Fixation Of Humeral Fractures Research Articles

Incidence and risk factors of ulnar nerve dysfunction after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral intercondylar fractures

Objective: To investigate the incidence and related risk factors of ulnar nerve dysfunction after open reduction and internal fixation of humeral intercondylar fractures. Methods: A total of 168 patients who underwent open reduction and plate and screw fixation of a humeral intercondylar fracture between January 2013 and May 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. There were 85 males and 83 females, aged from 14 to 77 years with a mean age of (43±17) years. Diagnosis of ulnar neuropathy was defined as documentation of sensory and motor dysfunction of the ulnar nerve in the medical record. The explanatory (independent) variables included age, gender, injury type, AO typing, time from injury to surgery, surgery approach, plates fixation methods and whether the nerve was transposed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors associated with postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction. Results: Acute injury-related ulnar nerve neuropathy was diagnosed in 12(7.1%) of 168 patients. Among the other 156 patients without preoperative ulnar nerve neuropathy,the total postoperative ulnar neuropathy was found in 52 patients (33.3%), and in 26(16.7%) at the final follow-up, according to the McGowan grades system; 23(88.5%) of 26 patients were clinically graded as grade 1, and 3(11.5%) were graded as grade 2. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that triceps sparing approach (OR=2.639, P=0.039) and parallel double plate fixation (OR=3.089, P=0.046) were associated with a risk of postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction. Conclusion: There is a substantial incidence of postoperative ulnar nerve dysfunction after open reduction and plate and screw fixation of humeral intercondylar fracture, postoperative ulnar neuropathy may occur from the time of injury through the long-term follow-up period, triceps sparing approach and parallel double plate fixation are the risk factors for ulnar neuropathy.

Comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction-internal fixation for proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis based on 1050 individuals

BackgroundThis meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and complications of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) and open reduction–internal fixation (ORIF) in patients with proximal humeral fractures.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid, and the Cochrane Library to identify all relevant studies from inception to April 2019. Cochrane Collaboration’s Review Manage 5.3 was used for meta-analysis.ResultsSixteen studies involving 1050 patients (464 patients in the MIPO group and 586 patients in the ORIF group) were finally included. According to the meta-analysis, MIPO was superior to ORIF in operation time, blood loss, postoperative pain, fracture union time, and constant score. However, MIPO was associated with more exposure to radiation and axillary nerve injury. No significant differences were found in length of hospital stays and complication except for axillary nerve injury.ConclusionThe present evidence indicates that compared to ORIF, MIPO had advantages in functional outcomes, operation time, blood loss, postoperative pain, and fracture union time for the treatment of PHFs. However, the MIPO technique had a higher rate of axillary nerve injury and longer radiation time compared to ORIF.

Retrospective study of open reduction and internal fixation of lateral humeral condyle fractures with absorbable screws and absorbable sutures in children.

Background:Lateral humeral condyle fractures are the second most common elbow fracture in children. Displaced and rotated fractures require stabilization and reduction. Kirschner wires (K-wires) are most commonly used in the fixation of these fractures. Here, we introduce a new fixation method that uses an absorbable screw. We aim to determine if it is feasible to treat lateral humeral condyle fractures with an absorbable screw by comparing functional outcomes following absorbable screw fixation vs. K-wire fixation.Methods:Between May 2007 and September 2010, 86 patients were treated with absorbable screws (43 patients) or K-wire (43 patients). All patients had been diagnosed with lateral condyle fractures that were classified as either Jacob type II (unstable) or III. One absorbable screw (3.5 mm-diameter) was used for fixation in 1 group, while two 1.6 to 1.8 mm K-wires were used in the other group. Patients were followed 6 months about the elbow function according to Broberg and Morrey standard. On 5–7 years, the patients were followed about the carrying angle (valgus deformities and varus deformities), range of motion (flexion loss and extension loss), prominent lateral condyle, symptomatic implants, and fishtail deformity.Results:Anatomic reduction was achieved in all patients. Each group had one radial nerve injury that were present preoperatively. Nerve function recovered spontaneously within 3 to 4 weeks of surgery in both patients. No patient developed necrosis of the capitulum in both groups. Nine patients in K-wires group and 2 in absorbable screw group developed symptomatic implants (P = .048). On the sixth month, there was no significant difference on elbow function according to Broberg and Morrey standard. On 5 to 7 years (average, 6.7 ± 1.3 years), valgus deformities was 6.8 ± 1.2 vs 5.7 ± 0.8, varus deformities was 7.2 ± 1.5 vs 5.1 ± 1.9, flexion loss was 12.4 ± 2.2 vs 9.5 ± 3.1, extension loss was 11.1 ± 3.1 vs 10.2 ± 2.7, prominent lateral condyle was 27.9% vs 37.2%, fishtail deformity was 7.3% vs 4.9%, no significant difference between these groups.Conclusions:Open reduction with absorbable screw fixation is feasible and safe for the treatment of lateral condyle fractures of the humerus in children.Level of Evidence:Therapeutic III.

Is a radiograph needed one week after internal fixation of a supracondylar humeral fracture?

Displaced supracondylar fractures of the humerus (SCFH) require surgical treatment, most commonly closed reduction with pin fixation. Postoperative displacement following pin fixation is uncommon. Routinely, an early follow-up visit with a radiograph was recommended after fixation of SCFH. The aim of this study was to examine the rate of displacement of SCHF treated with pin fixation using objective radiologic measurements and to determine the need for the early follow-up radiographs. We retrospectively reviewed 161 patients with displaced SFCH treated surgically. The primary outcome measure was loss of reduction (LOR). We examined patient and fracture characteristics and postoperative complications. LOR was defined as a change of 5° or more in measurement of Bauman's angle or the lateral capitellohumeral angle. After applying exclusion criteria, the study group consisted of 131 patients; 87 (66.4%) were male; the left limb was involved in 76 patients (58%); 98 were classified as Gartland type 3 (74.8%); 118 patients had extension type fractures (90%); complications included nerve injury in 32 patients (24.4%), mostly involving the ulnar nerve (17, 13%). Pin-tract infection occurred in four patients (3%). LOR was found in five patients (3.8%). In all these patients, there was evidence of inadequate fixation in the intraoperative radiographs. When adequate fixation is obtained intraoperatively, the next follow-up radiograph is recommended after 3 weeks, at the time of pin removal.

Quantitative localization of the entry point of the lateral ascending branch of the anterior circumflex humeral artery: a high definition CT-scan radiological study.

To define the localization of the entry point of the lateral ascending branch of the anterior circumflex humeral artery (LACHA) for better surgical management and prevention of injury to this important vessel. The hypothesis is that the insertion point of the artery will be constant in subjects. A retrospective study of 27 tomographic images was conducted to generate a three-dimensional (3D) model and localize the entry point of the LACHA. Using a coordinate system consisting of three axes: the proximal-distal axis (PDA), the anterior-posterior axis (APA) and the medial-lateral axis (MLA), the position of a foramen located in the superior portion of the bicipital groove and representing the entry point of LACHA was measured on each reconstructed model. On average, the foramen was located 10.0mm distal along the PDA from the most proximal point of the greater tuberosity (GT). Along the MLA and with respect to the most medial portion of the GT, the foramen was located 3.4mm medially, on average. No significant differences between men and women or between sides for foramen position measurements were found. Unnecessary procedures to the proximal biceps, aiming to prevent chronic pain, should be avoided in fracture fixation as they would affect a significant source of blood supply to the humeral head. These findings could help surgeons protect the only vascular supply they can during the fixation of proximal humeral fractures, when using the anterior or antero-lateral approaches.

Complications and Long-Term Outcomes of Open Reduction and Plate Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures.

The optimal treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures in adults remains controversial. We evaluated the risk of complications and the long-term outcomes in patients with a severely displaced fracture or a fracture-dislocation of the proximal part of the humerus treated with open reduction and plate fixation (ORIF). Between 1995 and 2012, 5,897 consecutive patients with a proximal humeral fracture were referred to a specialist shoulder clinic for surgical assessment. Indications for surgery included anterior or posterior fracture-dislocation, substantial tuberosity involvement with >1 cm of displacement in a Neer 3 or 4-part fracture configuration, disengagement of the head from the shaft, or severe varus or valgus deformity of the head. All patients who met the surgical criteria and had been followed for 2 years were included, and standardized clinical and radiographic assessments of outcomes were performed. At a median of 10.8 years (range, 5 to 22 years) after ORIF, all surviving cognitively intact patients completed a patient-reported questionnaire assessing functional outcomes and satisfaction. Three hundred and sixty-eight patients (6.2%) met the inclusion criteria and had the appropriate follow-up. The study population had a high rate of complex fracture configurations; 77.2% had tuberosity involvement, 54.1% had complete head-shaft disengagement, and 44.0% had a dislocated head. Eighty-seven patients (23.6%) had postoperative stiffness, 25 (6.8%) had fixation failure/nonunion, and 16 (4.3%) had late osteonecrosis/posttraumatic osteoarthritis; these complications were the reason for the majority of the reoperations in the cohort. The survivorship until any reoperation was 74% at 10 years, but when reoperations for stiffness were excluded, the survivorship was 90% during the same time period. The patients' mean levels of pain, function, and satisfaction with treatment were good to excellent. Our results support the use of primary ORIF in medically fit patients with a severely displaced fracture or a fracture-dislocation of the proximal part of the humerus in centers where the expertise to carry out such treatment exists. Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

External Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures: Does It Deserve More Visibility?: Commentary on an article by Davide Blonna, MD, et al.: "Outcomes of 188 Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with a Dedicated External Fixator with Follow-up Ranging from 2 to 12 Years".

External Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures: Does It Deserve More Visibility?: Commentary on an article by Davide Blonna, MD, et al.: "Outcomes of 188 Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with a Dedicated External Fixator with Follow-up Ranging from 2 to 12 Years".

A prospective randomised controlled trial of operative versus non-operative management of fractures of the humeral diaphysis: the HUmeral Shaft Fracture FIXation (HU-FIX) Study\xa0protocol

BackgroundHumeral shaft fractures constitute around 1% of adult fractures in the UK, with an annual incidence of approximately 13 per 100,000 population. Historically, these injuries have been primarily managed non-operatively, with operative fixation reserved for specific indications. Although some recent retrospective studies have suggested there are potential benefits of operative fixation over humeral bracing, there is a deficiency in level 1 evidence to support operative management as the primary treatment for humeral shaft fractures.Methods/designThis single-centre prospective randomised controlled trial aims to recruit 70 adult patients with an isolated closed fracture of the humeral diaphysis into one of two treatment arms: operative (n = 35) or non-operative (n = 35). The operative arm will undergo open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the fracture using a standard fixation technique (plate and screws). The non-operative arm will be fitted with a prefabricated humeral brace until fracture union. All patients will be followed up for 1 year post-intervention. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score at 3 months post-intervention. Secondary outcome measures will include pain, treatment complications, return to work or sporting activities, shoulder and elbow range of motion, radiographic assessment, EuroQol (EQ-5D) Health Outcome score and 12-item Short Form (SF-12) Health Survey score. A health economic analysis will be performed to compare the cost implications of each treatment strategy.DiscussionThis randomised controlled trial will provide level 1 evidence comparing a standard ORIF technique against functional bracing for isolated closed humeral shaft fractures. The investigators hope that the study results will assist surgeons in their decision-making when managing patients with these injuries.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03689335. Registered on 28 September 2018 (retrospectively).

Managing the Endosteal Fibula During Arthroplasty for Proximal Humeral Fracture Sequelae.

Augmentation of proximal humeral fracture fixation with an endosteal fibular allograft has increased in popularity because it biomechanically improves construct stability and potentially may lead to a lower rate of humeral head collapse. However, the potential need for arthroplasty after proximal humeral fracture fixation may still arise. Placing a humeral stem in the presence of an existing intramedullary fibular graft is challenging because the fibula is dense cortical bone and is typically well-integrated by the time an arthroplasty would be performed. Some have proposed burring the proximal humerus open to receive a stem, or using cannulated intramedullary reamers until a humeral stem can be placed. These steps are tedious and inefficient. We have found the most efficient technique as treating the fibula as if it were a well-fixed humeral stem: freeing it up from the native bone and removing it in its entirety.

Biomechanical behavior of three types of fixation in the two-part proximal humerus fracture without medial cortical support.

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of a non-locking plate applied to the anteromedial surface of the proximal humerus on loads at the implant-bone interface of non-locking and locking lateral plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a medial gap.MethodsTwenty synthetic humeri models were used. In fifteen, the proximal portion of the humerus was osteotomized to create a two-part surgical neck fracture, with a 10-mm medial gap and a 5-mm lateral gap; five models were controls. In the osteotomized humeri, five models were stabilized with a locking lateral plate (group L), five with a locking lateral plate and an anteromedial non-locking plate (group L+T), and five with a non-locking lateral plate and a non-locking anteromedial plate (group T+T). All humeri were tested under axial loading until catastrophic failure, which was characterized as complete closure of the medial gap. Stiffness was calculated using force vs. displacement curves. The data were analyzed via descriptive and inferential studies, at a 5% significance level.ResultsStatistically significant differences were seen among all the constructions. The combination of a lateral locking plate with an anteromedial non-locking plate (group L+T) was the stiffest construction, while the combination of a non-locking lateral plate with a non-locking anteromedial plate (group T+T) was the least stiff, even in comparison with a single locking lateral plate (p = 0.01). When the two groups which utilized a lateral locking plate (groups L+T and L) were compared, the group with additional anteromedial support demonstrated greater stiffness (p = 0.03), and stiffness values for the control group comprised of intact humeri models were even higher (p = 0.01).ConclusionCombining a lateral locking plate with a non-locking anteromedial plate provides a stiffer construction for fixation of unstable two-part proximal humerus fractures with a medial gap. Mechanical benefits of medial support with a second non-locking antero-medial plate seems to be related with better construct stability in terms of strength and fatigue, potentially reducing the risk of varus collapse of the humerus head and fracture healing disturbances.

Retrospective Evaluation of The Result of Fixation of Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures by K-Wires versus Cannulated Screws in Children

Background: fractures of the lateral condyle of the humerus represent the second most common type of fracture of the elbow in children. Although this injury is seen at all ages, it is predominately observed in children aged between 5 and 10 years. Objective: the purpose of this study is retrospective evaluation of the results of fixation of lateral humeral condyle by K-wires versus cannulated screws in children by assessment of: 1-Time to full union. 2-Range of motion.3- Percentage of complications. 4-According to Hardacre criteria. Patients and methods: a retrospective study for evaluation of the result of fixation of lateral humeral condyle fractures in children by K-wires vs cannulated screws. Our series was conducted in Al-Azher University Hospitals. 20 patients with humeral condyle fractures were treated by K-wires and cannulated screws. Results: in group A patients presented by complications as following: extension lag 1 (10%), delayed union (healing at 3–6 months) 1 (10%), revision 1 (loss of reduction at the 3rd day of operation and required revision using pin fixation) (10%), fish tail deformity 0 (0%) and 7 (70%) had no complications. While in group B: extension lag 1 (10%), delayed union 2 (20%), nonunion 1 (10%) (Not healed at greater than 6 months and reoperated using bone graft and pin fixation), revision 0 (0%), fish tail deformity 1 (10%), pin tract infection 1 (10%) and 4 (40%) had no complications. Conclusion: our study supports that screw fixation may be a viable option, with no nonunions and fewer complications than pin fixation.

Retrospective Evaluation of The Result of Fixation of Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures by K-Wires versus Cannulated Screws in Children

Retrospective Evaluation of The Result of Fixation of Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures by K-Wires versus Cannulated Screws in Children

EVALUATION OF RESULTS OF INTERNAL FIXATION OF CLOSED, DISPLACED, RECENT FRACTURE SHAFT OF HUMERUS BY MIPPO TECHNIQUE

BACKGROUND: The humerus shaft fracture is the second most common fracture of the upper extremity. The predominant causes of humerus shaft fractures include low energy trauma such as fall from a standing height in older population, while in the younger population it is caused by high energy trauma.
 Aims and Objectives - To investigate the effectiveness of economical MIPPO technique and to determine the radiological and functional significance of MIPPO technique in the patients undergoing treatment for recent fracture shaft of humerus.
 MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective study had been carried out from December 2012 to August 2014 in the Orthopaedics Department of SSKM Hospital, Kolkata, West Bengal, India. Thirty three patients, who presented with fracture shaft of humerus and underwent fixation of humeral shaft fractures by MIPPO technique were included in this study. Complete history was taken and full clinical examination was carried out.
 RESULTS: The average age group in our study is 35.3 years. Of them 85% are male and 15% are female. In majority cases, mode of injury was road traffic accident. 85% cases had middle 1/3rd fracture shaft of humerus and the average time interval between the injury and surgery was 8.54 days.
 CONCLUSION: The results obtained in this study have shown that the MIPPO technique is safe, convenient and effective, since there was minimal soft tissue injury with no major complications.
 KEYWORDS: Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPPO); Road Traffic Accident (RTA).

Early post-operative outcomes of plate versus nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures

IntroductionThis study was designed to measure early postoperative outcomes of plate vs. nail fixation for humeral shaft fractures. Patients and methodsPatients ≥18 years who underwent plate or nail fixation for low-energy humeral shaft fractures between 2005–2016 were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). Multivariable regression was used to compare postoperative outcomes using propensity score adjustment to account for differences between fixation groups. Variables included in the propensity score were age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, hypertension, steroid use, cancer, functional status, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), and sex. ResultsPlate fixation was used in 1418 patients (70.6%), while nail fixation was used in 591 (29.4%). Patients undergoing nail fixation were more likely to be older, have a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and have comorbidities. Mean operative time was statistically longer in the plate fixation group (130 +/−62 min vs. 102 +/−54 min). After propensity score adjustment, type of fixation was not a significant predictor of major or minor complications, length of stay, or readmission. However, nail fixation was a significant predictor of mortality following propensity score adjustment (OR 3.15, 95% Confidence interval 1.26–7.85). ConclusionPatients undergoing intramedullary nail fixation tended to be older patients with more comorbidities, suggesting that surgeons are selecting nail fixation in patients who may not be ideal surgical candidates. Although LOS, complications, and readmission rates were higher in the nail group, this difference was not statistically significant following propensity score adjustment. However, nail fixation remained an independent predictor of 30-day mortality following adjustment. This suggests that nail fixation may not be a safer surgical option in patients with multiple medical co-morbidities and low-energy humeral shaft fractures.

Early locking plate removal following open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures could prevent secondary implant-related complications

IntroductionProximal humeral fracture is a common cause of morbidity in the elderly and poses a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon. Open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with a locking plate is associated with high rate of secondary implant-related complications (IRC). Early implant removal could potentially reduce the risk of IRC and further improve the outcome in relatively asymptomatic patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and radiologic outcomes following implant removal. MethodsA total of 56 patients with an average age of 63 ± 13 years and a mean follow-up of 29 months were evaluated retrospectively following removal of a locking plate in the proximal humerus. Postoperative functional outcomes were evaluated with the Constant-Score, Subjective shoulder value and Quick-DASH score. ResultsEarly implant removal resulted in high functional outcomes with 96% of the patients reporting an improvement of their shoulder function following implant removal. No intraoperative complications were reported. Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head occurred in 12.5% of the patients, but no secondary screw cut-out was reported. ConclusionEarly implant removal might be a safe option to avoid secondary IRC with significant subjective functional improvement also in asymptomatic patients. Although early implant removal cannot reverse the process of AVN, it could potentially prevent secondary IRC and subsequent glenohumeral cartilage destruction.

Three- and 4-part proximal humeral fracture fixation with an intramedullary cage: 1-year clinical and radiographic outcomes

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is a treatment option for 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients. However, arthroplasty has drawbacks in younger patients because of their greater activity level and more likely need for revision surgery. In such patients, an intramedullary cage may allow for reconstruction of the proximal humerus. We reviewed the outcomes of patients with proximal humeral fractures treated with expandable intramedullary cages from 2016 to 2017. We included patients with closed 3- or 4-part fractures (Neer classification), no osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint, and minimum 12-month follow-up. We assessed range of motion, pain, the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and the Subjective Shoulder Value. Eleven patients (mean follow-up, 54 weeks [range, 49-61 weeks]) were included. Two patients had 3-part fractures, and nine had 4-part fractures. At final follow-up, the mean visual analog scale score for pain was 1.4 (range, 0-6), the mean Subjective Shoulder Value was 69 (range, 20-90), and the mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score was 80 (range, 27-98). Mean forward flexion was 123° (range, 45°-160°), mean abduction was 82° (range, 30°-90°), and mean external rotation in 90° of abduction was 71° (range, 30°-90°). At final radiographic evaluation, all fractures were healed. No wound-related or neurologic complications were noted. Avascular necrosis developed in 1 patient; conversion to shoulder arthroplasty was performed. Treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures with an expandable intramedullary cage produced good clinical outcomes and a 100% union rate.

PHILOS Plate as a Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fracture: A Revisit

Fracture is common after trauma. Proximal humeral fracture can occur in the elderly after fall and in youngsters after motor vehicle accidents (MVA) and sport injuries. A 37-year-old man was admitted with a fracture of his left proximal humerus following an MVA. He sustained a 3-part fracture and treated surgically using a PHILOS plate. There are few options in managing proximal humerus fracture ranging from conservative to surgical intervention based on its severity. We reminiscent the usage of PHILOS plate as a mode of treatment of such fracture.

Treatment of the surgical neck fracture of the humerus with a novel external fixator in the elderly with osteoporosis: biomechanical analysis

BackgroundNo consensus exists on the treatment of proximal humerus fractures, especially in the elderly patients with osteoporosis. This study was aimed to evaluate the biomechanical characteristics of a novel external fixator in treating two-part surgical neck fracture of the proximal humerus in the elderly patients with osteoporosis.MethodsSixteen female elderly humeral shaft specimens with osteoporosis were randomized into 2 groups. Models with the surgical neck two-part fracture of the proximal humerus were built, in which a novel external fixator (test group) and a clover plate (control group) were applied separately. In the test group, the fracture was firstly fixed with intersection pinning using 3 Schanz pins (3.5 mm), followed by the novel external fixation frame. In the control group, a clover plate and 6 cortical bone screws were applied. Biomechanical testing of the specimens was performed to assess the resistance to load bearing and torsional stress. The parameters of the two groups were compared using independent t-test.ResultsUltimate bearing capacity and load bearing at different parts with the humerus rotation were higher (P < 0.05) in the external fixator group (145.16 ± 17.42 N and 140 N respectively) than those in the plate group (120.21 ± 13.15 N and 69.63 ± 25.16–90.78 ± 17.18 N respectively). As for resistance to torsional stress, plate’s torque fluctuated between 1 Nm and 5 Nm, while the external fixator’s torque values were more evenly (P < 0.01) distributed with the fluctuation within 1 Nm.ConclusionsIn the fixation of two-part humeral fracture in elderly patients with osteoporosis, the new external fixator seemed to be superior to plate fixation in load bearing and resistance to torsional stress.

Biomechanics of Upper Extremity Double Plating.

Double plating (DP) is an established treatment modality in traumatology. For certain indications, such as open reduction and internal fixation of bicondylar tibial plateau fractures and distal humeral fractures, DP is standard of care in the clinical routine. However, the principles of DP can be transferred to other anatomic regions and indications. In the past years, DP has been brought more and more into focus. For revision cases, such as the treatment of fracture non-unions, DP seems generally useful. In anatomical locations with high torsional stress and bending forces, but also in regions with traction forces by muscles and tendons DP provides multiplanar stability and therefore seems to have biomechanical advantages. Usually two smaller implants can replace one larger implant. Thus, the number of points of fixation can be increased, the stability can be improved and soft-tissue irritations by bulky implants can be minimized. Along with the established indication and application at the distal humerus, there is biomechanical evidence in the current literature for DP of clavicle fractures and humeral shaft fractures. Furthermore, DP provides mechanical advantages in the treatment of certain proximal humeral fractures and olecranon fractures. This review of the literature summarizes the published literature on biomechanics of upper extremity DP.

Open reduction, retention, and fixation of proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate osteosynthesis

Open reduction, retention, and fixation of proximal humeral fractures using a locking plate osteosynthesis