ABSTRACT This study investigates cotton oil as an environmentally friendly alternative to fuel oil in the flotation of hard coal from the Zonguldak Kozlu Region, Türkiye. We compared their performance across various operational parameters using a Denver-type flotation machine. Results showed that cotton oil achieved superior combustible recovery in most scenarios. At 1000 g/t, cotton oil achieved 97% combustible recovery compared to fuel oil’s 90% at 2000 g/t. Cotton oil maintained high recovery (94–95%) over a broader pH range (2–10) compared to fuel oil’s stable 90% from pH 2–8. However, fuel oil demonstrated better ash rejection, achieving 50% rejection at 2% solids compared to cotton oil’s 36%. Both oils performed optimally at pH 8.25 and 10% solid ratio. Cotton oil maintained 93% recovery at 1050 rpm compared to fuel oil’s 89% and exhibited less sensitivity to frother concentration. FTIR and zeta potential analyses revealed distinct interaction mechanisms, with cotton oil showing stronger adsorption on coal surfaces. This research contributes to developing sustainable practices in coal beneficiation, highlighting the trade-offs between combustible recovery and ash rejection when choosing between these collectors for industrial applications.
Read full abstract