Research Article| July 01, 1961 Origin and Development of the Three Forks Basin, Montana G. D ROBINSON G. D ROBINSON U. S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, Federal Center, Denver, Colo Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information G. D ROBINSON U. S. Geological Survey, Geologic Division, Federal Center, Denver, Colo Publisher: Geological Society of America Received: 13 Jan 1960 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1943-2674 Print ISSN: 0016-7606 Copyright © 1961, The Geological Society of America, Inc. Copyright is not claimed on any material prepared by U.S. government employees within the scope of their employment. GSA Bulletin (1961) 72 (7): 1003–1013. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1961)72[1003:OADOTT]2.0.CO;2 Article history Received: 13 Jan 1960 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation G. D ROBINSON; Origin and Development of the Three Forks Basin, Montana. GSA Bulletin 1961;; 72 (7): 1003–1013. doi: https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1961)72[1003:OADOTT]2.0.CO;2 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyGSA Bulletin Search Advanced Search Abstract The Three Forks Basin sprawls where the intricately deformed sedimentary and volcanic rocks of the Disturbed Belt along the Rocky Mountain front are faulted against the Precambrian metamorphic rocks that make the core of the Tobacco Root, Madison, Gallatin, and Beartooth ranges. Its eastern edge is linear, controlled by steep faults at the west front of the Bridger Range. All other boundaries are sinuous and show little sign of structural control.Tertiary deposits in the basin, rich in contemporaneous rhyolitic and latitic ash, are about equally of lake, bolson, and stream origin. The western part of the basin is dominated by moderately folded Eocene and lower Oligocene rocks, more than 2000 feet thick. They dip eastward beneath apparently unfolded upper Miocene and Pliocene rocks, more than 1300 feet thick, that also dip gently eastward to the basin edge.Thin but extensive Quaternary deposits lying unconformably on the Tertiary and pre-Tertiary rocks are mainly of rounded terrace and flood-plain gravel, angular fan gravel, and wind-blown silt.The basin began as part of an east-flowing stream system that developed in Late Cretaceous and Paleocene time, concurrently with Laramide folding and thrusting; the faulted contact between metamorphic and sedimentary rocks was especially erodible and became a main drainage way. Recurrent uplift to the west throughout the Tertiary provided gradient and load to the streams; additional load was provided by showers of ash from unknown vents. Relative uplifts of the Bridger Range in Eocene and early Oligocene time, and again in late Miocene and Pliocene time, impeded flow from the basin and led to deposits in channels, flood plains, and lakes. During most of Oligocene and Miocene time, however, the basin was being eroded. By the end of the Tertiary the basin was deeply filled and became part of a regional surface of low relief. Regional northwestward tilting stimulated headward erosion of the Missouri River which then captured the formerly east-draining or closed basin. The Tertiary deposits have been deeply eroded, and the rugged pre-basin surface partly exhumed. This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access. First Page Preview Close Modal You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Read full abstract