Flanking Bars Research Articles

Spatial Interactions in Interocular and Monocular "Blur Suppression".

The suppression of blurred images in one eye by clear images in the other eye is thought to contribute to the success of monovision correction. We show that interocular suppression occurs also for low-contrast targets that are not blurred and, to a lesser extent, when clear and low-contrast targets are presented to the same eye. A blurred target presented to one eye may be suppressed when a clear target is presented to the other eye. We sought to determine how this interocular suppression varies according to the separation between the blurred and clear targets and the magnitude of imposed blur. In addition, we examined whether a similar suppression occurs when the clear and blurred targets are imaged in the same eye. Subjects (N = 4) viewed a clear 20/40 Sloan letter surrounded by four 2 × 10 min-arc flanking bars. In different blocks of trials, the gap between the letter and flanking bars varied from 0.5 to 4 bar widths. In addition, the flanking bars were either clear or spatially filtered to simulate 0.5 to 2 D of blur. The contrast required to detect the flanking bars was determined when the letter and flanking bars were presented either dichoptically or monoptically and compared with the thresholds for the bar targets presented alone. In both dichoptic and monoptic viewing conditions, detection thresholds for the blurred flanking bars are highest for the smallest spatial gap and decrease systematically as the gap increases. Thresholds are uniformly higher during dichoptic than monocular viewing, but the proportional change with the bar-to-letter separation is similar in both conditions. Surprisingly, the magnitude of imposed blur has very little influence on the magnitude of threshold elevation in either the dichoptic or monoptic viewing conditions. Because threshold elevation is nearly the same in the presence of 0 to 2 D of blur, we prefer to designate the phenomenon we studied as "contrast suppression." The similar spatial characteristics of suppression during dichoptic and monoptic viewing are consistent with contributions from a common neural mechanism.

Upturn of the contour-interaction function at small flanking bar-to-target separations

Nearby flanking bars degrade letter identification and resolution, a phenomenon known as contour interaction. However, many previous studies found that the relationship between foveal letter identification and flanker separation is non-monotonic, with an upturn in performance at very small target-to-flanker separations. Here, we replicate this observation and show that a similar upturn occurs also for targets presented at 5 deg in the inferior field, if the target-to-flanker separation is sufficiently small. The presence and magnitude of the observed performance upturn depends on the flanking-bar width, being more evident for narrower compared to wider flanking bars. We interpret our results to indicate that neural interactions between nearby contours reduce performance when the target and flanking bars form discrete neural images. At sufficiently small separations, the images of the target and flanking bars can not be distinguished and performance is governed by the contrast of the target in the blended neural image.

Contrast Energy and Contour Interaction.

Contour interaction describes an impairment of visual acuity produced by nearby flanking features, which exerts a significant impact in many clinical tests of visual acuity. Our results indicate that the magnitude of interaction depends either on the flanker contrast energy (i.e., the product of flanker contrast and width) or the flanker contrast alone, depending on the contrast energy of the flankers. The discrimination of acuity targets is impaired by the presence of nearby flanking contours, a phenomenon known as contour interaction. In this study, we measured percent correct identification for threshold size, high-contrast Sloan letters at the fovea and at 5° in the inferior visual field for different combinations of flanking-bar width, and Weber contrast corresponding to specific fixed values of contrast energy (width × contrast, in %-min arc). For flanking bars with low-contrast energy, contour interaction exhibited no systematic dependence on the flanking-bar width. However, when the flanking bars had higher contrast energy, narrower high-contrast bars produced significantly greater contour interaction than wider bars of lower contrast. The results are consistent with the interpretation that contour interaction depends primarily on the contrast energy of flanking contours when their contrast energy is low. As the contrast energy of the flanking contours increases, the magnitude of contour interaction depends on the flanker contrast. For high-contrast flanking contours, the magnitude of contour interaction saturates when the width of the flanking contours is approximately 20% of letter size.

Now you feel it, now you don't: Motivated attention to emotional content is modulated by age and task demands.

Several studies with younger adults have examined the degree to which emotion captures attention using the event-related potentials (ERP) technique, but it is unknown whether there are age-related differences on this issue. We examined ERP correlates of age-related differences in processing of task-relevant and task-irrelevant emotional material. Participants viewed emotional or neutral images, presented at fixation, flanked by two bars of either differing or matching orientation. In one set of trials, participants decided whether the pictures were presented in black-and-white or color; in another set of trials, they made a match/judgment on the flanking bars. Before the experiment proper, we determined each individual's threshold for line orientation (in the presence of neutral pictures at fixation); mismatch bar stimuli were constructed using this threshold, thus equating baseline performance on the bar tasks across individuals. When attention was focused on the images, ERPs provided evidence for emotion-based processing in the younger group, regardless of valence; older adults showed more differentiated valence-based processing as reflected by a positivity effect (in line with socioemotional selectivity theory). When the images were task-irrelevant, older adults showed no evidence of emotional processing whatsoever; younger adults showed a pattern of suppression in the form of reduced processing of emotional material relative to neutral images. These findings suggest that, once performance on a neutral baseline task is equated, older adults do not exhibit a specific age-related deficit in inhibiting emotional material; they also suggest qualitative differences in processing of to-be-ignored emotional material in younger and older adults.

Dissecting the influence of the collinear and flanking bars in White’s effect

In White’s effect equiluminant test patches placed on the black and white bars of a square-wave grating appear different in brightness. The illusion has generated intense interest because the direction of the brightness effect does not correlate with the amount of black or white border in contact with the test patch, or in its general vicinity. Therefore, unlike brightness induction effects such as simultaneous contrast, White’s effect is not consistent with explanations based on contrast or assimilation that depend solely on the relative amounts of black and white surrounding the test patches. We independently manipulated the luminance of the collinear and flanking bars to investigate their influence on test patch matching luminance (brightness). The inducing grating was a 0.5c/d square-wave and test patches measured 1.0° in width and either 0.5° or 3.0° in height. Test patches measuring 0.5° in height had more extensive contact with the collinear bars and test patches measuring 3.0° in height had more extensive contact with the flanking bars. The luminance of the collinear (or flanking) bars assumed twenty values from 3.2 to 124.8cd/m2, while the luminance of the flanking (or collinear) bars remained white (124.8cd/m2) or black (3.2cd/m2). Under these conditions the influence of the collinear and flanking bars was found to be purely in the direction of contrast. The effect was dominated by contrast from the collinear bars (which results in White’s effect), however, the influence of the flanking bars was also in the contrast direction. The data elucidate the luminance relationships between the collinear and flanking bars which produce the behavior associated with White’s effect as well as that associated with “the inverted White effect” which is akin to simultaneous contrast.

Dissecting the influence of the collinear and flanking bars in White's effect

In White's equiluminant test patches placed on black and white bars of a square-wave grating appear different in brightness. The illusion has generated intense interest because direction of brightness does not correlate with amount of black or white border in contact with test patch, or in its general vicinity. Therefore, unlike brightness induction effects such as simultaneous contrast, White's is not consistent with explanations based on contrast or assimilation that depend solely on relative amounts of black and white surrounding test patches. We independently manipulated luminance of collinear and flanking bars to investigate their influence on test patch matching luminance (brightness). The inducing grating was a 0.5c/d square-wave and test patches measured 1.0° in width and either 0.5° or 3.0° in height. Test patches measuring 0.5° in height had more extensive contact with collinear bars and test patches measuring 3.0° in height had more extensive contact with flanking bars. The luminance of collinear (or flanking) bars assumed twenty values from 3.2 to 124.8cd/m(2), while luminance of flanking (or collinear) bars remained white (124.8cd/m(2)) or black (3.2cd/m(2)). Under these conditions influence of collinear and flanking bars was found to be purely in direction of contrast. The was dominated by contrast from collinear bars (which results in White's effect), however, influence of flanking bars was also in contrast direction. The data elucidate luminance relationships between collinear and flanking bars which produce behavior associated with White's as well as that associated with the inverted White effect which is akin to simultaneous contrast.

Foveal crowding differs in children and adults.

We used custom-designed acuity tests to compare the magnitude and extent of crowded letter recognition in children and adults. Visual acuity (logMAR) was measured monocularly in children and adults using five custom-designed letter tests with varying degrees of crowding: single letter, single letter surrounded by four flanking bars, single letter surrounded by four flanking letters, line of five letters surrounded by flanking bars, and line of five letters surrounded by flanking letters. The tests were constructed using Sloan letters and presented on an iPad (Apple Incorporated, Cupertino, CA) at 4 m using a standardized endpoint and instructions. Crowded logMAR was normalized to unflanked logMAR and results were analyzed in three groups: younger children aged 4-6 (n = 32), older children, aged 7-9 (n = 30), and adults (n = 27). Both groups of children showed a greater extent of crowding than the adults. The adult participants showed no difference in performance between single or linear presentation and letter or bar flankers. Letter flankers and linear presentation individually resulted in poorer performance in the younger children p < 0.001 and p = 0.003, respectively (mean normalized logMAR 0.17 in each case) and together had an additive effect (mean 0.24), p < 0.001. Crowding in the older children was adult-like except in the linear presentation with letter flankers, p < 0.001. These results indicate that both target-flanker similarity and linear presentation contribute more to foveal crowding in young children than in adults.

Contour interaction for foveal acuity targets at different luminances

Single-letter visual acuity is impaired by nearby flanking stimuli, a phenomenon known as contour interaction. We showed previously that when foveal acuity is degraded by a reduction of letter contrast, both the magnitude and angular spatial extent of foveal contour interaction remain unchanged. In this study, we asked whether contour interaction also remains unchanged when foveal visual acuity is degraded by a reduction of the target's background luminance. Percent correct letter identification was measured for isolated, near-threshold black Sloan letters and for letters surrounded by 4 flanking bars in 10 normal observers, 5 at Anglia Ruskin University, UK (ARU) and 5 at Palacky University, Czech Republic (PU). A stepwise reduction in the background luminance over 3 log units resulted in an approximately threefold increase in the near-threshold letter size. At each background luminance, black flanking bars with a width equal to 1 letter stroke were presented at separations between approximately 0.45 and 4.5 min arc (ARU) or 0.32 and 3.2 min arc (PU). The results indicate that the angular extent of contour interaction remains unchanged at approximately 4 min arc at all background luminances. On the other hand, the magnitude of contour interaction decreases systematically as luminance is reduced, from approximately a 50% reduction to a 30% reduction in percent correct. The constant angular extent and decreasing magnitude of contour interaction with a reduction of background luminance suggest foveal contour interaction is mediated by luminance-dependent lateral inhibition within a fixed angular region.

Foveal contour interaction for low contrast acuity targets

Previous investigators reported the impairment of foveal visual acuity by nearby flanking targets (contour interaction) is reduced or eliminated when acuity is measured using low contrast targets. Unlike earlier studies, we compared contour interaction for high and low contrast acuity targets using flankers at fixed angular separations, rather than at specific multiples of the acuity target’s stroke width. Percent correct letter identification was determined in 4 adult observers for computer generated, high and low contrast dark Sloan letters surrounded by 4 equal contrast flanking bars. Two low contrast targets were selected to reduce each observer’s visual acuity by 0.2 and 0.4 logMAR. The contour interaction functions measured for high and low contrast letters are very similar when percent correct letter identification is plotted against the flanker separation in min arc. These results indicate that contour interaction of foveal acuity targets occurs within a fixed angular zone of a few min arc, regardless of the size or contrast of the acuity target.

Temporally offset motion-induced spatial misalignment

We investigated the effect of visual motion on apparent spatial location [1]. A rotating (40 rpm) black bar (2.7°) on a white background was flanked by two smaller horizontal bars (10.8 min arc) that flashed in synchrony with the bar. We measured the apparent vertical misalignment of the flanking bars as a function of the angular position of the rotating bar using a binary choice psychophysical procedure. The vertical offset of the flashed bars was varied systematically over trials and subjects reported which was the higher of the two bars. Surprisingly, the greatest effect (perceived misalignment ∼20 min arc) was found when the bar was around 30° of rotation before the horizontal rather than when the bar was closest to the flashed bars. The effect was replicated in a subsequent experiment using a number of naive subjects. We found a significant misalignment 30° before the horizontal and no misalignment 30° before the vertical. This induced effect demonstrates that spatial position information is maximally affected by motion information present 125 msec before the rotating bar reaches the flash position. This critical angle before the horizontal is consistent with previous flash-lag measurements showing a similar sized lag between the rotating bar and flash[2]. Thus the flanker misalignment is maximal when bar and flash are perceived to be aligned rather than when they are truly aligned. We believe that this spatial misalignment may result from a cortical feedback mechanism [1,3] that updates position information during motion.

Unmasking the standing wave of invisibility: An account in terms of object-mediated representational updating

A central bar presented in counterphase with two flanking bars creates the perception of only two bars, instead of three, flickering (standing wave of invisibility illusion). Current explanations of this illusion highlight the importance of local interactions between the central bar and the flankers as a reason for the invisibility of the central bar. In three experiments, we show that the reduction in visibility of the central bar occurs even when the flankers are spatially separated from the central bar. Thus local mechanisms-low-level lateral inhibition or border-ownership competition-do not suffice to account for the decreased visibility. Furthermore, the reduced visibility of the central bar is accompanied by the perception of the flankers in apparent motion at all separations. We suggest an account of the standing wave phenomenon in terms of object updating: The representation of the central bar is updated with the representation of the flankers leaving the perception of just the flankers moving across space. The stimuli for the key conditions from this study, in QuickTime format, may be down loaded from http://app.psychonomic-journals.org/content/supplemental.

Lateral Masking in Cycling Displays: The Relative Importance of Separation, Flanker Duration, and Interstimulus Interval for Object-Mediated Updating

A central bar repeatedly presented in alternation with two flanking bars can lead to the disappearance of the central bar. Recently it has been suggested that this masking effect could be explained by object-mediated updating: the information from the central bar is integrated into the representation of the flankers, leading not only to the disappearance of the central bar as a separate object, but also to the perception of the flankers in apparent motion between their real position and the position of the central bar. This account suggests that the visibility of the central bar should depend on the same factors as those that influence the construction and maintenance of object representations. Therefore separation between central bar and flankers should not influence visibility as long as the time interval between them is adequate to make an interpretation of the scene in terms of one object moving from one location to the other possible location. We found that if the time interval between the central bar and the flankers is neither too short nor too long, the central bar becomes invisible even at large separations. These findings are inconsistent with traditional accounts of the cycling lateral masking displays in terms of local inhibitory mechanisms.

Target Visibility in the Standing Wave Illusion: Is Mask—Target Shape Similarity Important?

The perceptibility of a flickering central bar can be dramatically reduced by the presence of two flanking bars presented in counterphase. This phenomenon, known as the 'standing wave illusion', has been suggested to involve local edge interactions (Macknik et al, 2000 Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 97 7556-7560). High-level re-entrant mechanisms have also been implicated. Enns (2002, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 489-496) reports an association between the reported viability of the centre bar and its similarity in shape with the flanking bars. We find that this relationship between shape similarity and reported visibility seems to be contingent on the degree of experienced apparent motion. When target duration is shortened, so reducing apparent motion, reports of visibility reflect the amount of abutting contour. In a further experiment we find that luminance discriminations of the centre bar are related to the amount of abutting contour not to shape similarity. This is despite experiment 3 being conducted at stimulus durations for which experiment 2 visibility ratings indicated that shape similarity is important and contour is not. We suggest that this perceived motion may be the factor mediating shape 'effects' in the reported visibility task. We propose that the absence of such shape effects in the discrimination task may be because the task provides an objective measure of visibility that is immune to bias from perceived motion. We also speculate that while target luminance information may be immune to masking resulting from perceived motion, it may be subject to masking due to lateral inhibition.

Foveal contour interaction: detection and discrimination

Contour interaction, the detrimental effect of flanking features on the discrimination of optotypes, has been studied mainly close to the visual acuity limit. We were interested to know how these results compare with those for the detection of targets. According to the simplest model of contour interaction, comparable detection effects would be expected. The case for low-level masking would be further strengthened if the form and nature of the dependence on flank separation and flank polarity followed that typically found in studies of lateral spatial masking [Vision Res. 33, 993 (1993)]. Landolt Cs subtending a visual angle of 0.25 degrees, 0.5 degrees, and 1.0 degrees were presented and contrast thresholds for detecting the presence of the Landolt C and discriminating its orientation were measured in five normal subjects as a function of flank separation and flank polarity. The results obtained for the relationship between detection and discrimination depend on the size of the target used. For small letters, discrimination but not detection was significantly affected by flanking bars. For large letters, detection and discrimination were affected to the same extent. However, in this case the effectiveness of opposite-polarity flanks and the finding that facilitation occurred at close, not far, flank separations suggests that the simplest explanation in terms of masking may not be applicable.

Crowding under scotopic conditions

Under certain circumstances, a subject's ability to discriminate spatial features of a target may be hampered by neighbouring contours. This phenomenon is popularly known as the “crowding effect”, and it has been intensely studied for photopic vision: little attention has been paid to the effect at lower light levels. The underlying basis of the crowding effect has recently provoked some conjecture, with Hess and colleagues claiming that a passive “physical” phenomenon may either wholly [Vis. Res. 40 (2000) 365], or partially [J. Opt. Soc. Am. A––Opt. Image Sci. Vis. 17 (2000) 1516], account for the effect. In order to investigate the crowding effect under scotopic conditions, we conducted scotopic frequency of seeing experiments for Landolt C targets presented both with, and without, flanking bars; the size of the targets was varied so that frequency of seeing curves could be derived for each stimulus condition. Our results suggest that the spatial extent of crowding is significantly less for scotopic vision than for photopic vision at the same eccentricity––furthermore the effect does not seem to scale in proportion to target size. We also compared the resulting empirical curves to those that would be predicted by the hypothesis of Hess and colleagues. Our results do not support the hypothesis that the scotopic crowding effect is caused by a passive physical process.

Foveal contrast thresholds exhibit spatial-frequency- and polarity-specific contour interactions

Traditionally, contour interaction has been investigated at the visual acuity limit using a Landolt C and flanking bars, performance being quantified in terms of a percent correct measure. More recently, it has been shown that the properties of the contour interaction are different when larger stimuli are used: Contour interaction is not polarity specific, and spatial frequency tuning for an unflanked C is broader. Here we quantify contour interaction for stimuli 5x larger than the resolution limit in terms of contrast thresholds. We show that polarity of bars has little effect on unfiltered stimuli but does show very different effects on the spatial-frequency-tuning curves for discrimination of the Landolt C. This explains the polarity dependence of crowding at the visual acuity limit and its independence for larger unfiltered targets. Thus the underlying filtering function is composed of more than one mechanism, affected differently depending on the relative polarity of the test and flank contours.

Visual binding in the standing wave illusion.

When two video frames are alternated at the appropriate rate, one with a central bar and the other with two flanking bars, the central bar becomes invisible. Competing explanations for this standing wave illusion are examined, with the results showing an influence of higher level shape representations on lower level edge processes. In Experiment 1, flanking bar duration was found to be more important to masking than central bar duration. Experiment 2 showed strong nonlocal effects in that masking of the central bar depended critically on whether it appeared in the same video frame as other visible bars. Experiments 3 and 4 showed that the contour shared by bars in separate frames was a less important factor than shape and surface similarity. This illusion is therefore an excellent tool for studying recursive interactions between higher level object representations and lower level contour processes.

Can the amplitude difference spectrum peak frequency explain the foveal crowding effect?

Hess et al. (Vision Res. 40 (2000) 365) found that the peak frequency of the amplitude difference spectrum (ADS) of a Landolt C/flanking bar configuration was higher than that of an isolated C. They believed that this mismatch in the dominant frequency components could account for the foveal crowding effect. The following empirical and theoretical studies were conducted to evaluate this new explanation. First, the foveal crowding effect between a Landolt C and four flanking bars was measured under same- and mixed-polarity conditions. Significant crowding was found under the mixed-polarity condition. This result is different from the data that Hess et al. used to support their explanation of the foveal crowding effect. Second, analytical expressions for the Fourier transforms of C/flanking bar configurations were derived. ADS for various ring/bar separations and contrast polarities were calculated using these expressions. This analysis showed several discrepancies between ADS peak frequency predictions and empirical data. Therefore, the ADS peak frequency of the stimulus configuration does not provide an adequate explanation for the foveal crowding effect.

Dual oriented mechanisms in contour interaction

Foveal visual acuity is impaired by the presence of contours that surround the target (contour interaction (CI)). In order to determine the roles of various surrounding contours, visual acuities for a square C were measured in the presence of four and two flanking bars. Bars of different orientations relative to the gap of the C produced different CI patterns. The CI produced by a pair of bars was alleviated by adding another pair of bars of an orthogonal orientation. These results indicate that CI is mediated by not one, but at least two orientation selective mechanisms that actively inhibit each other.

Contour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers

We investigate the influence of stimulus contrast upon contour interaction in normal and amblyopic subjects. Using a computer generated acuity task, flanked and unflanked acuities were measured psychometrically at both high contrast (80%) and low contrast (6%), in a group of 19 normal and 11 amblyopic subjects. The crowding ratio for high contrast letters was found to be significantly higher than that for low contrast letters. The extent of the crowding zone was measured at high and low contrast by varying the separation of the optotype and flanking bars. The crowding zone measurement was repeated for the high contrast optotypes using dioptric blur. The position of the flanking contours was found to have a significant effect on letter resolution at high contrast but no significant effect was demonstrable at low contrast. With the addition of dioptric blur the effect of contour interaction became negligible at high contrast. These findings support the hypothesis that the crowding effect is: (1) similar in normal and amblyopic eyes when tested at threshold; (2) is contrast dependent appearing only for high contrast optotypes.