The Fluoride-salt-cooled High-temperature Reactor (FHR) is a promising Generation IV nuclear reactor due to its improved safety design, near atmospheric working pressure, and high electric power conversion efficiency. However, control of radioactive fission gases, such as tritium, is a critical issue in FHRs due to the significantly larger production rate and potentially larger leakage rate of tritium compared to those in Light Water Reactors (LWRs). Therefore, this study proposes two mitigation strategies for tritium in FHRs: Double-Wall Heat eXchanger with a Tritium Carrier (DWHX-TC) option and Single-Wall Heat eXchanger with a Tritium Barrier (SWHX-TB) option. For the DWHX-TC option, two tube surface configurations, i.e., plain and fluted tubes, and four tritium carriers, i.e., helium, FLiBe, FLiNaK, and KF-ZrF4, are initially considered, among which the best tube configuration and promising tritium carrier are then selected and used for design optimization of the DWHX. For the SWHX-TB option, two cases, tritium barriers with and without cracks, are investigated in this study. In addition, the two mitigation strategies are evaluated by an in-house, one-dimensional, coupled HEat and MAss Transfer (HEMAT) code developed to predict the leakage rate of tritium in nuclear systems. Our analysis shows that (1) a double-wall configuration using fluted tubes as both the inner and outer tubes is better than other double-wall configurations investigated; (2) helium, as a tritium carrier, is superior to other candidates, including FLiBe, FLiNaK, and KF-ZrF4; (3) the leakage rate of tritium (into the atmosphere) is reduced from 3400 Ci/day, taking the Advanced High-Temperature Reactor (AHTR) as a reference, to 4.0 Ci/day for an optimum design of the DWHX-TC option using helium as the tritium carrier and 1.7 Ci/day for an optimum design of the SWHX-TB option using 30-µm thick silicon carbide (SiC) as the tritium barrier (no cracks); and (4) potential cracks in tritium barriers may significantly deteriorate mass transfer performance of the SWHX-TB option. For example, a cracking rate of 0.1% leads to an increase of 694.1% in the leakage rate under the conditions investigated.
Read full abstract