We make here an effort to find commonality between the athermal constraint approach toglassiness due to Phillips and Thorpe, in which composition is the key variable, and themore conventional temperature-induced softening approaches to the glass transition atconstant composition. A starting point for our discussion is the parallel in behaviour of theboson peak, derived from the vibrational density of states, which is enhanced both byincreasing glass fictive temperature (potential energy), and by decreasing glass coordinationnumber (through a rigidity threshold), e.g. in chalcogenide glasses. We relate the potentialenergy of the glass to a topological defect concentration, and see defect formation as ameans of lifting constraints, and hence promoting flow in formally overconstrained glasses.This viewpoint is supported by observations on irradiation of glasses, in whichthe athermal introduction of defects, or lifting of barriers, may induce flow, orrelaxation/annealing. These considerations emphasize the importance of takingtemperature, and fictive (‘structural’) temperature, considerations into account inevaluating the properties of laboratory glasses for comparison with constraint theorypredictions.
Read full abstract