Abstract

You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022V13-05 A NOVEL SUPINE APPROACH TO ROBOTIC RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY AND LEVEL III INFERIOR VENA CAVA THROMBECTOMY Christopher Dall, James Mason, Charlotte Goldman, Sholklapper Tamir, Jason Hawksworth, and Keith Kowalczyk Christopher DallChristopher Dall More articles by this author , James MasonJames Mason More articles by this author , Charlotte GoldmanCharlotte Goldman More articles by this author , Sholklapper TamirSholklapper Tamir More articles by this author , Jason HawksworthJason Hawksworth More articles by this author , and Keith KowalczykKeith Kowalczyk More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002646.05AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Although multiple surgeons have successfully performed robotic nephrectomy and thrombectomy for level I-II thrombus, robotic nephrectomy with thrombectomy for level III-IV tumors is less common given the complexity of such cases and difficulty with visualization of the retrohepatic IVC. We describe our experience performing a robotic right radical nephrectomy with thrombectomy of a level III (IVC) thrombus utilizing a novel multidisciplinary approach with urologic oncology and hepatobiliary surgery services. METHODS: A 37-year-old male presented with back pain and a new 6.7x7cm right renal mass with level III tumor thrombus and a single enlarged retrocaval node without evidence of metastasis. The patient was taken for robotic-assisted laparoscopic right radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy and lymph node dissection jointly with the urology and hepatobiliary teams. Rather than utilizing the common transperitoneal flank approach, the patient was placed in a supine position with a small bump under the right flank, and ports were placed in the lower abdomen aligned towards the right shoulder as commonly placed during robotic liver resections. A gelport was placed in the lower abdomen to allow for easy access to the abdomen in the case of intraoperative bleeding (Image 1). The retrohepatic IVC was circumferentially dissected up to the level of the hepatic veins and clamped above the tumor thrombus. The thrombus was excised and the cavotomy primarily closed robotically. RESULTS: Operative time was 384 minutes and the IVC clamp time was 33 minutes. No intraoperative blood transfusions were administered. Final pathology showed pT3bN1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Postoperatively, the patient was anticoagulated for three months. Patient remains free of disease without adjuvant therapy at 10 months followup. CONCLUSIONS: Radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy can be safely performed robotically, however higher level tumors are challenging and require a multidisciplinary approach. We describe a novel approach to these challenging cases utilizing a novel port placement that allows for superior dissection of the retrohepatic IVC for level III thrombus. This approach allows excellent visualization and access to the IVC and should be considered in select patients. Source of Funding:- © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e1032 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Christopher Dall More articles by this author James Mason More articles by this author Charlotte Goldman More articles by this author Sholklapper Tamir More articles by this author Jason Hawksworth More articles by this author Keith Kowalczyk More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call