Isocarpha comprises five species ranging from southern Texas and the Bahamas to northern Peru and northeastern Brazil. The genus belongs in Eupato rieae rather than Heliantheae, but structure of the head of Isocarpha with its elon gate, chaffy receptacle is anomalous within Eupatorieae. An hypothesis is presented suggesting the evolutionary derivation of this type of head through formation of floral buds in the axils of the involucral bracts. Generic ties of Isocarpha within Eupatorieae are unclear, but the closest affinities appear to be with Ayapana and relatives. Isocarpha is a small g~nus of Latin American Compositae occurring principally within Mexico, Central America, the Caribbean, and northern South America. Taxonomic problems at the specific and varietal levels have persisted for many years, but more vexing have been questions of generic, subtribal, and tribal affinities. Isocarpha has been treated as be longing both to Eupatorieae (Robinson and King 1977) and Heliantheae (Stuessy 1977). Part of this difficulty of tribal placement has derived from the unusual conical receptacle and lack of differentiation between in volucral and receptacular bracts. These problems suggested the need for' a modern revision with focus on reproductive morphology and tribal and generic affinities. TAXONOMIC HISTORY Isocarpha was first recognized by Robert Brown (1817) who formed the genus to accommodate two Linnaean species, Galea opPositifolia and Spi lanthus atriplicifolius, that were discordant elements in the genera to which they had originally been assigned. Cassini (1822, 1823) suggested that Isocarpha be placed in Heliantheae and added two additional species (I. kunthii and I. pyrethraria), both of which we have excluded from the genus. i.Lessing (1830), believing Brown's Isocarpha to be congeneric with Gal- ydermos Lagasca (=Galea L., Heliantheae), described as new his own ver sion of Isocarpha in which he included a new species, I. echioides. This taxon was later transferred by Hemsley (1881) to Ageratum (Eupatorieae). In 1831, Lessing reversed his opinion and merged his own version of Isocarpha with that of Brown and added to it another new spe~ies (I. billbergiana). In the same publication (Lessing 1831) he noted that species
Read full abstract