Fully printable carbon-based multiporous-layered-electrode perovskite solar cells (MPLE-PSCs) has long-term stability, because the thick carbon layer (~15 μm) can be protected the perovskite light absorption crystals from ambient water and oxygen [1-5]. This allows MPLE-PSCs to be manufactured in air, and scale-up is possible when used in conjunction with printing technologies. However, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) is lower than that of general thin-film type perovskite solar cells. To solve this problem, we need to introduce high-quality perovskite light-absorbing crystals inside the porous layer by controlling the permeation and crystallization process of the perovskite precursor solution. In this study, it was found that by mixing SnO2 in the mesoporous carbon electrode, the SnO2 acts as an inorganic binder and helps the perovskite precursor solution to penetrate. MPLE-PSCs with a sub-module size of 15.17 cm2 active area were also fabricated using this SnO2-mixed carbon electrode.In order to fabricate MPLE-PSCs, a hole blocking layer (compact-TiO2) layer was deposited on the FTO (fluorine-doped SnO2) glass substrate by the spray pyrolysis method. Then, electron transport layer (mesoporous TiO2), insulation layer (mesoporous ZrO2) and hole transport layer/back contact electrode (mesoporous carbon) were coated by screen printing method. Finally, the perovskite precursor solution ((HOOC(CH2)4NH3)0.05(CH3NH3)0.95PbI3, 1.2 mol/L in γ-butyrolactone) was dropped and annealed to complete the MPLE-PSCs [1].Analysis of the pore size distribution of the carbon electrode, contact angle, and elemental distribution in the cross-section of the MPLE-PSCs showed that mixing SnO2 changed the morphology of the carbon electrode and allowed the perovskite precursor solution to penetrate throughout the mesoporous electrode. The PCE of MPLE-PSCs mixed with SnO2 was found to be 11.02 % at the optimum ratio (15 wt% SnO2 to carbon powder). Furthermore, the PCE of a sub-module fabricated with the same material achieved 9.03 %. This value represents a significant improvement by 22.9 % compared to the pristine-carbon case.[1] A. Mei, et al., Science 345, 295 (2014).[2] R. Tsuji, et al., Electrochemistry 88, 418 (2020).[3] R. Tsuji, et al., Photonics 7, 133 (2020).[4] D. Bogachuk, et al., Carbon 178, 10 (2021).[5] E. Kobayashi, et al., Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2, 100648 (2021).
Read full abstract