrawal symptoms or achieve euphoria) was first reported in online forums in 2005. Following a 2016 US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Drug Safety Communication on the potential risk of cardiovascular adverse events with high doses of LOP, the OTC industry initiated a communications campaign (www.LoperamideSafety.org) to educate health professionals, including emergency medicine specialists, about LOP abuse/misuse awareness and prevention. Retrospective surveillance (eg, FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database and National Poison Data System) has traditionally been employed to track reports of drug abuse/misuse. We utilized modern online social listening technology to observe and analyze comments/conversations (posts) about LOP abuse/misuse on various websites and online social media platforms to gain earlier insight into potential LOP abuse/misuse. Utilizing the software tools Crimson Hexagon and Synthesio, we scanned thousands of publicly accessible user posts in online blogs, forums, and social networks – including major platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Reddit, and Forums – from January 2015 to March 2021 to observe posts about LOP abuse/misuse. Listening consisted of keyword-based scrapes of user-generated content using search terms including loperamide, Imodium, overdose, OD, get high, getting high, withdrawal, and related terms/phrases. Findings were analyzed and reported quarterly. From January 2015 to March 2021, there were 27,213 user posts regarding LOP abuse/misuse among all observed online platforms. Annual post volume peaked in 2016 before declining in 2019/2020, consistent with the pattern of annual intentional exposure cases reported by the American Association of Poison Control Centers. Over 2015-2021, there was an average of 390 posts per month. Since May 2018, Reddit contained the majority of posts (70%), followed by Twitter (18%), YouTube (6%), Forums (4%), Facebook (<1%), and other sites (<1%). Reddit and Forums accounted for an increasing percentage of posts over time with a decrease for all other platforms. Posts primarily addressed the use of high-dose LOP for easing withdrawal symptoms (73%) or seeking euphoria (17%). Posts about risks and dangers of misuse/abuse were 16% of Reddit posts from Q2 2020 to Q1 2021, with a peak of 22% in Q2 2020. Spikes in posts coincided with key events, including journal article publications regarding effects of high doses (2,499 posts in May 2016 and 830 posts in January 2017) and FDA Drug Safety Communications regarding abuse/misuse of LOP (650 posts in June 2016 and 1,400 posts in January 2018). Post volume also appeared to increase in relation to US COVID-19 infection rates in 2020/2021 slightly. Online chatter about LOP abuse/misuse rose from 2015 to a peak in 2016 before declining in 2019/2020, consistent with the pattern of reported annual intentional exposure cases. While not a substitute for epidemiological surveillance, online social media listening is a useful adjunct surveillance strategy for earlier insight into potential LOP abuse/misuse by observing and analyzing online comments/conversations, sentiments and contexts.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Use Associated With Fournier's Gangrene: A Review of Case Reports and Spontaneous Post-Marketing Cases.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are effective for glycemic control and have demonstrated cardiorenal benefits. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) released a boxed warning in 2018 regarding the potential development of Fournier's gangrene (FG) with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors. FG is a serious perineal infection with a mortality rate of up to 88% in some cases. To report spontaneous post-marketing cases from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and case reports from the literature of FG associated with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors and to determine whether correlations exist with specific agents. A search of the FAERS database was conducted to identify reported cases of FG associated with the use of any FDA-approved SGLT2 inhibitor between 1 March 2013 and 30 June 2020. Additionally, a literature search was conducted of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane library using PRISMA guidelines to identify case reports of FG with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors up to 9 October 2020. A total of 491 cases from the FAERS database were included for review. Descriptive analysis depicted more cases in the empagliflozin, canagliflozin, and dapagliflozin groups than in the ertugliflozin group. Nine case reports were included from the literature review; four attributed to dapagliflozin, three to empagliflozin, and two to canagliflozin. The median ages from cases reported in the FAERS database and from the literature review were 54 and 52 years, respectively. In both datasets, males had a higher incidence of FG than females. Additional data reported include clinical outcomes and concomitant antihyperglycemic medications. Consistent findings are noted in this systematic review and warrant further investigation to elucidate the association between SGLT2 inhibitor use and the development of FG. These results may drive enhanced prescribing patterns to consider patient-specific risk factors and timely monitoring, especially as more indications are approved related to these medications' cardiorenal protective properties.

Influence of anticancer agents on sexual function: An in vivo study based on the US FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

BackgroundPatients with cancer are treated with chemotherapeutics that cause adverse effects, including erectile dysfunction (ED).ObjectivesWe investigated erectile function in rats after the administration of anticancer agents based on data retrieved through mining of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) database.Materials and methodsThe statistical signal strength for the association between anticancer drugs and ED was calculated using the reporting odds ratio (ROR). A drug–event combination was detected when the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the ROR exceeded 1.00. Rats were administered anticancer agents detected in the FDA AERS analysis. Erectile function was assessed using intracavernous pressure (ICP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) analysis after electrical stimulation of the cavernous nerve. Statistical significance was determined using Welch's t‐test or two‐way ANOVA.ResultsMelphalan (L‐PAM; ROR = 4.72, 95% CI = 2.78–8.00), vincristine (VCR; ROR = 2.47, 95% CI = 1.54–3.97), docetaxel (DTX; ROR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.28–3.95), methotrexate (MTX; ROR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.39–2.75), and doxorubicin (DOX; ROR = 1.82, 95% CI = 1.07–3.19) enhanced ED risk. L‐PAM and MTX decreased the ICP/MAP ratio 1 week after administration. VCR and DOX decreased erectile function 4 weeks after administration. DTX decreased erectile function at all assessed time points.Discussion and conclusionCertain anticancer agents should be considered risk factors for ED.Our results provide possible treatment strategies for maintaining erectile function in cancer survivors, including careful erectile function monitoring after treatment.

Correlation Analysis of Target Selectivity and Side Effects of FDA‐Approved Kinase Inhibitors**

AbstractKinase inhibitors (KIs) represent a popular class of therapeutic agents and chemical probes but most of them tend to be polypharmacological. Receptor and non‐receptor Tyrosine KIs can target more than 100 kinases simultaneously compare to other KIs. We here analyze the molecular targets of 41 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)‐approved KIs. We chose 18 drugs (Tyrosine KIs) and sought out to evaluate their selectivity profile and engagement with a number of targets in vivo at clinically relevant doses. We also wanted to see whether there prevails any correlation between the target engagement profile and the reported side effects for specific KIs chosen as test cases. To explore all clinical targets of the 18 KIs, we considered the free (unbound) maximum serum concentration (Cmax) of each KI and only chose targets for which the cognate affinities lie within the reported free Cmax values, thereby allowing plausible interaction in clinical doses. We retrieved the side effects of those KIs that is reported in the FDA adverse event reporting system. We illustrate how correlation analysis of target‐side effect can give a new insight into the off target of KIs and their effect on increasing the toxicity of KIs. These analyses could aid our understanding of the structural‐activity relationship of KIs.

Neoplasm Reports in Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System Following Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Recalls.

A worldwide voluntary recall of valsartan in July 2018 due to the potential carcinogen N-nitrosodimethylamine received extensive media and public attention. This was followed by more Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recalls regarding other contaminated ARB (angiotensin receptor blocker) products. Our study investigated the association between the FDA recalls and ARB neoplasm adverse events (AEs) reported to the FDA adverse event reporting system. In this cross-sectional study, data were retrospectively collected from the FDA adverse event reporting system database from January 2015 to December 2019. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were estimated to detect signals of association between ARBs (valsartan, irbesartan, and losartan) and reported neoplasm AEs using negative (amoxicillin and sertraline) and positive (omeprazole and ranitidine) control exposures. The χ2 was used to compare categorical variables. A total of 2 181 524 AEs, including 10 461 nonmetastatic neoplasm AEs were analyzed. Monthly RORs (95% CI) of valsartan-associated neoplasms versus controls (ROR*: valsartan/negative exposures; ROR†: valsartan/omeprazole; and ROR‡: valsartan/ranitidine) showed the highest signals after the recall date in July 2018 (7.64 [4.78-12.19]*; 4.77 [3.36-6.79]†; 4.13 [2.50-6.84]‡) and August 2018 (7.87 [5.19-11.94]*; 5.65 [4.12-7.75]†; and 7.20 [4.46-11.63]‡). In contrast, the highest cancer signals for the irbesartan and losartan recalls detected in March 2019 (4.80*; 4.06†; and 3.38‡) and April 2019 (3.63*; 3.69†; and 2.52‡) respectively, were lower. One-year postrecall reported neoplasm AEs were ≈2-fold higher for valsartan than irbesartan (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 1.47-2.13], P<0.0001) and losartan (OR, 2.07 [95% CI, 1.85-2.32], P<0.0001). Although all ARBs had the same nitrosamine contamination, we found 1-year postrecall versus prerecall cancer signals for valsartan were 3-fold higher versus control exposures, while the changes in RORs for irbesartan and losartan were only 20-30% higher. Significantly more postrecall neoplasms were reported for valsartan, with higher valsartan-associated cancer signals compared with irbesartan and losartan, although they all contained the same carcinogenic contaminant. Extensive media coverage of the FDA valsartan recall may have alarmed patients and generated these abrupt, biologically infeasible cancer signals.

DPP-4 Inhibitors and Increased Reporting Odds of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Pharmacovigilance Study of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2006 to 2020.

In recent years, an association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid has been detected in pharmacovigilance studies in European and Asian countries; however, no pharmacovigilance data have been published yet in the USA. The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between bullous pemphigoid and DPP-4 inhibitors and other oral diabetes mellitus medications in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Case/non-case analyses were performed in the FAERS using data from 2006 to 2020 to examine the reporting odds ratio (ROR) signal for bullous pemphigoid for all classes of oral diabetes medications. These analyses were performed under multiple conditions to control for bias: (1) comparison to all other drugs in the FAERS; (2) comparison to other diabetes medications; and (3) comparison to all other diabetes medications where only a single agent was implicated. A statistically significant ROR for bullous pemphigoid was found for DPP-4 inhibitors under all conditions: (1) 109.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 101.61-118.62); (2) 74.46 (95% CI 60.58-91.52); and (3) 35.94 (95% CI 27.91-46.28). A larger signal was seen for non-US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved (anagliptin, vildagliptin, teneligliptin) vs FDA-approved DPP-4 inhibitors (alogliptin, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin), likely because of an overestimation of the ROR for non-FDA-approved drugs. The largest signal was seen under conditions 1 and 2 with vildagliptin (1) 1022.83 (95% CI 909.45-1150.35) and (2) 158.84 (95% CI 127.01-198.66) followed by anagliptin (1) 628.63 (95% CI 221.36-1785.24) and (2) 60.64 (95% CI 20.98-175.26), alogliptin, teneligliptin, linagliptin, sitagliptin, and saxagliptin. Under condition 3, the largest signal was seen with linagliptin 122.25 (95% CI 93.96-159.07). Both metformin and the sulfonylureas had a significant ROR under condition 2 [3.42 (95% CI 3.01-3.89) and 2.07 (95% CI 1.66-2.57) respectively]; however, this association was not present under condition 3 as only confounded cases occurred, and a large majority of reported cases had concurrent exposure to a DPP-4 inhibitor. Our findings support an association between DPP-4 inhibitors and bullous pemphigoid. This association was maintained under controls to limit bias and falsely elevated signal, including controlling for disease state and cases with multiple drug exposures. Non-FDA-approved DPP-4 inhibitors had a larger ROR compared with FDA-approved DPP-4 inhibitors, likely owing to fewer reported adverse effects overall for non-FDA-approved drugs in FAERS.

The impact of anti-TNFα agents on weight-related changes: new insights from a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

ABSTRACT Introduction Studies in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) have inconsistently suggested that anti-TNFα therapy may be associated with excessive weight gain. Areas covered We performed a nested case/non-case analysis to investigate the anti-TNF-α inhibitor-associated body-changes in the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The risk was expressed as a measure of disproportionality using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) while adjusting for sex, drugs known to cause weight gain and reporter type. We also performed a time-to-onset (TTO) analysis of body weight-related events. Results Infliximab was the most commonly involved TNF-α inhibitor in body weight-related changes, reaching an aROR of 1.42 (95%CI:1. 26; 1.59). An increased risk was especially found in patients affected by rheumatic disorders, both in the adult and pediatric population. The median TTO after the start of anti- TNFα therapy was about 6–7 months for both children and adults. Conclusions Given the potential effect of these agents on the excess weight gain in IMIDs patients, continuous attention for this side effect with appropriate counseling regarding lifestyle modifications are warranted, especially in those at high risk for obesity.

Safety of Epidural Steroid Injections for Lumbosacral Radicular Pain: Unmet Medical Need.

Objective:Epidural steroid injections (ESIs) are a commonly utilized treatment for lumbosacral radicular pain caused by intervertebral disc herniation or stenosis. Although effective in certain patient populations, ESIs have been associated with serious complications, including paralysis and death. In 2014, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a safety warning on the risk of injecting corticosteroids into the epidural space. The aims of this article were to review the neurological complications associated with ESIs and to compare the formulations, safety, and effectiveness of commercially available corticosteroids given by transforaminal, interlaminar, or caudal injection.Methods:Serious adverse events associated with ESIs were identified by a search of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. A MEDLINE search of the literature was conducted to identify clinical trials comparing the safety and effectiveness of nonparticulate and particulate corticosteroid formulations.Results:Neurological complications with ESIs were rare and more often associated with the use of particulate corticosteroids administered by transforaminal injection. Among the 10 comparative-effectiveness studies reviewed, 7 found nonparticulate steroids had comparable efficacy to particulate steroids, and 3 studies suggested reduced efficacy or shorter duration of effect for nonparticulate steroids.Discussion:The risk of complications for transforaminal ESI is greater with particulate corticosteroids. Nonparticulate corticosteroids, which are often recommended as first-line therapy, may have a short duration of effect, and many commercial formulations contain neurotoxic preservatives. The safety profile of ESIs may continue to improve with the development of safer, sterile formulations that reduce the risk of complications while maintaining efficacy.

Thyroid dysfunction related to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A real-world study based on FAERS.

The adverse events of thyroid dysfunction caused by the use of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (VEGFR-TKIs) have not been confirmed in a real-world investigation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between thyroid dysfunction and treatment using Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved VEGFR-TKIs. Four data-mining algorithms were employed to detect thyroid dysfunction signals for VEGFR-TKIs, using data in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database from 68 quarters. MySQL Workbench and R were used to conduct statistical analysis. We identified 32679 reports of thyroid dysfunction, of which 1567 listed VEGFR-TKIs as the primary suspected drugs. All four algorithms showed that the strength of the signals for hypothyroidism were greater than those for hyperthyroidism, for all the VEGFR-TKIs. In most cases, the median appearance time was within 100days of initiation of VEGFR-TKIs therapy, except in the case of ponatinib. This indicated the need to actively identify and manage thyroid dysfunction during the early stages of VEGFR-TKIs treatment. This study systematically identified the pharmacovigilance signals of thyroid dysfunction associated with the use of VEGFR-TKIs, using the FAERS database.

Adverse events reported to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System for tisagenlecleucel.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, tisagenlecleucel, in August 2017. We sought to describe adverse events (AEs) reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for tisagenlecleucel in the post-marketing period. We searched FAERS reports to identify U.S. patients treated with tisagenlecleucel between August 30, 2017-August 31, 2019. We reviewed individual reports, calculated AE frequencies and reporting rates (RRs), and used Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean methods to identify disproportionate reporting. We identified 646 de-duplicated reports with a median age at AE of 18 (interquartile range: 11-56) years. The overall RR was 81.0%, and more than 95% of reports described a serious outcome. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) was the most frequently reported AE (51.1%) with a RR of 41.4%; neurotoxicity was reported less frequently (21.2%), with a RR of 17.2%. Most disproportionately reported AEs were listed on the package insert or confounded by indication. We identified 13 subsequent neoplasms (SPN), the majority occurring within 6 months of tisagenlecleucel administration, and none reporting evidence of insertional mutagenesis. A total of 165 reports (26%) described a death outcome; most deaths occurred >30 days after treatment. The majority of deaths (64%) were due to progression of the underlying lymphoid neoplasm, and few (<5%) were attributed to CRS or neurotoxicity. We did not identify new safety concerns reported for tisagenlecleucel in the post-marketing period. Reporting rates for CRS and neurotoxicity were lower than identified in the prelicensure clinical trials.

Feature engineering and machine learning for causality assessment in pharmacovigilance: Lessons learned from application to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System

BackgroundOur objective was to support the automated classification of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports for their usefulness in assessing the possibility of a causal relationship between a drug product and an adverse event. MethodWe used a data set of 326 redacted FAERS reports that was previously annotated using a modified version of the World Health Organization–Uppsala Monitoring Centre criteria for drug causality assessment by a group of SEs at the FDA and supported a similar study on the classification of reports using supervised machine learning and text engineering methods. We explored many potential features, including the incorporation of natural language processing on report text and information from external data sources, for supervised learning and developed models for predicting the classification status of reports. We then evaluated the models on a larger data set of previously unseen reports. ResultsThe best-performing models achieved recall and F1 scores on both data sets above 0.80 for the identification of assessable reports (i.e. those containing enough information to make an informed causality assessment) and above 0.75 for the identification of reports meeting at least a Possible causality threshold. ConclusionsCausal inference from FAERS reports depends on many components with complex logical relationships that are yet to be made fully computable. Efforts focused on readily addressable tasks, such as quickly eliminating unassessable reports, fit naturally in SE's thought processes to provide real enhancements for FDA workflows.

Assessing Adverse Drug Reactions Reported for New Respiratory Medications in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System Database.

Between 2012 and 2017, 25 new medications or combination products were approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in treatment of chronic lower respiratory diseases (CLRDs). With limited data on post-marketing patient exposure to these drugs, their safety profiles remain unknown. This study aims to provide post-marketing surveillance of these medications. A list of new CLRD medications approved between 2012 and 2017 was generated through searches on Drugs.com (https://www.drugs.com), FDA.gov (https://www.fda.gov), and IBM Micromedex (https://www.micromedexsolutions.com/home/dispatch/ssl/true). Data describing adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were collected from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System for analysis. Of the 25 identified medications, we selected 4 medications indicated for asthma or COPD with at least 500 reports. Only ADRs catalogued with these medications as the primary suspect were analyzed. Reporting odds ratios were calculated for the top 10 ADRs of each CLRD medication. A total of 61,682 ADR reports were collected for newly approved CLRD medications (n = 27,190 older adults; n = 30,502 male). Reports of COPD medications (umeclidinium and umeclidinium/vilanterol) indicate that umeclidinium/vilanterol yielded a higher reporting odds ratio than umeclidinium alone for reports of pain. Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol had higher reporting odds ratios for cough, pain, and dizziness than budesonide/formoterol and fluticasone propionate/salmeterol. Our findings suggest that the incidence of different adverse events experienced by patients in post-marketing reports resembles the incidence reported in pre-marketing clinical trials for COPD medications, except for fluticasone furoate/vilanterol, which has several differences.

Hepatotoxicity reports in the FDA adverse event reporting system database: A comparison of drugs that cause injury via mitochondrial or other mechanisms

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading reason for preclinical safety attrition and post-market drug withdrawals. Drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity has been shown to play an essential role in various forms of DILI, especially in idiosyncratic liver injury. This study examined liver injury reports submitted to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) for drugs associated with hepatotoxicity via mitochondrial mechanisms compared with non-mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. The frequency of hepatotoxicity was determined at a group level and individual drug level. A reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated as the measure of effect. Between the two DILI groups, reports for DILI involving mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity had a 1.43 (95% CI 1.42–1.45; P < 0.0001) times higher odds compared to drugs associated with non-mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. Antineoplastic, antiviral, analgesic, antibiotic, and antimycobacterial drugs were the top five drug classes with the highest ROR values. Although the top 20 drugs with the highest ROR values included drugs with both mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial injury mechanisms, the top four drugs (ROR values > 18: benzbromarone, troglitazone, isoniazid, rifampin) were associated with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. The major demographic influence for DILI risk was also examined. There was a higher mean patient age among reports for drugs that were associated with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity [56.1 ± 18.33 (SD)] compared to non-mitochondrial mechanisms [48 ± 19.53 (SD)] (P < 0.0001), suggesting that age may play a role in susceptibility to DILI via mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity. Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that reports of liver injury were 2.2 (odds ratio: 2.2, 95% CI 2.12–2.26) times more likely to be associated with older patient age, as compared with reports involving patients less than 65 years of age. Compared to males, female patients were 37% less likely (odds ratio: 0.63, 95% CI 0.61–0.64) to be subjects of liver injury reports for drugs associated with mitochondrial toxicity mechanisms. Given the higher proportion of severe liver injury reports among drugs associated with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity, it is essential to understand if a drug causes mitochondrial toxicity during preclinical drug development when drug design alternatives, more clinically relevant animal models, and better clinical biomarkers may provide a better translation of drug-induced mitochondrial toxicity risk assessment from animals to humans. Our findings from this study align with mitochondrial mechanisms of toxicity being an important cause of DILI, and this should be further investigated in real-world studies with robust designs.

Real-world risk of anosmia with cancer directed systemic therapy: A pharmacovigilance assessment using FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database.

e18790 Background: Anosmia is a rare and under-reported adverse event associated with the use of several oncologic drugs. Instances of olfactory disturbances following administration of chemotherapeutic agents have been sporadically documented in case reports and case series. We aimed to conduct a more comprehensive study to generate signal for anosmia as adverse effect of drugs used for oncologic indications. Methods: The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) database, a pharmacovigilance database, was used to extract data. All reported cases of anosmia in the database were filtered for an indication of cancer. Descriptive analysis was conducted using SPSS 26. Results: Total 10250 cases of anosmia were extracted from FAERS database. Out of these, cancer as an indication for medication use was noted in 139 cases. Some of the most common suspect medications exclusively associated with more than one case of anosmia were palbociclib (n=16), enzalutamide (13), pazopanib (8), cabozantinib (8), letrozole (6), leuprolide (5), niraparib (5), rucaparib (4), tamoxifen (4), capecitabine (3), everolimus (3), anastrazole (2), exemestane (2), zoledronic acid (2), vandetanib (2) and vismodegib (2). Detailed description of medications with highest number of reported cases is listed in Table. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (interquartile range 58-71). Anosmia was reported more commonly in females (64% ) as compared to males (33.8%). Reactions were reported to the FDA more commonly by consumers (56.8%) as compared to healthcare professionals (40.3% cases). Out of 139 patients with anosmia, 93 (66.9%) had concomitant ageusia, 8 (5.7 %) had dysgeusia and 6 (4.3%) patients had neuropathy. Conclusions: This study demonstrates a signal for anosmia as side effect in patients receiving select oncologic medications based on the FAERS database. It is worth noting that none of the suspect medications identified in this study have anosmia listed as known adverse reaction on accompanying package insert. Further studies need to be conducted to confirm if causal relationship exists between use of these drugs and olfactory function compromise. [Table: see text]

Real-world experience of ocrelizumab initiation in a diverse multiple sclerosis population

BackgroundOcrelizumab (OCR) is a humanized monoclonal antibody directed against CD20 positive B-lymphocytes. It was approved for use in 2017 by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for both the relapsing-remitting and primary progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). ObjectiveTo provide real-world data for patients with MS treated with OCR in our center and evaluate both the safety and efficacy across different ethnic groups not studied in previous clinical trials. MethodsWe performed a retrospective observational analysis of MS patients who were treated with OCR from March 31, 2017 to April 30, 2020. We collected data on patients who had received at least a one dose infusion of OCR at our MS center. Patient characteristics, including demographics, clinical disease course, and documented side effects, were collected and analyzed. ResultsA total of 82 patients were eligible for this study, of which 72% had relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), 14% had primary progressive MS (PPMS), and 11% active/relapsing secondary progressive MS (SPMS). 22% of our patients were of African American descent, 61% Caucasian, and 17% of Hispanic descent. The mean age of starting OCR was 41 ± 11 years. 47% were treatment naïve when started on OCR, 24% were previously treated with one disease-modifying therapy (DMT), 14% were treated with two DMTs, and 15% were treated with more than two DMTs prior to OCR. 50% of patients had at least one adverse event while on OCR; 4.8% had adverse events requiring to OCR discontinuation, 36% had infusion-related reactions, and 7.3% had viral infections. We found two cases of severe babesiosis along with index cases of re-activation of lichen planus, agranulocytosis, severe lymphopenia, and ectopic pregnancy. There were no cases of malignancy, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, or death within our cohort. The mean time after OCR initiation was 17.3 months in the RRMS group, 22.2 months in the PPMS group, and 28.2 months in SPMS group. The annualized relapse rate reduced from 1.33 to 0.15 in the RRMS group. The mean extended disability status scale (EDSS) scores did not worsen across MS phenotypes and ethnic groups while being treated with OCR. ConclusionsIn a diverse patient population, OCR was well-tolerated without significant adverse events. There were novel cases of severe babesiosis, re-activation of lichen planus, lymphopenia, agranulocytosis, and ectopic pregnancy. It is vital to consider geographic risk factors that may expose patients to Babesia microti (B. microti) when either considering or initiating OCR therapy. There were an additional six cases of severe B. microti cases associated with OCR that were reported to the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) along with multiple babesiosis cases associated with other DMTs, including rituximab. OCR was found in our cohort to be effective by decreasing relapse rates and maintaining EDSS scores. Our study extends the generalizability of OCR from clinical trials to a real-world setting consisting of a diverse population.

Arterial aneurysm and dissection with systemic vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: A review of cases reported to the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System and published in the literature.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved multiple systemic vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors since 2004 to treat various malignancies. Inhibition of the VEGF signaling pathway can result in impairment of vascular wall integrity through medial degeneration and endothelial dysfunction, potentially resulting in arterial (including aortic) aneurysm/dissection. We performed a postmarketing review to evaluate arterial aneurysm/dissection as a potential safety risk for patients with cancer treated with VEGF inhibitors. We searched the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and literature for reports of arterial (including aortic) aneurysm/dissection with VEGF inhibitors currently approved by the FDA for a cancer indication. We identified 240 cases of arterial aneurysm/dissection associated with VEGF inhibitors. The median time to onset of an arterial aneurysm/dissection event from the initiation of a VEGF inhibitor was 94 days (range 1-1955 days). Notably, 22% (53/240) of cases reported fatal outcomes related to arterial aneurysm/dissection. We determined the drug-event association as probable in 15 cases that lacked relevant confounding factors for arterial aneurysm/dissection, which is supported by unremarkable computed tomography (CT) findings prior to starting VEGF inhibitor therapy, despite nondrug-associated background arterial aneurysm/dissection generally demonstrating preexisting arterial abnormalities. FAERS and literature case-level evidence suggests that VEGF inhibitors may have contributed to arterial aneurysm/dissection, as a class effect, based on short onset relative to natural history of disease and biologic plausibility. Cardiovascular and oncology healthcare professionals should be aware of this rare, but life-threatening safety risk associated with VEGF inhibitors.