Focal Onset Epilepsy Research Articles

OS02.6.A Lacosamide in monotherapy in brain tumour-related epilepsy (BTRE): results from an Italian multicentre retrospective study

Abstract Background Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) approved for focal onset epilepsy in patients aged ≥4 years. Previous studies have reported an efficacy of LCM as add-on treatment in brain tumour-related epilepsy (BTRE). To date, there are no studies in the literature focusing on lacosamide used in monotherapy to treat BTRE. In our retrospective study we investigated efficacy and tolerability of LCM in monotherapy in a multicentre national cohort of primary brain tumour patients. Patients and Methods Adult patients who were treated with LCM in monotherapy were collected from 12 Italian Centres (either mainly involved in neuro-oncology or in epileptology). Main inclusion criteria were diagnosis of primary brain tumour; at least two focal-onset seizures in the disease course; LCM used either as primary or secondary monotherapy after withdrawal of previous ASMs. For each patient, we evaluated seizure freedom at 3 and 6 months (primary endpoints), side effects and drop-out rate (secondary endpoints). Results We collected 132 patients. The majority of patients had a diagnosis of diffuse gliomas, being those with lower-grade glioma 66 (50.0%) and those with glioblastoma 33 (25.0%). Overall, LCM led to seizure-freedom in 64.4% of patients at 3 months and 55% at 6 months. Patients who used two or more ASMs before LCM had a worse seizure control than patients in monotherapy with LCM as first choice.In 14 patients, we observed seizure control despite tumour progression on magnetic resonance (MRI). Multivariate analysis showed that gross-total resection at diagnosis and use of steroids were significantly associated with higher seizure freedom rate at 6 months. Side effects were mainly mild (grade 1-2 according to the CTCAE classification), and the drop-out rate was low (1.5%). The main side effects were dizziness and somnolence. Conclusion This is the first study on the role of LCM in monotherapy in BTRE. The study has shown a good efficacy and tolerability of LCM with more than a half of patients becoming seizure-free at 6 months and with a very low rate of drop-out. Further studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data in a prospective manner, adding quality of life and neurocognitive functions as endpoints.

Felbamate add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

This is an updated version of the Cochrane Review first published in 2011, and most recently updated in 2019. Epilepsy is a chronic and disabling neurological disorder, affecting approximately 1% of the population. Up to 30% of people with epilepsy have seizures that are resistant to currently available antiepileptic drugs and require treatment with multiple antiepileptic drugs in combination. Felbamate is a second-generation antiepileptic drug that can be used as add-on therapy to standard antiepileptic drugs. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of felbamate versus placebo when used as an add-on treatment for people with drug-resistant focal-onset epilepsy. For the latest update, we searched the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web) and MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 13 July 2021) on 15 July 2021. There were no language or time restrictions. We reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies to search for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted the manufacturers of felbamate and experts in the field for information about any unpublished or ongoing studies. We searched for randomised placebo-controlled add-on studies of people of any age with drug-resistant focal seizures. The studies could be double-blind, single-blind or unblinded and could be of parallel-group or cross-over design. Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted information. In the case of disagreements, a third review author arbitrated. Review authors assessed the following outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; absolute or percentage reduction in seizure frequency; treatment withdrawal; adverse effects; quality of life. We included four randomised controlled trials, representing a total of 236 participants, in the review. Two trials had parallel-group design, the third had a two-period cross-over design, and the fourth had a three-period cross-over design. We judged all four studies to be at an unclear risk of bias overall. Bias arose from the incomplete reporting of methodological details, the incomplete and selective reporting of outcome data, and from participants having unstable drug regimens during experimental treatment in one trial. Due to significant methodological heterogeneity, clinical heterogeneity and differences in outcome measures, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis of the extracted data. Only one study reported the outcome of 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency, whilst three studies reported percentage reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo. One study claimed an average seizure reduction of 35.8% with add-on felbamate whilst another study claimed a more modest reduction of 4.2%. Both studies reported that seizure frequency increased with add-on placebo and that there was a significant difference in seizure reduction between felbamate and placebo (P = 0.0005 and P = 0.018, respectively). The third study reported a 14% reduction in seizure frequency with add-on felbamate but stated that the difference between treatments was not significant. There were conflicting results regarding treatment withdrawal. One study reported a higher treatment withdrawal for placebo-randomised participants, whereas the other three studies reported higher treatment withdrawal rates for felbamate-randomised participants. Notably, the treatment withdrawal rates for felbamate treatment groups across all four studies remained reasonably low (less than 10%), suggesting that felbamate may be well tolerated. Felbamate-randomised participants most commonly withdrew from treatment due to adverse effects. The adverse effects consistently reported by all four studies were headache, dizziness and nausea. All three adverse effects were reported by 23% to 40% of felbamate-treated participants versus 3% to 15% of placebo-treated participants. We assessed the evidence for all outcomes using GRADE and rated the evidence as very low certainty, meaning that we have little confidence in the findings reported. We mainly downgraded evidence for imprecision due to the narrative synthesis conducted and the low number of events. We stress that the true effect of felbamate could likely be significantly different from that reported in this current review update. In view of the methodological deficiencies, the limited number of included studies and the differences in outcome measures, we have found no reliable evidence to support the use of felbamate as an add-on therapy in people with drug-resistant focal-onset epilepsy. A large-scale, randomised controlled trial conducted over a longer period of time is required to inform clinical practice.

Peri-Ictal Changes in Depression and Anxiety in Persons With Epileptic and Non-epileptic Seizures.

ObjectiveWe tested the hypothesis that epileptic, but not non-epileptic, seizures would produce an improvement in comorbid depression and anxiety symptoms in the peri-ictal period, much like the antidepressant effects of electroconvulsive therapy.MethodsWe examined depression and anxiety symptoms in patients admitted to an inpatient unit for continuous video electroencephalography as part of routine clinical care. Patients completed three questionnaires that included the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI), Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) after admission, in the 24 h following a seizure, then again 2 weeks after the last seizure.ResultsIn patients with epilepsy, depression and anxiety scores improved in the 24 hrs following a seizure (change in BDI = 24%; change in MADRS = 19%; change in BAI = 21%) but returned toward baseline after 2 weeks. In patients with non-epileptic seizures, depression and anxiety scores also improved in the 24 hrs following a psychogenic non-epileptic seizure (change in BDI = 17%, change in MADRS = 27%, change in BAI = 36%). There was a greater improvement in depression and anxiety scores in patients with focal-onset epilepsy (BDI = 30%, MADRS = 22%, BAI = 30%) compared to generalized seizure onset (BDI = 6%, MADRS = 12%, BAI = 8%).ConclusionWe conclude that single seizures can result in transient improvements in mood. Because seizures need not be generalized or epileptic to exert this effect, the underlying mechanisms are uncertain.

Real-World Experience Treating Pediatric Epilepsy Patients With Cenobamate.

IntroductionIn one third of all patients with epilepsy, seizure freedom is not achieved through anti-seizure medication (ASM). These patients have an increased risk of earlier death, poorer cognitive development, and reduced quality of life. Cenobamate (CNB) has recently been approved as a promising novel ASM drug for the treatment of adults with focal-onset epilepsy. However, there is little experience for its application in pediatric patients.MethodsIn a multicenter study we evaluated retrospectively the outcome of 16 pediatric patients treated “off label” with CNB.ResultsIn 16 patients with a mean age of 15.38 years, CNB was started at an age of 15.05 years due to DRE. Prior to initiation of therapy, an average of 10.56 (range 3–20) ASM were prescribed. At initiation, patients were taking 2.63 (range 1–4) ASM. CNB was increased by 0.47 ± 0.27mg/kg/d every 2 weeks with a mean maximum dosage of 3.1 mg/kg/d (range 0.89–7) and total daily dose of 182.81 mg (range 50–400 mg). Seizure freedom was achieved in 31.3% and a significant seizure reduction of >50% in 37.5%. Adverse events occurred in 10 patients with fatigue/somnolence as the most common. CNB is taken with high adherence in all but three patients with a median follow-up of 168.5 daysConclusionCenobamate is an effective ASM for pediatric patients suffering from drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition to excellent seizure reduction or freedom, it is well-tolerated. Cenobamate should be considered as a novel treatment for DRE in pediatric patients.

Comparison of Lamotrigine and Oxcarbazepine Monotherapy Among Chinese Adult Patients With Newly-Diagnosed Focal-Onset Epilepsy: A Prospective Observational Study.

ObjectiveWe performed a prospective cohort study to compare the efficacy, safety, effect on mood, and quality of life between lamotrigine (LTG) and oxcarbazepine (OXC) monotherapy among Chinese adult patients with newly-diagnosed focal-onset epilepsy (FOE) with or without secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures.MethodsWe enrolled 106 adult patients with new-onset FOE, of whom 56 were in the OXC group and 50 in the LTG group. Their clinical characteristics were detailly recorded especially basic seizure frequency, seizure types, and drug-related adverse events. Efficacy was evaluated as seizure-free (no seizure for 6 months), effective (seizure reduction by more than 50%), and ineffective (seizure reduction by less than 50%). Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. We also assessed their mood state with the Zung Self-rating Scale for anxiety (Z-SAS) and Zung Self-rating Scale for Depression (Z-SDS) and quality of life (QOL) with Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31) at their baseline visit, 3-month visits, and 6-month visit. Intra-group comparisons in each group and inter-group comparisons between the two groups were made. Correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis were also conducted.ResultsExcept for gender, the two groups were well matched in any other characteristics such as primary seizure frequency and seizure types. In terms of efficacy, 33 patients in the OXC group were evaluated as seizure-free and 15 as effective, while in the LTG group, 31 were seizure-free, and nine were effective. No significant differences could be observed in efficacy between the two groups (P = 0.429). Through multiple logistic regression analysis, we found that OXC monotherapy was more likely to predict a seizure-free state (OR = 1.76) than LTG, but the difference didn't reach statistical significance (P = 0.322) after correcting for other clinical variables. Both groups had adverse events such as fatigue, drowsiness, dizziness, rash, and gastrointestinal discomfort, most of which were mild and transient. In the OXC group, the scores of SAS (P = 0.067) and SDS (P = 0.004) reduced at the 6-month visit, while the score of QOLIE-31 significantly increased (P = 0.001). In the LTG group, a significant decrease in SAS and SDS scores and an increase in QOLIE-31 scores could be witnessed (All P < 0.001). The inter-group comparison showed that improvement of SAS and SDS in the LTG group was more evident than that in the OXC group, which was of statistical significance. Correlational analysis indicated that the improvement of mood and life quality scales in both groups was independent of baseline seizure frequency and treatment efficacy. Multiple linear regression analysis indicated that LTG monotherapy was the only independent factor that could predict a better SAS (P = 0.01) and SDS (P = 0.019) outcome.ConclusionsOXC and LTG are effective as monotherapy and can be considered first-line selection among adult patients with new-onset FOE. Most adverse events are mild, transient, and tolerable. The two drugs improve the mood state of patients, though LTG is superior to OXC in this respect. OXC and LTG have great power in enhancing patients' quality of life. The positive effect on the psychosocial well-being of epilepsy patients may be one of the intrinsic pharmacological properties of LTG and OXC.

Lacosamide in monotherapy in BTRE (brain tumor-related epilepsy): results from an Italian multicenter retrospective study.

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) approved for focal onset epilepsy in patients aged ≥ 4.378 Previous studies have reported an efficacy of LCM as add-on treatment in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE). To date, there are no studies in the literature focusing on lacosamide used in monotherapy to treat BTRE. In our retrospective study we investigated efficacy and tolerability of LCM in monotherapy in a multicenter national cohort of primary brain tumor patients. We collected from 12 Italian Centers 132 patients with primary brain tumors who were treated with LCM in monotherapy. For each patient we evaluated seizure freedom at 3 and 6months (primary endpoints), side effects and drop-out rate (secondary endpoints). Overall, LCM led to seizure freedom in 64.4% of patients at 3months and 55% at 6months. Patients who used two or more ASMs before LCM had a worse seizure control than patients in monotherapy with LCM as first choice. In 14 patients, we observed seizure control despite tumor progression on magnetic resonance (MRI). Multivariate analysis showed that gross-total resection at diagnosis was significantly associated with higher seizure freedom rate at 6months. Side effects were mainly mild (grade 1-2 according to CTCAE classification) and drop-out rate was low (1.5%). Main side effects were dizziness and somnolence. This is the first study showing a good efficacy and tolerability of LCM when used in monotherapy in BTRE. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data, investigating also quality of life and neurocognitive functions.

Adjunctive use of cenobamate for pediatric refractory focal-onset epilepsy: A single-center retrospective study

ObjectiveWe explored the efficacy and safety profile of cenobamate as an adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory focal-onset epilepsy in the pediatric population. MethodsThis was a retrospective, single-center study of cenobamate used as an adjunctive medication in pediatric patients with refractory focal-onset epilepsy . We measured seizure reduction, median reduction in seizure frequency, median dose, responder rate, and treatment-emergent adverse events. ResultsWe studied the efficacy and safety profile of cenobamate in 21 pediatric patients (mean age 15.9). Cenobamate was up titrated using the prescribed starter pack with final doses ranging from 100 mg to 400 mg daily. The mean and median dose of cenobamate was 209.8 mg (±98.87 mg) and 200 mg (175–275), respectively. For patients weighing less than 50 kg, mean and median dose was 4.0 mg/kg/day (3.20–4.63) and 4.32 mg/kg/day, respectively. Mean and median baseline seizure frequency per month in this cohort was 15.38 and 16, respectively, prior to the introduction of cenobamate. After the adjunctive use of cenobamate, mean and median seizure frequency per month reduced to 7.29 and 1, respectively; median reduction in seizure frequency was 93.7%. Seizure reduction of at least 50% (responder rate) was noted in 13 (62.5%) patients and a seizure reduction of at least 75% noted in 11 (52.4%) patients, similar to that seen in adults. Four patients (19%) achieved seizure freedom. Of the 21 pediatric patients, 9 (42.8%) patients had treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) with the most commonly reported symptom being ataxia (5, 23.8%) and sedation (2, 9.5%). Three (14.3%) patients discontinued early due to these side effects. No children developed drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS). ConclusionCenobamate demonstrates similar efficacy rates and safety profile within the pediatric population when compared to the published adult data, making it an effective, safe, and tolerable adjunctive medication for children with refractory focal-onset epilepsy, even at the maximum daily dose.

Phase irregularity: A conceptually simple and efficient approach to characterize electroencephalographic recordings from epilepsy patients.

The severe neurological disorder epilepsy affects almost 1% of the world population. For patients who suffer from pharmacoresistant focal-onset epilepsy, electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings are essential for the localization of the brain area where seizures start. Apart from the visual inspection of the recordings, quantitative EEG signal analysis techniques proved to be useful for this purpose. Among other features, regularity versus irregularity and phase coherence versus phase independence allowed characterizing brain dynamics from the measured EEG signals. Can phase irregularities also characterize brain dynamics? To address this question, we use the univariate coefficient of phase velocity variation, defined as the ratio of phase velocity standard deviation and the mean phase velocity. Beyond that, as a bivariate measure we use the classical mean phase coherence to quantify the degree of phase locking. All phase-based measures are combined with surrogates to test null hypotheses about the dynamics underlying the signals. In the first part of our analysis, we use the Rössler model system to study our approach under controlled conditions. In the second part, we use the Bern-Barcelona EEG database which consists of focal and nonfocal signals extracted from seizure-free recordings. Focal signals are recorded from brain areas where the first seizure EEG signal changes can be detected, and nonfocal signals are recorded from areas that are not involved in the seizure at its onset. Our results show that focal signals have less phase variability and more phase coherence than nonfocal signals. Once combined with surrogates, the mean phase velocity proved to have the highest discriminative power between focal and nonfocal signals. In conclusion, conceptually simple and easy to compute phase-based measures can help to detect features induced by epilepsy from EEG signals. This holds not only for the classical mean phase coherence but even more so for univariate measures of phase irregularity.

The utility of hematological indices in differentiation between general and focal onset epilepsy

Introduction and Aim: Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders with mainly focal and generalized onset types. Discrimination between these types is of paramount importance because the prescription of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) depends on such decimation. Currently this made mainly upon the medical history of the patient. The aim of the study is to evaluate the role of hematological indices in discrimination between focal and generalize onset epilepsy. Patients and Methods: This cross-sectional study included a total of 100 patients with epilepsy (mean age 21.44±10.5, range 6-52, 67 males and 33 females). Blood samples were collected for the participant and complete blood count (CBC) was performed. Furthermore, serum concentration of K+ and Na+ was determined. Results: There were 38 patients with generalized and 62 patients with focal onset epilepsy. In multivariate initial analysis, each of mean platelet volume (MPV) (odds ratio (OR)= 2.56, 95%CI=1.09-13.22, p= 0.046) and serum Na+ (OR= 3.85, 95%CI=1.13-13.19, p= 0.032) were significantly associated with generalized onset epilepsy. Furthermore, two AEDs: carbamazepine and valproic acid were also independently associated with generalized and local onset epilepsy, respectively. Conclusion: These data indicate the possible utility of MPV in the discrimination between generalized and focal onset epilepsy. However, further studies are required for more reliable conclusions.

A tale of two cohorts: Differing outcomes in infantile-onset focal epilepsy.

Infants with focal-onset epilepsy are an understudied population, requiring additional evaluation for clinical assessment and prognostication. Our goal was to characterize the etiology and natural history of infantile-onset focal epilepsy. We retrospectively identified all infants (0-24months) with onset of focal epilepsy while resident in Olmsted County, Minnesota, between 1980 and 2018, using the Rochester Epidemiology Project Database. We assessed the impact of etiology on both seizure and neurodevelopmental outcome, and mortality. Of 686 children with epilepsy onset <18years, 125 (18.2%) presented with focal-onset seizures in infancy. Median follow-up for this group was 10.9years (interquartile range [IQR] 6.2, 19.3). Etiology was identified in 65.6% (structural N=62, genetic N=13, both structural and genetic N=3, metabolic N=4). Of 107 patients followed >2years, 38 (35.5%) developed drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). DRE was more likely with younger age at onset, known etiology, and presence of epileptic spasms. Sixty-eight (63.0% of those with follow-up) were developmentally delayed at last follow-up, and known etiology, DRE, and presence of epileptic spasms were significantly associated with delay (p<.001 for all). Fifteen patients (12.0%) died at a median age of 7.1years (IQR 1.7, 21.7), but only one death was seizure related (suspected sudden unexpected death in epilepsy [SUDEP]). Of 20 infants with normal development at onset and no known etiology with >2years follow-up, none developed DRE, all were seizure-free at last follow-up (95% off antiseizure medications [ASMs]), and all remained developmentally normal. Infantile-onset focal epilepsy accounts for 18% of all epilepsy in childhood, is frequently due to known etiologies, and has a high rate of DRE. However, developmentally normal infants without a known cause appear to have a very favorable course.

High prevalence of pathological alertness and wakefulness on maintenance of wakefulness test in adults with focal-onset epilepsy

BackgroundExcessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a common complaint in adults with epilepsy (AWE), but objective evaluation is lacking. We used the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) to objectively measure the ability of adults with focal-onset epilepsy to maintain wakefulness in soporific conditions. MethodsAdults with epilepsy participating in a study investigating the effects of lacosamide on sleep and wakefulness underwent baseline ambulatory polysomnography (PSG)/EEG followed by MWT. Mean sleep latency (MSL) and mean percent sleep time (MST, mean percentage of non-wake EEG scored in 3-sec bins from lights out to sleep onset averaged over the 4 MWT trials) were quantified. Subjective sleepiness was assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Spearman correlation and linear regression assessed relationships between MWT parameters, ESS and relevant sleep and epilepsy-related variables. ResultsMaintenance of wakefulness test MSL in 51 AWE (mean age 43.5 ± 13 years, 69% female, mean BMI 24.6 ± 11.2 kg/m2) was 21.7 ± 11.9 min; 45.1% had an abnormally short MSL <19.4 min and 15.7% <8 min. MST was 9.3% [3.3, 19.1]. Mean ESS score was 8.8 ± 5.7; 39% had elevated ESS (>10). No correlation between subjective ESS and objective MSL (p = 0.67) or MST (p = 0.61) was found. MSL was significantly shorter in subjects with focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS; 7.9 min [13.6, 22.3]) compared to those without (27.4 min [21.2, 33.6], p = 0.013). Younger subjects had shorter MSL; MSL increased 3.2 min for every 10-year increase in age. ConclusionWe found a high prevalence of objective sleepiness/difficulty maintaining wakefulness on the MWT and subjective sleepiness using the ESS in AWE without a correlation between the two. More severe objective sleepiness was found in subjects with a history of FBTCS and younger age. Further research is needed to determine mechanistic underpinnings and optimal measurements of pathological sleepiness in people with epilepsy given the burden of it on quality of life.

Cost-Effectiveness of Zonisamide Versus Levetiracetam in Newly Diagnosed Focal Onset Epilepsy in Serbia

ObjectivesWhen choosing initial therapy for epilepsy, the decision should be supported by studies that include both treatment outcome and costs. This is especially important for developing countries with restricted budgets because such circumstances are also characterized by higher epilepsy prevalence rates. The aim of this study was to compare cost-utility of zonisamide (ZNS) and levetiracetam (LEV) in patients with newly diagnosed focal-onset epilepsy in the Republic of Serbia. MethodsA 5-state, 3-month-cycle Markov model was created to compare ZNS and LEV. The model assumed that patients whose seizures were not controlled by treatment with either ZNS or LEV would be continued on carbamazepine in controlled-release form in the second cycle and would then be treated with a pregabalin add-on if still not adequately controlled. The perspective of the Serbian Republic Health Insurance Fund was chosen, and the time horizon was 15 years. Model results were obtained after Monte Carlo microsimulation of a sample with 1000 virtual patients. Both multiple one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. ResultsAfter base-case analysis, LEV was dominated by ZNS because the net monetary benefit was positive (16 940.78 ± 22 572.26 Serbian dinars; €144.09 ± €191.99) and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was below the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 Serbian gross domestic products per capita per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Multiple one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the results of the base-case simulation. ConclusionsZNS has a more beneficial cost-effectiveness ratio than LEV for the treatment of newly diagnosed focal epilepsy in Serbian milieu.

Sentinel Epileptiform Discharges Activating Two Seizure Networks on Intracranial EEG.

Sentinel epileptiform discharges (SEDs) are epileptiform transients preceding the onset of a focal seizure seen on scalp EEG. Despite their potential localizing value, formal study of SED has been limited. The authors report a patient with MRI-negative focal-onset epilepsy whose seizures on scalp and intracranial EEG were always preceded by SED. Although the location and morphology of the SED was invariable, the seizures after the discharge were of two clearly distinct types, each with different semiology and region of spread on intracranial EEG. This suggests that the SED played a role in activating two distinct seizure networks. A right temporal lobectomy with amygdalohippocampectomy was performed. The resection included both the region of the SED as well as the seizure-onset zone of the more common seizure type, achieving seizure freedom at 3 years after surgery. Further research exploring whether the localization of SED is a reliable indicator of the seizure-onset zone could aid surgical planning in patients whose seizures are preceded by SED.

Responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant focal onset epilepsy may be cost effective in the USA

Responsive neurostimulation for drug-resistant focal onset epilepsy may be cost effective in the USA

Cost‐effectiveness analysis of responsive neurostimulation for drug‐resistant focal onset epilepsy

We evaluated the incremental cost-effectiveness of responsive neurostimulation (RNS) therapy for management of medically refractory focal onset seizures compared to pharmacotherapy alone. We created and analyzed a decision model for treatment with RNS therapy versus pharmacotherapy using a semi-Markov process. We adopted a public payer perspective and used the maximum duration of 9years in the RNS long-term follow-up study as the time horizon. We used seizure frequency data to model changes in quality of life and estimated the impact of RNS therapy on the annual direct costs of epilepsy care. The model also included expected mortality, adverse events, and costs related to system implantation, programming, and replacement. We interpreted our results against societal willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50000, $100000, and $200000 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Based on three different calculated utility value estimates, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for RNS therapy (with continued pharmacotherapy) compared to pharmacotherapy alone ranged between $28825 and $46596. Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded ICERs often below $50000 per QALY and consistently below $100000/QALY. Modeling based on 9years of available data demonstrates that RNS therapy for medically refractory epilepsy very likely falls within the range of cost-effectiveness, depending on method of utility estimation, variability in model inputs, and willingness-to-pay threshold. Several factors favor improved cost-effectiveness in the future. Given the increasing focus on delivering cost-effective care, we hope that this analysis will help inform clinical decision-making for this surgical option for refractory epilepsy.

Efficacy and safety of levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy for refractory focal epilepsy.

Epilepsy affects about 50 million people worldwide and around 30% of these patients have refractory epilepsy, with potential consequences regarding quality of life, morbidity and premature mortality. The aim of treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs) is to allow patients to remain without seizures, with good tolerability. Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum ASM with a unique mechanism of action that differs it from other ASMs. It has been shown to be effective and safe for treating adults and children with epilepsy. This was a phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in children and adults (4-65 years) as an adjuvant treatment for focal-onset seizures. It was conducted among 114 patients undergoing treatment with up to three ASMs. The primary efficacy analysis was based on the proportion of patients who achieved a reduction of ≥ 50% in the mean number of focal seizures per week, over a 16-week treatment period. The patients were randomized to receive placebo or levetiracetam, titrated every two weeks from 20 mg/kg/day or 1,000 mg/day up to 60 mg/kg/day or 3,000 mg/day. Levetiracetam was significantly superior to placebo (p = 0.0031); 38.7% of the participants in the levetiracetam group and 14.3% in the control group shows reductions in focal seizures. Levetiracetam was seen to have a favorable safety profile and an adverse event rate similar to that of placebo. Corroborating the results in the literature, levetiracetam was shown to be effective and safe for children and adults with refractory focal-onset epilepsy.

Mood and quality of life in patients treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation: The value of earlier intervention

ObjectiveTo establish whether earlier treatment using direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for medically intractable focal-onset seizures is associated with better mood and Quality of Life (QoL) compared to later treatment intervention. MethodsData were retrospectively analyzed from prospective clinical trials of a direct brain-responsive neurostimulator (RNS® System) for treatment of adults with medically intractable focal-onset epilepsy. Participants completed the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31) yearly through 9 years of follow-up and the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) through 2 years of follow-up. Changes in each assessment after treatment with responsive neurostimulation were calculated for patients who began treatment within 10 years of seizure onset (early) and those who began treatment 20 years or more after seizure onset (late). ResultsThe median duration of epilepsy was 18.3 years at enrollment. At 9 years, both the early (N = 51) and late (N = 109) treatment groups experienced similar and significant reductions in the frequency of disabling seizures (73.4% and 77.8%, respectively). The early treatment patients had significant improvements in QoL and mood. However, the late treatment patients not only failed to show these improvements but also declined in the emotional QoL subscale. ConclusionsPatients treated with brain-responsive neurostimulation earlier in the course of their epilepsy show significant improvements in multiple domains of QoL and mood that are not observed in patients treated later in the course of their epilepsy despite similar efficacy in seizure reduction. Even with similar and substantial reductions in seizure frequency, the comorbidities of uncontrolled epilepsy may be less responsive to treatment when too many years have passed. The results of this study suggest that, as with resective and ablative surgery, treatment with brain-responsive neurostimulation should be delivered as early as possible in the course of medically resistant epilepsy to maximize the opportunity for improvements in mood and QoL.

Experimental GABA A Receptor Agonists and Allosteric Modulators for the Treatment of Focal Epilepsy.

GABA A receptors are ubiquitous in the central nervous system and there is a huge diversity of receptor subtypes in almost all regions of the brain. However, the expression of GABA A receptor subtypes is altered in both the gray and white matter of patients with focal epilepsy. Although there is a number of anticonvulsants with marketing authorization for the treatment of focal epilepsy which act through GABA A receptors, potentiating the inhibitory effects of GABA, it is necessary to develop more potent and more specific GABAergic anticonvulsants that are effective in drug-resistant patients with focal epilepsy. There are three orthosteric and at least seven allosteric agonist binding sites at the GABA A receptor. In experimental and clinical studies, full agonists of GABA A receptors showed a tendency to cause desensitization of the receptors, tolerance, and physical dependence; therefore, partial orthosteric agonists and positive allosteric modulators of GABA A receptors were further developed. Preclinical studies demonstrated the anticonvulsant efficacy of positive allosteric modulators with selective action on GABA A receptors with α2/α3 subunits, but only a handful of them were further tested in clinical trials. The best results were obtained for clobazam (already marketed), ganaxolone (in phase III trials), CVL-865 (in phase II trials), and padsevonil (in phase III trials). Several compounds with more selective action on GABA A receptors, perhaps only in certain brain regions, have the potential to become effective drugs against specific subtypes of focal-onset epilepsy. However, their development needs time, and in the near future we can expect only one or two new GABA A agonists to obtain marketing authorization for focal epilepsy, an advance that would be of use for just a fraction of patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.

Cenobamate treatment of focal-onset seizures: Quality of life and outcome during up to eight years of treatment

A large proportion of patients with focal-onset epilepsy have frequent seizures despite treatment with newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs). We describe our experience optimizing cenobamate treatment for 49 patients treated at one center for up to eight years. We assessed the influence of treatment response on measurements of quality of life (QOLIE). Forty-nine patients were evaluated from three cenobamate regulatory trials: two open-label extensions of randomized placebo-controlled studies and one open-label safety study at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (JHU). Patients had focal-onset seizures despite treatment with one to three ASMs and were 18 years of age and older. Patients kept seizure diaries for the duration of the study and had tri-monthly evaluations. Seizure responder rates were determined, and patients with long-term seizure freedom (≥six months seizure free) were identified. Cenobamate doses were adjusted within the range of 100–400 mg/day. Johns Hopkins Hospital patients who were continuing treatment when the studies ended (n = 37) were administered the QOLIE-31 survey and a separate survey to assess changes in independence and epilepsy-linked disability at the end of the study at JHU. Thirty-seven of 49 (76%) patients continued treatment for three to eight years (median 5.6 years). In their final three months of treatment, 45% of patients achieved ≥75% seizure reduction, 29% had ≥90% reduction, and 16% were seizure free (responder rates computed with n = 49). Posttraumatic etiologies did not reduce treatment responses. Increased dosage of cenobamate across 150–400 mg/day range was significantly associated with higher responder rates (p < 0.001). High seizure responses—particularly ≥90% reduction—correlated with high QOLIE scores. Patients with drug-resistant focal-onset epilepsy had stable treatment responses during up to eight years of cenobamate treatment. Patients often tolerated high doses of cenobamate; high responders appeared to benefit with high QOLIE scores.

Seizure focus in the frontal interhemispheric fissure leads to ipsilateral isolated eye deviation

ObjectiveFew studies have examined the localization of seizures presenting with ictal eye deviation (ED) in the absence of other motor symptoms. We aimed to investigate differences in the localization of the ictal onset zone (IOZ) between patients with isolated ED and those with ED plus head turning (HT) during focal seizures. MethodsWe reviewed intracranial video-EEG data for 931 seizures in 80 patients with focal onset epilepsy in whom the IOZ could be confirmed. The 233 seizures in 49 patients with ED were classified into two semiological groups based on initial ED and the presence/absence of HT: (1) isolated ED (i.e., ED without HT), and (2) ED + HT (i.e., ED with HT). We analyzed the localization and lateralization of IOZs in each semiological group. We performed multivariate logistic regression analysis using a mixed-effects to determine the associations between IOZs and isolated ED/ED + HT. ResultsA total of 183 IOZs in 24 patients were included in the isolated ED group, while a total of 143 IOZs in 31 patients were included in the ED + HT group. Sixty-eight IOZs of eight patients in the isolated ED group were located in the ipsilateral frontal interhemispheric fissure (F-IHF). Only ipsilateral F-IHF was significantly associated with isolated ED (odds ratio [OR], 2.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–4.49; P = 0.021). The contralateral lateral frontal cortex (latF) (P = 0.007) and ipsilateral mesial temporal region (mT) (P = 0.029) were significantly associated with ED + HT. ConclusionThe present study is the first to demonstrate that seizures with an F-IHF focus tend to present with initial ipsilateral isolated ED. This finding may aid in identifying the seizure focus in patients with isolated ED prior to resection.