Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Research Articles

Focused ultrasound in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by advanced paramedics

Background: This study describes and evaluates advanced paramedic practitioner (APP) use of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and relates ultrasound findings with decisions to terminate resuscitation. The authors report characteristics of patients who do/do not undergo a FoCUS examination by APPs, ultrasound probe positions used and whether FoCUS findings were associated with decisions to terminate resuscitation or to convey patients to an emergency department (ED) with ongoing resuscitation. Method: A retrospective, observational cohort study of all adult medical OHCA patients attended by APPs in Greater London during 2018 was carried out using data from EMS and APP databases. Results: Twenty-eight APPs attended 1444 OHCA patients in 2018, of whom 744 underwent FoCUS. The subcostal probe position was used most frequently (74%), followed by the parasternal long axis (19%), with significantly smaller use of the parasternal short axis and apical windows. Absence of spontaneous cardiac motion (SCM) was associated with resuscitation being terminated (333 out of 391; 85%) and the presence of SCM was associated with conveyance to the emergency department (213 out of 264 patients; 80%). All decisions to terminate resuscitation were within the APP scope of practice. Conclusion: The authors believe this is the largest prehospital study involving FoCUS in OHCA. An association between FoCUS findings and decisions made to either convey patients to hospital or terminate resuscitation was found. The SC window was most used and ROLE decisions were deemed to be in accordance with local guidance and practice.

Focused ultrasound in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by advanced paramedics

Background: This study describes and evaluates advanced paramedic practitioner (APP) use of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), and relates ultrasound findings with decisions to terminate resuscitation. The authors report characteristics of patients who do/do not undergo a FoCUS examination by APPs, ultrasound probe positions used and whether FoCUS findings were associated with decisions to terminate resuscitation or to convey patients to an emergency department (ED) with ongoing resuscitation. Method: A retrospective, observational cohort study of all adult medical OHCA patients attended by APPs in Greater London during 2018 was carried out using data from emergency medical services (EMS) and APP databases. Results: Twenty-eight APPs attended 1444 OHCA patients in 2018, of whom 744 underwent FoCUS. The subcostal probe position was used most frequently (74%), followed by the parasternal long axis (19%), with significantly smaller use of the parasternal short axis and apical windows. Absence of spontaneous cardiac motion (SCM) was associated with resuscitation being terminated (333 out of 391; 85%) and the presence of SCM was associated with conveyance to the emergency department (213 out of 264 patients; 80%). All decisions to terminate resuscitation were within the APP scope of practice. Conclusion: The authors believe this is the largest prehospital study involving FoCUS in OHCA. An association between FoCUS findings and decisions made to either convey patients to hospital or terminate resuscitation was found. The SC window was most used and ROLE decisions were deemed to be in accordance with local guidance and practice.

Point-of-care ultrasonography in the initial characterization of patients with COVID-19

BackgroundThere is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in chest X-rays and computed tomography scans; however, their availability during this pandemic outbreak might be compromised. Currently, the role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) has yet to be explored. ObjectivesTo describe the POCUS findings of COVID-19 in patients with the disease admitted to the emergency department (ED), correlating them with vital signs, laboratory and radiologic results, therapeutic decisions, and the prognosis. MethodsProspective study performed in the ED of 2 academic hospitals. Patients with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 underwent a lung ultrasonography (lung POCUS), focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS), and inferior vena cava (IVC) exam. ResultsBetween March and April 2020, 96 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.2 years (SD 17.5). The most common findings in the lung POCUS were an irregular pleural line (63.2%), bilateral confluence (55.2%), and isolated B-lines (53.1%), which were associated with a positive RT-PCR (odds ratio 4.327; 95% CI 1.216–15.401; p<.001), and correlated with IL-6 levels (rho=0.622; p=.002). The IVC negatively correlated with levels of expiratory pO2 (rho=−0.539; p=.014) and inspiratory pO2 (rho=−0.527; p=0.017), and expiratory diameter positively correlated with troponin I (rho=0.509; p=.03). After the POCUS exam, almost 20% of the patients had an associated condition that required a change in their treatment or management. ConclusionsPOCUS parameters have the potential to impact the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19.

Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Curriculum for Internal Medicine Residents.

Background: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) is a safe and efficient diagnostic intervention for internal medicine physicians. FCU is a highly teachable skill, but is used in routine cardiac assessment in only 20% of surveyed training programs.We developed an FCU curriculum for internal medicine residents and an assessment tool to evaluate the impact of the curriculum on trainee knowledge and confidence. Methods: Internal medicine residents rotating through clinical cardiology services underwent 30 minutes of didactic and 60 minutes of hands-on teaching on acquisition and interpretation of FCU. A 20 item pre and post-curriculum online survey was administered (November 2018-December 2019) to assess confidence and knowledge in FCU. Results: 79 of 116 (68%) residents completed the pre-survey and 50 completed the post-survey, of whom 34 received the curriculum. The mean change in confidence score in those who received versus did not receive the curriculum was 0.99 versus 0.39 (p=0.046) on a 5-point Likert scale. Among 33 residents who had paired pre- and post-surveys the mean change in confidence score was 1.2 versus 0.85 (p<0.001) in those who received versus did not receive the curriculum. The mean increase in knowledge score was 13% versus 7% respectively (p<0.0001). Conclusions: We instituted a novel curriculum for internal medicine residents to gain experience in image acquisition and interpretation. Both confidence and knowledge in FCU improved following the curriculum, indicating that this is a highly teachable skill. Additional analysis of the of the FCU study images will be useful for informing future interventions.

Point-of-care ultrasound after attempted suicidal hanging

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) can provide critical information quickly to determine the etiology after cardiac arrest and may expedite a diagnosis in order to identify underlying treatable causes. We present a case of reversible acute left ventricular dysfunction after cardiopulmonary resuscitation following attempted suicide by hanging presenting with severe hypoxemia. FoCUS revealed findings consistent with severe left ventricular dysfunction, and point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) ruled out pneumothorax. These findings, in conjunction with the clinical presentation, facilitated an early identification and rapid evaluation of cardiogenic shock; furthermore, they led to the use of FoCUS, which can provide critical information quickly on site for a patient who is suddenly symptomatic after severe mechanical asphyxia in the pediatric emergency department, pediatric intensive care unit, or the prehospital setting.

Interpretation of Emergency Department Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography by Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians and Pediatric Cardiologists

Interpretation of Emergency Department Focused Cardiac Ultrasonography by Pediatric Emergency Medicine Physicians and Pediatric Cardiologists

Point-of-care ultrasonography in the initial characterization of patients with COVID-19

BackgroundThere is growing evidence regarding the imaging findings of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in chest X-rays and computed tomography scans; however, their availability during this pandemic outbreak might be compromised. Currently, the role of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) has yet to be explored. ObjectivesTo describe the POCUS findings of COVID-19 in patients with the disease admitted to the emergency department (ED), correlating them with vital signs, laboratory and radiologic results, therapeutic decisions, and the prognosis. MethodsProspective study performed in the ED of 2 academic hospitals. Patients with highly suspected or confirmed COVID-19 underwent a lung ultrasonography (lung POCUS), focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS), and inferior vena cava (IVC) exam. ResultsBetween March and April 2020, 96 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 68.2 years (SD 17.5). The most common findings in the lung POCUS were an irregular pleural line (63.2%), bilateral confluence (55.2%), and isolated B-lines (53.1%), which were associated with a positive RT-PCR (odds ratio 4.327; 95% CI 1.216–15.401; p<.001), and correlated with IL-6 levels (rho=0.622; p=.002). The IVC negatively correlated with levels of expiratory pO2 (rho=−0.539; p=.014) and inspiratory pO2 (rho=−0.527; p=0.017), and expiratory diameter positively correlated with troponin I (rho=0.509; p=.03). After the POCUS exam, almost 20% of the patients had an associated condition that required a change in their treatment or management. ConclusionsPOCUS parameters have the potential to impact the diagnosis, management, and prognosis of patients with confirmed or suspected COVID-19.

Screening for aortic stenosis using physical examination and echocardiography.

Most patients with aortic stenosis (AS) can be treated with either traditional surgical aortic valve replacement or newly emerged transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Therefore, the early and appropriate detection of significant AS has become more important for avoiding overlooking patients who require treatment. AS is initially detected by the presence of a systolic ejection murmur (SEM). However, it is time-consuming and expensive for all subjects presenting with SEM to undergo comprehensive standard echocardiography using high-end ultrasound machines since the SEM is audible in a large proportion of elderly patients and is not specific for significant AS. Therefore, further physical examination and/or focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is required to determine whether patients with a SEM should be referred for standard echocardiography. One or more abnormal physical findings in addition to a SEM can rule out a certain proportion of normal cases without overlooking severe AS. Most of the previous studies suggesting the usefulness of FoCUS in screening for valvular heart disease only used visual impressions in their assessment of AS. By contrast, visual AS and calcification scores are good objective parameters in screening for AS with FoCUS. Patients with severe AS and patients with a high probability of AS-related events are rarely overlooked even if comprehensive standard echocardiography is performed only when either (or both) of the FoCUS scores is 3 or more. The appropriate combination of physical examinations and FoCUS to screen for AS is discussed in this review article.

Focused cardiac ultrasound in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a literature review

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) is emerging in emergency medical systems, particularly in the context of prognostication in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, FoCUS has not been formally incorporated into UK guidelines because of a lack of evidence. Furthermore, concerns have been raised that FoCUS can distract people from providing other essential and evidenced elements of care. This broad literature search aims to shed light on the practice of FoCUS in cardiac arrest by reviewing articles related to in-hospital and out-of-hospital practice. The findings are conspicuous by the lack of high-quality studies, particularly regarding prognostication. Association between ultrasound findings and outcome are asserted, as is the feasibility of paramedic use of FoCUS, although the evidence is from small and non-randomised studies and subject to bias.

Effect of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in Combination with Lung Ultrasound on Critically Ill Patients: A Multicenter Observational Study in China.

Objective Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) and lung ultrasound (LU) are increasingly being used in critically ill patients. This study aimed to investigate the effect of FCU in combination with LU on these patients and to determine if the timing of ultrasound examination was associated with treatment change. Methods This is a multicenter cross-sectional observational study. Consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) were screened for enrollment. FCU and LU were performed within the first 24 h, and treatment change was proposed by the performer based on the ultrasound results and other clinical conditions. Results Among the 992 patients included, 502 were examined within 6 h of ICU admission (early phase group), and 490 were examined after 6 h of admission (later phase group). The early phase group and the later phase group had similar proportions of treatment change (48.8% vs. 49.0%, χ 2=0.003, P=0.956). In the multivariable analysis, admission for respiratory failure was an independent variable associated with treatment change, with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.357 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.284-4.326, P=0.006]; the timing of examination was not associated with treatment change (OR=0.725, 95%CI: 0.407-1.291, P=0.275). Conclusions FCU in combination with LU, whether performed during the early phase or later phase, had a significant impact on the treatment of critically ill patients. Patients with respiratory failure were more likely to experience treatment change after the ultrasound examination.

Simple echocardiographic scoring in screening aortic stenosis with focused cardiac ultrasonography in the emergency department

BackgroundNo established methodology exists for diagnosis of aortic stenosis (AS) using focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS). We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of our developed visual AS score for screening AS in an emergency department. MethodsSeventy-two emergency outpatients with suspected cardiovascular disease were studied. Emergency physicians assessed the visual AS score in addition to conducting the standard FOCUS, and then the aortic valve area index (AVAI) was measured by expert sonographers in the echocardiography laboratory. AVAI values >0.85 cm2/m2, 0.6–0.85 cm2/m2, and <0.6 cm2/m2 were defined as no or mild AS, moderate AS, and severe AS, respectively. ResultsSeventeen (24%) patients had moderate or severe AS. Visual AS scores assessed by emergency physicians and by expert sonographers showed excellent agreement (κ = 0.93), and a strong association was noted between the visual AS score assessed by emergency physicians and the AVAI assessed by expert sonographers (R = –0.71, p < 0.0001). A visual AS score ≥3 assessed by emergency physicians had a sensitivity of 82%, specificity of 100%, positive predictive value of 100%, and negative predictive value of 95% for diagnosing moderate or severe AS. The prevalence of new-onset AS-related events during hospitalization was higher in patients with visual AS score ≥3 assessed by emergency physicians than in the remaining patients [7 (50%) vs. 2 (3%), p < 0.0001]. ConclusionThe visual AS score is a useful AS screening tool for emergency physicians who are not expert cardiologists.

Intraoperative Focused Cardiac Ultrasound for Assessment of Hypotension: A Systematic Review.

Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) has become a valuable tool to assess unexplained hypotension in critically ill patients. Due to increasing availability of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) equipment in the operating room, there is a widespread interest in its usefulness for intraoperative diagnosis of hypotension as an alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate the utility of intraoperative FoCUS to assess patients experiencing unexplained hypotension while undergoing noncardiac surgery. We performed a systematic literature search of multiple publication databases for studies that evaluated the utility of intraoperative FoCUS for assessment and management of unexplained hypotension in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery, including retro- and prospective clinical studies. A summary of the study findings, study quality, and assessment of level of evidence is presented. We identified 2227 unique articles from the literature search, of which 27 were potentially relevant, and 9 were included in this review. The number of patients pooled from these studies was 255, of whom 228 had intraoperative diagnoses with the aid of intraoperative FoCUS. The level of evidence of all studies included was very low according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) guidelines. This systematic review has demonstrated that FoCUS may be a useful, noninvasive method to differentiate causes of intraoperative hypotension and guide correcting interventions, although the quality of evidence is very low. Further prospective high-quality studies are needed to investigate whether intraoperative FoCUS has a diagnostic utility that is associated with improved outcomes.

Focused Cardiac Ultrasound is Applicable to Internal Medicine and Critical Care but Skill Gaps Currently Limit Use.

ContextCoronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) put a spotlight on focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS). However, the spectra of cardiac disease, and the resources available for investigation vary internationally. The applicability of FoCUS to internal medicine (IM) and critical care medicine (CCM) practice in Saudi Arabia and their current use of FoCUS are unknown.AimsTo determine the applicability of FoCUS to IM and CCM practice in Saudi Arabia and quantify the residents’ current proficiency, accreditation and use of FoCUS.MethodsA questionnaire was distributed to the residents in IM and CCM at our institution to determine their proficiency, use of FoCUS, and perceptions of its applicability.ResultsIn total, 110 residents (IM 100/108; CCM 10/10) participated (Response rate 93.2%) and reported that FoCUS was very applicable to their practice, most specifically for pericardial effusion, right heart strain, and left ventricular function. Two IM residents had received postgraduate training, ten used FoCUS regularly, none were accredited and overall self-reported proficiency was poor. In contrast all CCM residents had received postgraduate training and reported regular use of FoCUS. Two were accredited.ConclusionsWhilst FoCUS is applicable to IM practice in Saudi Arabia, significant skills gaps exist. The skills gap in CCM is lower but unaccredited practice is common. Our residents’ responses were similar to those from Canada. Thus, international standardization of FoCUS training could be considered.

Abstract 15892: Reliability of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in the Post-Operative Assessment of Patients With Congenital Heart Disease: A Single Center Experience

Introduction: Early detection of postoperative complications in children with congenital heart disease (CHD) is crucial. The utility of focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) in the assessment of post-operative congenital cardiac surgical patients is not known. Objective: To evaluate the reliability of FoCUS in the assessment of children with CHD in the early post-operative period. Methods: A prospective observational cross-sectional study was performed in a single pediatric center. All FoCUS studies were performed by one imager within two hours of the paired echocardiographic (ECHO) study performed by a different imager. FoCUS studies were obtained using Philips Lumify R and ECHO studies utilized a high-end ultrasound machine (Philips Affiniti R ). Qualitative ventricular (right and left) function, pericardial effusion, pleural effusion, and degree of mitral regurgitation (MR) and tricuspid regurgitation (TR) were compared. All FoCUS and ECHO studies were sent for review in a random and blinded fashion to two independent noninvasive imaging cardiologists. Weighted k statistics were used to determine the level of agreement between FoCUS and ECHO, and between observers. Results: Twenty-three FoCUS studies were performed in 12 patients with a mean age of 16.6 months (range 0-96 months) within two weeks postoperatively. There was inter-observer agreement for ECHO on all parameters and inter-observer agreement for FoCUS on all parameters except for TR. The intra-observer agreement between FoCUS and ECHO for the two cardiologists was fair to moderate for ventricular function (k= 0.470, p&lt; 0.05 and 0.340, p &lt; 0.05), substantial for pericardial effusion (k = 0.617, p&lt; 0.05 and 0.777, p&lt; 0.05), and fair for MR (0.400, p&lt; 0.05). There was no statistically significant agreement for TR and pleural effusion for both observers and MR for one observer. Conclusions: FoCUS demonstrated acceptable reliability in the assessment of ventricular function and presence of pericardial effusions, with a limited value in the assessment of atrioventricular valve regurgitation. This tool is valuable in the early post-operative evaluation of pediatric patients with congenital heart disease in the cardiac intensive care unit.

Creatine phosphokinase MB levels as a diagnostic marker of myocardial dysfunction in pediatric patients with electrical burns.

The decrease of the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as consequence of a ventricular dysfunction is reported in cardiac alterations secondary to electrical injury. The focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) helps to complete the clinical examination because it allows a faster non-invasive evaluation, and provides information that contributes to make better therapeutic decisions, especially those for patients in critical condition. The objective of this study was to explore the utility of creatine phosphokinase MB (CPK-MB) as a diagnostic tool of myocardial dysfunction in patients from 6 to 18 years old with electrical burn. From November 2018 to August 2019, we conducted a transversal analytic study of 10 children with electric burn (6 to 18 years of age), in whom the percentage of LVEF was obtained through the FoCUS protocol in the first 24 hours after injury. We found 10 cases of electrical burn injury, eight males and two females, with an average of 13 years of age. Eighty percent of these cases showed a slight decrease in LVEF (45-59%). When performing the FoCUS protocol, myocardial hypokinesia was reported in seven patients. We observed a moderate correlation between LVEF and CPK-MB levels (r = -0.671), and no correlation between LVEF and body surface area affected by the electrical burn. The cardiac ultrasound influences decision making to improve the prognosis of these patients.

400 Feasibility of Focused Cardiac Ultrasound during Cardiac Arrest in the Emergency Department

Transthoracic focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) can aid in evaluation and management of patients with cardiac arrest. The quality of imaging in this population has been questioned. The inclusion of only patients with satisfactory imaging may have biased previous research. Widespread adoption of this technology requires some understanding of its feasibility in routine use. The goal of this study was to determine how often adequate imaging can be obtained in cardiac arrest patients. All patients in a six-month period who presented to the emergency department (ED) in cardiac arrest or who had cardiac arrest while in the ED were prospectively identified as part of a quality improvement initiative to improve ultrasound documentation. Cardiac arrest was defined as anyone who was found to be pulseless and underwent at least one round of cardiopulmonary resuscitation by Emergency Medical Services or in the ED. Patients who had achieved return of spontaneous circulation before arrival to the ED and who were purposefully moving upon arrival were excluded. FOCUS images were obtained by resident or attending physicians as part of routine clinical care. Patients with images obtained were paired with age- and sex-matched controls who underwent FOCUS for another clinical indication during the study period. All studies were scored by two blinded reviewers for quality using the following scoring system: 0 = no image obtained, 1 = only cardiac motion detected, 2 = chambers and valves grossly resolved with the left ventricle and posterior epicardium visible, 3 = endocardium and wall thickness seen but incomplete, and 4 = greater than 90% of endocardium and valve motion seen. When a disagreement between scorers was present, a score by a third reviewer was obtained. Studies including at least one image with a score of ≥2 were considered adequate. There were 137 consecutive cardiac arrests, 121 out-of-hospital and 16 in-hospital, during our study period. FOCUS was attempted in 133 (97%) patients, with images recorded in 126 (92%). Of the 7 attempts without saved imaging, 6 patients had documentation that images were adequate, and in 1 patient images could not be obtained. Of the FOCUS studies performed with images recorded, 97 (77%) were obtained during advanced cardiac life support while 29 (23%) were obtained once return of spontaneous circulation was achieved. The average age of cardiac arrest patients was 58 years, and 45% were female. The controls were similar. Of the 126 cardiac arrest studies with recorded images, 106 (84%) were rated adequate, compared to 116 (92%) in controls (p = 0.08). When compared to control FOCUS studies, the scores given to studies of cardiac arrest patients were lower than controls (Figure 1, p = 0.001). Inter-rater reliability between the two study reviewers was substantial (linear weighted Kappa:0.66; 95% CI 0.60-0.72). Transthoracic FOCUS can reliably be used during cardiac arrest to obtain images adequate to answer clinical questions and guide therapies.

Accuracy of Emergency Physicians for Detection of Regional Wall Motion Abnormalities in Patients With Chest Pain Without ST‐Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Our aim was to evaluate the accuracy of emergency physicians (EPs) in the detection of regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMAs) using focused cardiac ultrasound (FOCUS) in patients suspected of non-having ST-elevation myocardial infarction. We prospectively enrolled patients with chest pain. Three EPs underwent didactics and hands-on-training, of 3 hours each, by an experienced cardiologist, on detecting RWMAs using 2-dimensional echocardiography. They performed a FOCUS examination to evaluate for RWMAs and recorded the echo images. Our reference standard for the detection of RWMAs was accepted as a blinded cardiologist review of the prerecorded video clips. We calculated the corrected sample size and inter-rater agreement between the EPs (82 and 0.83, respectively). The analysis of the study was performed on 89 patients. Eighty-nine patients with chest pain were screened. Emergency physicians demonstrated the detection of RWMAs with good sensitivity and even excellent specificity: 76.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56.4%- 91.0%) and 92.1% (95% CI, 82.4%-97.4%), respectively. The accuracy of FOCUS was 87.6% (95% CI, 79.0%-93.7%). The area under the curve from a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, which evaluated the EPs' rate of detecting the presence or absence of RWMAs, was 0.845 (95% CI, 0.753-0.913). Our study results suggest that EPs with training in bedside echocardiography can accurately rule in patients with RWMAs in suspected non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction cases.

Development of a Focused Cardiac Ultrasound Image Acquisition Assessment Tool.

Background: Focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) is widely used by healthcare providers to answer specific questions about cardiac structure and function at the bedside. Currently, no widely accepted FCU image acquisition checklist exists to assess learners with varying skill levels from different specialties.Objective: The primary objective of this project was to develop a consensus-based FCU image acquisition checklist using a multispecialty group of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) experts.Methods: The essential components of an FCU examination were identified on the basis of published recommendations from echocardiography and international ultrasound societies. A checklist of the essential components of an FCU examination was drafted. A panel of POCUS experts from different medical specialties in the United States and Canada was convened to vote on each checklist item by answering two questions: 1) Is this item important to include in a checklist of essential FCU skills applicable to any medical specialty? and 2) Should the learner be required to successfully complete this item to be considered competent? A modified Delphi approach was used to assess the level of agreement for each checklist item during four rounds of voting. Checklist items that achieved an agreement of 80% or greater were included in the final checklist.Results: Thirty-one POCUS experts from seven different medical specialties voted on sixty-five items to be included in the FCU image acquisition assessment tool. The majority of POCUS experts (61%) completed all four rounds of voting. During the first round of voting, 59 items reached consensus, and after revision and revoting, an additional 3 items achieved 80% or greater consensus. A total of 62 items were included in the final checklist, and 57 items reached consensus as a requirement for demonstration of competency.Conclusion: We have developed a multispecialty, consensus-based FCU image acquisition checklist that may be used to assess the skills of learners from different specialties. Future steps include studies to develop additional validity evidence for the use of the FCU assessment tool and to evaluate its utility for the translation of skills into clinical practice.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in cardiac arrest: results of a hands-on training for a simplified TEE protocol

BackgroundIntegration of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with Focused Cardiac Ultrasound (FoCUS) can impact decision-making, assist in the diagnosis of reversible etiologies and help guiding resuscitation of patients with cardiac arrest.ObjectiveTo evaluate the ability of emergency physicians (EPs) to obtain and maintain skills in performing resusTEE after a course with clinical training in the cardiac surgery theatre.MethodsTen EPs without previous TEE experience underwent a resusTEE course, based on a 2-h workshop and an 8-h hands-on training. The training was performed in a cardiac surgery theatre tutored by cardiovascular anesthesiologists. The six taught views were mid-esophageal four-chamber (ME4CH), mid-esophageal long axis (MELAX), mid-esophageal two-chamber (ME2CH), mid-esophageal bicaval view (MEbicaval), transgastric short axis (TGSAX) and aorta view (AOview). The EPs were evaluated by a cardiovascular anesthesiologist at the end of the course as well as after 12 weeks according to a standardized evaluation method. Once the course was completed, resusTEE exams, performed by EPs in Emergency Department (ED), were monitored for a 12-week period.ResultsThe average assessment of the ten EPs by the tutors was higher than 4 points out of 5, both at the end of the course and after 12 weeks. Probe insertion, acquisition and interpretation of the different views scored on average more than 4 points out of 5 except for TGSAX that showed worsening after 12 weeks. Trainees performed twelve resusTEE exams in ED in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) over 12 weeks after the course. EPs used only four out of six taught views in clinical practice, in the following order of frequency: ME4CH, AOview, MEbicaval and MELAX.ConclusionsEPs, after a course with clinical training in the cardiac surgery theatre, can successfully acquire and maintain the skills needed to perform resusTEE. However, among the six views learned in the course, EPs used only four of them (ME4CH, MEbicaval, MELAX and AOview).

I Will Be at Your (Bed)Side – The Role of Bedside Echocardiography for Non-Cardiologists

As the availability of portable echocardiographic equipment is becoming more and more widespread, physicians can add a powerful tool to their bedside examination skills, thus helping them to more effectively face the growing complexity of patients admitted to internal medicine departments or the emergency room. Focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) can be defined as a goal-directed, simplified, qualitative examination performed at the bedside using portable echocardiographic devices. FoCUS is not meant to be a substitute for a standard 2D color Doppler echocardiographic examination. Nevertheless, it can provide rapid and reliable information when limited to basic questions, even when performed by non-cardiologists with brief training. Furthermore, a focused cardiac ultrasound examination maximizes its diagnostic role when integrated with an ultrasonographic assessment of the lung, abdomen and deep veins, in a multisystem approach that is particularly dear to internists. In this article, we will focus on the specific targets of a focused cardiac ultrasound examination, as well as the most common pitfalls that can be encountered in ultrasonographic practice. We will also address the application of FoCUS in the management of two typical scenarios in clinical practice, such as dyspnea and non-post-traumatic hypotension.