Kidneys are a retroperitoneal organ but the widely practiced laparoscopic approach torenal surgery is transperitoneal due to the advantages of greater working spaceat the cost of entering the peritoneal cavity, risk of injury to intraperitoneal organs, and the increased risk of postoperative bowel complications. The classic open approach to kidney procedures has been the flank approach without violating the peritoneal cavity instead of the retroperitoneal approach to renal surgery with the advantages of direct access to the renal hilum, especially the renal artery. Being a technically challenging procedure,the retroperitoneoscopic approach is less practiced and needs an experienced surgical team. Through this study, we have tried to unveil the myths and illustrate the exact position of ports, which is the decisive initial step in retroperitoneoscopic surgery. This retrospective study was conducted at a developing tertiary centerin northern India with novice staffmainly todetermine the technical and anatomical caveats pertaining to the retroperitoneoscopic approach for renal surgeries, the challenges faced, and their resolutions. The decision for the site of incision for primary or camera port was taken only after a proper anatomical study of the cadavers and ongoing retroperitoneal surgical experience while treating various patients suffering from renal diseases. The study comprised eight patients, during the period from June 2023 to March 2024. Various parameters, such as demographic variables, diagnosis, mean operative time, estimated blood loss, technical difficulties encountered and their resolution, complications, and reasons for conversion were studied.A total of 15 cadavers were dissected during the above time period to study finer anatomical details of port positioning and other details. After an elaborate study of 15 cadaversand thereafter performing surgeryon eight patients during the above time period, surgery was successfully performed on six patients, and two patients needed conversion to open procedure due to dense adhesions and non-progression whilecomplications occurred in two patients (peritoneal rent and renal vein injury), which were managed laparoscopically. Nonetheless, restrictions of surgical space make retroperitoneoscopic space a challenging procedure but with elaborate experience, which we gained through cadaveric study, and surgical results obtained during the initial few cases such as the exact site of the primary port and technical intricacies, and handling of complications if and when faced, we hope our study will certainly make retroperitoneal space more amicable to urologists.
Read full abstract