Introduction: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or focal endoscopic resection (ER) followed by RFA safely and effectively eradicates the Barrett's esophagus (BE) with or without dysplasia. However, little is known about the total required treatment sessions to achieve a complete cure when comparing both (RFA alone versus ER+RFA) methods. Herein, we report 2-year experience of treating BE with both approaches. Methods: All patients undergoing treatment for BE with RFA or RFA/ER at a tertiary care center between January 2014 and December 2015 were included in the analysis. Patients who got their initial treatment session before 2014 were included after adding those sessions to the overall number of treatment sessions. Patients who underwent APC tissue destruction as a last treatment session for minute Barrett's islands and then followed by their referring physician were considered as a complete cure. Patients who haven't received their last treatment were excluded. (Figure 1) Tables 1 and 2 show patients demographics and the data collected. Initial biopsy results from the referring physician were compared with the biopsy after the last treatment session to evaluate the complete eradication of intestinal metaplasia (CE-IM) and/or Dysplasia/Intramucosal Carcinoma (CE-D/IMC). Subjects were divided into 2 main groups: Dysplasia/IMC and Intestinal Metaplasia (IM). Comparison was made among patients who underwent RFA or RFA/ER in each main group. (Tables 1 + 2)Figure 1Table 1: Patients who had intestinal metapalsia onlyTable 2: Patients who had Dysplasia/IMCResults: 74 patients with a mean age of 66.5±9.4 years (83% males) were included. Median BE length was 3 cm (range 1-15). Ten patients presented as a recurrence after complete eradication from prior therapy at another facility. 1. Dysplasia/IMC Group: 51 patients were identified (24 RFA + 27 RFA/ER). Median number of total required sessions was 2 in RFA group and 4 in RFA/ER group (p = 0001). CE-D/IMC was achieved in 24 (100%) and 25 (92.6%) patients among RFA and RFA/ER groups respectively. ER 2. Intestinal Metaplasia Group: 23 patients were identified (19 RFA + 4 RFA/ER). The median number of total required sessions was 2 and 4 among RFA and RFA/ER groups respectively (p= 0.0165). There was no significant difference in complications among the RFA and RFA/ER patients. Conclusion: RFA and RFA/ER are safe and effective methods for the treatment of BE. However, patients who were treated with RFA/ER required higher number of overall treatment sessions compared to RFA only.
Read full abstract