Understanding crop evapotranspiration (ET) is important for efficient irrigation management. The eddy covariance (EC) technique is useful in measuring whole canopy latent heat flux from field crops. However, it requires expensive equipment and complex data analysis; hence, is relevant for research only. With the aim of developing a low-cost and simple method, we investigated here the surface-renewal (SR) method. This method estimates sensible heat flux from high frequency temperature measurements by using a fine wire thermocouple (TC). Next, latent heat flux is derived from the energy balance closure. Since fine wire thermocouple measurements of air temperature can be performed near the canopy top, it was hypothesized (Castellvi, 2012) that fetch requirements can be relaxed relatively to those for EC, and a relatively small fetch is sufficient for reliable flux measurements by SR. In the present study, the SR technique was examined in a cotton field in southern Israel. Seven fine wire thermocouples were installed at various distances from field edges and at different heights above the ground, providing variable fetch from 50 to 200 m, depending on field geometry and wind direction. An EC system was installed within the field at a position that provided sufficient fetch (400 m) for reliable reference values of sensible and latent heat fluxes. Excellent energy balance closure of 0.96 (R2 = 0.95) was obtained from a non-continuous period of 31 days of measurements. SR data from fine-wire thermocouples at all heights were classified by either available fetch or by 90% flux footprint. Only cases in which footprint was smaller than the available fetch were included in the analysis. Two footprint models were examined, KJ (Kljun et al., 2015) and HS (Hsieh et al., 2000). Results of fetch classification showed that the SR weighting factor varied between 0.67 and 1.34 and was independent of fetch. Footprint classification provided weighting factors between 0.46 and 1.18 for the KJ model and between 0.8 and 1.26 for the HS model. LE derived from SR sensible heat flux and energy balance closure, was regressed against LE reference values measured by the eddy covariance. Results showed deviations of up to 15% and 30% between SR and EC, for the KJ and HS model data, respectively. We conclude that in the cotton field under study the SR technique was reliable in estimating sensible and latent heat fluxes and the weighting factor was essentially independent of the geometrical fetch and the flux footprint of the sensors.