Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures Research Articles

Comparison of experimental measurements and fast Monte Carlo simulations for typical set-ups in fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures

PyMCGPU-IR is an application based on the Monte Carlo code MCGPU-IR that automatically retrieves procedure information from X-ray systems and medical worker positions from a tracking camera system. PyMCGPU-IR calculates personal dose equivalent values, doses in organs and effective dose values for both patient and medical staff in interventional radiology procedures and displays them visually. The code’s main advantage lies in its time efficiency, enabling simulations in under two minutes with statistical uncertainties below 5% (k = 2).This study involved testing in a hospital room using an interventional X-ray system. A RANDO phantom simulated the patient, with passive dosimeters affixed to the back for measuring skin dose values. A PMMA slab phantom represented the operator, with passive and active dosimeters affixed to its front surface to measure Hp(10). The irradiation conditions were simulated with PyMCGPU-IR using voxelized geometries to represent both phantoms. Results demonstrate good agreement between PyMCGPU-IR simulations and measured patient skin dose values, with differences of up to 5% for mean skin dose and up to 14% for the peak skin dose. Concerning Hp(10) values on the operator phantom, PyMCGPU-IR calculated values fall within the uncertainty ranges of dosimeter measurements for most points. The highest Hp(10) discrepancy is 42%, which is acceptable when compared with the typical variability observed between active and passive personal dosimeters measurements in interventional radiology. The results demonstrate PyMCGPU-IR’s satisfactory performance for patient and personal dosimetry, compared to existing solutions like commercial skin dose calculation software and personal physical dosimeters.

Potential risk assessment: a model for quality evaluation in fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures.

This study presented a model applied for potential risk assessment in an interventional radiology setting. The model of potential risk assessment (MARP) consisted of the creation of a scale of indicators ranging from 0 to 5. The radiation levels were categorized according to gender, kind of procedure, value of kerma air product (Pka), and accumulated radiation dose (mGy). The MARP model was applied in 121 institutions over 8 y. A total of 201656 patient radiation doses (Dose-area product and accumulated kerma) data were launched into the system over time, with an average of 22406 doses per year. In the context of the workers (cardiologists, radiographers, and nurses) monitored during the MARP application, 8007 cases (with an average of 890 per year) of occupational radiation doses were recorded. This study showed a strategy for quality evaluation in fluoroscopy using a model with a compulsory information system for monitoring safety.

Occupational Radiation Dose Trends in U.S. Radiologic Technologists Assisting with Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures, 1980–2020

PurposeTo summarize dose trends from 1980 to 2020 for 19,651 U.S. radiologic technologists (USRTs) who reported assisting with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures (FGIPs), overall and by work history characteristics. Materials and MethodsA total of 762,310 annual personal dose equivalents at a 10-mm reference depth (doses) during 1980–2020 for 43,823 participants of the USRT cohort who responded to work history questionnaires administered during 2012–2014 were summarized. This population included 19,651 technologists who reported assisting with FGIP (≥1 time per month for ≥12 consecutive months) at any time during the study period. Doses corresponding to assistance with FGIP were estimated in terms of proximity to patients, monthly procedure frequency, and procedure type. Box plots and summary statistics (eg, medians and percentiles) were used to describe annual doses and dose trends. ResultsMedian annual dose corresponding to assistance with FGIP was 0.65 mSv (interquartile range [IQR], 0.60–1.40 mSv; 95th percentile, 6.80). Higher occupational doses with wider variability were associated with close proximity to patients during assistance with FGIP (median, 1.20 mSv [IQR, 0.60–4.18 mSv]; 95th percentile, 12.66), performing ≥20 FGIPs per month (median, 0.75 mSv [IQR, 0.60–2.40 mSv]; 95th percentile, 9.44), and assisting with high-dose FGIP (median, 0.70 mSv [IQR, 0.60–1.90 mSv]; 95th percentile, 8.30). ConclusionsOccupational doses corresponding to assistance with FGIP were generally low but varied with exposure frequency, procedure type, and proximity to patients. These results highlight the need for vigilant dose monitoring, radiation safety training, and proper protective equipment.

Establishment of Diagnostic Reference Levels in Portuguese Interventional Radiology departments

PurposeTo establish Portuguese Diagnostic Reference Levels (DRLs), for six body fluoroscopy guided interventional procedures (FGIP). MethodA retrospective study was conducted in five interventional departments most representative of Interventional Radiology (IR) practice. Dose values, in terms of air kerma area product (PKA in Gy.cm2), air kerma at the patient entrance reference point (Ka,r in mGy), and exposure parameters (fluoroscopy time (FT) and number of cine runs) were collected. Examinations were selected per procedure (at least 20), according to the antero-posterior and lateral diameter mean value (±5 cm), measured on previous Computed Tomography (CT) examinations. ResultsData of 489 body FGIP show a large variation on dose values per procedure and per department. National DRLs in terms of PKA were 20.2 Gy.cm2 for Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), 98.2 Gy.cm2 for Bronchial artery embolisation (BAE), 247.7 Gy.cm2 for Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), 331.6 Gy.cm2 for Inferior epigastric arteries embolisation (IEAE), 312.0 Gy.cm2 for Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) and 19.3 Gy.cm2 for Endovascular treatment of femoral popliteal arteries (ETFPA). ConclusionsThis is the first study reporting Interventional Radiology DRLs in Portugal and we propose preliminary national estimates for the six more common body FGIP. The results of this study will be presented and discussed with all Portuguese IR departments, to promote procedures optimisation.

Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Procedures in Argentina.

The aim of this work was to propose a preliminary local diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for pediatric interventional cardiology (PIC) procedures in Argentina, for different ranges of age and weight. This work has been conducted in the framework of the "Optimization of Protection in Pediatric Interventional Radiology in Latin America and the Caribbean" (OPRIPALC) program coordinated by the World Health Organization and the Pan American Health Organization in cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency to ensuring that radiation exposures of pediatric patients are the minimum necessary during fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. The local DRL values presented in this paper by weight group and age group were 7.1 Gy·cm2 (<5 kg), 10.7 Gy·cm2 (5-15 kg), 18.0 Gy·cm2 (15-30 kg), 15.9 Gy·cm2 (30-50 kg), and 28.2 Gy·cm2 (50-80 kg) and 5.3 Gy·cm2 (<1), 11.2 Gy·cm2 (1 to 5<), 19.6 Gy·cm2 (5 to 10<), and 21.4 Gy·cm2 (10 to 16<), respectively. Our dose results are among the values found in other international studies; however, there is great potential for dose optimization.

Assessment of radiation doses and DNA damage in pediatric patients undergoing interventional procedures for vascular anomalies.

Interventional procedures (IPs) have been widely used to treat vascular anomalies (VA) in recent years. However, patients are exposed to low-dose X-ray ionizing radiation (IR) during these fluoroscopy-guided IPs. We collected clinical information and IR doses during IPs and measured biomarkers including γ-H2AX, chromosome aberrations (CA), and micronuclei (MN), which underpin radiation-induced DNA damage, from 74 pediatric patients before and after IPs. For the 74 children, the range of dose-area product (DAP) values was from 1.2 to 1754.6Gy∙cm2, with a median value of 27.1Gy∙cm2. DAP values were significantly higher in children with lesions in the head and neck than in the limbs and trunk; the age and weight of children revealed a strong positive correlation with DAP values. The treated patients as a group demonstrated an increase in all three endpoints relative to baseline following IPs. Children with vascular tumors have a higher risk of dicentric chromosome +centric ring (dic+r) and cytokinesis-block micronucleus (CBMN) after IPs than children with vascular malformations. The younger the patient, the greater the risk of CA after IPs. Moreover, rogue cells (RCs) were found in five children (approximately 10%) after IPs, and the rates of dic+r and CBMN were significantly higher than those of other children (Z=-3.576, p<0.001). These results suggest that there may be some children with VA who are particularly sensitive to IR, but more data and more in-depth experiments will be needed to verify this in the future.

Radioprotective Effects of a Semicircular X-ray Shielding Device for Operators During CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Interventional Procedures: Experimental and Clinical Studies

To evaluate, experimentally and clinically, the radioprotective effects of a semicircular X-ray shielding device for operators during CT fluoroscopy-guided IR procedures. During experimentation, the reduction rates of scattered radiation rates from CT fluoroscopy were evaluated using a humanoid phantom. Two shielding device positions were tested: "shielding close to the CT gantry" and "shielding close to the operator". The scattered radiation rate without shielding was also evaluated. The clinical study retrospectively evaluated the operator's radiation exposure during 314 CT-guided IR procedures. With a semicircular X-ray shielding device (with shielding group, n = 119) or without it (no shielding group, n = 195), CT fluoroscopy-guided IR procedures were performed. Radiation dose measurements were taken using a pocket dosimeter placed near the operator's eye. For shielding and no shielding groups, the procedure time, dose length product (DLP), and the operator's radiation exposures were compared. Experimentation revealed the respective mean reduction rates of "shielding close to the CT gantry" and "shielding close to the operator" as 84.3% and 93.5% compared with the no-shielding setting. Although no significant differences were found in the procedure time and the DLP between "no shielding" and "with shielding" groups in the clinical study, the operators' radiation exposure in the "with shielding" group (0.03 ± 0.04mSv) was significantly lower than in the "no shielding" group (0.14 ± 0.15mSv; p < .001). The semicircular X-ray shielding device provides valuable radioprotective effects for operators during CT fluoroscopy-guided IR.

Cardiologist’s exposure to radiation in cath lab measured with InstadoseTM dosimeter

Introduction: complex fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures in cardiology are known to result in higher radiation doses for patients and staff. Purpose: to estimate the equivalent dose received in different regions of the cardiologist’s body in catheterism (CATH) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures, as well as to evaluate the effectiveness of monitoring the doses in the catheritization laboratory (cath lab) using a direct ion storage dosimeter. Materials and methods: the InstadoseTM and the thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD-100) were fixed simultaneously in the following regions of the cardiologist’s body: near the eyes (left and right), the trunk region (over the lead apron) and the left ankle. Occupational doses were recorded during 86 procedures (60% CATH). Results: catheterization procedures showed third quartile dose values near to the left eye region equal to 0.10 mSv (TLD-100) and 0.12 (InstadoseTM) and for intervention 0.15 mSv (TLD-100 and InstadoseTM). The doses measured in the trunk region, over the lead apron, were about 13% higher for catheterization procedures and 20% higher for intervention procedures compared to left eye region measurements. The Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test was applied for unpaired data for all body regions, comparing the data obtained between the TLD-100 and InstadoseTM dosimeters. For CATH and PCI, the responses of the TLD-100 and InstadoseTM dosimeters are considered equal for all analysed regions (p > 0.05) with the exception of the right eye region. Conclusion: the InstadoseTM passive dosimeter can be useful as a complementary assessment in the monitoring of a cardiologist’s personal occupational doses in the cath lab.

Could Hypertension in Radiographers Associated with Low Ionizing Radiation Exposure? An Evidence-Based Case Report

Low-dose ionizing radiation exposure (<0.5 Gy) may give rise to circulation disorders. Nevertheless, it is not yet known whether low-dose ionizing radiation exposure can cause hypertension. A 27-year-old male patient, who is a radiographer, consulted regarding the result of his periodic check-up with the result of hypertension. He also said that his electrocardiogram (ECG) examination in the previous year's periodic check-up suggested a poor result, but he couldn't remember what the cardiologist told him. Could hypertension in radiographers be associated with ionizing radiation exposure at work? The literature was searched via PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane. One relevant article was found that met the inclusion criteria. A cohort study by Preetha R, et al (2015) showed no relationship between the risk of hypertension with fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures (FGIP) exposure. The selected article is quite valid but not in importance. Therefore, it did not apply to the case patient. Since research about this matter is still rare, there was only one suitable article found, so the causal relationship still cannot be proven. Further research is recommended using better exposure and outcome measures.

Patient Radiation Doses in IR Procedures: The American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy Pilot

PurposeTo update normative data on fluoroscopy dose indices in the United States for the first time since the Radiation Doses in Interventional Radiology study in the late 1990s. Materials and MethodsThe Dose Index Registry-Fluoroscopy pilot study collected data from March 2018 through December 2019, with 50 fluoroscopes from 10 sites submitting data. Primary radiation dose indices including fluoroscopy time (FT), cumulative air kerma (Ka,r), and kerma area product (PKA) were collected for interventional radiology fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. Clinical facility procedure names were mapped to the American College of Radiology (ACR) common procedure lexicon. Distribution parameters including the 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th, and 99th percentiles were computed. ResultsDose indices were collected for 70,377 FGI procedures, with 50,501 ultimately eligible for analysis. Distribution parameters are reported for 100 ACR Common IDs. FT in minutes, Ka,r in mGy, and PKA in Gy-cm2 are reported in this study as (n; median) for select ACR Common IDs: inferior vena cava filter insertion (1,726; FT: 2.9; Ka,r: 55.8; PKA: 14.19); inferior vena cava filter removal (464; FT: 5.7; Ka,r: 178.6; PKA: 34.73); nephrostomy placement (2,037; FT: 4.1; Ka,r: 39.2; PKA: 6.61); percutaneous biliary drainage (952; FT: 12.4; Ka,r: 160.5; PKA: 21.32); gastrostomy placement (1,643; FT: 3.2; Ka,r: 29.1; PKA: 7.29); and transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement (327; FT: 34.8; Ka,r: 813.0; PKA: 181.47). ConclusionsThe ACR DIR-Fluoro pilot has provided state-of-the-practice statistics for radiation dose indices from IR FGI procedures. These data can be used to prioritize procedures for radiation optimization, as demonstrated in this work.

Risk of occupational radiation exposure for radiation workers involved in interventional endourology in Saudi Arabia

In recent years, fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures have become an essential part of endourology practices and widely performed around the world. Despite the many clinical benefits of these procedures, they expose patients and workers to a significant amount of radiation. Thus, this study aimed to estimate the mean annual occupational radiation dose for interventional endourology workers in Saudi Arabia. During the five-year period from 2017 to 2021, 262 interventional endourology workers were monitored to estimate the radiation effective dose during their work routine in 28 Saudi Ministry of Health healthcare facilities. To estimate the radiation effective doses for workers, thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) were used on a quarterly basis. The interventional endourology workers were asked to operate the TLD-100 device using a lead apron, a thyroid protective collar and leaded protective eyewear to protect most parts of their body. The mean annual effective dose (mSv) was used as an indicator of the overall occupational exposure for the workers. Analysis of the occupational dose data showed that the mean annual effective dose for all workers, averaged over the study period, was 0.70 mSv (0.12–3.18 mSv). The results indicate a safe environment in terms of radiation protection with no single dose exceeding the recommended occupational dose limits. However, optimisation of radiation protection practices is always advised to facilitate a reduction in the occupational exposure to the radiation dose.

Underestimation of Radiation Doses by Compliance of Wearing Dosimeters among Fluoroscopically-Guided Interventional Medical Workers in Korea

This study aimed to estimate the level of underestimation of National Dose Registry (NDR) doses based on the workers’ dosimeter wearing compliance. In 2021, a nationwide survey of Korean medical radiation workers was conducted. A total of 989 medical workers who performed fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures participated, and their NDR was compared with the adjusted doses by multiplying the correction factors based on the individual level of dosimeter compliance from the questionnaire. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors for low dosimeter wearing. Based on the data from the NDR, the average annual effective radiation dose was 0.95 mSv, while the compliance-adjusted dose was 1.79 mSv, yielding an 89% increase. The risks for low compliance with wearing a badge were significantly higher among doctors, professionals other than radiologists or cardiologists, workers not frequently involved in performing fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures, and workers who did not frequently wear protective devices. This study provided quantitative information demonstrating that the NDR data may have underestimated the actual occupational radiation exposure. The underestimation of NDR doses may lead to biased risk estimates in epidemiological studies for radiation workers, and considerable attention on dosimetry wearing compliance is required to interpret and utilize NDR data.

Radiation Protection of the Eye Lens in Fluoroscopy-guided Interventional Procedures.

The medical staff involved in fluoroscopy-guided procedures are at potential risks of radiation-induced cataract. Therefore, proper monitoring of the lens doses is critical, and radiation protection should be provided to the maximum extent that is reasonably achievable. The collar dosimeter is necessary to avoid underestimation of the lens dose, and the third dosimeter behind the protective eyewear would be helpful for those who are likely to exceed the dose limit. The reduction of the patient doses will correspondingly reduce the staff doses. Proper placement of the ceiling-mounted shields and minimization of the face-to-glass gap are the keys to effective shielding. The optimization of procedures and devices that help maintain a distance from the irradiated area and to prevent the looking-up posture will substantially reduce the lens dose.

Radiation exposure in 101 non-coronary fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: reference levels of air kerma at the reference point and air kerma area product.

To present the median value and 75th percentile of air kerma at the reference point (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (KAP), and fluoroscopic time for a large number of fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. This retrospective study included the consecutive non-coronary FGI procedures from a Radiology department between May 2016 and October 2018 at a large tertiary-care hospital in the U.S. An in-house developed, semi-automated software, integrated with a dictation system, was used to record patient examination information, including Ka,r, KAP and fluoroscopic time. The included patient procedures were categorized into procedure types. A software package R (v. 3.5.1, R Foundation) was used to calculate procedure-specific quartiles of radiation exposure. Based on analysis of 24,911 FGI cases, median value and 75th percentile are presented for each of Ka,r, KAP and fluoroscopic time for 101 procedures that can act as benchmark for comparison for dose optimization studies. This study provides reference levels ( 50th and 75th percentiles) for a comprehensive list of FGI procedures, reflecting an overall picture of the latest FGI studies for diagnosis, targeted minimally invasive intervention, and therapeutic treatment. This study provides reference levels (50th and 75th percentiles) for the largest number of fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures reported to date (101 procedures), in terms of air kerma at the reference point, air kerma-area product, and fluoroscopic time, among which these quartiles for ≥50 procedures are presented for the first time.

Collar Badge Lens Dose Equivalent Values among United States Physicians Performing Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Procedures

PurposeTo describe the range of occupational badge dose readings and annualized dose records among physicians performing fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures using job title information provided by the same 3 major medical institutions in 2009, 2012, and 2015. Materials and MethodsThe Radiation Safety Office of selected hospitals was contacted to request assistance with identifying physicians in a large commercial dosimetry database. All entries judged to be uninformative of occupational doses to FGI procedure staff were excluded. Monthly and annualized doses were described with univariate statistics and box-and-whisker plots. ResultsThe dosimetry data set of interventional radiology staff contained 169 annual dose records from 77 different physicians and 698 annual dose records from 455 nonphysicians. The median annualized lens dose equivalent values among physicians (11.9 mSv; interquartile range [IQR], 6.9–20.0 mSv) was nearly 3-fold higher than those among nonphysician medical staff assisting with FGI procedures (4.0 mSv; IQR, 1.8–6.7 mSv) (P < .001). During the study period, without eye protection, 25% (23 of 93) of the physician annualized lens dose equivalent values may have exceeded 20 mSv; for nonphysician medical staff, this value may have been exceeded 3.5% (6 of 173) of the time. However, these values did not account for eye protection. ConclusionsThe findings from this study highlight the importance of mitigating occupational dose to the eyes of medical staff, particularly physicians, performing or assisting with FGI procedures. Training on radiation protection principles, the use of personal protective equipment, and patient radiation dose management can all help ensure that the occupational radiation dose is adequately controlled.

Monte Carlo-based patient internal dosimetry in fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures: A review.

This systematic review aims to understand the dose estimation approaches and their major challenges. Specifically, we focused on state-of-the-art Monte Carlo (MC) methods in fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. All relevant studies were identified through keyword searches in electronic databases from inception until September 2020. The searched publications were reviewed, categorised and analysed based on their respective methodology. Hundred and one publications were identified which utilised existing MC-based applications/programs or customised MC simulations. Two outstanding challenges were identified that contribute to uncertainties in the virtual simulation reconstruction. The first challenge involves the use of anatomical models to represent individuals. Currently, phantom libraries best balance the needs of clinical practicality with those of specificity. However, mismatches of anatomical variations including body size and organ shape can create significant discrepancies in dose estimations. The second challenge is that the exact positioning of the patient relative to the beam is generally unknown. Most dose prediction models assume the patient is located centrally on the examination couch, which can lead to significant errors. The continuing rise of computing power suggests a near future where MC methods become practical for routine clinical dosimetry. Dynamic, deformable phantoms help to improve patient specificity, but at present are only limited to adjustment of gross body volume. Dynamic internal organ displacement or reshaping is likely the next logical frontier. Image-based alignment is probably the most promising solution to enable this, but it must be automated to be clinically practical.

Interventional respiratory motion compensation by simultaneous fluoroscopic and nuclear imaging: a phantom study

Purpose. A compact and mobile hybrid c-arm scanner, capable of simultaneously acquiring nuclear and fluoroscopic projections and SPECT/CBCT, was developed to aid fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures involving the administration of radionuclides (e.g. hepatic radioembolization). However, as in conventional SPECT/CT, the acquired nuclear images may be deteriorated by patient respiratory motion. We propose to perform compensation for respiratory motion by extracting the motion signal from fluoroscopic projections so that the nuclear counts can be gated into motion bins. The purpose of this study is to quantify the performance of this motion compensation technique with phantom experiments. Methods. Anthropomorphic phantom configurations that are representative of distributions obtained during the pre-treatment procedure of hepatic radioembolization were placed on a stage that translated with three different motion patterns. Fluoroscopic projections and nuclear counts were simultaneously acquired under planar and SPECT/CBCT imaging. The planar projections were visually assessed. The SPECT reconstructions were visually assessed and quantitatively assessed by calculating the activity recovery of the spherical inserts in the phantom. Results. The planar nuclear projections of the translating anthropomorphic phantom were blurry when no motion compensation was applied. With motion compensation, the nuclear projections became representative of the stationary phantom nuclear projection. Similar behavior was observed for the visual quality of SPECT reconstructions. The mean error of the activity recovery in the uncompensated SPECT reconstructions was 15.8% ± 0.9% for stable motion, 11.9% ± 0.9% for small variations, and 11.0% ± 0.9% for large variations. When applying motion compensation, the mean error decreased to 1.8% ± 1.6% for stable motion, 2.2% ± 1.5% for small variations, and 5.2% ± 2.5% for large variations. Conclusion. A compact and mobile hybrid c-arm scanner, capable of simultaneously acquiring nuclear and fluoroscopic projections, can perform compensation for respiratory motion. Such motion compensation results in sharper planar nuclear projections and increases the quantitative accuracy of the SPECT reconstructions.

Radiation exposure and fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures among orthopedic surgeons in South Korea

BackgroundThe use of fluoroscopically-guided interventional (FGI) procedures by orthopedic surgeons has been increasing. This study aimed to investigate the occupational radiation exposure among orthopedic surgeons in South Korea.MethodsA nationwide survey of orthopedic surgeons was conducted in South Korea in October 2017. The dosimetry data of the participants were obtained from the National Dosimetry Registry. The orthopedic surgeons were categorized by job specialty [spine or trauma specialists, other orthopedic specialists, and residents], and descriptive statistics for the demographics and work-related characteristics were presented. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for the orthopedic surgeons who were not linked with the dosimetry data.ResultsAmong the total participants (n = 513), 40.5% of the orthopedic surgeons spent more than 50% of their time working with the FGI procedures when compared with their overall work. The average frequency of the FGI procedures among the orthopedic surgeons was 12.3 days per month. Less than 30% of the participants were regularly provided with radiation monitoring badges. The proportion of subjects who always wore lead aprons and thyroid shields were 52 and 29%, respectively. The residents group experienced more unfavorable working conditions of radiation exposure than the other specialists. The dosimetry data were not significantly linked among the residents (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–3.95) and orthopedic surgeons working at small hospitals (OR 4.76, 95% CI 1.05–21.51).ConclusionsAlthough orthopedic surgeons often performed FGI procedures, they wore protective gear less frequently, and a large proportion of orthopedic surgeons were not monitored by the national radiation dosimetry system. As the number of radiation procedures performed by the orthopedic surgeons increases, more intensive approaches are needed to reduce radiation exposure, especially for spine and trauma surgeons.

Rogue cell-like chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes of interventional radiologists: A case study

We report two cases of interventional radiologists who had been exposed to radiation while performing fluoroscopically-guided interventional procedures (FGIPs), mainly transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, percutaneous catheter drainage, and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage procedures, for over 10 years. They had a unique multi-aberrant cell type with not only high numbers of dicentrics and/or centric rings but also excess acentric double minutes, similar to a rogue cell. As revealed in a self-administered questionnaire, they wore personal dosimeters and protective equipment at all times and used shielding devices during interventional fluoroscopy procedures. However, the exposed dose levels derived from cytogenetic dosimetry were much higher than the doses recorded on their personal dosimeters. A large number of unstable and stable chromosomal aberrations that were found in the peripheral blood lymphocytes of these interventional radiologists might be due to repeated and long-term exposure to ionizing radiation while performing FGIPs. Further investigations of chromosomal aberrations in interventional radiologists may improve the understanding of the long-term effects of radiation exposure on medical personnel.

Radiation Effective Dose Above 100 mSv From Fluoroscopically Guided Intervention: Frequency and Patient Medical Condition.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article was to investigate the medical condition of patients who received substantial cumulative effective dose (CED) in fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS. We examined 25,253 patients (mean age, 58.2 years; 50.6% male) who underwent 46,491 FGI procedures at a tertiary care center in the United States from January 2010 to January 2019. Radiation dosage data were retrieved from an in-house semiautomated dose-tracking system. A cohort was identified as those who received a CED of 100 mSv or greater and was categorized by medical disorder from longitudinal medical records. Statistical software was used to determine mean value, five percentiles (10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 95th), and interquartile range for age and dose. RESULTS. Among 1011 (4.0%) patients (30.4% female) with a CED of 100 mSv or more, the median number of procedures was 2.0, the median age at first procedure was 60.0 years old, and the median value of CED was 177.2 mSv. The patients' medical disorders included cancer (36.7%), chronic disease of the torso (30.0%), internal bleeding (24.8%), trauma (4.6%), organ transplant (3.2%) and cerebrovascular disease (0.7%). Eight-hundred (79.1%) patients underwent all of their procedures within 365 days. CONCLUSION. This is the first cohort study of the medical condition of patients receiving substantial cumulative doses from FGI procedures over a long period. In the critical care of patients with serious medical disorders, 4.0% of patients may be exposed to substantial radiation dose (CED ≥ 100 mSv). The risks associated with such a high level of radiation warrant continued attention.