Use Of Flash Glucose Monitoring Research Articles

Proposed treatment strategy for reactive hypoglycaemia.

Managing reactive hypoglycaemia (RH) poses challenges due to limited and often ineffective treatment options. We report a case series and draw on this to propose a stepwise treatment approach consisting of lifestyle modifications, metformin, GLP-1 analogues, and the use of flash glucose monitoring technology. A retrospective review was conducted to analyse the management of 11 cases presenting with recurrent RH symptoms. Two patients experienced successful resolution of symptoms through lifestyle modifications. Metformin alone was effective in treating seven out of nine patients who received pharmacological treatment. Two patients with previous upper gastrointestinal surgery showed a partial response to metformin and benefited further from additional long-acting GLP-1 analogue. Pharmacological intervention led to significant reductions in insulin and C-peptide levels in repeat mixed meal tolerance tests (P-values 0.043 for insulin and 0.006 for C-peptide). Finally, flash glucose monitoring technology was useful in early detection and preventing episodes of hypoglycaemia in one of these patients with persistent symptoms. These findings highlight the potential efficacy of escalated treatment strategies for RH, including the use of metformin, GLP-1 analogues, and flash glucose monitoring technology.

Modern methods for assessing compensation of diabetes mellitus. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes

Background. An integral part of diabetes mellitus (DM) management is its timely diagnosis. The reference method to study the quality of glycemic control is evaluating the level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) as one of the most accessible and informative tools. However, the introduction of novel technologies, namely the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), has given patients with DM, their relatives and healthcare professionals an access to new indicators of glycemic control such as time in range (TIR), time above range and time below range. These indicators are criteria for compensation of carbohydrate metabolism according to the 2023 American Diabetes Association guidelines. The purpose of the study was to compare the effectiveness of using glucometers and the FreeStyle Libre system for flash glucose monitoring in patients with DM. Materials and methods. An examination of 60 patients with type 2 DM who received insulin therapy was conducted. They were aged 45–65 years, with DM duration of 5 ± 2 years. All participants were divided into two equal groups of 30 people each. The first group consisted of patients with CGM devices, the second group used glucometers for daily glycemic control. Additional CGM parameters were used: glucose coefficient of variation, glucose management indicator, which shows the probable level of HbA1c. Results. When evaluating the data obtained from patients who used CGM, it is important to note their high adherence to the use of flash glucose monitoring. The use of CGM made it possible to achieve compensation of carbohydrate metabolism faster compared to patients who used glucometers to correct glycemia. Discontinuation of CGM resulted in poorer glycemic control. The obtained results prove that the compensation of patients depends primarily on their motivation, willingness to follow medical prescriptions, careful glycemic control, and compliance with medical recommendations. Conclusions. For better control of the DM course, patients should use CGM. In order to assess diabetes compensation, it is not enough to consider only TIR. Time below range indicating hypoglycemia, time above range indicating hyperglycemia, glucose management indicator should also be taken into account. Discontinuation of CGM resulted in a loss of approximately half of the initial TIR gain achieved while using CGM. CGM is more favored among patients than a 7-point self-monitoring of blood glucose.

Feasibility and acceptability of the use of flash glucose monitoring encountered by Indigenous Australians with type 2 diabetes mellitus: initial experiences from a pilot study

BackgroundType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is highly prevalent within the Indigenous Australian community. Novel glucose monitoring technology offers an accurate approach to glycaemic management, providing real-time information on glucose levels and trends. The acceptability and feasibilility of this technology in Indigenous Australians with T2DM has not been investigated.ObjectiveThis feasibility phenomenological study aims to understand the experiences of Indigenous Australians with T2DM using flash glucose monitoring (FGM).MethodsIndigenous Australians with T2DM receiving injectable therapy (n = 8) who used FGM (Abbott Freestyle Libre) for 6-months, as part of a clinical trial, participated in semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis of the interviews was performed using NVivo12 Plus qualitative data analysis software (QSR International).ResultsSix major themes emerged: 1) FGM was highly acceptable to the individual; 2) FGM’s convenience was its biggest benefit; 3) data from FGM was a tool to modify lifestyle choices; 4) FGM needed to be complemented with health professional support; 5) FGM can be a tool to engage communities in diabetes management; and 6) cost of the device is a barrier to future use.ConclusionsIndigenous Australians with T2DM had positive experiences with FGM. This study highlights future steps to ensure likelihood of FGM is acceptable and effective within the wider Indigenous Australian community.

Improved glycemic control after the use of flash glucose monitoring accompanied by improved treatment satisfaction in patients with non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial

AimsIn our previously reported randomized controlled trial in patients with noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes, the use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) improved glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the improvement was sustained after the cessation of glucose monitoring. In this post-hoc analysis, we examined data from our trial to identify the factors that influenced FGM efficacy. MethodsWe analyzed data for 48 of 49 participants of the FGM group who completed the trial to clarify the changes in various parameters and factors related to HbA1c improvement with the use of FGM. ResultsAnalyses of the FGM data during the 12-week FGM provision period showed that the weekly mean blood glucose levels considerably decreased as early as at 1 week compared with the baseline values, and this decline continued for 12 weeks. An enhancement in the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire regarding “willingness to continue the current treatment” score was significantly associated with the improvement in HbA1c at 12 (p = 0.009) and 24 weeks (p = 0.012). ConclusionsGlycemic control was improved soon after FGM initiation, accompanied by improved satisfaction with continuation of the current treatment in patients with noninsulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in Patients with Type2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Treated with an Intensive Insulin Regimen: 1-Year Real-Life Retrospective Cohort Study.

Estimation of laboratory-derived glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) cannot be individually used to monitor clinically significant trends in glucose variability. Hence, clinicians advise use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices such as the Freestyle Libre™ flash glucose monitoring system (FLASH) to optimize glycemic control by estimating glucose monitoring index (GMI) values, which convert mean glucose into an estimate of simultaneously measured laboratory HbA1c. This study aimed to investigate the sustainability of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring (isCGM) in patients with type2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not on intensive insulin regimen, and correlations between GMI values obtained from isCGM and laboratory-derived HbA1c values. A retrospective review of 93 patients with T2DM not on intensive insulin regimen, using FLASH device, was conducted at a major tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia, over 1year of continuous device use. To determine the sustainability of isCGM, various glycemic markers such as average glucose and time in range were evaluated. Paired ttest or Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess differences in markers of glycemic control, and Pearson's correlation was used to determine correlations between HbA1c and GMI values. Descriptive analysis shows the mean HbA1c value significantly decreased following continued use of isCGM. Pre-isCGM mean HbA1c value of 8.3% improved to 8.1% (p < 0.001) and 7.9% (p < 0.001) in the first 90 and last 90days of device use, respectively. For both 90-day time periods, correlation analysis revealed a statistically significant positive correlation and linear regression between laboratory-derived HbA1c and GMI values (first 90days r = 0.7999, p < 0.001; last 90days r = 0.6651, p < 0.001). Continuous use of isCGM demonstrated reductions in HbA1c levels for patients with T2DM not on an intensive insulin regimen. The GMI values showed high levels of agreement with measured HbA1c, indicating their accuracy in glucose management.

Flash glucose monitoring system in patients with type 1 diabetes in healthcare center in Brazil: real world data from a short-term prospective study.

To evaluate the alternate use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) with self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG), in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). Two weeks of open FGM (P2), both preceded (P1) and followed by 2 weeks (P3) of SMBG with a blinded FGM system. Mean absolute relative difference (MARD) was calculated by (|FGMi - SMBGi|) / SMBGi, where it was a paired data sample. In total, 34 patients were evaluated. Time in range (TIR) did not change between P1 and P2. In 12 patients (35.3%), TIR increased from 40% at P1 to 52% at P2 (p = 0.002) and in 22 (64.7%), TIR decreased or did not change. FGM use resulted in decreased % time spent in hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) (6.5% vs. 5.0%; p = 0.005), increased % time spent in hyperglycemia (>180 mg/dL) (44.5% to 51%; p = 0.046) with no significant change in % TIR. The proportion of patients who reached sensor-estimated glycated hemoglobin (eA1c) < 7% decreased from 23.5% at P1 to 12.9% at P2, p = 0.028. For the whole sample, the MARD between the two methods was 15.5% (95% CI 14.5-16.6%). For normal glucose range, hyperglycemic levels and hypoglycemic levels MARD were 16.0% (95% CI 15.0-17.0%), 13.3% (95% CI 11.5-15.2%) and 23.4% [95% CI 20.5-26.3%)], respectively. FGM after usual SMBG decreased the % time spent in hypoglycemia concomitant with an undesired increase in % time spent in hyperglycemia. Lower accuracy of FGM regarding hypoglycemia levels could result in overcorrection of hypoglycemia.

Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring technology in type 2 diabetic patients in basal-bolus insulin therapy improves metabolic control and generates saving health costs: fake or reality.

Since few years Glucose monitoring, which contributes to good metabolic control, has available a new tool, sensors, which automatically and continuously measure interstitial glucose levels in two modes: continuous (Continuous Glucose Monitoring) and flash (Flash Glucose Monitoring). Flash Glucose Monitoring has been shown to be efficient and improve the quality of life in type 1 diabetic patients; and also for type 2 diabetic patients there are a growing number of studies, which have evaluated efficacy, the frequency of hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in these patients. The purpose of this review is to take stock of use of Flash Glucose Monitoring in type 2 diabetic patients by examining international studies and Italian experiences, also reporting data on the costs and savings generated by use of this new technology. KEY WORDS Flash Glucose Monitoring; type 2 diabetes; basal-bolus insulin therapy; elderly with type 2 diabetes; diabetes costs.

FGM-based remote intervention for adults with type 1 diabetes: The FRIEND randomized clinical trial.

The use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) in conjunction with proper education has been reported to improve glycemic control in people with diabetes on insulin therapy. However, there are still few randomized controlled trials on the educational effect, and an ideal educational model has not been established. This study aimed to estimate the efficacy of remote intervention for glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes using FGM. In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, we enrolled adults with type 1 diabetes (HbA1c ≥7.0%). The participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either FGM use with remote intervention (intervention group) or FGM use only (control group). Changes in glycemic outcomes such as HbA1c levels and continuous glucose monitoring metrics were evaluated at 12 weeks. Among 36 randomized participants (mean age, 44.3 years; mean baseline HbA1c, 8.9%), 34 completed the study. The remote intervention did not significantly reduce HbA1c levels. FGM use significantly improved HbA1c levels by -1.4% and -0.8% in both groups with and without remote intervention, respectively (P=0.003 and P=0.004, respectively). However, the intervention group showed significant increases in time with glucose in the range of 70-180 mg/dL (TIR; from 49.8% to 60.9%, P=0.001) and significant decreases in time with hyperglycemia (P=0.002) and mean glucose (P=0.017), but the control group did not. Moreover, the TIR (P=0.019), time with hyperglycemia >250 mg/dL (P=0.019), and coefficient of variation (P=0.018) were significantly improved in the intervention group compared to the control group. In particular, the CGM metrics improved gradually as the remote intervention was repeated. Furthermore, the intervention group reported higher treatment satisfaction (P=0.016). Ongoing, personalized education during FGM use may lead to amelioration of glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes, even remotely. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04936633, identifier NCT04936633.

Abstract #1324365: Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring and Glycemic Control in Nonintensive Insulin Regimen Treated Patients with T2DM: One Year Real-Life Retrospective Cohort Study

Regular monitoring and measurement of glucose levels are required to ensure reasonable glycemic control and to prevent diabetes-related complications in patients. The Freestyle LibreTM flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system has significantly improved self-management by providing real-time access to their glucose profiles and guiding necessary steps for management based on the retrieved data. The term ‘glucose management indicator’ (GMI) was proposed to replace estimated A1c to avoid a misinterpretation that the value of this metric should always closely match a corresponding laboratory-measured A1c.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Flash Glucose Monitoring System for People with Type 2 Diabetes Receiving Intensive Insulin Treatment.

AimsFor people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on intensive insulin therapy, the use of flash continuous glucose monitoring (“flash monitoring”) is associated with improved average glucose control and/or reduced hypoglycemic exposure. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of flash monitoring versus traditional blood glucose monitoring (BGM) in people with T2D using intensive insulin in the United Kingdom (UK).MethodsThe IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model (IQVIA CDM; v9.0) was used to analyze the impact of flash monitoring versus BGM over a 40-year time horizon from the UK payer perspective. Model inputs included baseline characteristics, intervention effects, resource utilization, costs, and utilities, based on recently published literature and national databases. UK National Health Service reimbursed costs of flash monitoring and BGM were used. An intervention-related health utility was obtained from a time trade-off study. Alternative scenarios were explored to assess the impact of key assumptions on base case results.ResultsIn base-case analysis, flash monitoring compared with BGM resulted in an incremental cost of £5781 and an additional 0.47 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This provides an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £12,309/QALY. HbA1c and the intervention-related health utility were the key drivers of differentiation. All scenario analyses, including different discount rates, time horizons, effects on HbA1c and on the intervention-related health utility, as well as glycemic emergencies, generated ICERs of less than £20,000 per QALY.ConclusionsThe consistent results across base case and a range of scenario analyses indicate that long-term flash glucose monitoring use is cost-effective compared with BGM in a UK population of T2D on intensive insulin therapy based on updated clinical effects and a cost-effectiveness threshold of £20,000–30,000 per QALY. Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-022-01325-w.

Flash glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes managed with basal insulin in the USA: a retrospective real-world chart review study and meta-analysis

IntroductionEvidence supporting use of continuous glucose monitoring in type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin is unclear. This real-world study aimed to assess the impact on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of...

Flash glucose monitoringを用いて血糖値管理を行ったCOVID‒19で入院した糖尿病合併維持血液透析患者の3例

COVID‒19肺炎を伴う糖尿病血液透析患者において，高血糖は重症化や死亡リスクと関連するとされている．Flash glucose monitoring（FGM）は新しい連続的なセンサーによる皮下グルコースモニターである．われわれは3例のCOVID‒19肺炎を伴う糖尿病血液透析入院患者でFGMを経験した．COVID‒19肺炎は全例まずfavipiravirを投与，その後remdesivirとmethylprednisolone（mPSL）に続いてdexamethasoneを投与したが，mPSL開始時から血糖値が悪化しFGMを導入した．患者が発熱，倦怠感，混迷状態でもFGM施行可能であった．FGMは導入が容易で，グルコース値の改善が全例にみられ，スタッフと患者の接触回数も削減できた．COVID‒19合併糖尿病血液透析患者におけるFGMの正確性については今後の検討を要する．

The use of Flash glucose monitoring in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus in real clinical practice

BACKGROUND: In 2018, a Frestyle Libre flash glucose monitoring system (FGM) appeared in Russia and became a potential alternative to the traditional CGM. Studies carried out to date have shown the advantages of FGM over SMBG, but only a few of them relate to real clinical practice, especially in children with type 1 diabetes.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of FGM in children with T1DM in relation to glycemic control indicators, the occurrence of severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis, as well as the satisfaction of patients and their parents with the use of FGM.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center, prospective, observational cohort study. Children 4–18 years old with T1DM and HbA1c level less than 10.0% were invited to participate in the study on intensified insulin therapy (by MDI or CSII). The duration of the patient’s participation in the study was 6 months. At baseline and every 3 months thereafter, face-to-face consultations were conducted with an assessment of the general condition, HbA1c study, an assessment of glycemic indicators, progress in relation to glycemic control targets and correction of the therapy. A total of 228 patients (110 boys and 118 girls) who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study. The median age was 11.2 (8.6–14.7) years, the duration of type 1 diabetes was 3.8 (2–7.1), 136 patients received insulin therapy by CSII for 1.3 (0.8–2.6) years.RESULTS: In the general group of patients, 3 and 6 months after the start of FGM use, the HbA1c values decreased statistically significantly by 0.2%. In addition, the number of children with HbA1c &lt;7.5% increased by 6.1 and 4.9% at 3 and 6 months, respectively, but these changes were not statistically significant. The number of cases of DKA when using FGM decreased by 74%, and the number of cases of severe hypoglycemia by 83%, thus the number of episodes decreased by 4 and 6 times, respectively. Patients and / or their parents rated the ease of use and their experience with FGM on a scale from 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). The majority of children and parents positively (0 or 1) assessed the convenience of installing and wearing the sensor (72.7–98.2%) using the FGM system in general (75.0–96.4%) and in comparison with the SMBG glucometer (92.3–98.2%).CONCLUSION: The installation and use of FGM is convenient and comfortable for the vast majority of children and parents, while compared to SMBG, the use of FGM is more convenient and simpler, and glucose measurement is much faster and less painful.

The use of flash glucose monitoring significantly improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetes managed with basal bolus insulin therapy compared to self-monitoring of blood glucose: A prospective observational cohort study

AimThis prospective, observational cohort study aimed to measure HbA1c change over 3–6 months in type 2 diabetes managed with basal-bolus insulin and FreeStyle Libre® Flash Glucose Monitoring System (FSL) use compared to self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG). MethodsSixteen Italian hospitals enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 322, [109 FSL, 213 SMBG users]) using basal-bolus insulin therapy for ≥ 1 year, HbA1c 8.0–12.0% (64–108 mmol/mol), new to FSL use (<3 months) or continuing with SMBG (controls). Eligible FSL and SMBG users were matched (1:2 ratio) for baseline HbA1c (within ± 0.5%, recorded ≤ 3 months previously), study site and baseline data collection date. ResultsOverall, baseline HbA1c was 8.9 ± 0.8% (74 ± 9 mmol/mol), age 67.2 ± 10.0 years, BMI 30.5 ± 6.5 kg/m2 and insulin use duration 8.6 ± 6.6 years (mean ± SD), 56.2% were males. After 3–6 months, 234 complete cases (83 FSL, 151 SMBG users) demonstrated significantly reduced HbA1c for FSL use compared to SMBG (0.3% ± 0.12 [3 mmol/mol ± 1.3, (mean ± SE)], p = 0.0112). The difference remained statistically significant after adjusting for confounders. ConclusionsHbA1c significantly improved in basal-bolus treated type 2 diabetes after flash glucose monitoring use for 3–6 months compared to SMBG.

Improved HbA1c and reduced glycaemic variability after 1-year intermittent use of flash glucose monitoring

Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) was introduced in China in 2016, and it might improve HbA1c measurements and reduce glycaemic variability during T1DM therapy. A total of 146 patients were recruited from October 2018 to September 2019 in Liaocheng. The patients were randomly divided into the FGM group or self-monitoring blood glucose (SMBG) group. Both groups wore the FGM device for multiple 2-week periods, beginning with the 1st, 24th, and 48th weeks for gathering data, while blood samples were also collected for HbA1c measurement. Dietary guidance and insulin dose adjustments were provided to the FGM group patients according to their Ambulatory Glucose Profile (AGP) and to the SMBG group patients according to their SMBG measurements taken 3–4 times daily. All of the participants underwent SMBG measurements on the days when not wearing the FGM device. At the final visit, HbA1c, time in range (TIR), duration of hypoglycaemia and the number of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) events were taken as the main endpoints. There were no significant difference in the baseline characteristics of the two groups. At 24 weeks, the HbA1c level of the FGM group was 8.16 ± 1.03%, which was much lower than that of the SMBG group (8.68 ± 1.01%) (p = 0.003). The interquartile range (IQR), mean blood glucose (MBG), and the duration of hypoglycaemia in the FGM group also showed significant declines, compared with the SMBG group (p < 0.05), while the TIR increased in the FGM group [(49.39 ± 17.54)% vs (42.44 ± 15.49)%] (p = 0.012). At 48 weeks, the differences were more pronounced (p < 0.01). There were no observed changes in the number of episodes of DKA by the end of the study [(0.25 ± 0.50) vs (0.28 ± 0.51), p = 0.75]. Intermittent use of FGM by T1DM patients can improve their HbA1c and glycaemic control without increasing the hypoglycaemic exposure in insulin-treated individuals with type 1 diabetes in an developing country.

Factors influencing the effectiveness of using flash glucose monitoring on glycemic control for type 1 diabetes in Saudi Arabia.

BACKGROUNDIn 2017, 35000 Saudi children and adolescents were living with a type 1 diabetes (T1D) diagnosis. Diabetic complications are minimized upon strengthened glycemic regulation. The annual cost of treating diabetic patients with complications was four-fold higher than for patients without complications. The use of flash glucose monitoring (FGM) enables better diabetes treatment and thereby improves glycemic control. Understanding the factors that affect effectiveness of FGM will help enhance the device’s use and management of hospital resources, resulting in improved outcomes.AIMTo investigate factors that affect effectiveness of the FGM system for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels/glycemic control among T1D patients.METHODSA retrospective empirical analysis of T1D patient records from King Abdul-Aziz University Hospital and Prince Sultan Military Medical City was performed. T1D patients who began FGM between 2017 and 2019 were included.RESULTSThe data included 195 T1D patients (70 males and 125 females) with a mean age of 23.6 ± 8.1 years. Among them, 152 patients used multiple daily injection and 43 used an insulin pump. The difference in HbA1c level from baseline and after using FGM was -0.60 ± 2.10, with a maximum of 4.70 and a minimum of -6.30. There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the independent variables (age, duration of diabetes, level of engagement) and HbA1c. The group with the highest HbA1c mean (9.85) was 18-years-old, while the group with the lowest HbA1c mean (7.87) was 45-years-old. Patients with a low level of engagement (less than six scans per day) had the highest HbA1c mean (9.84), whereas those with a high level of engagement (more than eight scans per day) had the lowest HbA1c mean (8.33).CONCLUSIONWith proper education, FGM can help people with uncontrolled T1D over the age of 18 years to control their glucose level.

Two-year use of flash glucose monitoring is associated with sustained improvement of glycemic control and quality of life (FLARE-NL-6)

IntroductionThe FreeStyle Libre (FSL) is a flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system. The Flash Monitor Register in the Netherlands (FLARE-NL-4) study previously demonstrated the positive effects of FSL-FGM use during 1...

The Impact of Flash Glucose Monitoring on Markers of Glycaemic Control and Patient Satisfaction in Type 2 Diabetes.

Introduction: The effect of flash glucose monitoring on glycaemic control and patient satisfaction in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (T2D) from Saudi Arabia is uncertain. The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate the change in HbA1c (Hemoglobin A1c) and satisfaction with treatment following the initiation of flash glucose monitoring.Methods: This single-arm, single-centre prospective observational study included flash glucose monitoring-naive adult patients with T2D managed with multiple daily injections of insulin therapy (MDI) and HbA1c ≥7%. HbA1c was measured, and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ, Arabic version) and Glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Survey (GMSS) were completed at baseline and 12 weeks.Results: For participants (n=54) from one diabetes centre, HbA1c significantly improved by 0.44% from 8.22%±0.69 (mean±SD) at baseline to 7.78%±0.71 at 12 weeks, p<0.001. Confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes reduced from 4.43±1.51 episodes/month to 1.24±1.15 (-3.19, p<0.001). Glucose monitoring frequency improved, indicated by the number of scans per day, with a mean increase of 5.13 (p <0.001) tests/day. GMSS scores improved across all four categories, as did overall treatment satisfaction (p<0.001 for all categories). Patients perceived clear improvements across all questions relating to satisfaction and frequency of hypo- or hyperglycaemic episodes.Conclusion: Following initiation of flash glucose monitoring in patients with T2D and MDI insulin therapy, HbA1c improved with reduced hypoglycaemic events and increased patient-reported satisfaction. This study contributes valuable data on the use of flash glucose monitoring in this population, and a larger multicentre study is warranted to inform future health policy for T2D in Saudi Arabia.

Important Drop in Rate of Acute Diabetes Complications in People With Type 1 or Type 2 Diabetes After Initiation of Flash Glucose Monitoring in France: The RELIEF Study.

The RELIEF study assessed rates of hospitalization for acute diabetes complications in France before and after initiation of the FreeStyle Libre system. A total of 74,011 patients with type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes who initiated the FreeStyle Libre system were identified from the French national claims database with use of ICD-10 codes, from hospitalizations with diabetes as a contributing diagnosis, or the prescription of insulin. Patients were subclassified based on self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) strip acquisition prior to starting FreeStyle Libre. Hospitalizations for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), severe hypoglycemia, diabetes-related coma, and hyperglycemia were recorded for the 12 months before and after initiation. Hospitalizations for acute diabetes complications fell in type 1 diabetes (-49.0%) and in type 2 diabetes (-39.4%) following FreeStyle Libre initiation. DKA fell in type 1 diabetes (-56.2%) and in type 2 diabetes (-52.1%), as did diabetes-related comas in type 1 diabetes (-39.6%) and in type 2 diabetes (-31.9%). Hospitalizations for hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia decreased in type 2 diabetes (-10.8% and -26.5%, respectively). Before initiation, hospitalizations were most marked for people noncompliant with SMBG and for those with highest acquisition of SMBG, which fell by 54.0% and 51.2%, respectively, following FreeStyle Libre initiation. Persistence with FreeStyle Libre at 12 months was at 98.1%. This large retrospective study on hospitalizations for acute diabetes complications shows that a significantly lower incidence of admissions for DKA and for diabetes-related coma is associated with use of flash glucose monitoring. This study has significant implications for patient-centered diabetes care and potentially for long-term health economic outcomes.

New Innovation: Use of Flash Glucose Monitoring for Evaluating Glycaemic Variability, Patient Satisfaction and Clinical Utility in Pregnant Women with Diabetes.

Application of Flash glucose monitoring (FGM) system to evaluate glycaemic variability (GV), patient satisfaction and clinical utility in pregnant women with diabetes. This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary care teaching hospital on 70 pregnant women with diabetes where blood sugar levels were monitored by FGM and self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). FGM generated 19,950 readings versus 1470 readings by SMBG over 3days. Glucose values measured by FGM and SMBG had significant positive correlation (r > 0.89; p < 0.001). Significant difference (p < 0.001) was present between minimum glucose values by FGM (52.49 ± 15.42mg/dl) and SMBG (72.74 ± 18.30mg/dl). FGM (20.9%) was able to pick exact duration of hypoglycaemia, while one-third of this duration was missed by conventional SMBG (14.7%; p < 0.05). Hypoglycaemic episodes were observed in 92.9% women by FGM as compared to 45.7% by SMBG (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in maximum glucose level or duration of hyperglycaemia by both methods. FGM identified hyperglycaemia in 74% women vs. 52% by SMBG (p < 0.001). GV calculated by using MODD by FGM was 118.4 ± 52.4mg/dl and by SMBG was 83.2 ± 53.2mg/dl (p < 0.001). 100% women preferred AGP vs. SMBG. This is the first study to evaluate FGM for GV and patient satisfaction in women with GDM. Significant correlation was observed in glucose values by FGM and SMBG. FGM was more sensitive in detecting GV and hypoglycaemic excursions as compared to SMBG. All women preferred FGM over SMBG. Use of FGM gave new insights in clinical management of challenging cases.