Distal Interphalangeal Joint Flexion Research Articles

The Normal Active Range of Motion of the Index, Middle, Ring, and Little Fingers in a Sample of Indian Population.

Background The normative data for finger range of motion (ROM) are not available for the Indian population. The aim of our study was to measure the active ROM of finger joints in normal healthy volunteers in a sample of Indian population. Materials and Methods This is a prospective observational study conducted as a part of the Indian normative data project of the Indian Society for Surgery of the Hand (ISSH). The study included one participating center from four geographical regions of the country. Certified goniometers were used to measure the ROM of fingers in all centers. A standardized methodology was devised. A pilot study was done to assess the interobserver and intraobserver reliability, following which data were collected by one measurement. Results This pilot study was performed in 20 hands that showed good interobserver and intraobserver reliability correlation. A total of 390 hands were measured in four participating centers. Active flexion of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint was the highest in the middle finger (86.6 ± 10.4 degrees) followed by the index finger (86.0 ± 9.2 degrees), little finger (85.0 ± 8.4 degrees), and ring finger (84.2 ± 8.6 degrees). The index finger (97.2 ± 16.9 degrees) showed maximum proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint flexion followed by the middle finger (96.2 ± 15.8 degrees), ring finger (96.0 ± 15.9 degrees), and little finger (91.8 ± 12.7 degrees). Distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint flexion increased from the index finger (81.6 ± 13.9 degrees) to the little finger (84.6 ± 12.9 degrees). The little finger MCP joint (26.3 ± 6.2 degrees) showed maximum extension followed by the index finger (25.7 ± 6.8 degrees), middle finger (24.7 ± 6.7 degrees) and ring finger (22.3 ± 7.1 degrees). The middle finger (15.6 ± 8.1 degrees) and ring finger (16.2 ± 8 degrees) had more PIP joint extension when compared to the index (13.7 ± 7.8 degrees) and little finger (13.2 ± 8.4 degrees). The ring finger (8.1 ± 6.8 degrees) and the middle finger (8.4 ± 6.9 degrees) had more DIP joint extension when compared with the index finger (6.0 ± 6.0 degrees) and the little finger (6.8 ± 6.7 degrees). Total active motion (TAM) of the middle finger (315.9 ± 31.0 degrees) was the maximum followed by the index finger (310.2 ± 27.3 degrees), ring finger (308.8 ± 29.1 degrees), and little finger (307.8 ± 25.2 degrees). Gender, body mass index (BMI), mother tongue, geographical location, and occupation were factors that had significant correlation, while no significant differences based on side, hand dominance, and age were noted. Conclusion We have reported normative data of finger ROM and TAM for the index, middle, ring, and little fingers in the Indian population. Finger ROM in the Indian population is highly variable. The observed TAM in the Indian population is higher than what is reported earlier.

Ultrasound-guided Hydrogel Injection Provides Better Therapeutic Effects After Hand Tendon Surgery Than Intraoperative Injection: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hydrogels are used to provide a barrier against peritendinous adhesion formation, but when implanted intraoperatively, they degrade rapidly and aggravate early inflammatory pain. It is uncertain whether clinical efficacy can be improved by avoiding the inflammatory phase when hydrogels are delivered during adhesion formation. (1) Compared with intraoperative hydrogel application, does ultrasound-guided postoperative application result in better total active motion (TAM) at 12 months after tendon injury? (2) Does ultrasound-guided postoperative application of hydrogels result in lower pain, better function, and better satisfaction? This open-label, prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial was conducted by reparative and reconstructive surgeons at the National Orthopedics Clinical Medical Center, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Between May 2021 and December 2022, 53% (168 of 317) of patients who met our inclusion criteria were recruited, and 47% (149 of 317) of patients were excluded because of the exclusion criteria. Finally, 84 patients were randomized to the postoperative group to receive ultrasound-guided carboxymethyl chitosan (CMC) hydrogel delayed injection, and 84 patients were randomized to the intraoperative group to receive CMC hydrogel intraoperative application. Another 8% (7 of 84) of patients in the postoperative group and 10% (8 of 84) of patients in the intraoperative group were lost before the minimum study follow-up time of 1 year or had incomplete datasets, leaving 91% (153 of 168) of patients with data for analysis. Data on outcome events were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle, which included all patients who underwent randomization. Follow-up visits were completed at 3 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after tendon repair. The primary outcome was TAM (ie, the sum of the degrees of active metacarpophalangeal joint, proximal interphalangeal joint, and distal interphalangeal joint flexion less the degrees from full extension; minimum clinically important difference [MCID] 20°) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included pain (measured with a VAS; range 0 to 10, a higher score indicating worse pain; MCID 0.6), Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire activities of daily living (MHQ-ADL) score (range 0 to 100, a higher score indicating better outcomes; MCID 10.1), and MHQ satisfaction (MHQ-SAT) score (range 0 to 100, a higher score indicating better outcomes; MCID 33.0). At 12 months, the ultrasound-guided postoperative injection group had improved TAM (intraoperative 189° [95% CI 179° to 199°] versus postoperative 209° [95% CI 199° to 219°], mean difference 20° [95% CI 6° to 35°]; p = 0.006; the mean difference in the primary outcome fulfilled the MCID value at all time points). At 6 weeks, we found no clinically important difference in VAS pain scores among groups (intraoperative mean ± SD 2.0 ± 1.0 versus postoperative 1.7 ± 1.0, mean difference 0.3 [95% CI 0.1 to 0.7]; p = 0.02); however, at 3 weeks, the VAS pain scores showed clinically important difference among groups (3.6 ± 1.4 versus 2.9 ± 1.2, mean difference 0.7 [95% CI 0.3 to 1.1]; p = 0.001). At 3 months, the ultrasound-guided postoperative injection group had higher MHQ-ADL scores (intraoperative 62 ± 10 versus postoperative 75 ± 10, mean difference 13 [95% CI 11 to 17]; p < 0.001), and the mean difference of MHQ-ADL scores reached the MCID value at all time points. At 3 months, there was no clinically important difference in MHQ-SAT scores between groups (intraoperative 62 ± 8 versus postoperative 70 ± 8, mean difference 8 [95% CI 6 to 11]; p < 0.001). Compared with intraoperative CMC hydrogel injection, postoperative ultrasound-guided injection improved the TAM and function of the affected limb, showed a short-term pain control effect, and did not increase the risk of complications. Clinical trials are needed to confirm the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided postoperative injection of CMC hydrogels and to determine the most effective dose and the health and economic benefits of treatment. Level I, therapeutic study.

Outcomes of antegrade homodigital neurovascular island flap in fingertip amputations

BackgroundAntegrade homodigital neurovascular island flap (AHIF) is one of the methods used in fingertip amputations to cover the defect area, preserve finger length and obtain a painless and sensitive fingertip. The aim of this study was to evaluate the functional and sensory outcomes in patients who underwent AHIF for fingertip amputation and to analyze the relationship between patient satisfaction and outcome measures. MethodsTwenty patients with a mean age of 37 (18–63) years were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were evaluated in terms of hook nail development, active interphalangeal joint movements, cold intolerance, and sensory function of the flap covered area. Static two-point discrimination test and Semmes Weinstein monofilament test were performed for sensory evaluation. ResultsAll flaps survived completely at the end of follow-up (mean, 36 months; range 11–64 months). Five patients had cold intolerance and two had hook nails. In total, proximal interphalangeal or distal interphalangeal joint flexion contracture developed in 25 % of the patients. The mean static two-point discrimination score was 4.6 ± 1.6 (2–8) and Semmes–Weinstein monofilament test score was 3.48 ± 0.6 (2.44–4.17). Subjective satisfaction levels of the patients were found to be high and did not show a statistical relationship with the measured clinical outcome parameters (p > 0.05). ConclusionsSince AHIF contains a solid and continuous neurovascular pedicle, the probability of necrosis and loss of sensation is low in AHIF. In addition, the graft need of the donor area is not high. Its disadvantage is the rate of restriction of joint movements. Level of evidenceIV.

Direct fixation of fracture fragment with modified double Kirschner wires for the treatment of old bony mallet finger.

The management of old bony mallet fingers is complicated. The purpose of this study was to describe direct fixation of fracture fragment with modified double Kirschner wires (K-wires) for treatment of old bony mallet finger, and to evaluate the functional outcomes during long-term follow-up. Forty-nine patients with old bony mallet finger were enrolled and underwent surgical treatment from August 2014 to January 2021 in our hospital. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether they had undergone triple K-wires fixation or modified double K-wires with a dorsal brace fixation. The operation time, mean number of intraoperative fluoroscopy, bone union time, functional recovery and incidence of complications were monitored. Neither QuickDASH nor visual analogue scale measurement found statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the patients that underwent fixation with double K-wires and a dorsal brace required a shorter operation time and fewer intraoperative fluoroscopy, and exhibited a significantly greater mean final active range of the distal interphalangeal joint flexion, compared to those treated with triple K-wires (P < 0.01). Direct fixation of fracture fragment with modified double K-wires was an easy and feasible procedure which could achieve anatomical reduction and stable fixation of the dorsal fracture block of old bony mallet finger with relatively few complications.

Clinical Outcomes of Closed Reduction and External Fixation for Isolated Second Metacarpal Base Fracture-Dislocations.

The isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations in adults are rare, and the traditional main treatments include closed reduction with the plaster or splint and open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF). However, closed reduction with the plaster or splint is not solid enough and ORIF can damage the surrounding important tissues. The purpose of this study was to explore the clinical outcomes of closed reduction and external fixation (CREF) for the treatment of isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations. Ten patients who suffered isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations between January 1, 2010, and February 1, 2020, were reviewed. All of the patients were treated by CREF. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were performed regularly after the operation. The grip and pinch strength, visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, American Society for Surgery of the Hand total active movement (TAM) and total active flexion (TAF) scores, Cooney score, Sollerman hand function test (SHFT) score, QuickDASH score, and range of motion of the index finger were recorded at the last follow-up visit to evaluate functional recovery; the injured and healthy hands were compared and we also recorded postoperative complications. The paired samples t-test was used to compare the healthy and injured sides. The patients were followed up for a median of 29.50 ± 4.2 months. There were no significant differences in the grip strength, pinch strength, angle of proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) flexion, or angle of distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) flexion between the injured and healthy sides at the final follow-up visit (all p > 0.05). The mean TAM (268.20 ± 4.21) and TAF scores (270.60 ± 4.17) on injured side were significantly lower than those on healthy side (all p < 0.05). The mean Cooney score (93.50 ± 7.47) and SHFT score (78.50 ± 1.08) on injured side were lower, while the mean QuickDASH score (7.05 ± 3.11) on injured side was higher than those on healthy side (all p < 0.05). The mean VAS pain score was 0.50 ± 0.53 on injured side. There were no significant postoperative complications except for traumatic arthritis in one patient without obvious clinical symptoms. CREF achieves the satisfactory curative effect, and the patients obtain the good functional recovery without significant postoperative complications. CREF is a safe and effective treatment for isolated second metacarpal base fracture-dislocations with satisfactory clinical outcomes.

Precision and accuracy of measuring finger motion with a depth camera: a cross-sectional study of healthy participants.

The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to determine the precision and accuracy of the measurement of finger motion with a depth camera. Fifty-five healthy adult hands were included. Measurements were done with a depth camera and compared with traditional manual goniometer measurements. Repeated measuring showed that the overall repeatability and reproducibility of extension measured with the depth camera were within 3° and 4° and that of flexion were within 13° and 14°. Compared with traditional manual goniometry, biases of extension of all finger joints and flexion of metacarpophalangeal joints were less than 5°, and the average bias of flexion of proximal and distal interphalangeal joints was 29°. We conclude that the measurement of finger extension and flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joints with a depth camera was reliable, but improvement is required in the precision and accuracy of interphalangeal joint flexion.

The Use of Relative Motion Flexion Orthoses for Chronic Boutonniere Deformity

This study investigated the effectiveness of a relative motion flexion orthosis (RMFO) for increasing the range of motion for boutonniere deformity. We included 28 patients aged 13-62 years with chronic boutonniere deformity who could complete 0° proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint extension with the pencil test and were stage 1 according to the Burton classification of boutonniere deformity. At the initial hand therapy appointment, the RMFO was made. The duration of the orthosis usage at the initial therapy session, after stopping the use of the orthosis (posttreatment), and at the follow-up period were noted. The mean time for orthosis usage of all patients was 11.7 weeks (6-40 weeks). The mean initial active distal interphalangeal joint flexion was 47° (0° to 90°) and improved to 66.8° (5° to 110°). The mean initial extension lag of the PIP joint was 22.5° (5° to 55°) and improved to 12° (0° to 30°). This did not change between discontinuation of the orthosis and final follow-up. The use of RMFO is effective in increasing active distal interphalangeal joint flexion and improving PIP extension in patients with Burton stage 1 chronic boutonniere deformity. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVıDENCE: Therapeutic IV.

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing 3-Point Prefabricated Orthosis and Elastic Tape Versus Cast Immobilization for the Nonsurgical Management of Mallet Finger

The purpose of this randomized trial was to compare the outcomes of using a 3-point prefabricated orthosis with elastic tape versus cast immobilization for the management of nonsurgical mallet finger. This study was conducted in a single center. Individuals with a mallet injury requiring nonsurgical management were randomized to 6 weeks of full-time immobilization with either a 3-point prefabricated orthosis and elastic tape or a cast for distal interphalangeal joint extension. Outcomes were assessed at 12 weeks after the initiation of full-time immobilization and 6 months after injury. A total of 70 individuals agreed to participate in the study between April 2017 and April 2021. No statistically or clinically significant differences were found between the groups regarding distal interphalangeal joint extension lag, distal interphalangeal joint flexion deficits, function according to the brief Michigan Hand Outcome Questionnaire, and pain on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale. The overall findings for both treatment groups included means of <15° of extensor lag and minimal pain (mean, <1.2 of 10) at the 6-month outcome assessment. The use of a 3-point prefabricated orthosis with elastic tape and cast are both appropriate immobilization options for the management of nonsurgical mallet finger. Therapeutic II.

Comparison of extension block pinning technique versus pin orthosis-extension block pinning technique for acute mallet fractures: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

The extension block pinning technique (EBPT) is a popular surgical treatment for mallet fractures; however, it has several drawbacks. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to compare EBPT to the pin orthosis-extension block pinning method (PO-EBPT) in the treatment of mallet fractures involving more than one-third of the joint surface but without primary joint dislocation. Sixty-five patients with mallet fractures were randomized into two groups between June 2017 and January 2020: Group I (33 patients) was treated with EBPT and group II (32 patients) was treated with PO-EBPT. Five patients were lost to follow up due to lack of follow-up and death. There were no significant differences in the clinical and demographic characteristics of both groups. Patients were evaluated according to fracture union, extension lag, distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint range of motion, Crawford's criteria, and complication rates. The patients were followed-up post-operatively at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter. A total of 60 patients were randomized into two groups: one (30 patients) was treated with EBPT and the second (30 patients) with PO-EBPT. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of fracture union and active DIP joint flexion (P = 0.743 and P = 0.059, respectively). The mean extension lag of the DIP joint in the EBPT group was significantly greater than the PO-EBPT group (10° ± 9.47° vs. 4.17° ± 7.2°, P = 0.009). According to the Crawford criteria, the PO-EBPT group showed significantly better outcomes (P = 0.005). The complication rates were similar between groups (P = 0.45). In comparison to the EBPT technique, the group of patients operated with PO-EBPT had superior clinical outcomes and less loss of extension at the DIP joint according to the Crawford's criteria.

1102 Tackling Jersey Finger Using Extraosseous Tunnels – Study of a New Technique

Abstract Aim Flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) avulsion or Jersey finger is a common injury in hand trauma. Common methods of surgical repair include Mitek bone anchor or a pull-out technique using tunnels drilled through the bone. We present a novel method of FDP tendon repair using extraosseous tunnels. Method Once the avulsed FDP tendon is retrieved, a double-Kessler or Krakow repair is performed with a 3-0 Prolene suture through the distal FDP tendon. Extraosseous tunnels are created either side of the distal phalanx using 18-gauge needles passing through the nailplate and sterile matrix, avoiding the germinal matrix. Suture ends are then passed through the needles. After removing the needles, the suture is knotted over a Jelonet roll. We reviewed this method in a cohort of 16 paediatric and adult patients with FDP avulsion or division at its insertion. Patients were followed-up for at least 6 weeks. All patients underwent post-operative rehabilitation with hand therapists. Function was measured subjectively and using distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) flexion and loss of extension. Results 14 patients regained normal or near-normal function. The remaining two had significant polytrauma and developed complex regional pain syndrome. Mean range of DIPJ flexion was of 49.6° at a mean of 11 weeks’ follow-up, mean loss of extension was 11.6°. Conclusions Our results show good outcomes comparable to those in the literature using existing methods. This method is simple and requires no complex instrumentation while providing reliable FDP fixation.

Technique de l’embrochage percutané d’arthrorise contre orthèse d’extension pour le traitement du mallet-finger osseux aigu : étude rétrospective

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the clinical, radiological, aesthetic and economic outcomes of extension pin block technique and extension orthosis in closed mallet fractures with more than 1/3 of articular surface involvement without subluxation (Wehbe and Schneider classification type IB and IC). Materials and methods39 patients (11 women and 28 men; mean age: 40.9±11.5 years) who had mallet fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-one patients were treated with the extension pin block technique, and the remaining 18 were treated with the extension orthosis. Fracture classification, measurement of articular surface involvement, presence of subluxation, and the fragment displacement were performed according to the Wehbe and Schneider classification. Crawford's criteria, extension lag, distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) range of motion, dorsal bump, and visual analog scale were evaluated. Fracture union, articular incongruity, and all other complications were followed and analyzed. The Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) was used to evaluate the aesthetic perception of the patient's finger. Direct and indirect costs were calculated for each treatment method. ResultsAt the final follow-up (mean: 18.4±6.2 months), there was no significant difference with respect to clinical outcomes between groups (p=0.335) and pain (p=0.131). Fracture union was achieved in all cases. Both extension lag (p=0.150) and DIPJ flexion (p=.261) were not different between groups. Dorsal bump was more frequent in the conservative treatment group (p=0.048). Aesthetic scores were similar between groups (p=0.477), but female patients rated significantly lower aesthetic scores than males (p=0.003) regardless of the treatment method. The direct medical (p=0.001), indirect (p=0.009) and cumulative costs (p=0.001) were significantly higher in surgical treatment group. One pin tract infection, one nail dystrophy, and one joint space narrowing were seen in the surgical treatment group versus none in the conservative treatment group (p=0.698). ConclusionsConservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical, radiographic and aesthetic outcomes compared to surgical fixation in closed mallet fractures with more than 1/3 of articular surface involvement without subluxation. Extension orthosis which is non-invasive, and cheap, maybe the treatment of choice in closed mallet fractures. Level of evidenceIV; Retrospective cohort.

A Novel Hook Wire Tension Technique for the Treatment of Mallet Fractures: A Comparison with the Extension Block Pinning Technique

We developed a percutaneous surgical technique that allows early mobilization and compression for the treatment of mallet fractures. The aim of this study was to describe this novel technique called the hook wire tension technique (HWTT) and provide a clinical and radiological comparison between HWTT and the extension block pinning technique (EBT) in the treatment of mallet fractures. This retrospective study included 23 mallet fracture patients treated using HWTT and 25 patients treated using EBT. At the final follow-up visit, extension lag and flexion of the distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) were measured. DIPJ pain was assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and the overall clinical outcomes were graded according to the Crawford criteria. Time to bone healing and osteoarthritis development were assessed radiologically. Complications, including skin necrosis, dorsal prominence and nail deformity, were also compared. The mean follow-up period was 18 months (range: 12-24) in the HWTT group and 19.2 months (range: 12-26) in the EBT group (p = 0.239). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of mean extension lag of the DIPJ, mean VAS scores and mean time to bone healing (p > 0.405). The mean DIPJ flexion was greater in the HWTT group compared with the EBT group (p = 0.001). According to the Crawford criteria, outcomes were similar in both groups (p = 0.370). No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups when each complication was compared (p > 0.358). The short-term clinical and functional results of HWTT were found to be similar to those of EBT in the surgical treatment of mallet fractures.

Anatomic Repair of the Central Slip with Anchor Suture Augmentation for Treatment of Established Boutonniere Deformity

BackgroudThe rupture of the central slip of an extensor tendon of a finger causes a boutonniere (or buttonhole) deformity, characterized by pathologic flexion at the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint and hyperextension at the distal interphalangeal (DIP) joint. Currently, there are no standard treatment guidelines for this deformity. This study aimed to report clinical results of surgery to correct chronic boutonniere deformity.MethodsThis retrospective case series was conducted between January 2010 and December 2018 and only 13 patients with trauma-induced chronic deformity were included. After excision of elongated scar tissue, a direct anatomic end-to-end repair using a loop suture technique with supplemental suture anchor augmentation was conducted. Total active motion was assessed before and after surgery and self-satisfaction scores were collected from phone surveys.ResultsAll patients presented with Burton stage I deformities defined as supple and passively correctable joints. The initial mean extension lag of the PIP joint (43.5°) was improved by an average of 21.9° at the final follow-up (p < 0.001). The mean hyperextension of the DIP joint averaged 19.2° and improved by 0.8° flexion contracture (p < 0.001). The average total active motion was 220.4° (range, 160°–260°). Based on the Souter's criteria, 69.2% (9/13) of the patients had good results. Only 1 patient reported fair outcome and 23.1% (3/13) reported poor outcome. The average Strickland formula score was 70 (range, 28.6–97.1). In total, 10 patients (77%) had excellent or good results. Of 10 patients contacted by phone, self-reported satisfaction score was very satisfied in 2, satisfied in 3, average in 3, poor in 1, and very poor in 1. Three patients reported a relapse of the deformity during range of motion exercises, 1 of whom underwent revision surgery. One patient complained of PIP joint flexion limitation, and 2 complained of DIP joint flexion limitation at final follow-up.ConclusionsIn chronic boutonniere deformity, central slip reconstruction with anchor suture augmentation can be an easily applicable surgical option, which offers fair to excellent outcome in 77% of the cases. The risk of residual extension lag and recurrence of deformity should be discussed prior to surgery.

The Ideal Insertion Site for the Flexor Digitorum Profundus Tendon in Jersey Finger Repair: A Biomechanical Analysis

Most jersey finger repair techniques involve reattaching the tendon to an approximate location corresponding to the tendon's native attachment. This study aimed to determine the biomechanical effect on the distal interphalangeal joint flexion forces and range of motion when the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) tendon attachment site on the distal phalanx is altered within its broad footprint. We fixed 14 fresh-frozen cadaveric fingers to a wooden block with an attached pulley and weights system. A pressure mapping sensor placed under the fingertip measured the contact force and area in response to FDP tendon loading for the intact tendon and 3 repair sites along the FDP footprint. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance test using mixed-effect model was performed to test the influences of attachment location (intact, proximal, central, and distal) and digit (index, middle, and ring) on the outcomes. Mean ± SD contact force under 45 N tendon loading force was 43.5 ± 7.2 N for the intact tendon, 34.6 ± 7.4 N for the proximal insertion, 38.0 ± 7.1 N for the central insertion, and 43.1 ± 6.3 N for the distal insertion. Compared with the intact tendon, the proximal group generated notably less contact force. No significant difference was detected between the intact tendon and the central or distal repairs. Comparisons among the 3 repair groups show that the distal group generated significantly higher force than the proximal group. There was no difference between contact areas across all groups. The FDP tendon inserted at the distal edge of its footprint conferred significantly greater distal interphalangeal joint flexion force compared with the proximal insertion site and most closely resembled the intact FDP tendon. Biomechanically, distal reattachment of the FDP most closely approximates the contact force of the native anatomy and may help guide intraoperative placement of the repair footprint.

Extension pin block technique versus extension orthosis for acute bony mallet finger; a retrospective comparison

PurposeThis study aimed to compare the clinical, radiological, aesthetic and economic outcomes of extension pin block technique and extension orthosis in closed mallet fractures with more than 1/3 of articular surface involvement without subluxation (Wehbe and Schneider classification type IB and IC). Materials and methodsThirty-nine patients (11 women and 28 men; mean age: 40.9±11.5 years) who had mallet fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Twenty-one patients were treated with the extension pin block technique, and the remaining 18 were treated with the extension orthosis. Fracture classification, measurement of articular surface involvement, presence of subluxation, and the fragment displacement were performed according to the Wehbe and Schneider classification. Crawford's criteria, extension lag, distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ) range of motion, dorsal bump, and visual analog scale were evaluated. Fracture union, articular incongruity, and all other complications were followed and analyzed. The Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) was used to evaluate the aesthetic perception of the patient's finger. Direct and indirect costs were calculated for each treatment method. ResultsAt the final follow-up (mean: 18.4±6.2 months), there was no significant difference with respect to clinical outcomes between groups (p=0.335) and pain (p=0.131). Fracture union was achieved in all cases. Both extension lag (p=0.150) and DIPJ flexion (p=0.261) were not different between groups. Dorsal bump was more frequent in the conservative treatment group (p=0.048). Aesthetic scores were similar between groups (p=0.477), but female patients rated significantly lower aesthetic scores than males (p=0.003) regardless of the treatment method. The direct medical (p=0.001), indirect (p=0.009) and cumulative costs (p=0.001) were significantly higher in surgical treatment group. One pin tract infection, one nail dystrophy, and one joint space narrowing were seen in the surgical treatment group versus none in the conservative treatment group (p=0.698). ConclusionsConservative treatment does not result in inferior clinical, radiographic and aesthetic outcomes compared to surgical fixation in closed mallet fractures with more than 1/3 of articular surface involvement without subluxation. Extension orthosis which is non-invasive, and cheap, maybe the treatment of choice in closed mallet fractures. Level of evidenceIV; Retrospective cohort.

Feasibility of Homodigital Flexor Digitorum Superficialis transposition, a new technique for A2-C1 pulleys reconstruction: A kinematic cadaver study

IntroductionHomodigital flexor digitorum superficialis transposition (HFT) is proposed as a new technique for A2-C1 pulley reconstruction. Flexor digitorum superficialis is transposed on the proximal phalanx and inserted on the pulley rims, crossing over flexor digitorum profundus and acting as a pulley. Materials and methodsThe kinematic feasibility was investigated in a cadaveric bowstring model (after A2 and C1 pulley removal) on 22 fingers (thumb excluded). ResultsHFT was effective in restoring the correct flexion of proximal and distal interphalangeal joints, compared to bowstring model. No adverse events were registered. ConclusionHFT is a feasible technique. Clinical application is encouraged.

Tensile load on the flexor digitorum profundus tendon during palmar and lateral blocking exercises: Influence on blocking force and distal interphalangeal joint flexion angle

Study DesignThis is a basic science research. IntroductionIsolating excursion of the flexor digitorum profundus (FDP) in zones I and II is common practice in the current management after flexor tendon repair. During this procedure, the proximal interphalangeal joint is sometimes fully extended with unmeasured external forces at the middle phalanx when the distal interphalangeal joint is actively flexed. Purpose of the StudyThe purpose of the study was to investigate the incremental effect of external force with palmar blocking versus lateral blocking and increased angles of flexion on internal tendon forces at the repair site for a safer application of force by the treating therapist. MethodsEight human cadaveric fingers were studied. To simulate palmar or lateral finger blocking, a compression force of blocking was applied from 5N (510 grams) to 25N (2,550 grams) on the skin surface of the palmar or the lateral aspect of each of these middle phalanges in 5N increments. The tensile load on the FDP tendon during distal interphalangeal joint flexion from 0° to 60° was measured in 10° increments. ResultsDuring palmar blocking, the tensile load was significantly increased with increases in palmar blocking force. However, no significant increase in the tensile load on the FDP tendon was observed at any lateral blocking. DiscussionLateral blocking exercise can be performed with less tensile force on the FDP tendon when performing blocking exercise after flexor tendon injury repair. ConclusionsThis study supports the concept that lateral blocking with incremental joint angles allows a safer application of force for the healing tendon.

The Effect of Ring Finger Distal Interphalangeal Joint Stiffness on Grip Strength: A Simulated Study in Normal Participants

Background: Pain of the hand distal interphalangeal joints may result from trauma, osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis. When symptoms are not controlled by non-operative means, surgical arthrodesis may be performed, resulting in complete stiffness of the joint and possible weakening of grip strength. This study aims to quantify the effect of a stiff ring finger distal interphalangeal joint on overall grip strength. Methods: One hundred participants were screened to exclude upper limb pathology. A Jamar dynamometer was used to assess overall hand grip strength. A splint was used to prevent distal interphalangeal joint flexion, thus replicating a fused distal interphalangeal joint. Participants were tested with and without the splint and the results compared. The mean of three grip strength tests was taken. Results: The participants included 55 females. Mean age was 31 (18-60 years). 76 participants had a reduction in grip strength with splinting, with a significant difference seen (p < 0.05) on Wilcoxon signed rank test. The median reduction in grip strength with splinting was 1.67 kg. However only 10 participants (10%) had a grip strength loss of greater than 6.5 kg, which is the minimal clinically important difference. Conclusions: This study found a significant loss in overall hand grip strength when the ring finger distal interphalangeal joint was stiffened. However, despite this significant change, only 10 (10%) participants experienced a reduction of greater than 6.5 kg. This is the level of weakness felt to be required to reduce function. Thus our results suggest that 90% of patients with a stiff ring finger distal interphalangeal joint are unlikely to have a clinically identifiable functional reduction in grip strength as a result.

Postoperative treatment and rehabilitation following flexor tendon injuries

The ideal surgical and postoperative treatment for flexor tendon injuries, especially in zone2, is still subject to continuous modifications and professional discussions. Presentation of established rehabilitation concepts, specific problems and new treatment approaches with practical recommendations for application. Comparison of commonly used treatment concepts by assessing surgical flexor tendon repair, splint choice and clinical application in patients. Discussion of new surgical approaches and standards and their influence on postoperative therapy after flexor tendon injuries. The Washington regimen has retained its status as the standard in the current follow-up treatment of flexor tendon injuries. New suture materials and techniques enable early active rehabilitation of sutured flexor tendons with good clinical results, such as increased range of motion for interphalangeal joint extension and improved distal interphalangeal joint flexion with overall acceptable frequencies of suture rupture. Astable tendon repair with smooth gliding is the foundation for treatment after flexor tendon injuries. After intraoperative active digital extension-flexion testing of the sutured tendon an early active rehabilitation approach should follow. New splint designs in combination with primary stable tendon suture techniques have the potential to improve the postoperative outcome, presupposing areliable cooperation of the patient.

Prior to Repair Functional Deficits in Above- and Below-Elbow Ulnar Nerve Injury

Clinical deficits might vary, depending on whether an ulnar nerve lesion is above or below the elbow. Lack of strength and clawing are common manifestations of ulnar nerve paralysis. However, the magnitude of strength deficit relating to different pinch patterns and the rate and range of proximal interphalangeal extension deficits are poorly described. I prospectively evaluated 14 patients with above-elbow and 16 with below-elbow unrepaired ulnar nerve injuries. The completeness of flexion of the ring and little fingers was tested at the metacarpophalangeal and distal interphalangeal joints. Proximal interphalangeal joint extension lag of the ring and little fingers was assessed by goniometry, and adduction and abduction of the little finger. With dynamometers, I bilaterally evaluated grasp, key pinch, and pinch-to-zoom strength. Hand sensibility was evaluated with monofilaments. Metacarpophalangeal flexion in the ulnar fingers was absent in all patients, whereas distal interphalangeal joint flexion was preserved in 29 of 30 patients. In above-elbow ulnar nerve injuries, there was no paralysis of the flexor digitorum profundus. One-third of patients exhibited no clawing. There were minimal differences between the rate of clawing and proximal interphalangeal extension lag in above- and below-elbow ulnar nerve lesions, or its occurrence in the ring or little finger. In relation to the normal hand, grasping, key pinch, and pinch-to-zoom decreased by 62%, 51%, and 75% compared with 59%, 61%, and 76% in below- and above-elbow injuries groups, respectively. In both groups, sensory deficits were predominantly over the little finger and ulnar side of the hand. Minimal differences were observed in clinical deficits after above- and below-elbow ulnar nerve injuries. Hand weakness was the most frequent problem, whereas pinch-to-zoom strength was highly affected. Diagnostic IV.