FLT3 Inhibitors Research Articles

PHI-101 As a Potent Next-Generation FLT3 Inhibitor, Overcome Resistances in Previously Treated Patients with FLT3-ITD or TKD Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Results of a Phase Ia/Ib Clinical Trial

Background: The FLT3 receptor is mutated in about 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (pts) and has proven to be an attractive therapeutic target. The most prevalent alteration is internal tandem duplication (ITD) of the juxtamembrane domain, and several FLT3 inhibitors (e.g. gilteritinib, quizartinib, midostaurin) succeddfully target this mutation. However, patients frequently relapse due to resistance to these FLT3 inhibitors after initial clinical responses, often caused by the secondary mutations observed in the kinase domain (TKD) region. PHI-101, an orally bioavailable novel small molecule, is a next-generation FLT3 inhibitor that shows a potent anti-leukemic activity in primary AML samples harboring several FLT3-resistance mutations in preclinical studies. Global Phase I clinical trials with PHI-101 (NCT04842370) are currently underway in refractory or relapsed (R/R) AML pts. Study Design and Methods: The open-label, multicenter AML clinical trial consists of phase Ia, dose-escalation, and phase Ib, dose-expansion, utilizing oral PHI-101 tablets as a single-agent with R/R AML pts. If dose-escalation concludes with no dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), dose-expansion proceeds upon recommendation from the Safety Monitoring Committee (SMC). Response assessments with PHI-101 were reported according to 2017 ELN guidelines. The variant allelic frequency of mutations of FLT3 and other AML-related mutations was analyzed using NGS with bone marrow aspirates collected from pts before and after PHI-101 treatment. Blood samples were collected to evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK) and the plasma inhibitory assay (PIA) using FLT3-mutant cell lines. Together, these assessments were considered to determine the recommended dose for expansion (RDE) in phase Ib trials. Results: Phase Ia clinical trials of PHI-101 was designed to evaluate for safety and tolerability at five dose levels ranging from 40 mg to 200 mg. A total of 13 R/R AML pts were enrolled in the phase Ia and no DLTs were reported from daily doses of PHI-101 during the 28-day cycle. The target RDE at 160 mg was determined based on several considerations, including the PIA test achieving >85% inhibition of phosphor-FLT3, all available adverse events, PK data, and recommendation by the SMC. As of May 2023, with 6 pts enrolled in phase Ib, a total of 19 pts (5 FLT3-wild type (26.3%) and 14 FLT3 mutated (73.7%)), have been treated with PHI-101. Thirteen pts (68.4%) had more than 3 prior anti-leukemic treatments. Twelve of 13 pts (92%) assessed for the leukemic blast evaluation achieved clinical responses-4 pts with composite complete remissions [CRc, including complete remission with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) and morphological leukemia free state (MLFS)] within 1 cycle of PHI-101 treatment. Ten pts were R/R following previous treatment with other FLT3 inhibitors (gilteritinib, quizartinib, midostaurin, or HM43239). 88 % of these pts achieved clinical responses including 3 CRc and 1 partial response (PR). Notably, all 5 R/R pts after gilteritinib treatment had clinical responses that included 2 with CRc. In addition, a patient with both FLT3-ITD and TKD (D835E and N676K) mutations who was resistant to 3 different FLT3 inhibitor treatments achieved PR and continued PHI-101 treatment for 6 cycles. Among pts who received 160 mg of PHI-101, 4 pts (57.1%) responded: 2 (28.6%) achieved CRi, 1(14.3%) achieved MLFS, and 1 (14.3%) achieved PR. Conclusion: In dose-escalating phase Ia clinical trials, PHI-101 was well tolerated at all dose levels with no DLTs. Phase Ib dose-expansion trials with 160 mg daily dosing are currently ongoing. PHI-101 has delivered CRcs at 120 mg and 160 mg. In this first-in-human, phase Ia/Ib trial of PHI-101, 92% of FLT3-wild or -mutated AML pts showed clinical responses even after having previously been treated with otherFLT3 inhibitors. More notably, 100% of pts who had relapsed after prior gilteritinib treatment showed clinical responses. The data from the clinical study of PHI-101to date demonstrates significant efficacy, particularly in R/R FLT3 mutant AML pts.

Efficacy and Safety of FLT-3 Inhibitors in Newly Diagnosed FLT-3 Mutated AML Patients: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Introduction: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT-3) is the most commonly reported gene alteration in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and is associated with relatively poor survival outcomes and response rates. Multiple FLT-3 inhibitors were tested in combination with standard first line therapy in recent years in both medically fit and unfit patients for intensive chemotherapy. In this systematic study, we will assess the efficacy and safety of FLT-3 inhibitors in newly diagnosed patients with AML. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase with keywords for, “FLT-3 mutations” AND “AML” from the inception of data till 6/31/23. PRISMA guidelines were followed while conducting this systematic review. We screened 5,983 articles and included 5 randomized clinical trials (RCTs, N=1,906) and 6 non-randomized clinical trials (nRCTs, N=891) based on inclusion criteria. Results: In 11 clinical trials (N=2,797), 233 patients were unfit for intensive chemotherapy while 2,464 were fit for intensive chemotherapy. 1,906 patients were treated with FLT-3 inhibitor-based regimens while 891 patients were treated with standard therapy. In an RCT by Wang et al. (N=123) on unfit patients, CR/ORR were 58%/63.5% with giltritinib (Gil)+ azacytadine (Aza) vs. 26.5%/34.7% with Aza. Hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival (OS) was 0.9, similar in two groups. In subgroup of an RCT by Dennis et al. (N=27), HR of OS was 0.36 (0.16-0.85) significantly in favor of quizartinib (Qui) + low dose cytarabine (LDAC) vs. LDAC alone. In two nRCTs (N=63) on unfit patients, Qui + venetoclax (Ven) +Aza/LDAC showed complete response (CR)/overall response (ORR) of 42%/72% and Qui+Aza/LDAC showed CR/ORR of 44%/56%. In an RCT by Stone et al. (N=617) on fit patients up to 59 years old, CR/CRi was 58.9% and 53.5% with midostaurin (Mid)+ chemotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. HRs of event free survival (EFS) and OS were 0.78 (0.66- 0.93) and 0.78 (0.63-0.96), respectively, significantly in favor of Mid+chemotherapy as compared to chemotherapy alone. In two nRCTs (740) including older fit patients up to 85 years of age, CR/CRi was 77% with no new safety signal. In an RCT by Erb et al. (N=539), CR/CRi was 71.6% and 64.9% with Qui + chemotherapy and chemotherapy, respectively. HRs of EFS and OS were 0.92 (0.75-1.11)* and 0.78 (0.62-0.98), respectively, in favor of Qui + chemotherapy (*not statistically significant). In an RCT by Knapper et al. (N=500) on fit patients, HRs of relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 0.88 (0.69-1.12) and 0.9 (0.7-1.15), respectively, with no significant difference among lustaurtinib (Lus) + chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone. In two RCTs (N=88), CR/CRi was 90.9% and 73% with Gil+chemotherapy and crenolanib (Cren) + chemotherapy, respectively. Table 1. ≥3 grade 3 hematological and non-hematological side effects are given in table 1. Conclusion: Addition of Gil, Qui, Lus, Mid, or Cren to standard therapy was well tolerated by most of the patients with FLT-3 mutation. Addition of Mid or Qui to chemotherapy significantly improved survival and response rates as compared to chemotherapy alone in fit patients with FLT-3 mutation and the results were consistent in both young and old fit patients. In early phase trials, Gil and Cren were effective in combination with chemotherapy in fit patients. In subgroup analysis of an RCT, Qui significantly improved survival and response rates in FLT-3 mutated unfit patients in combination with LDAC. Gil and Lus failed to improve survival in FLT-3 mutated unfit and fit patients, respectively. More randomized double-blind multicenter phase III clinical trials are needed to confirm these results.

Trial in Progress: A Phase 1b Single-Arm, Open-Label Study of Emavusertib (CA-4948) in Combination with Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients in Complete Response with Measurable Residual Disease

Background Emavusertib is a novel potent oral inhibitor of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 4 (IRAK4) with additional inhibitory activity against FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) and CDC-like kinases (CLK1/2/4). Inhibition of these onco-proteins may induce remission thereby addressing a critical unmet need for novel therapies in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Clinical studies with emavusertib monotherapy have demonstrated a significant reduction in AML blasts with clinical and molecular responses, including patients with relapsed or refractory AML, previously treated with an HMA and/or FLT3 inhibitors (Metzeler 2022). Azacitidine + venetoclax (aza+ven) has been approved in newly diagnosed, unfit patients with AML. In the VIALE-A study, composite complete response (CRc) (CR, CRh, or CRi) in the absence of measurable residual disease (MRD) of <1 residual blast/1000 leukocytes (MRD negative [MRD−]) resulted in longer duration of response (DOR), event-free survival, and overall survival (OS), and better HSCT outcome compared with patients who achieved CRc but were MRD+ (Pratz, 2022). In pre-clinical studies, emavusertib in combination with aza+ven demonstrated synergistic antileukemic effects in AML cell lines, including azacitidine- or venetoclax-resistant cell lines. Adding emavusertib to aza+ven in MRD+ patients at the time of CR may convert MRD status without adding significant toxicity and confirm that emavusertib can be safely added to aza+ven as a potential new regimen in front-line therapy. Study Design: This is a single-arm, open-label Phase 1b trial evaluating safety and tolerability, PK, and conversion of MRD status with emavusertib as an add-on agent to aza+ven in AML patients who achieved CR or CRh with MRD+ based on local testing (EU CT Number 2023-505828-58-00). The primary objective of the study is to determine a safe and tolerable dosing schedule for the triple combination. Secondary objectives include MRD conversion rate, DOR, OS, and pharmacokinetics. The study will enroll approximately 24 patients at 5 to 10 sites globally. Patients will have received azacitidine and venetoclax as first line therapy and achieved CR or CRh after 1-6 cycles of aza/ven. If MRD status remains positive, emavusertib will be added to the existing well tolerated aza+ven regimen. The starting emavusertib dose is 200 mg BID for 7 days per cycle of 28 days. If well tolerated, duration of emavusertib treatment will be extended to 14 and 21, respectively; no intra-patient change of emavusertib dosing duration is planned. The patients will continue triple treatment (emavusertib+aza+ven) until consent withdrawal, disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or not achieving MRD- within 6 cycles of triple treatment. In this Phase 1b trial, MRD can be evaluated by local testing of bone marrow. Key exclusion criteria include residual toxicities and significant comorbidities.

A Phase 1a/b Trial of Luxeptinib (CG-806) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Malignancies or Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Evaluation of New G3 Formulation

INTRODUCTION: Luxeptinib (CG-806; LUX) is an orally active noncovalent kinase inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), wild type and mutant forms of Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) (including the internal tandem duplicates (ITD), tyrosine kinase domain (TKD), and F691L mutant forms), and growth receptors like KIT, CSF1R, PDGFRα, and TRKs. In prior studies, LUX has been shown to suppress aberrant proliferative signaling in B cell malignancies and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) via regulation of BTK, LYN, SYK, AKT, ERK, and MAPK. LUX is cytotoxic to primary AML cells insensitive to other FLT3 inhibitors and to malignant B-cells insensitive to ibrutinib, at pM and nM concentrations, respectively. AIMS: The primary objectives of these studies are to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of LUX and determine recommended phase 2 doses for relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML and B cell malignancy patients. METHODS: In two studies (NCT04477291; NCT03893682), LUX (original formulation, G1) was administered continuously as oral capsules BID in 28-day cycles of ascending cohorts (relapsed or refractory de novo, secondary, or therapy-related AML or higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), and relapsed and refractory for B cell lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic/small lymphocytic leukemia). A novel generation 3 (G3) formulation of LUX designed to increase bioavailability was tested at a single-dose (sub-study) for relative bioavailability (RBA), followed by continuous dosing in subsequent R/R AML patients. RESULTS: In the B-cell study (as of 15 th May 2023), LUX has been administered to 36 patients at dose levels from 150 mg to 900 mg BID in patients with a median of 3 lines of prior treatment, with 47.2% having received a BTK-inhibitor. Only one (2.8%) patient had a DLT of hypertension and 14 (38.9%) experienced at least one drug related ≥Grade3 treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE). Two patients (900 mg) are currently on study with no DLT and no ≥Grade 3 related TEAEs. A Follicular lymphoma patient is at cycle 28, and achieved a best response as partial response (PR) with a decrease in lesion size of 76.2%; an SLL patient is at cycle 13, and achieved stable disease (SD) showing a decrease in lesion size of 43.1% (Figure A). The overall best response achieved among the 17 patients who have been on treatment for more than 12 weeks are stable disease (SD) (n=11), partial response (PR) (n=3), minor response (n=2) and complete response (CR) (n=1). As of 5 th June 2023, in the AML trial, a total of 40 patients (16 (40%) FLT3-ITD, 21 (52.5%) FLT3-WT, 2 (5.0%) FLT3-TKD, and 1 (2.5%) unknown mutations) with a median of 3 prior treatments (range, 1 - 10) have been treated with LUX G1 formulation at dose levels from 450 mg - 900 mg BID (n=34) or with 50 mg BID of G3 formulation (n=6). Four (10%) experienced drug related SAE and 7 (17.5%) had a drug related grade ≥3 TEAEs. The most common related TEAEs were lymphocyte count decrease, platelet count decrease, and anemia (n=2; 5% patients each). One (2.5%) patient at 450 mg dose, reported complete remission without minimum residual disease (CRmrd) and remained on study for 56 weeks. In the RBA sub-study, G3 (50 mg) produced comparable exposures to G1 (450-900 mg range) (Figure B) and was, therefore, selected as the starting dose for use in the R/R AML study. Six patients were treated with a continuous dosing of 50 mg BID G3; with plasma levels of 274 ng/mL and 195 ng/mL LUX observed by the end of C1D15 and C1D22 respectively. No drug related Grade ≥3 TEAEs or DLTs were observed in 50 mg BID G3 LUX treated patients; with no new safety signals observed for the G3 formulation. Based on these findings and expected exposures for higher dose levels, the cohort safety review committee has approved escalation of G3 dosing to 200 mg BID at which dosing is ongoing. CONCLUSIONS: LUX has a favorable safety profile in patients at all tested dose levels, for multiple cycles, for both studies. Antitumor activity was observed in a heavily pretreated relapsed AML patient and in multiple B-NHL subtypes and CLL/SLL patients including several with prior ibrutinib exposure. Continuous dosing of patients with R/R AML and Higher-Risk MDS with the G3 formulation is ongoing; with updated clinical data (200 mg dose level) to be presented at the meeting.

A Phase 1b Multi-Center Study of the FLT3 Inhibitor Gilteritinib in Combination with the IDH1 Inhibitor Ivosidenib or the IDH2 Inhibitor Enasidenib for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Have Co-Occurring FLT3/IDH1 or FLT3/IDH2 Mutations

Background: Mutations in isocitrate dehydrogenase isoenzymes 1 and 2 (IDH1 and IDH2) occur in 15- 25% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Enasidenib and ivosidenib, inhibitors of mutant IDH2 and IDH1 respectively, decrease intracellular levels of 2-HG, restore myeloid maturation, and lead to complete or partial remissions in approximately 40% of patients with IDH-mutant AML. While this response rate is remarkable in a relapsed and refractory AML population, nearly 60% of patients fail to respond. Approximately 30% of patients with IDH1/2 mutations have co-occurring mutations in the FMS like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3). Correlative science suggests that the acquisition of FLT3 mutations (either an internal tandem duplication (ITD) or tyrosine kinase domain (TKD)) is a common mechanism of resistance to IDH inhibitor monotherapy. Gilteritinib is a FLT3 inhibitor that targets the ITD and TKD mutations. This clinical trial (NCT05756777) will evaluate the safety and efficacy of concurrent IDH and FLT3 inhibition, while determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for each of the combinations. Methods: NCT05756777 is a multi-center, open-label, experimental, interventional study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of the combination of gilteritinib + ivosidenib (Cohort 1 - IDH1/FLT3 co-mutation) and gilteritinib + enasidenib (Cohort 2 - IDH2/FLT3 co-mutation) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia with co-occurring FLT3 (ITD or TKD) and IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. Treatment with gilteritinib + ivosidenib will be administered for patients with IDH1/FLT3 co-mutations and gilteritinib + enasidenib will be administered for patients with IDH2/FLT3 co-mutations. Patients in both cohorts will dose daily throughout the 28-day cycle and without pause between cycles. The study will enroll 36 patients with relapsed/refractory AML with co-occurring FLT3 (ITD or TKD) and IDH1 or IDH2 mutations. The dose escalation schema will use the Bayesian Optimal Interval (BOIN) design. This study is open for accrual at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. The study population will include patients with AML with dual FLT3 and IDH1/IDH2 mutations R/R to initial intensive induction therapy, or for patients treated with low intensity therapy, the patient must be refractory to treatment with a single agent hypomethylating agent (HMA) or low dose cytarabine (LDAC) (at least two cycles) or an HMA/LDAC in combination with venetoclax (at least one cycle) or another standard of care therapy (e.g. gemtuzumab ozogamicin, glasdegib/LDAC). Patients with a history of autologous or allogeneic stem cell transplant for AML are permitted to participate in the study. This study is partially supported by Astellas Pharma Global Development, Inc. Clinical trial information: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05756777

A Phase 2 Study of Ponatinib for Prevention of Relapse after Allotransplantation in FLT3-ITD + AML Patients : The Ponallo Trial

Background : For acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients relapse remains a major issue after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). In those with a FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3-internal tandem duplication (FLT3-ITD+), survivals have been improved with the use of small molecule Flt3 receptor protein-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in maintenance due to a significant decrease of relapse after allo-SCT. Ponatinib (pona) is a multikinase inhibitor that is approved for the treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic and chronic myelogenous leukemias. It has also activity against FLT3-mutants including ITD and ITD691L but not D835 within the Flt3 activation segment. Pona may then represent an alternative drug for maintenance after allo-SCT in FLT3-ITD+ AML patients. Methods : This was a multicenter phase 2 non-randomized prospective study testing the efficacy and tolerability of pona after allo-SCT in FLT3-ITD+ AML patients (ClinicalTrial.gov ID : NCT03690115). The main objective was the incidence of relapse at 2 years post-transplant with the hypothesis that this incidence at 2 years will be reduced at 15% instead of 30%. Seventy-seven patients had to be included. Inclusion criteria were all patients, aged between 18 and 70 yo, with a FLT-3 ITD+ AML in cytologic complete remission (<5% of bone marrow blasts) and a documented engraftment at the time of starting pona after an allo-SCT using any type of conditioning regimen and donor. The control of a GVHD (if present) was mandatory as well as a platelets count ≥70 Giga/l and a neutrophils count ≥ 1 Giga/l at time of inclusion. The study was supported by Incyte. Initially, pona administration had to start between day +60 and +90/100 at the dose of 30 mg/day for 1-year. However, because of excesssive hematopoietic toxicity, an amendment was made after the 14th patient to start pona between day 100 and day 120 post-allo. During the study, It was allowed to restart pona at 15 mg/day after resolution of 30 mg dose related toxicities. After 1 year of pona it was not allowed to start a new FLT3 inhibitor or pursue pona. Results : Twenty-three patients were included between December 2019 and April 2022. Among them, 22 were effectively treated. Indeed, the last patient included did not receive pona due to hepatic abnormalities incompatible with the start of pona. Also, because of a very low rate of enrollment, the trial was closed prematurely in accordance with the sponsor in December 2022. Results for the 22 treated patients are reported here. Patient characteristics are given in Table 1. With a median follow-up of 740 days (range : 374-930), 1-y and 2-y overall survival were 81.3% (66.3-99.6) and 63.9% (45.4-90.0), and 1-y and 2-y leukemia-free survival were 54.5% (37.2-79.8) and 49% (31.8-75.7), respectively. Ten relapses occured at a median of 186 days (range=69-481) after allo-SCT with a CI of relapse of 45.5% at 2 years. Pona was started at a median of 69 days post-allo-SCT (range : 60-130). The median duration of treatment was 75.5 days (range : 4-369). Only 3 patients received one year of treatment and all at 30 mg/day as required by the protocol. The reasons for stopping pona were toxicity in 11 patients, relapse in 6, toxicity then relapse in 1, GVHD then relapse in 1. Among the 13 patients who stopped pona for toxicity or GVHD, 6 restarted pona (15 mg n=5, 30 mg n=1) then stoppped again for toxicity (n=4) or progression (n=2). A total of 36 adverse events related to pona were documented in 17 patients. The majority was grade 1 or 2 (n=27, 75%) while 6 grade 3 (17%) and 3 grade 4 (8%) occured. ( Table 2) Conclusion : Ponatinib administration after allo-SCT is associated with toxicity and do not reduce relapse or improve survival in this small cohort of FLT3+ AML patients. Other FLT3 inhibitors have to be considered in FLT3+ AML patients for maintenance after allo-SCT.

The Shifting Prognosis of FLT3 Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia in the Era of Targeted Therapy: A Real-World Study Using Large-Scale Electronic Health Record Data

Background: Mutations in FLT3 occur in 20-30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and their prognostic implications have varied over time with improved understanding of FLT3 (Döhner et al., Blood, 2022). However, since 2017, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved three FLT3 inhibitors, and few studies have examined the prognosis of FLT3 mutations in the era of targeted therapy. Additionally, a real-world oncology data analysis suggested that novel therapies may have greater effects than clinical trials showed, due to the inclusion of previously ineligible patients (Liu et al., Nature, 2021). Therefore, we examined the relative prognosis of FLT3-mutated AML before and after the FDA approval date of the first FLT3-inhibitor, midostaurin. Methods: Patients were included if both FLT3-ITD (internal tandem duplication) and FLT3 D835 mutations were tested within 14 days of AML diagnosis at the Stanford Cancer Center. Data came from databases associated with Stanford's electronic health record (EHR), except that overall survival (OS) data was supplemented with external databases like the Social Security Death Index, and diagnosis dates came from the Stanford Cancer Registry. A FLT3 mutation was defined as either an ITD or D835 variant. The FDA approval of midostaurin served as a real-world, unplanned experiment illustrating the impact of FLT3 inhibitors' availability on the prognosis of FLT3-mutated AML. Thus, using a difference-in-differences approach, we built a logistic regression model predicting one-year overall survival using the variables FLT3 mutation, diagnosis before vs. after the midostaurin approval date, and an interaction between those terms. The model was adjusted for patient age at diagnosis, NPM1 mutation presence, and other interaction terms, and for that model, patients who were lost to follow-up before one year were excluded. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to make interpretation comparable to clinical trial hazard ratios, and Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves were used to explore age subgroups. Patients were excluded if they received gilteritinib, sorafenib, or midostaurin but were diagnosed before midostaurin's approval. Results: Between April 2008 and September 2022, 522 patients met inclusion criteria, and 120 (23%) had an ITD mutation only, 22 (4%) had a D835 mutation only, and 8 (2%) had both mutations at diagnosis, and the remainder were negative for FLT3 mutation. FLT3 mutation was not significantly associated with overall survival (p = 0.55), but the interaction between FLT3 and diagnosis after midostaurin's approval was associated with a lower chance of death in multiple logistic regression (Table 1, odds ratio [OR] 0.237, p = 0.0044), implying that a FLT3 mutation had a better prognosis after midostaurin's approval. This trend was present in patients both under age 60 (OR 0.153, p = 0.043; KM curves in Figure 1) and at least age 60 (OR 0.273, p = 0.04). In a Cox regression, the interaction term was similar (HR 0.54, p = 0.021), with a HR that compared favorably to 0.78, the HR seen in phase III clinical trials studying midostaurin or quizartinib at diagnosis (Stone et al., NEJM, 2017; Erba et al., Lancet, 2023). Younger patients with FLT3-mutated AML after midostaurin's approval were more likely to have a record of FLT3 inhibitor prescription (79% under age 60 vs. 56% at least age 60, p = 0.07). Conclusions: The relative prognosis of FLT3 mutations in AML has improved, including in older patients, likely due to the approval of FLT3 inhibitors, and the relative survival is more favorable than what was described in major clinical trials. Gathering real-world data to estimate prognosis of FLT3 mutations is crucial for accurate risk stratification, and this can be done more easily with EHR data.

SHP2 Inhibition Overcomes Adaptive and Acquired Resistance to FLT3 TKI to Improve Efficacy Against FLT3/ITD AML

FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) that is frequently mutated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), with the internal tandem mutation (FLT3/ITD) conferring a poor prognosis to AML patients. This makes FLT3/ITD AML a validated target for treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), but their success has been hindered by mechanisms of resistance including rapid signal reprogramming known as adaptive resistance and acquired resistance gained through long-term treatment. Past work from our lab has shown that FLT3/ITD cells undergo adaptive resistance, through the rapid reactivation of ERK signaling within 24 hours of sustained FLT3 inhibition. To improve therapy of FLT3/ITD AML it is important to identify therapeutic targets that overcome this ERK reactivation. Since adaptive ERK reactivation is often due to the relief of negative feedback loops that result in the activation of other RTK, we performed an RTK phospho-array on the FLT3/ITD cell line MV4;11. 48-hour treatment with the FLT3 TKI sorafenib resulted in increased activation of IGF-R, HER3 and AXL. While recent work from our lab found that combining AXL and FLT3 inhibition abrogated the ERK reactivation and exerted greater antileukemic effects, the activation of multiple RTKs suggests that targeting a signaling hub that inhibits multiple RTKs at once will likely prove more efficacious in overcoming this adaptive response. Recent literature has implicated SH2-containing protein tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP2) as a therapeutic target in adaptive ERK reactivation in other cancers. SHP2 acts directly downstream of RTKs and is involved in the activation of the ERK pathway. Therefore, we explored whether the addition of an SHP2 inhibitorto FLT3 TKI can overcome the adaptive response and increase treatment efficacy. To explore this possibility, we first treated the FLT3/ITD cell lines Molm14 and MV4;11 as well as FLT3/ITD patient samples with FLT3 TKI alone or in combination with an SHP2 inhibitor for 24 hours. The addition of SHP099 to sorafenib decreased the expected ERK reactivation in a dose-dependent manner. Furthermore, combination treatment with synergized to decrease proliferation and increase apoptosis in the FLT3/ITD cell lines. Impressively, in a long-term assay, treatment with the combination for just 72 hours greatly reduced leukemic cell recovery. To determine whether this combination would improve efficacy in vivo, we engrafted NSG mice with Molm14 cells and treated them for 4 weeks via oral gavage. The combination of SHP099 with gilteritinib group resulted in a statistically significantly lower leukemia burden compared to either treatment alone and the vehicle control. The combination group also had prolonged survival compared to the other groups. In addition to rapid adaptive resistance, there are mechanisms of acquired resistance that render traditional FLT3 TKI treatments ineffective against FLT3/ITD AML cells. We next examined the effects of SHP2 inhibition on FLT3-TKI resistant cells models that were generated by growing and maintaining Molm14 and MV4;11 cells in the presence of FLT3 TKI. The combination of FLT3 TKI and SHP099 resensitized the cells to FLT3 TKI, resulting in decreased ERK phosphorylation, decreased proliferation and increased apoptosis of these FLT3 TKI resistant cells. We also explored the effects of treating the FLT3/ITD mutant cell lines with the combination of SHP099 and several of the cytotoxic chemotherapy agents typically used in the treatment of AML including cytarabine and daunorubicin. While daunorubicin or cytarabine alone had little effect on the level of phosphorylated ERK, the addition of SHP099 decreased ERK activation and the combination synergized to exert greater to decrease proliferation and increase apoptosis. These studies reveal that combining FLT3 TKI treatment with an allosteric SHP2 inhibitor decreases the adaptive ERK reactivation observed in FLT3/ITD cells. The finding that SHP099 synergized with both FLT3 TKI and chemotherapy agents in different FLT3-mutated AML models speaks to the versatile efficacy of SHP2 inhibition in multiple AML models. Taken together, the data suggests that SHP2 inhibition can help overcome both adaptive and acquired resistance in FLT3/ITD AML and is a candidate to try to improve patient outcomes.

Covalent-103: A Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, and Dose-Expansion Study of Bmf-500, an Oral Covalent FLT3 Inhibitor, in Adults with Acute Leukemia (AL)

Background: FLT3 mutations occur in 25-35% of patients with AML and are associated with poor prognosis. FLT3 mutations are most frequently the result of an internal tandem duplication (ITD) of amino acids in the juxtamembrane region of FLT3 or point mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain (TKD). FLT3-ITD mutations are associated with increased incidence of relapse, shorter duration of remission, and decreased disease-free and overall survival. BMF-500 is a novel orally bioavailable, highly potent and selective covalent inhibitor of FLT3 including wildtype (WT), ITD, TKD, as well as a variety of additional resistance-conferring mutations such as the gatekeeper F691. BMF-500 has demonstrated high affinity for FLT3, lack of cKIT inhibition, and sustained cell-killing capacity despite drug washout (Law et al., ASH 2022 Abstract 2756). BMF-500 has shown sustained tumor regression and improved survival in both subcutaneous and disseminated xenograft models of mutant FLT3-driven AML. Study Design: COVALENT-103 (NCT05918692) is an open-label, non-randomized, multicenter, first-in-human Phase I study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and clinical activity of escalating doses of twice daily oral BMF-500 in patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) AL, including AML, ALL, or MPAL, with or without FLT3 mutations. The trial has 2 arms that will undergo dose escalation in parallel: Arm A (without) and Arm B (with) concomitant use of a moderate or strong CYP3A4 inhibitor. Utilizing an accelerated titration design (ATD), doses of BMF-500 will be escalated in single-subject cohorts until 1 subject experiences either a Grade 2 or higher related-adverse event or dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). At that point, the cohort will switch to a classical “3 +3” design. Patients with WT FLT3 AL may be enrolled, up to a limit of 33% per arm. Treatment will continue in 28-day cycles until progression or intolerability. Expansion cohorts will enroll additional patients to obtain further safety and efficacy data. Patients must be refractory, relapsed or must have progressed on or following discontinuation of the most recent anti-cancer therapy or be ineligible for any approved standard of care therapies, including HSCT. Participants with FLT3-mutant AML must have received treatment with a FLT3 inhibitor approved for treatment of relapsed or refractory FLT3-mutant AML. Key inclusion criteria include ECOG PS ≤ 2, adequate organ function, and documented FLT3 mutation status. Key exclusion criteria include known CNS disease involvement, clinically significant cardiovascular disease, and WBC count >50,000/µL (uncontrollable with cytoreductive therapy). Objectives: The primary objective of the study is to evaluate safety and tolerability and to determine the optimal biological dose (OBD)/ recommended Phase 2 dose (RP2D) of BMF-500 oral monotherapy based on evaluation of available PK/ PD, safety and efficacy data. Secondary objectives include characterization of the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of BMF-500, and assessment of its antitumor activity per modified Cheson (2003) criteria or the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines (ALL Version 1.2022) as determined by the investigator. Endpoints include best overall response rate (ORR), complete remission (CRc), duration of response (DOR), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The study was initiated in July 2023 and will enroll ~110 participants at approximately 30 sites.

FLT3-ITD Induces Immune Escape in AML Via up-Regulating CD47 Expression and Decreased Phagocytic Ability of Macrophages

The FLT3-ITD mutation is frequently observed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and confer a poor prognosis. FLT3 inhibitors such as Quizartinib could prolong survival. However, very few relapsed patients are cured. Little attention has been paid to the characteristics of the immune microenvironment in FLT3-ITD AML. Within the bone marrow, Flt3/ITD animals demonstrated significantly increased dendritic cells and T cells levels compared to Flt3/WT mice, which suggested that FLT3-ITD can modulate the immune microenvironment in AML. Here, we found that FLT3-ITD cell lines (MV-4-11 and MOLM-13) induced less LDH release compared to FLT3-WT cell lines (HEL and K562) ( Figure a), indicating less macrophage killing. CD47 gene is an integrin related protein, which acts as an “anti phagocytosis” signal, and it interacts with signal-regulatory protein alpha (SIRPalpha) on macrophages, so that tumor cells expressing CD47 can escape being destroyed by macrophages. Further Flow Cytometry results showed that the CD47 Mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of the FLT3-ITD group was significantly higher than those of the control group ( Figure b). Therefore, we can ask a hypothesis that FLT3-ITD in tumor cells may leads to decreased phagocytic capacity of macrophages and immune tolerance. To test our hypothesis, the FLT3 wildtype (FLT3-OE, FLT3 over expression) or ITD mutant (FLT3-ITD) stable overexpression HEL/K562 cells were constructed by means of lentiviral transfections. In the FLT3-ITD group, the MFI levels of CD47 was higher than FLT3-OE group and FLT3 NC (FLT3 Normal control) group ( Figure c and d). Green-fluorescent (CFSE-stained) Hel and K562 were then added to cultures of macrophages induced by Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell stained with the red dye PKH26 (ratio tumor cell:macrophages, 5:1). Flow Cytometry results showed FLT3-ITD decreased the Phagocytic Capacity of Macrophages ( Figure e and f). The TRANSFAC database was used to predict the transcription factor binding sites of the CD47 promoter. We found that HOXB5 may regulate the expression of CD47 at the transcriptional level. Compared with the FLT3-NC and FLT3-OE group, the relative expression level of the CD47 gene in the FLT3-ITD group was significantly upregulated ( Figure g, p < 0.05). To ascertain the mechanism that HOXB5 regulated CD47, we analysed the location CD47 gene on the chromosome, as well as the sequence of promoter and first non-encoding exon of HOXB5 (−2000 ~ 100 bp) by Jaspar online tool (http://jaspar.genereg.net/). Mechanistically, Dual luciferase reporter gene assay and ChIP experiments suggest HOXB5 directly activate CD47( Figure h and i). Compared to the monotherapy group, Combination therapy with CD47 inhibitor and Quizartinib (AC220) significantly promoted the phagocytic ability of M1-like macrophages against MOLM13 cells ( Figure j and k). The mouse model of AML was constructed by injection of 5x106 FLT3-ITD cells via the tail vein. Mouse models further demonstrate that combination therapy with CD47 inhibitor and Quizartinib significantly reduces the tumor burden and improves survival rate. We first revealed that FLT3-ITD can up-regulates CD47 to promote immune escape of macrophages. These evidences indicates that combination therapy with CD47 inhibitor and FLT3-ITD inhibitor can be a promising therapeutic method for impressive treatment of FLT3-ITD AML patients.

Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of Emavusertib (CA-4948) in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients with FLT3 Mutation

Background Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogenous disease and exhibits a dynamic mutational landscape as the disease progresses. Internal tandem duplication (ITD) of FLT3 is considered an acquired late-event mutation and is associated with a poor prognosis in AML. Emavusertib is a potent oral inhibitor of IRAK4 and FLT3, conferring potential efficacy advantages compared to other IRAK4 and FLT3 inhibitors. IRAK4 is upregulated during anti-FLT3- or other cytotoxic therapies, which could drive a resistance pathway of early relapse and progression (Melgar 2019; Li 2019). Presence of spliceosome mutations U2AF1 or SF3B1 results in excessive IRAK4-L and further enhance toll-like receptor pathway activation (Smith 2019). Methods The safety, clinical activity, and potential biomarkers of emavusertib in relapsed/refractory (R/R) AML and higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome are being investigated in the ongoing open-label, Phase 1/2a TakeAim Leukemia trial (NCT04278768). Here we present preliminary safety and efficacy data in the subset of enrolled AML patients who carried FLT3 mutation (FLT3m) at baseline and were treated with emavusertib monotherapy. Patients' mutational profiles were documented based on local testing results. Results As of 12 June 2023, 10 R/R AML patients with FLT3m have been treated at initial doses of 200, 300, or 400 mg BID. There was 1 patient with FLT3-TKD and 9 patients with FLT3-ITD, of which 2 carry both FLT3-ITD and U2AF1 mutations, and 1 with both FLT3-TKD and SF3B1 mutations. The median number of prior anti-cancer therapies was 3 (range 1-6) and 7 out of 10 patients had prior exposure to gilteritinib. Two patients with prior gilteritinib exposure also received midostaurin therapy. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) Grade ≥ 3 were reported in 7/10 (70%) patients, and the majority of Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reversible and manageable. No dose-limiting toxicity was reported in these 10 patients. Five of 9 response evaluable patients demonstrated more than 90% bone marrow blast reduction compared to baseline. Enrollment is being expanded in this trial at the Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of 300 mg BID for patients with ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy. Preliminary data for the 3 response evaluable patients in this population (for whom baseline and post-treatment marrow assessments were available) include blast count reductions of 99%, 100%, and 100% and include 2 CRs and 1 morphologic leukemia-free state (MLFS), with on-treatment duration of 213 days, 225 days, and 134 days, respectively. FLT3-ITD became undetectable in both patients achieving CR. Conclusion Emavusertib has a favorable safety profile in heavily pretreated AML patients with FLT3m and demonstrated anti-cancer activity in patients with FLT3m, including patients who have progressed on prior FLT3 inhibitor. No dose-limiting myelosuppression was reported. In addition, mutational profiles are suggestive of disease-modifying activity of emavusertib. Enrollment in this trial is continuing at a dose of 300mg BID (phase 2 expansion cohort) for patients with ≤ 2 prior lines of therapy.

CEBPA-Driven Expression of the Transcriptionally Inactive deltaTP73 Isoform Phenocopies TP53mutated Poor Risk and Drug-Resistant Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Mutations in TP53 ( TP53mut) are present in roughly 10% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and represent a unique subgroup of patients with very poor prognosis. While the exact mechanisms of TP53mut-driven leukemogenesis remain elusive, transcriptional changes associated with suppression of the TP53 signaling pathway are considered to confer a dismal prognosis on TP53mut patients. Using molecular profiling of a large cohort of AML patients (n=823) we identify a new poor prognostic subgroup in AML that is TP53 WT but shares strong similarities with TP53mut patients. Patients included in this new group present increased expression of the oncogenic TP73 gene isoform ΔNp73,which lacks the transactivation domain but still binds to chromatin. We find that the transcriptional and metabolic program of ΔNp73high AMLs strongly resembles that of TP53mut AML, being enriched for stemness signatures like “17LSC” and “LSC UP”. In line with TP53mut AML, ΔNp73high/ TP53WT frequently co-occurs with U2AF1, SRSF2, TET2, and RUNX1 mutations . Lentiviral overexpression (OE) of ΔNp73 in healthy CD34 + cells increased cell proliferation and stemness. ΔNp73-OE in TP53WT AML models, imposed drug resistance against several standard-of-care cytotoxic therapies in AML (e.g., AraC, venetoclax (VEN) ± azacytidine (AZA), and FLT3 inhibitors), while drug resistance was not further enhanced upon ΔNp73-OE in TP53mut AML models. These results were validated using ex vivo treated primary AML samples (n=80), whereby ΔNp73 high samples were more resistant to several cytotoxic therapies, including VEN+AZA . Lentiviral ΔNp73-OE in primary APL samples (n=10) allowed efficient engraftment in vivo using xenograft mouse models with colonization of secondary organs and splenomegaly, which was not observed in the empty vector controls. To unravel mechanisms via which ΔNp73controls oncogenic transformation we performed RNA-seq and ChIP-seq to identify direct transcriptional targets of TP53, ΔNp73, and the transcriptionally active isoform TAp73. These studies revealed that ΔNp73 and TP53 compete for the same target genes, whereby ΔNp73-OE resulted in complete loss of TP53 binding and strong downregulation of these loci, including downregulation of known TP53 target genes CDKN1A, BBC3, and GAS6, but also of TP53 itself. Gene set enrichment analyses of molecular programs in ΔNp73-OE cells revealed that these were associated with the terms “LSC UP”, “CEBPA targets”, and “SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION BY TP53”, indicating that ΔNp73 phenocopies TP53mut AML. Chromatin accessibility data on AML patients revealed a differentially accessible region in intron 2 (+24 Kb after the transcription start site, referred to as peak B) of the TP73 gene, with unknown regulatory functions on TP73 expression in AML. To access the potential enhancer functions of this region driving ΔNp73 expression we generated CRISPR/Cas9-KO MOLM13 cells lacking the peak B region (MOLM13-KO). MOLM13-KO cells exhibited reduced ΔNp73 expression, and the ability to up-regulate ΔNp73 expression upon high dose AraC-induced stress was abrogated. Since CEBPA was a transcription factor predicted to bind to Peak B, we investigated whether CEBPA could regulate the expression of the different TP73 isoforms. CEBPA-KD in AML cells resulted in decreased ΔNp73 levels and restored the TAp73 expression, suggesting that CEBPA controls the balance of the distinct TP73 isoforms. Pharmacological inhibition of CEBPA using the FDA-approved drug Guanfacine (GFC), diminished ΔNp73 levels and restored drug sensitivity against several cytotoxic agents in ΔNp73-OE AML cells. Moreover, the combination of GFC+VEN displayed strong synergistic effects in a cohort of ex vivo treated AML blasts (n=20), including patients with TP53mut, which are often resistant to VEN. Here, we describe a new AML patient subgroup that is TP53WT but behaves similarly to TP53mut AML due to the expression of the ΔNp73 isoform that impairs TP53 signaling. This patient subgroup displays a very poor prognosis and is resistant to standard-of-care drugs used for AML patients. We identify a novel enhancer region that drives the expression of oncogenic TP73 isoforms, which is controlled by CEBPA, and inhibition of CEBPA by GFC enhances sensitivity to cytotoxic therapies in TP53mut-like AMLs. Our insightsfurther refine patient stratification and provide alternatives for treatment for the most dismal group of AML patients.

Komet-008: A Phase 1 Study to Determine the Safety and Tolerability of Ziftomenib Combinations for the Treatment of KMT2A-Rearranged or NPM1-Mutant Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Background and Significance: Relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with nucleophosmin 1-mutations ( NPM1-m) or KMT2A-rearrangment ( KMT2A-r) remain a high unmet need. Ziftomenib is a potent and selective inhibitor of the interaction between menin and mixed-lineage leukemia (MLL) lysine[K]-specific methyltransferase 2A ( KMT2A), which drives leukemogenesis in these subtypes. Preclinical data have demonstrated ziftomenib's ability to target multiple types of menin-dependent AML clones, and that the antitumor activity of ziftomenib and other menin inhibitors in cell-derived xenograft (CDX) and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of KMT2A-r and NPM1-m AML is enhanced by the addition of FLT3 inhibitors such as gilteritinib and quizartinib. An ongoing Phase 1/2 study (KOMET-001) in R/R AML has demonstrated that ziftomenib monotherapy is safe and well tolerated and that the clinical activity at the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) is robust, as the rates of response were not affected by the presence of downstream co-mutations, such as FLT3 and IDH1 or IDH2. Given the monotherapy activity seen to date, the development of ziftomenib in combination with standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapies or FLT3 inhibitors may provide increased clinical benefit for R/R AML patients with KMT2A-r or with NPM1-m with or without concurrent FLT3-mutations ( FLT3-m) and warrants further investigation. Study Design and Methods: KOMET-008 (NCT# 05735184) is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study to determine the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of ziftomenib when combined with SOC regimens for the treatment of either NPM1-m (Arm A) or KMT2A-r (Arm B) R/R AML. Each genetically defined arm will evaluate ziftomenib in combination with various SOC treatments in separate and independent cohorts, as outlined below: Arm A:NPM1-m R/R AML Cohort A-1: Ziftomenib plus FLAG-IDACohort A-2: Ziftomenib plus LDACCohort A-3: Ziftomenib plus gilteritinib (for NPM1-m + FLT3-m R/R AML) Arm B: KMT2A-r R/R AML Cohort B-1: Ziftomenib plus FLAG-IDACohort B-2: Ziftomenib plus LDAC The Part 1a dose escalation uses a i3+3 design, followed by dose expansion/validation in Part 1b. Key eligibility criteria include adults (≥18 years) with documented NPM1-m (±co-occurring FLT3-m) or KMT2A-r R/R AML, ECOG ≤2, prior hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) allowed, if recovered and prior gilteritinib allowed. Patients who receive an HSCT during study participation will be allowed to receive ziftomenib maintenance therapy upon recovery. The primary objectives are to establish the safety and tolerability of ziftomenib when combined with SOC therapies (ie, dose limiting toxicities, AEs per CTCAE v5.0) and to identify the RP2D of ziftomenib for each SOC combination in each genetically defined cohort. Secondary endpoints include preliminary efficacy (including MRD-negative responses and number of patients able to receive stem cell transplant) and pharmacokinetics. Exploratory end points include biomarkers for efficacy and resistance and pharmacodynamic biomarkers potentially related to the activity of ziftomenib when combined with SOC treatments in adults with R/R AML with NPM1-m or KMT2A-r.

BGS-2456 Is a Novel Potent Covalent Inhibitor of FLT3 That Highly Discriminates Against KIT and Is Not Toxic Toward Normal Hematopoiesis in Vitro

Introduction: Class III receptor tyrosine kinases include FLT3, KIT, PDGFRA/B and CSF1R. Activating mutations in FLT3 represent the most common genetic anomalies in AML (30%). While there are numerous examples of KIT TKIs that do not inhibit FLT3 (imatinib, avapritinib, dasatinib), to date, all clinically active FLT3 TKIs (quizartinib, gilteritinib, midostaurin, sorafenib) fail to spare KIT inhibition. Preclinical studies suggest that coinhibition of FLT3 and KIT can result in non-specific myelosuppression, which can limit dose intensification and the ability to safely achieve maintenance dosing. A potent FLT3 TKI that is non-myelosuppressive may enable prolonged treatment in conjunction with chemotherapy and thereby substantially improve clinical outcomes, similar to BCR::ABL1 TKIs in Ph+ ALL (Slayton et al, JCO 2018). FF-10101 is a recently described covalent inhibitor to irreversibly bind FLT3. In vitro and in vivo studies have revealed that FF-10101 exhibits substantial activity against FLT3 and resistant mutants F691L and D835V/Y. However, it does not effectively discriminate against KIT inhibition (Yamara et al, Blood 2018). In clinical experience, a majority of responses were associated with persistent myelosuppression (Levis et al, JCO 2021 39:15_suppl, 7008). Further clinical development of FF-10101 has been abandoned. Here we describe a novel covalent inhibitor (BGS-2456) that potently targets FLT3 with outstanding selectivity against KIT. Results: To confirm that BGS-2456 is a covalent FLT3 inhibitor, we tested various Cys→Ser substitutions in FLT3-ITD. Of these, only substitution of C695 resulted in loss of activity, suggesting that this residue is critical for covalent bond formation with BGS-2456, as has also been demonstrated for FF-10101 (Yamara et al, Blood 2018). Additionally, the compound without the covalent warhead (BGS-2457) was found to be unimpacted by the C695S substitution and substantially less potent than BGS-2456 (Figure). To characterize in vitro properties of BGS-2456 and whether it achieves selectively against FLT3 relative to KIT, we performed cell viability assays of the patient-derived FLT-ITD-positive AML Molm14 cell line as well as the gastrointestinal stromal tumor cell line GIST-T1, which contains an activating juxtamembrane mutation in KIT. We compared EC50 ratios with other FLT3 TKIs and found that BGS-2456 is highly potent, with an EC50 value of ~0.2nM. Moreover, BGS-2456 displayed remarkable selectivity toward FLT3, >10-fold greater than all other TKIs tested. Kinome profiling confirmed FLT3 as the kinase that was most highly inhibited by BGS-2456 among the 300 kinases assessed, with BMX being a distant second (Figure). To assess whether the selectivity of BGS-2456 results in less myelosuppression in vitro, we performed CFU assays of healthy bone marrow. Compared to FF-10101 and gilteritinib, BGS-2456 exhibited the least amount of hematologic toxicity, facilitating in vitro proliferation and differentiation of normal hematopoietic progenitor cells even at 100x EC50 concentration against Molm14 cells. Finally, we assessed BGS-2456's ability to retain activity against the known clinically problematic drug-resistant FLT3-ITD mutants D835Y and F691L. Encouragingly, BGS-2456 retained activity against both D835Y and F691L mutants in the low nanomolar range. Conclusion: This is the first description of a potent and exquisitely specific FLT3 inhibitor that spares KIT inhibition and displays no myelosuppression in vitro at >100x EC50 concentration. The potent inhibitory effects of BGS-2456 on both D835Y and F691L mutants support its promise as a best-in-class TKI for the treatment of FLT3-mutant AML. Efforts to molecularly dissect the basis of the high degree of selectivity of BGS-2456 are ongoing.

FT538, iPSC-Derived NK Cells Are Potent Inducers of Apoptosis in AML Cells and Their Effect Is Synergistic in Combination with Approved Therapeutic Strategies

Background: Natural killer (NK) cell-based therapies have been increasingly studied with their advantages of less treatment-related toxicity and lack of HLA restriction. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived NK cells offer an opportunity for a standardized, off-the-shelf treatment with the potential to treat a wider patient population. FT538 cells are triple gene-edited iPSC-derived NKs that express a high affinity non-cleavable CD16 maintaining constant activity, a CD38 knock out preventing CD38 antibody-induced fratricide, and an IL-15/IL-15R fusion preventing the need for cytokine administration, the main source of side effects in NK cell-based therapies. Several studies have shown success in treating AML with NK cell therapy, but the effect of iPSC-derived NK cell therapy in AML is unexplored. We hypothesized that FT538 cells may be able to target high-risk AML that is traditionally resistant to most chemotherapeutic agents and synergize with Venetoclax, 5-azacytidine, Cytarabine, and Gilteritinib. Methods: To examine the effect of the FT538 cells on AML cells, we co-cultured FT538 cells at ratios of 2:1, 4:1, and 8:1 with 8 AML cell lines: OCI-AML2, OCI-AML3, THP1, U937, Molm-13, Molm-14, MV4-11, and Kasumi-1, and with cells from 11 different AML patients. We analyzed the NK cell-induced apoptosis through an Annexin-V binding assay using IncuCyte live cell imaging. As Molm-13 and MV4-11 cell lines are FLT3 mutated, to determine the combination effect of FLT3 inhibitors with FT538 cells, we treated Molm-13 and MV4-11 cells with Gilteritinib for 24 hours before seeding the FT538 cells and co-culturing overnight. The effects of the combination were then analyzed through flow cytometry with a Beckman Coulter CytoFlex. Finally, to determine the combinatorial effect of the FT538 cells with approved therapies, we treated OCI-AML3 and U937 cell lines with Venetoclax, Azacitidine, and Cytarabine. After treatment, we performed flow cytometry to measure the leukemic cell death following the combinatorial therapies. Results: We observed FT538 NK-mediated killing in all the leukemic cell lines tested. A two-way ANOVA determined that an increase in the FT538 to AML cell ratio resulted in an increase in NK cell-mediated killing of AML cells (p<0.0001). Interestingly, the number of apoptotic AML cells was 1.5 to 6.1-fold higher in the OCI-AML2, OCI-AML3, U937, and THP1 cell lines than in the Molm-13, Molm-14, MV4-11, and Kasumi-1 cell lines (p<0.0001). This could be related to the FLT3 mutations in the Molm-13, Molm-14, and MV4-11 cell lines or to the TP53 mutation in the Kasumi-1 cell line. Further, to validate this finding in primary AML cells, we observed a ratio-dependent effect on FT538-mediated killing of AML cells. However, we did not observe any statistical difference by mutation, though this could be related to the limited sample size for specific mutations. Finally, flow cytometric analysis of the effects of combination treatment demonstrated that the FT538 cells synergize with Venetoclax, or Cytarabine, or Azacitidine, or Gilteritinib (p<0.05) in the killing of AML cells. This could be because NKG2DL upregulation has been shown in AML cells treated with Venetoclax and FLT3 inhibitors and in Cytarabine-resistant AML cells, and the NKG2D/NKG2DL pathway is a main mechanism of NK cell-mediated killing. Conclusion: iPSC-derived NK therapy offers a standardized, off-the-shelf option for NK cell therapies. FT538 iPSC-derived NK cells induce apoptosis in AML cell lines and patient samples in a dose-dependent manner and show a synergistic effect with Venetoclax, Gilteritinib, Azacitidine, and Cytarabine. Therefore, iPSC-derived NK cell therapy may be a promising possibility for AML treatment, particularly for patients resistant to standard therapies.

Emerging Trends in Frontline Treatment for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A Survey of NCI-Designated Cancer Centers

Introduction: For the past several decades the standard of care treatment for frontline therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in individuals that are eligible for intensive induction therapy has been 7 + 3 (7 days of cytarabine (Ara-C) + 3 days of danuorubicin). Older individuals with AML and those that are ineligible for intensive induction tend to be a more difficult population to treat. Since 2018, venetoclax + hypomethylating agents (HMA) (azacitidine or decitabine) has been considered the standard of care frontline treatment for AML in those who are induction ineligible. Over the past decade there have been significant improvements in genetic and molecular testing that have greatly impacted the development of new frontline treatment therapies for individuals with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with promising treatment outcomes. Methods: In an effort to quantify the impact that these evolving therapies have had on influencing leukemia treatment practices, a questionnaire was sent to every director/chair of Leukemia at each National Cancer Institute (NCI) designated center. Our two-question questionnaire centered around determining the preferred AML treatment for both patients who are not on clinical trials that are eligible and those that are ineligible for intensive induction therapy. Questions were created based on the 2019 NCCN clinical practice guidelines for AML. The survey was limited to 2 questions so as to elicit higher response rate to the questionnaire. Question #1: What is the preferred induction regimen backbone used at your center - In patients eligible for intense chemo, off-study? 7+3FLAG-IDACLAG-IDAVenetoclax w/ 5-azacytidine or decitabineOther Question #2: What is the preferred induction regimen backbone at your center - In patients who are ineligible for intensive chemo, off-study, and having actionable mutations (IDH or FLT3)? Venetoclax + Hypomethylating agentTargeted agent against IDH or FLT3 withoutvenetoclax +/- hypomethylating agentTargeted agent against IDH or FLT3 withvenetoclax +/- hypomethylating agentOther Results: From our study, we received 31/63 (49.2%) responses and saw that for the intensive induction 90.3% (28/31) respondents selected 7 +3 as the preferred treatment with 3.2% (1/31) choosing FLAG-IDA, with the remaining 6.5% (2/31) choosing “other” ((7 +3) w/ FLT3 inhibitor). Comparatively, for the intensive induction ineligible treatment, 61.3% (19/31) respondents preferred venetoclax + HMAs with 38.7% (12/31) preferring targeted agent w/ venetoclax +/- HMA. Of note, four respondents selected venetoclax + HMA as the preferred treatment, but also preferred aza-ivosidenib for IDH1 mutant AML. Conclusion: Preliminary findings from our survey suggest that results from genetic molecular testing may have a greater influence on the evolution in treatment for the intensive induction ineligible population. As more data comes out regarding combining targeted therapy with more broad-based treatments, clarity will emerge on the most appropriate standard-of-care approach. Additionally, improved turnaround time of testing methodology will likely modify treatment approaches. Our next steps include repeat outreach to obtain 100% response rate and sending a follow-up questionnaire to understand the rational for each specific treatment choice.

Multiomic Single-Cell Sequencing May Distinguish BCR-ABL-Mutated Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) from Blast Crisis Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia (BC-CML)

Introduction The existence of BCR-ABL+ AML as an entity distinct from BC-CML is controversial. The WHO recently recognized BCR-ABL+ AML, but with the caveat that it is poorly characterized (Khoury, 2022). Clinically, BCR-ABL+ AML is associated with high risk of relapse (Neuendorff, 2018). Further, acquired BCR-ABL mutations have been identified as a cause of relapse on FLT3 inhibitors (McMahon, 2019). We hypothesize that BCR-ABL+ AML can be distinguished as a distinct biologic entity from BC-CML by the observation of BCR-ABL as a sub-clonal rather than a founder mutation in leukemogenesis. Methods To test the utility of multi-omic single cell (SC) sequencing in determining tumor phylogeny and identification of BCR-ABL+ AML vs BC-CML, we analyzed bone marrow samples from 4 patients (pts): 1 relapsed AML with clinical development of a new BCR-ABL fusion at the time of relapse, and 3 newly diagnosed BC-CML (2 myeloid, 1 lymphoid). We performed high-throughput SC DNA sequencing with simultaneous cell-surface immunophenotyping and targeted RNA sequencing for BCR-ABL fusion proteins (Mission Bio Tapestri). All SC DNA sequencing included pt-specific primers for BCR-ABL DNA breakpoints, which were previously identified using nanopore-based technology for sequencing long strands of DNA. Results We analyzed 19,197 single cells (median 1995 cells/pt). Multi-omic SC technology differentiated BCR-ABL+ AML from BC-CML by confirming the fusion arose as a branch mutation from a founding leukemic clone and was not present in all leukemic populations. In Patient 1, who was sampled at time of AML relapse, we identified pathogenic FLT3 ITD and NRAS Q61K mutations. FLT3 co-mutated with either the BCR-ABL DNA breakpoint or NRAS in the same single cell and clone, while the BCR-ABL DNA breakpoint and NRAS were not co-mutated. Phylogenetic reconstruction determined FLT3 to be a founding mutation, which later branched into FLT3/BCR-ABL and FLT3/ NRAS co-mutant subclones. Further, the FLT3-ITD/BCR-ABL and FLT3-ITD/ NRAS subclones had distinct immunophenotypes. Blasts harboring the BCR-ABL DNA breakpoint were predominantly identified in the CD117+/CD33+ population (60.2% of cells) compared to CD34+ (16.4% of cells, p <0.001) and blasts with monocytic differentiation (19.1% of cells, p = 0.02). Notably, BCR-ABL+ cells were not identified in T cells. NRAS mutations were predominantly identified in both CD34+ and monocytic blasts. Together, these data support BCR-ABL arising late within the evolutionary history of this pt's AML. By contrast, in Patients 2 and 3 with myeloid BC-CML, the BCR-ABL DNA breakpoint and corresponding BCR-ABL fusion were detectable in all cell populations, including blasts as well as immunophenotypically normal T cells, B cells, and macrophages. In Patient 2, we identified an IDH2 R132C mutation co-mutated with BCR-ABL. Phylogenetic reconstruction determined the IDH2 mutation arose as a branch from a founding BCR-ABL+clone. Unlike the BCR-ABL breakpoint, which was present in all cell populations, the IDH2 mutation was only identified in immunophenotypically-defined CD33+/CD34+/CD117+ myeloid blasts and was absent from bystander T cells and macrophages. Finally, Patient 4had a clinical diagnosis of lymphoid BC-CML. Like Patients 2 and 3, the BCR-ABL DNA breakpoint and corresponding RNA fusion were present in all immunophenotypically-defined blast populations. Unlike Patients 2 and 3, however, BCR-ABL was absent from immunophenotypically normal CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, macrophages, and monocytes. Additional pts are needed to determine whether this pattern is consistent with all lymphoid BC-CML or whether this pt's biology may have been closer to BCR-ABL+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Conclusions Multi-omic SC technology can distinguish BCR-ABL+ AML from myeloid BC-CML and provide direct confirmation that lineage-restriction of BCR-ABL potentially clarifies the diagnosis of discrete Ph+ leukemias. Future studies are needed to understand the role of RT-PCR based BCR-ABL1 testing as a marker of minimal residual disease in pts with BCR-ABL+ subclones, the impact of BCR-ABL as a potential driver of AML resistance, and the utility of BCR-ABL inhibitors in leukemias with late-arising BCR-ABL+ clones. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinicaltrials.gov Identifiers: NCT00048958, NCT00899223, NCT00900224

Tuspetinib Myeloid Kinase Inhibitor Safety and Efficacy As Monotherapy and Combined with Venetoclax in Phase 1/2 Trial of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory (R/R) Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

INTRODUCTION: Tuspetinib is a potent once daily oral myeloid kinase inhibitor of SYK, FLT3, JAK1/2, RSK1/2, mutant KIT, and TAK1-TAB1 kinases that mediate dysregulated cellular proliferation in AML. In an orthotopic mouse model of FLT3-mutant AML, tuspetinib exhibited greater antitumor activity than gilteritinib, entospletinib, venetoclax (VEN), and azacitidine (AZA) and combined favorably with VEN and AZA individually. Tuspetinib is being evaluated clinically as monotherapy (TUS) and in combination (VEN/TUS) in a global Phase 1/2 trial of patients with R/R AML. AIMS: Study objectives are to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of TUS and VEN/TUS, to support selection of a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). METHODS: Dose escalation (Part A) and exploration (Part B) of single agent TUS have completed dosing of patients treated at 20 mg to 200 mg once daily. In dose expansion (Part C), 80 mg of TUS is administered continuously as once daily oral monotherapy in 28-day cycles, or in combination with daily VEN with a C1D15 marrow assessment and planned 28-day cycles. Treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) and clinical responses are evaluated using CTCAE and Revised IWG criteria, respectively. RESULTS: As of May 30, 2023, 100 patients received TUS in Parts A/B (20mg to 200mg; n=77) and in Part C (n=23: TUS 120 mg (n=14) and TUS 80 mg + VEN 400 mg dose equivalent (n=9)). Patients are predominantly Asian (46%) and White (41%) with a median age of 63 (range 18 to 84); 60% FLT3 wild-type (FLT3-WT), 35% FLT3-mutated (FLT3m) of which 18 (51%) received prior FLT3 inhibitors, and 5% FLT3 undetermined. Patients received a mean of 2.6 prior lines of therapy (range 1-6) (Table 1). Sixty percent of patients have received prior venetoclax. In Parts A/B, clinical responses with TUS monotherapy (composite complete remission [CRc; including CR, CRh, CRp and CRi]; see Figure 1 for definitions), were observed at 40 mg (15.4%), 80 mg (29.4%), 120 mg (7.1%), and 160 mg (16.7%) in both FLT3-WT (n=33, CRc:15.2%,) and FLT3-mutated (n=23, CRc:21.7%) patients. Overall response rate (ORR, including CRc and PR) was 14.3% in prior VEN treated patients (n=28), 23.1% in FLT3-mutated patients with previous FLT3i treatment (n=13), and 66.7% in NPM1 and FLT3-mutated patients (n=6). Notably, responses were also seen in patients with TP53 (n=5; CRc:40%) and RAS (n=9; CRc:22.2%) mutations frequently associated with resistance to VEN and standard therapies. TUS was well tolerated, with no dose limiting toxicity (DLT) observed at doses ranging from 20 mg to 160 mg. One patient experienced a DLT (Grade 3 muscular weakness) at 200 mg which demonstrated partial improvement at the time of treatment discontinuation (9 days after AE onset). Related TEAEs of Grade ≥3 were low (10.4%) with only neutrophil count decreased and muscular weakness (n=2 each; 2.6%) reported in more than 1 patient. No treatment-related non-hematologic SAEs, deaths, or discontinuations were observed. PK exposure was linear (20 mg-160 mg). The RP2D of 80 mg was selected for TUS monotherapy. In Part C, all 9 patients receiving VEN/TUS have tolerated treatment to date and remain on study. Eight (89%) patients had prior VEN treatment. Preliminary responses have been observed at the first post-dose bone marrow assessment (C1D15), including patients with prior VEN treatment. No treatment-related SAEs or TEAEs of Grade ≥3 have been reported. Updated enrollment, safety, PK, and response data will be presented at the meeting along with findings on the association between somatic mutations and TUS sensitivity as well as results for the TUS food-effect absorption study. CONCLUSIONS: Tuspetinib was well-tolerated and delivered single agent clinical responses across four dose levels among diverse AML genotypes; with a RP2D of 80 mg chosen for future single agent studies. Although early, the VEN/TUS combination has been well tolerated with preliminary objective responses noted.

Results of Phase I/II Study of Azacitidine in Combination with Quizartinib for Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms with FLT3 or CBL Mutations

Introduction: FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 ( FLT3) mutations occur in approximately 1% of patients (pts) with newly diagnosed myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and up to 19% of pts at time of failure to hypomethylating agents (HMA). In addition, mutations in the Casitas B-lineage Lymphoma gene ( CBL) are observed in 10% of pts with MDS/MPN and up to 15% of pts with CMML. Preclinical studies suggest that CBL-mutant cells are dependent on FLT3 signaling. Here we present results of a phase I-II study of the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib in combination with azacitidine for pts with FLT3 and CBL mutant MDS and MDS/MPN. Methods: We conducted a phase I/II clinical trial of azacitidine in combination with quizartinib for pts with MDS and MDS/MPN with detectable FLT3 and/or CBL mutations and with/without prior failure to HMA (HMA-F). The study included an initial phase I dose-escalation portion, following a 3+3 design, followed by a phase II dose expansion portion. Dose escalation included 3 dose levels of quizartinib: 30, 40 and 60 mg administered p.o daily on days 1-28 of each 28 day cycle. Therapy consisted on quizartinib (at corresponding dose level) in combination with azacitidine 75 mg/m 2/day i.v os s.c on days 1-5. The primary endpoint was to evaluate safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose of quizartinib. Responses were evaluated following 2006 IWG criteria. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method was used to estimate median survival. Results: Between July 2020 and June 2023 a total of 16 pts have been treated: 12 in the phase I portion and 4 in the phase II. A total of 4 pts had MDS with excess blasts, 2 had MDS/MPN with neutrophilia and 10 had CMML. Eight (50%) pts had FLT3-ITD mutations and 8 (50%) had CBL mutations. Four (25%) pts had HMA-F one of which had received 4 lines of therapy including hematopoietic stem-cell transplant (HSCT) prior to enrollment. Based on the Molecular IPSS, 8 (50%), 3 (19%) and 5 (31%) pts had very high, high and moderate high risk disease. Among CMML pts, 3 (30%) pts had high and 7 (70%) had intermediate-2 risk by CPSS-Molecular score. In the phase I portion, 3 pts received quizartinib at dose level 1, 3 at dose level 2 and 6 at dose level 3. No dose limiting toxicities were detected during the 28-day DLT evaluation window. Dose level 2 was selected as the P2RD. Most common adverse events (AEs) were constipation (56%), fatigue (50%), insomnia (44%), anorexia (38%), cough (38%), diarrhea (38%) and arthralgia (31%). Most common grade 3-4 AEs were anemia (31%), thrombocytopenia (31%), lung infection (13%), skin infection (13%), hyponatremia (13%) and sepsis (13%). Arrythmias were observed 5 pts: atrial fibrillation (grade 2, n=2; grade 3, n=1), Mobitz type II atrioventricular block (grade 3, n=1), atrial flutter (grade 2, n=1), QTC prolongation (grade 2, n=1). The 4-week and 8-week cumulative incidences of mortality were 0%. Median number of days to cycle 2 was 30 (range 27-51). Median number of days to cycle 2 of therapy by dose level were: 30, 30 and 37 days for dose levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively (p=0.301). Dose reductions due to myelosuppression were required in 5 (31%) pts including dose reductions of azacitidine in 3 pts and of quizartinib in 3 pts. Median number of cycles was 4 (range 1-17). Median cycles to to best response was 1 (range 1-6). The overall response rate was 69% (n=11): CR in 1 (6%), mCR with HI in 2 (13%), mCR in 8 (50%) pts. FLT3 mutant pts were more likely to respond to therapy (100% vs 50%, p=0.038). Clearance (n=6, 75%) or allelic burden reductions (n=2, 25%) of FLT3-ITD mutations were observed in all FLT3 mutant pts. No clearance of CBL mutations were observed. Dynamics of absolute neutrophil count, platelets and hemoglobin during cycle 1 are shown in Figure 1A. Median response duration was 3.5 months (range 0-22 moths). With a median follow up of 19.1 months (95% CI 2.6-35.6), the median event-free survival has not been reached and the median overall survival is 17.5 months (NR vs 10.1 months in FLT3 vs CBL mutant pts, p=0.084, Figure 1B) Five (31%) pts discontinued study to proceed with HSCT at time of best response, 3 (19%) due to transformation to AML, 2 (12%) due to pt choice, 1 (6%) due to treating physician choice and 1 (6%) due to relapse. Four (25%) pts remain on study. Conclusion: Therapy with azacitidine in combination with quizartinib for pts with higher-risk MDS and MDS/MPN with FLT3 or CBL mutations has acceptable toxicity profile and is associated with promising responses mainly among FLT3-mutant pts.

The FLT3-like Gene Expression Signature Predicts Response to Quizartinib in Wild-Type FLT3 Acute Myeloid Leukemia: An Analysis of the Pethema Quiwi Trial

Background The identification of predictive biomarkers is crucial for guiding treatment decisions in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Previously, we identified a FLT3-like gene expression signature in FLT3 wild-type AML patients, which clustered a variable proportion of FLT3 wild-type patients with FLT3-ITD and TKD mutated patients. The QUIWI trial was a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase II study preliminary showing a significant increase in overall survival (OS) in wild-type FLT3 AML patients treated with the FLT3 inhibitor quizartinib (Quiza) plus standard chemotherapy. This preplanned correlative study was designed to assess the value of the FLT3-like signature to predict responses to Quiza. Methods We performed RNA sequencing (RNAseq) analysis on a subset of patients from the clinical trial. RNA was extracted using standard methods, followed by assessment of nucleic acid integrity (TapeStation) and quantification (Qubit). Total mRNA sequencing was performed using polyA RNAseq with TruSeq technology. A total of 206 adequate samples from bone marrow and peripheral blood were sequenced (161 from FLT3-ITD negative enrolled in QUIWI; and 55 from FLT3-ITD positive patients who were screen failure of the QUIWI trial by this reason). The sequences were aligned to the GRCh37 reference genome using the Hisat algorithm. Gene expression quantification was performed using the Bioconductor workflow, and gene expression estimates (FPKM) were obtained. The gene expression estimates were log2 normalized. Finally, those genes mapping to the original FLT3-like signature (595 genes) were selected for downstream analysis. Clustering was based on the hierarchical method, using standard euclidean distance metrics. OS was defined as time from start of screening to death. Event-free survival (EFS) was defined as time from randomization to failure to achieve CR/CRi after 1 or 2 cycles, death in CR/CRi, or relapse (whichever occurred the first). Relapse-free survival was defined as time from randomization to disease relapse or death by any cause. Results Among the total 206 patients, a cluster of 54.37% (N=112) was enriched in FLT3-mutant cases (71.11% of cases, Figure 1A). This subgroup comprised 49.67% of wild-type FLT3 cases (N=80), hereafter FLT3-like patients. In the group of not FLT3-like patients, no differences were identified between the placebo and Quiza group in the total number of deaths (Fisher's p-value, 0.63), EFS (cox p-value, 0.83; HR 1.07 [0.56-2.06]), RFS (cox p-value 0.76; HR 0.88 [0.38-2.01]) and OS (cox p-value, 0.62; HR 1.22 [0.55-2.67]). Among FLT3-like patients, significant differences were identified in the total number of deaths (Fisher's p-value, 0.004), EFS (cox p-value, 0.009; HR 0.45 [0.25-0.82], RFS (cox p-value 0.01, HR 0.37 [0.18-0.79]) and OS (cox p-value 0.01, HR, 0.41 [0.20-0.84]) ( Figure 1B). No statistically significant association was observed between the FLT3-like pattern and the ELN-17 classification: 30.4% were low risk, 40.5% intermediate risk, 29.1% high risk. Conclusion The FLT3-like gene expression signature successfully identified a subset of patients who derived the most benefit from Quiz, while patients without the FLT3-like signature did not demonstrate a benefit compared with placebo. These findings support the use of the FLT3-like signature as a potential biomarker to identify those wild-type FLT3 AML patients who may benefit from Quiz, providing a valuable insight for personalized treatment in AML.