Folinic Acid, Fluorouracil, And Irinotecan Research Articles

Real-World Evidence of FOLFIRI Combined with Anti-Angiogenesis Inhibitors or Anti-EGFR Antibodies for Patients with Early Recurrence Colorectal Cancer After Adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX Therapy: A Japanese Claims Database Study.

Oxaliplatin-containing adjuvant regimens (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin [FOLFOX/CAPOX]) are used after curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, real-world evidence regarding treatment sequences and outcomes in patients with early recurrence CRC after adjuvant chemotherapy is limited. We aimed to describe the patient characteristics, treatment sequence, and overall duration of second-line (2L) therapy in patients with early recurrence CRC who received adjuvant chemotherapy (FOLFOX/CAPOX) followed by folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) + anti-angiogenesis drugs (AA) or FOLFIRI + anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies. This retrospective study analyzed Japanese administrative data from November 2014 to March 2023 of adult patients who underwent CRC resection surgery, started FOLFOX/CAPOX ≤3 months (mo) after surgery, and had early CRC recurrence. Early recurrence was defined as initiation of FOLFIRI+AA or FOLFIRI+anti-EGFR antibodies as 2L therapy, ≤12 mo of discontinuing adjuvant chemotherapy. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence, median time to treatment discontinuation (mTTD), i.e., duration between the start and end dates of 2L therapy (Kaplan-Meier method), and factors associated with 2L time to treatment discontinuation constituted the study outcomes (Cox regression model). Subgroup analyses were performed for timing of early CRC recurrence (≤6 mo and 6-12 mo) and tumor sidedness. Among the 832 selected patients (median age [minimum-maximum] 67 (24-86) years, 56.4% male), CAPOX (71.3%) was more commonly used than FOLFOX (28.7%) as adjuvant therapy. FOLFIRI+AA (72.5%) was used more commonly than FOLFIRI+anti-EGFR antibodies (27.5%) in 2L. AA and anti-EGFR antibodies groups had similar mTTD: 6.2 mo (95% confidence interval 5.8, 6.9) and 6.1 mo (95% confidence interval 5.2, 7.4). Age ≥70 years showed significant association with shorter 2L treatment duration (hazard ratio 1.2, 95% confidence interval 1.0, 1.4; p = 0.03). The AA cohort's mTTD was numerically shorter in the ≤6 mo recurrence subgroup compared with the 6-12 mo recurrence subgroup (6.1 mo vs 8.1 mo); the anti-EGFR antibodies cohort had similar mTTD (5.8 mo vs 6.2 mo). The AA and anti-EGFR antibodies cohorts also had similar mTTD in the left-sided CRC subgroup (6.5 mo vs 6.2 mo), but not in the right-sided subgroup (5.6 mo vs 3.9 mo). This is the first administrative data-based real-world evidence on treatment sequence and outcomes for patients with early recurrence CRC treated with FOLFIRI+AAs or FOLFIRI+ anti-EGFR antibodies after adjuvant FOLFOX/CAPOX therapy in Japan. Both regimens had similar TTD, but relapse timing and tumor sidedness may influence their efficacy.

FOLFIRI Plus Durvalumab With or Without Tremelimumab in Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Efficacy of second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric or gastrooesphageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma remains limited. To determine the efficacy of 1 or 2 immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) in the treatment of advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial is a randomized, multicenter, noncomparative, phase 2 trial, conducted from August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, at 37 centers in France that included patients with advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma who had disease progression after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. Patients were randomized to receive FOLFIRI plus durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death 1 [PD-L1]) (FD arm) or FOLFIRI plus durvalumab and tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated protein 4 [CTLA-4]) (FDT arm). The efficacy analyses used a clinical cutoff date of January 9, 2023. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 4 months according to RECIST 1.1 criteria evaluated by investigators. Overall, between August 27, 2020, and June 4, 2021, 96 patients were randomized (48 in each arm). The median age was 59.7 years, 28 patients (30.4%) were women and 49 (53.3%) had GEJ tumors. Four month PFS was 44.7% (90% CI, 32.3-57.7) and 55.6% (90% CI, 42.3-68.3) in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. The primary end point was not met. Median PFS was 3.8 and 5.4 months, objective response rates were 34.7% and 37.7%, and median overall survival was 13.2 and 9.5 months in the FD and FDT arms, respectively. Disease control beyond 1 year was 14.9% in the FD arm and 24.4% in the FDT arm. Grade 3 to 4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 22 (47.8%) patients in each arm. A combined positive score (CPS) PD-L1 of 5 or higher was observed in 18 tumors (34.0%) and a tumor proportion score (TPS) PD-L1 of 1% or higher in 13 tumors (24.5%). Median PFS according to CPS PD-L1 was similar (3.6 months for PD-L1 CPS ≥5 vs 5.4 months for PD-L1 CPS <5) by contrast for TPS PD-L1 (6.0 months for PD-L1 TPS ≥1% vs 3.8 months for PD-L1 TPS <1%). Combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors with FOLFIRI in second-line treatment for advanced gastric/GEJ adenocarcinoma showed an acceptable safety profile but antitumor activity only in a subgroup of patients. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03959293.

Refining first-line treatment decision in RAS wildtype (RAS-WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) by combining clinical biomarkers: Results of the randomized phase 3 trial FIRE-3 (AIO KRK0306).

13 Background: Optimal patient selection for first-line treatment targeting epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) in RAS-WT mCRC is based on primary tumor sidedness (PTS) with anti-EGFR being the preferred option for patients with left-sided mCRC (LC). Right-sided mCRCs (RC) are preferentially treated in combination with bevacizumab targeting vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Here, improvement in patient selection was evaluated by combining clinical biomarkers beyond PTS using the randomized phase III trial FIRE-3. Methods: FIRE-3 evaluated first-line FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan) plus cetuximab (FOLFIRI/Cet) versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab (FOLFIRI/Bev) in patients with RAS-WT mCRC. Besides PTS, further clinical biomarkers were evaluated in pairwise combinations using Cox regression models and model-based recursive partitioning with Weibull models to predict treatment benefit of either treatment arm regarding overall survival (OS): age, sex, liver-limited disease status (LLD) and baseline carcinoembryonic antigen serum level (CEA). The resulting P-values of second-order interactions were adjusted using Holm-Bonferroni correction. The model with the best test statistics and P-value was chosen for further evaluations. Results: In 400 patients with RAS-WT mCRC, a model combining PTS and LLD status best predicted treatment outcome of either treatment arm (c-index = 0.603, p=0.005). Here, a significant survival benefit of FOLFIRI/Cet over FOLFIRI/Bev was evident in patients with LC/non-LLD (HR 0.62, p=0.02) compared to LC/LLD (HR 0.83, p=0.40). In patients with RC, FOLFIRI/Bev was significantly associated with increased OS compared to FOLFIRI/Cet when patients suffered from non-LLD (HR 2.09, p=0.010). However, patients with RC/LLD rather had a benefit from FOLFIRI/Cet compared to FOLFIRI/Bev (HR 0.59, p=0.218). Conclusions: Combining clinical biomarkers PTS and LLD status might improve optimal patient selection for targeted first-line treatment in RAS-WT mCRC. Validation in further data sets is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT00433927 .

First-line Palliative Chemotherapy for Colorectal Cancer: a Population-based Analysis of Delivery and Outcomes in a Single-payer Health System

AimsClinical practice guidelines recommend palliative chemotherapy for most patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, outcomes observed in the real world compared with patients enrolled in clinical trials have not been sufficiently described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the delivery and outcomes of first-line palliative chemotherapy administered to patients with colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice compared with clinical trials. Materials and methodsUsing linked health administrative data, we carried out a retrospective population-level cohort study on patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer in Ontario, Canada from 2010 to 2019. Patient, disease and treatment characteristics were summarised. The primary outcome was median overall survival, stratified by treatment prescribed and age. Demographics and outcomes in this real-world population were compared with those from pivotal clinical trials. A multivariable Cox regression model reporting hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals was used to determine factors associated with survival in patients receiving systemic treatment. ResultsWe identified 70 987 patients with a new diagnosis of colorectal cancer, of which 4613 received first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic disease and formed the study cohort. Fifty-eight per cent were male and the mean age was 63 years. Most had colon cancer (69%), at least one comorbidity (73%) and lived in an urban location (79%). Less than half (47%) had surgery after diagnosis. The most common regimen prescribed was folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with bevacizumab or epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRi; n = 2784, 60%). Among all treated patients, the median overall survival was 17.1 months, with survival difference by regimen [median overall survival 18.3 for FOLFIRI with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 19.6 for folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)/capecitabine, oxaliplatin (XELOX) with bevacizumab or EGFRi, 13.6 for FOLFIRI alone and 7.8 for 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine]. Patients aged >80 years were most likely to have received single-agent 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine, and had inferior overall survival compared with their younger counterparts. Compared with pivotal clinical trials, patients in the real world had inferior overall survival outcomes despite similar demographic characteristics (including age and sex). ConclusionsIn this real-world population-based analysis of patients receiving first-line chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer, survival outcomes were inferior to those reported in randomised trials despite similarities in age and sex. This information can be used when counselling patients in routine practice about expected outcomes.

FOLFIRI-bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for advanced biliary tract cancer after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy

BackgroundAdvanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) has a poor prognosis. Gemcitabine with platinum chemotherapy was the standard first-line chemotherapeutic regimen until the recent addition of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies. After disease progression, the only second-line chemotherapy that has demonstrated a survival benefit versus supportive care is FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin), with a modest benefit. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of second-line FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) combined with bevacizumab for advanced BTC.MethodsThis single-center retrospective study enrolled patients with metastatic BTC (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [ICC], extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma [ECC], or gallbladder carcinoma) that progressed after first-line gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. FOLFIRI-bevacizumab was administered intravenously every 2 weeks [folinic acid 200 mg/m², fluorouracil 400 mg/m² (bolus), fluorouracil 2400 mg/m² (46-h continuous intravenous infusion), irinotecan 180 mg/m², and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg] until unacceptable toxicity, patient refusal, or disease progression.ResultsOverall, 28 patients received the FOLFIRI-bevacizumab regimen after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months (95% CI 6.4–16.5). The OS rate was 39.3% (95% CI 24.8–62.3) and 10.7% (95% CI 3.7–32.1) at 12- and 24-months respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months (95% CI 3.1–10.2) with FOLFIRI-bevacizumab. The PFS rates at 12 months and 24 months were 17.9% (95% CI 8.19–39.5] and 10.7% (95% CI 3.7–31.2), respectively. The overall response rate (ORR) to FOLFIRI-bevacizumab was 23.1%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 69.3%. Grade 3-4 adverse events (sAE) were reported in 20 patients (71.4%) treated with FOLFIRI-bevacizumab.ConclusionFOLFIRI-bevacizumab as a second-line treatment for advanced BTC after gemcitabine-based chemotherapy showed efficacy and safety with a promising tumor response rate in this retrospective single-center study.

Maintenance Therapy With Cetuximab After FOLFIRI Plus Cetuximab for RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The optimal maintenance strategy after induction chemotherapy with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody for patients with RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains to be debated. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with single-agent cetuximab after FOLFIRI (leucovorin [folinic acid], fluorouracil, and irinotecan) plus cetuximab induction therapy. The TIME (Treatment After Irinotecan-Based Frontline Therapy: Maintenance With Erbitux]) (PRODIGE 28 [Partenariat de Recherche en Oncologie Digestive]-UCGI 27 [UniCancer GastroIntestinal Group]) phase 2 noncomparative, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 15, 2014, to November 23, 2018, among 139 patients with unresectable RAS wild-type mCRC. The cutoff date for analysis was July 21, 2022. After first-line induction therapy with 8 cycles of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, patients without disease progression were randomized (1:1) to biweekly maintenance with cetuximab or observation. On disease progression, the same induction regimen was recommended for 16 weeks followed by further maintenance with cetuximab or observation until disease progression under the full induction regimen. The primary end point was the 6-month progression-free rate from randomization. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. An exploratory biomolecular analysis, using next-generation sequencing, investigated the putative prognostic value of the tumor mutation profile. Of 214 patients enrolled (141 men [65.9%]; median age, 67 years [range, 23-85 years]), 139 were randomized to receive cetuximab (n = 67; 45 men [67.2%]; median age, 64 years [range, 34-85 years]) or to be observed (n = 72; 50 men [69.4%]; median age, 68 years [23-85 years]). The 6-month progression-free rate was 38.8% ([26 of 67] 95% CI, 27.1%-51.5%) in the cetuximab group and 5.6% ([4 of 72] 95% CI, 1.5%-13.6%) in the observation group. At a median follow-up of 40.5 months (95% CI, 33.6-47.5 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization was 5.3 months (95% CI, 3.7-7.4 months) in the cetuximab group and 2.0 months (95% CI, 1.8-2.7 months) in the observation group. Median overall survival (OS) was 24.8 months (95% CI, 18.7-30.4 months) in the cetuximab group and 19.7 months (95% CI, 13.3-24.4 months) in the observation group. In an exploratory multivariate analysis, any tumor-activating mutation in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway genes was associated with shorter PFS from randomization regardless of treatment group (hazard ratio, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.01-2.62]; P = .04). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 treatment-related toxic effect in the cetuximab group during maintenance therapy was rash (8 of 67 [11.9%]). The randomized clinical trial did not meet its primary end point but suggests clinically meaningful PFS and OS benefits associated with cetuximab maintenance therapy. However, maintenance cetuximab or treatment breaks after first-line combination FOLFIRI-cetuximab therapy seems inappropriate for patients with MAPK-mutated independently of the side of primary tumor. A more complete assessment of MAPK pathway mutations warrants further investigation to the refine treatment strategy for patients with RAS wild-type mCRC. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02404935.

Impact of prior bevacizumab therapy on the incidence of ramucirumab-induced proteinuria in colorectal cancer: a multi-institutional cohort study.

The association between prior bevacizumab (BEV) therapy and ramucirumab (RAM)-induced proteinuria is not known. We aimed to investigate this association in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). mCRC patients who received folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus RAM were divided into with and without prior BEV treatment groups. The cumulative incidence of grade 2-3 proteinuria and rate of RAM discontinuation within 6months (6M) after RAM initiation were compared between the two groups. We evaluated 245 patients. In the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard model including prior BEV, age, sex, comorbidities, eGFR, proteinuria ≥ 2 + at baseline, and later line of RAM, prior BEV treatment contributed to proteinuria onset (P < 0.01). A shorter interval between final BEV and initial RAM increased the proteinuria risk; the adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the intervals of < 28days, 28-55days, and > 55days (referring to prior BEV absence) were 2.60 (1.23-5.51), 1.51 (1.01-2.27), and 1.04 (0.76-1.44), respectively. The rate of RAM discontinuation for ≤ 6M due to anti-VEGF toxicities was significantly higher in the prior BEV treatment group compared with that in the no prior BEV treatment group (18% vs. 6%, P = 0.02). Second-line RAM discontinuation for ≤ 6M without progression resulted in shorter overall survival of 132 patients with prior BEV treatment (P < 0.01). Sequential FOLFIRI plus RAM after BEV failure, especially within 55days, may exacerbate proteinuria. Its escalated anti-VEGF toxicity may negatively impact the overall survival.

Comparison of Two Chemotherapy Regimens After First-Line Treatment for HER2-Negative Metastatic Gastric Cancer.

Metastatic stage gastric cancer is a disease with a poor prognosis and the likelihood of achieving a cure in these patients is low. Treatment response to subsequent-line treatments is poor. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and paclitaxel+carboplatin regimens, which are used in subsequent lines of therapy in advanced-stage gastric cancer. This study included 40 patients who have metastatic stage gastric cancer and received FOLFIRI or paclitaxel+carboplatin therapy in subsequent lines of therapy between 2017 and 2022. The data of the patients were analyzed retrospectively. At diagnosis median age was 51 (23-88) years. The tumor was localized in the gastroesophageal junction in eight (20%) patients and in other gastric locations in 32 (80%) patients. At diagnosis, 75% (n=30) of the patients presented with the disease in the metastatic stage, while 25% (n=10) presented with stage II-III disease. Regarding the treatments received in the second and further lines of therapy, 18 (45%) patients received paclitaxel+carboplatin and 22 (55%) patients received a FOLFIRI regimen. Of these treatments, 67.5% (n=27) were given as the second line and 32.5% (n=13) were given as third-line therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 45.5% in the FOLFIRI arm compared to 16.7% in the paclitaxel+carboplatin arm (p=0.05). Both treatment arms had a median progression-free survival (PFS) of three months (p=0.82). The median overall survival (OS) time was seven months in the FOLFIRI arm compared to eight months in the paclitaxel+carboplatin arm (p=0.71). Side effects were similar between both treatment arms. This study determined that FOLFIRI and paclitaxel+carboplatin treatments have similar OS, PFS, and side effect profiles in subsequentline treatment of gastric cancer. The FOLFIRI treatment regimen yielded a higher ORR.

Economic evaluation of encorafenib with cetuximab in patients with BRAF V600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in France: a cost-effectiveness analysis using data from the BEACON CRC randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveThe BEACON CRC randomised controlled trial (NCT02928224) in BRAF-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients showed improved overall survival for the combination treatment of encorafenib (BRAF inhibitor) with cetuximab (EGFR inhibitor)...

A Comparison of Folinic Acid, Fluorouracil and Irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus Bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus Aflibercept as Second-line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

AimTo compare the efficacy and safety of folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab or aflibercept in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients pretreated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. Materials and methodsWe analysed the treatment outcomes of patients receiving FOLFIRI in combination with bevacizumab or aflibercept as second-line treatment for mCRC between October 2017 and March 2020. This analysis included 67 patients receiving FOLFIRI plus aflibercept and 83 receiving FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab. ResultsThe overall response rate (ORR) was 13.6% (95% confidence interval 4.85–22.34) in the FOLFIRI–aflibercept group and 14.7% (95% confidence interval 6.68–22.71) in the FOLFIRI–bevacizumab group. This difference in ORR was not statistically significant. The median progression-free survival was 8.6 months in the FOLFIRI–bevacizumab group and 8.5 months in the FOLFIRI–aflibercept group (P = 0.752). Patients in the FOLFIRI–bevacizumab group showed a median overall survival of 12.4 months, whereas patients in the FOLFIRI–aflibercept group had a median overall survival of 13.7 months (P = 0.276). There were no significant differences in survival between the two treatment groups. The adverse events were also largely similar between the two groups. However, hypertension of grade 3 or more was more frequent in the FOLFIRI–aflibercept group. ConclusionFOLFIRI plus bevacizumab and FOLFIRI plus aflibercept had similar anti-tumour activities and toxicity profiles when used as second-line therapy in mCRC patients. Based on these data, both aflibercept and bevacizumab are suitable anti-angiogenic agents when used in combination with FOLFIRI for mCRC.

FOLFIRI (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) increases not efficacy but toxicity compared with single-agent irinotecan as a second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial.

Background:FOLFIRI [irinotecan, folinic acid (CF), and fluorouracil] is considered a standard second-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens. However, it remains unknown whether fluorouracil is still necessary in this case. This trial was designed to test the superiority of FOLFIRI over single-agent irinotecan as a second-line treatment for patients with mCRC.Methods:This randomized clinical trial was conducted in five hospitals in China. From 4 November 2016 to 17 January 2020, patients aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed unresectable mCRC and who had failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens were screened and enrolled. Patients were randomized to receive either FOLFIRI or irinotecan. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and toxicity. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.Results:A total of 172 patients with mCRC were randomly treated with FOLFIRI (n = 88) or irinotecan (n = 84). The median PFS was 104 and 112 days (3.5 and 3.7 months) in the FOLFIRI and irinotecan groups, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.084, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.7911–1.485; p = 0.6094], and there was also no significant difference in OS and ORR between the two groups. The incidence of the following adverse events (AEs) was significantly higher in the FOLFIRI group than in the irinotecan group: any grade AEs including leucopenia (73.9% versus 55.4%), neutropenia (72.7% versus 56.6%), thrombocytopenia (31.8% versus 18.1%), jaundice (18.2% versus 7.2%), mucositis (40.9% versus 14.5%), vomiting (37.5% versus 21.7%), and fever (19.3% versus 7.2%) and grade 3–4 neutropenia (47.7% versus 21.7%).Conclusion:This is the first head-to-head trial showing that single-agent irinotecan yielded PFS, OS, and ORR similar to FOLFIRI, with a more favorable toxicity profile; therefore, it might be a more favorable standard chemotherapy regimen for mCRC patients who failed first-line XELOX/FOLFOX regimens.Trial registration:This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02935764, registered 17 October 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02935764.

Celecoxib as an adjuvant to chemotherapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomized controlled clinical study.

Objectives:To investigate the anti-tumor activity and tolerability of celecoxib as an adjuvant therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC).Methods:In this randomized controlled study, 54 patients with metastatic CRC were randomized into 2 groups; the control group (n=28) which received 6 cycles of folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) regimen (5-flourouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan), and the celecoxib group (n=26) which received 6 cycles of FOLFIRI regimen plus celecoxib 200 mg twice daily. The study duration was 3 months. Patients were assessed at baseline and at the end of intervention through the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors objective response rate (ORR) and through evaluating the serum concentrations of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), soluble factor-related apoptosis (sFAS), sFAS ligand (sFASL), and epithelial neutrophil-activating peptide -78 (ENA-78/CXCL5). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 6.0 was used for evaluating drug-related toxicity.Results:After intervention, celecoxib/FOLFIRI arm showed significant elevation in ORR as compared to FOLFIRI arm (p=0.001). As compared to FOLFIRI arm, celecoxib/FOLFIRI arm showed significantly lower VEGF (p<0.001), CXCL5 (p<0.001), and sFASL (p<0.001) serum levels and significantly higher sFAS serum level and sFAS/FASL ratio (p<0.001). Furthermore, celecoxib/FOLFIRI arm showed significantly higher progression-free survival and one-year overall survival when compared to FOLFIRI arm.Conclusion:Celecoxib plus chemotherapy may represent an effective and safe synergetic protocol for patients with metastatic CRC. Clinicaltrial.gov ID:NCT03645187

Simultaneous Laparotomy Resection of Recurrent Colorectal Cancer and Liver Metastases Followed by FOLFIRI Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Case Report

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. Combination of systemic therapies with liver resection in colorectal liver metastasis has been shown to be effective in providing promising survival benefits. Here, we present a case of colorectal liver metastases in which we devised a multidisciplinary treatment plan for a better prognosis Objectives and methods: We report a case of a 68 year old male who developed recurrent colorectal cancer with liver metastases after six cycles of chemotherapy one year previously. Radiological examination before liver resection demonstrated evident tumor from metastatic lesion in segment 4b and segment 8 of the liver (figure 1). Simultaneous laparotomy resection of the colorectal cancer and the liver metastasis was performed. The patient is now undergoing adjuvant combination chemotherapy with folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) and has no signs of recurrence. Results: Time interval from the initial colorectal surgery to first hepatic surgery has a median 11 months. Tumor recurrence after resection of colorectal metastasis remains a major problem, about 50% to 75% of the patients develop a recurrence of the disease within two years. A multidisciplinary approach including systemic chemotherapy with or without biologic agents in combination with colorectal liver metastases resection are recommended for all patients, unless there are some contraindications Conclusions: The combination of surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is a possible treatment of choice to cure colorectal liver metastases. Planned surveillance after metastasectomy may be necessary for the early detection of recurrence.

Cost-Effectiveness of First-Line Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Saudi Arabia

ObjectivesOur objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line cetuximab in relation to primary tumor location and after resection from the perspective of the Saudi healthcare system over a lifetime horizon. MethodsTwo standard partitioned survival models were developed in this study comprising 3 health states in each model. The first model was to simulate outcomes and costs of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus cetuximab compared with FOLFIRI alone in 2 target groups—first, in RAS wild-type left-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and second, in patients administered with 4 cycles of FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, who underwent a resection of liver metastases. The second model compared FOLFIRI plus cetuximab with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in wild-type left-sided mCRC and after resection. All cost data and utilities were extracted from published data. ResultsFOLFIRI plus cetuximab in RAS wild-type left-sided mCRC compared with FOLFIRI alone resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of Saudi Riyal (SAR) 180 880 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained ($102 019; cost-effective). After resection of liver metastases, it resulted in SAR140 442 ($79 211) per QALY gained (cost-effective). When comparing FOLFIRI plus cetuximab with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab, it resulted in SAR35 818 ($20 201) per QALY gained (highly cost-effective). After resection, it resulted in SAR109 612 ($61 822) per QALY gained (highly cost-effective). Thus, FOLFIRI plus cetuximab improved QALYs compared with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab at the minimized difference in costs in left-sided mCRC and patients with unresectable metastases. ConclusionFOLFIRI plus cetuximab is cost-effective compared with FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab or FOLFIRI alone in RAS wild-type left-sided mCRC and patients who undergo resection.

Risk-benefit Analysis of FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab/Aflibercept as a Third-line Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

The efficacy of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab (F-RAM) or aflibercept (F-AFL) as a second-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is established. In this study, the risks and benefits of F-RAM/AFL as a third-line treatment after first- and second-line bevacizumab for mCRC were evaluated. Overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between groups treated with F-RAM/AFL (n=17) and trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102) (n=26). Median OS was longer in the third-line F-RAM/AFL group (379 days; 95%CI=157-458 days) than in the TAS-102 group (183 days; 95%CI=80-204 days) (log-rank test, p=0.015). Discontinuation due to AEs was only observed in the F-RAM/AFL group (3 cases). As a third-line treatment for mCRC, F-RAM/AFL should be prioritized over TAS-102 in terms of efficacy; however, the risk of AEs should be considered.

Randomised phase II trial of CAPTEM or FOLFIRI as SEcond-line therapy in NEuroendocrine CArcinomas and exploratory analysis of predictive role of PET/CT imaging and biological markers (SENECA trial): a study protocol

IntroductionPatients with metastatic or locally advanced, non-resectable, grade 3 poorly differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) and lung neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are usually treated with in first-line platinum compounds. There is no standard...

Comparative Cost-effectiveness of Aflibercept and Ramucirumab in Combination with Irinotecan and Fluorouracil-based Therapy for the Second-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Japan

PurposeThe addition of aflibercept (AFL) or ramucirumab (RAM) to folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) prolongs overall survival and progression-free survival compared with FOLFIRI alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as second-line therapy. Although these combination regimens are recommended among the standard therapies, significant additional cost is a concern. The comparative cost-effectiveness of AFL and RAM was examined from the perspective of the Japanese health care payer. MethodsA partitioned survival analysis was constructed. The data sources were the VELOUR (Aflibercept Versus Placebo in Combination With Irinotecan and 5-FU in the Treatment of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer After Failure of an Oxaliplatin Based Regimen) and RAISE (Ramucirumab Versus Placebo in Combination With Second-Line FOLFIRI in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma That Progressed During or After First-Line Therapy With Bevacizumab, Oxaliplatin, and a Fluoropyrimidine) trials, which compared FOLFIRI alone with AFL or RAM in second-line treatment for mCRC. The cost and effectiveness of the combination of AFL or RAM with FOLFIRI were compared with those of FOLFIRI alone and examined between both agents in a 10-year time horizon. The health outcomes were life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). The costs were 2019 revisions to the drug prices and medical fees. The robustness of the model was verified by 1-way sensitivity analyses and a probability sensitivity analysis. A 2% annual discount was applied to the expenses and QALYs. A willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥7.5 million was used. FindingsCompared with FOLFIRI alone, combination AFL or RAM with FOLFIRI had incremental effects of 0.173 QALYs (0.253 LYs) and 0.137 QALYs (0.197 LYs), incremental costs of ¥3,423,481 (US $31,010) and ¥5,766,106 (US $52,229), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of ¥19, 836, 504 (US $179,678) and ¥41, 947, 989 (US $379,964) per QALY, respectively. Results of 1-way sensitivity analyses and probability sensitivity analysis all exceeded a willingness-to-pay threshold of ¥7.5 million. In the comparison of the 2 agents, AFL was a dominant over RAM. ImplicationsAdding AFL or RAM to FOLFIRI in the second line of mCRC treatment was not cost-effective in the Japanese health care system. On the basis of the results of this study, in the treatment of mCRC, it will be necessary to adjust the prices of AFL and RAM with the improvement of clinical parameters, such as survival time and adverse events. Of the 2 agents, AFL was more cost-effective than RAM.

A Randomized Phase II Study of Perioperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab Versus Postoperative Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab in Patients With Upfront Resectable Hepatic Colorectal Metastases

IntroductionWhether patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) gain a survival benefit from perioperative chemotherapy remains controversial. The benefit of including bevacizumab in chemotherapy also remains unclear. Material and MethodsSeventy-six patients with CRLM were randomly assigned to either 6 cycles of FOLFOX (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin)/FOLFIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, and irinotecan) with bevacizumab before and after surgery or 12 cycles after surgery. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. ResultsThe median PFS of all patients was 37.4 months at 5.4 years follow-up, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The PFS between the perioperative group and the postoperative group did not reveal a statistical difference (P = .280). The OS was significantly better in the perioperative group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI],) 0.35-1.02; P = .049). In subgroup patients with carcinoembryonic antigens (CEA) ≥ 5 ng/mL or those with over 2 liver metastases, perioperative group had longer OS than postoperative group (CEA: HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.25-0.93; P = .030; number of liver metastases: HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.30-0.99; P = .049). The largest liver metastases size, disease-free interval, and sidedness did not affect PFS or OS. There was no difference between the 2 groups in postoperative complications with bevacizumab or adverse events during chemotherapy. ConclusionsIn patients with resectable CRLMs, perioperative chemotherapy had no effect on PFS, but improved OS. Patients with high CEA levels or over 2 liver metastases may benefit from perioperative chemotherapy.

Risk Benefit of FOLFIRI Plus Ramucirumab as Third-line and Later-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

The aim of this study was to clarify the risk benefits of folinic acid, fluorouracil, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus ramucirumab (F-RAM) as third-line and later-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We compared the overall survival (OS), adverse events (AEs), and cost of F-RAM to those of trifluridine/tipiracil combination tablet (TAS-102). There was no significant difference in the median OS [6.1 (range=1.2-16.3) months vs. 6.1 (range=1.2-22.3) months; log-rank test, p=0.272] and treatment duration [4.0 (range=1.2-9.6) months vs. 3.5 (range=0.2-12.3) months, p=0.888] between the F-RAM (n=13) and the TAS-102 (n=36) groups. However, AEs were more frequent in the F-RAM group, and 1-year administration of F-RAM cost higher ($81,724.8 vs. $18,931.4, p<0.001). F-RAM as third-line and later-line treatment for mCRC has a poor risk benefit. TAS-102 should be given priority over F-RAM.

The potential in artificial intelligence-driven radiomic signature to predict survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab-based therapy.

247 Background: This analysis was undertaken to forecast survival and enhance treatment decisions for patients (pts) with colorectal cancer (CRC) with liver metastases sensitive to folinic acid, fluorouracil and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) alone [F] or in combination with cetuximab [FC] using simple quantitative radiomic changes between CT scans at baseline and 8 weeks. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 667 pts with KRAS-unselected metastatic CRC in NCT00154102 treated with F and FC. CT quality was classified as high (HQ) or standard (SQ), and four data sets were created and named by treatment quality. Pts were randomly assigned 1:2 to training or validation sets: FCHQ, 38/78 pts; FCSQ, 62/124 pts; FHQ, 51/78 pts; FSQ, 78/158 pts. A machine-learning signature was trained using data set FCHQ to classify pts as treatment-sensitive or treatment-insensitive using just 4 of 3,499 potential radiomic imaging features. Performance was calibrated/validated using ROC curves. Hazard ratios (HRs) and Cox regression models were used to evaluate association with overall survival (OS). Results: The signature used decrease in tumor heterogeneity plus boundary infiltration to successfully predict sensitivity to FC (FCHQ: AUC, 0.80; FCSQ: AUC, 0.72) but failed with non-cetuximab regimens (FHQ: AUC, 0.59; FSQ: AUC, 0.55). The radiomic signature outperformed existing biomarkers ( KRAS mutational status and tumor shrinkage by RECIST 1.1) for sensitivity to cetuximab-based therapy and was strongly associated with OS in the cetuximab-containing sets FCHQ (HR, 44.3; p = 0.0001) and FCSQ (HR, 6.5; p = 0.005). Conclusions: This signature, derived from simple radiomic analysis of tumor imaging phenotype using only standard-of-care CT scans, appeared to be treatment-specific and was superior to all tested prognostic biomarkers. The signature provided early prediction of sensitivity and survival and could be used to guide treatment continuation decisions.