Five-year Cause-specific Survival Research Articles

Prognostic Nomogram for Predicting Survival, Clinicopathological Analysis, and Racial Disparities in Uterine Carcinosarcoma: A Retrospective Population-Based Study

Introduction: Uterine carcinosarcoma is an aggressive gynecologic malignancy that accounts for 5% of all gynecological malignancies. There is a disproportion in its incidence and mortality among different races. This study describes demographic and clinicopathological factors and racial disparities affecting the survival of patients with uterine carcinosarcoma. Methods: Data on uterine carcinosarcoma patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2000 to 2020. Results: Of the 11,338 patients identified, the median age at diagnosis was 68 years, and the five-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rate was 38.7%. for all races. Compared with Asian patients (39.5%, 95% CI, 36.0–43.4%), Hispanic patients (39.4%, 95% CI, 36.5–42.5%), and White patients (37.9%, 95% CI, 36.7–39.2%), Black patients accounted for 21% of the patients and had a significantly lower 5-year CSS (95% CI, 27.2–31.2%). The CSS rates were 84.4% (95% CI, 83.3–85.6%) for localized tumors, 68.5% (95% CI, 66.9–70.1%) for regional tumors, and 39.0% (95% CI, 36.9–41.2%) for distant tumors. Multimodal treatment involving chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation improved the overall one- and five-year survival rates by 88.2% (95% CI, 87.0–89.5%) and 52.8% (95% CI, 50.7–55.1%), respectively, across all disease stages. Multivariate analysis identified age >60 years, Black race, tumor size >4 cm, and distant metastases as independent risk factors for mortality (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This large database study presents the most up-to-date epidemiological information regarding cases of uterine carcinosarcoma. The findings suggest that a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation may be most efficacious in treating this malignancy, especially in patients with distant disease.

Distinct Prostate Cancer Survival Outcomes in Firefighters: A Population-Based Study.

Introduction: Survival outcomes for prostate cancer among specific occupational groups prone to regular medical check-ups vis-à-vis the general population have been understudied. For firefighters, a demographic subject to rigorous medical evaluations, possessing above-average medical expertise, and exposed to specific carcinogens of interest, prostate cancer survival in the US has never been studied. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study, utilizing data from the Florida Cancer Data System spanning 2004 to 2014, coupled with firefighter certification records from the Florida State Fire Marshal's Office. Our study cohort consisted of 1058 prostate cancer cases among firefighters as well as prostate cases for the Florida general population (n = 150,623). We compared cause-specific survival between the two using Cox regression models adjusted for demographics and clinical characteristics, including PSA levels, Gleason scores, and treatment modalities. Results: Firefighters demonstrated a higher five-year cause-specific survival rate (96.1%, 95% CI: 94.7-97.1%) than the general population (94.2%, 95%CI: 94.1-94.3%). Overall, firefighters' diagnoses were established at younger ages (median age 63 vs. 67 in the general population), exhibited a higher proportion of localized stage cancers (84.7% vs. 81.1%), and had a greater utilization of surgery (46.4% vs. 37.6%), a treatment modality with a high success rate but potential side effects. In multivariable analysis, firefighters displayed a survival advantage for localized stage (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 0.53; 95%CI: 0.34-0.82). However, for regional or distant stages, firefighters aged 65 and above exhibited a higher risk of death (aHR = 1.84; 95% CI: 1.18-2.86) than the general population. Conclusion: Firefighters experience enhanced prostate cancer survival, primarily in cases diagnosed at localized stages, likely due to increased PSA testing. Nonetheless, for regional or distant stage, survival among older firefighters' lags behind that of the general population. Further investigations are warranted to unravel factors influencing the development of aggressive disease beyond PSA and Gleason scores in this population, as well as to assess the impact of a higher rate of surgical treatment on firefighters' quality of life.

Sidedness is not a prognostic factor in an unselected cohort of patients with colon cancer but prognosis for caecal carcinoma is worse – A multivariate analysis of a large single institution database

PurposeSidedness has emerged as a prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer treated with modern systemic therapies. This study investigates whether it is also relevant for an unselected patient cohort including all stages.MethodsAll consecutive patients admitted with colon cancer between 1995 and 2018 were retrieved from an institution-held database. Patients were divided into two cohorts. The first cohort included patients without distant metastases who were able to undergo curative resection. The second cohort presented with distant metastases (stage IV). Potentially prognostic factors were subjected to multivariate Cox Regression analysis.ResultsOverall, 1,606 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. An R0-resection was achieved in 1,222 patients without distant metastases. Five-year cause-specific survival rate was 89.3% for this group. There was no difference between right- and left-sided cancers (88.2% vs. 90.1%, p = 0.220). However, prognosis of caecal carcinoma was significantly worse than that of all other sites combined (83.5% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, pT-category, pN-category, grading, vascular invasion, emergency operation, adjuvant chemotherapy, and caecal carcinoma remained as independent prognostic factors. In the 384 patients with stage IV-disease, 3-year overall survival for right- vs. left-sided cancers differed only in univariate analysis (17.7% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.013).ConclusionIn non-metastatic colon cancer, location in the caecum is an independent prognostic factor. In unselected patients with stage IV colon cancer, sidedness was not found to be a prognostic factor. Differentiation into right- and left-sided tumors may be simplistic, and further studies on the biological behavior of different colonic sites are warranted.

Trends in Gynecologic Carcinosarcoma Based on Analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology End Result (SEER) Database.

Carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed Mullerian tumors) of a female genital organ are rare tumors associated with a poor survival. The purpose of this study was to identify site-specific differences in the incidence and prognosis in carcinosarcomas originating in the uterus, cervix, or ovary. The data of patients with gynecologic carcinosarcomas were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2000 and 2016. The characteristics of gynecologic carcinosarcomas were compared using Pearson X2 and Fisher's exact tests. Kaplan-Meier models were used for cause-specific survival (CSS) analysis. The cohort included 7086 females, including 5731 cases of uterine carcinosarcoma, 161 cervical carcinosarcomas, and 1193 ovarian carcinosarcomas. The age-adjusted incidence rates of uterine, cervical, and ovarian carcinosarcoma were 3.9, 0.1, and 0.6 per 1,000,000, respectively. In the distribution of carcinosarcoma incidence by race, compared with the uterus or cervix, those originating from the ovary were unequally distributed in Caucasians (84.4% versus 69.6%, 67.7%; p < 0.001). The incidence of uterine carcinosarcoma steadily increased over time, from 2.2 in 2000 to 5.5 in 2016 (per 1,000,000), while cervical or ovarian carcinosarcoma showed no significant difference in incidence. The five-year CSS rates based on the site of origin (uterus, cervix, and ovary) were 39.9%, 33.1%, and 25.8%, respectively. The incidence rates of gynecologic carcinosarcoma, especially uterine carcinosarcoma, are gradually increasing. Although uterine carcinosarcoma is associated with a higher incidence than the others, it has a better prognosis compared with ovarian and cervical carcinosarcoma. The survival rates were worst in ovarian carcinosarcoma.

Molecular subtypes predict the prognosis of male breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study.

Male breast cancer is rare, and something different from female breast cancer. The characteristics of molecular subtype in male breast cancer is unclear and lack of large-sample study. A retrospective study was conducted to investigate the characteristics and prognosis of patients with male breast cancer using the data recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010-2014. A total of 1,597 cases were enrolled with median age of 66 years. The study endpoint was considered as patient death. The molecular subtype was defined by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status, hormone receptor (HR) positive was defined as ER positive with or without PR positive, including 1,373 cases of HR+/HER2- tumor (86%), 182 cases of HR+/HER2+ tumor (11.4%), 13 cases of HR-/HER2+ tumor (0.8%) and 29 cases with triple negative (TN) tumor (1.8%), respectively. There were significant differences in distributions of age, race, grade, tumor size and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage between different molecular subtypes. Patients of different molecular subtypes differed significantly in 5 years overall survival and cause-specific survival (CSS). Five-year CSS (5y-CSS) rates of different molecular subtypes was 89.2% (HER2-/HR+), 78.4% (HER2+/HR+), 72.6% (HER2+/HR-) and 43.2% (TN), respectively. According to Cox regression, age ≥65 years [P=0.001, hazard ratio (HR) =2.136 (1.372, 3.324)], ER negative [P=0.02, HR =2.481 (1.159, 5.319)], PR negative [P=0.007, HR =2.294 (1.256, 4.184)], TN subtype [P<0.001, HR =10.676 (4.441, 25.665)], AJCC stage IV [P<0.001, HR =21.222 (10.377, 43.4)], tumor size >5 cm or T4 [P<0.001, HR =2.577 (0.978, 6.792)], Stage M1 [P=0.001, HR =4.519 (1.929, 10.587)] and Black race [P=0.002, HR =2.322 (1.442, 3.74)] were independent prognostic factors for poorer CSS. Just like female, molecular subtypes also varied in male breast cancer. It could be a predictor for survival and improve the strategy making in clinical practice.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Colorectal Epithelial Neoplasms: A Systematic Review.

In this review, we summarize up-to-date reports with five-year observation after colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Five-year cause-specific survival rates ranged from 98.6 to 100%. The local recurrence rates ranged from 1.1 to 2.2% in complete resection and 7.5 to 25.0% in incomplete resection. Incomplete resection was a risk factor for local recurrence. In non-curative ESD, five-year cause-specific survival rates ranged from 93.8 to 100% with additional surgery, and 92.7 to 99.1% without surgery. The choice of additional surgery should be based on the individual patient's age, concomitant diseases, wishes, life expectancy, and the risk of lymph node metastasis. The metachronous cancer rates ranged from 0.22 to 1.1%. Both local recurrence and metachronous tumors should be checked with a follow-up colonoscopy after ESD.

Cancer survival differentials for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples in Queensland: the impact of remoteness

PurposeIn Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples (First Nations population) often have low overall cancer survival, as do all residents of geographically remote areas. This study aimed to quantify the survival disparity between First Nations and other Queenslanders for 12 common cancer types by remoteness areas.MethodsFor all Queensland residents aged 20–89 years diagnosed with a primary invasive cancer during 1997–2016, we ran flexible parametric survival models incorporating age, First Nations status, sex, diagnosis time period, area-level socioeconomic status, remoteness categories and where appropriate, broad cancer type. Three survival measures were predicted: cause-specific survival, survival differences and the comparative survival ratio, each standardised to First Nations peoples’ covariate distributions.ResultsThe standardised five-year cause-specific cancer survival was 60% for urban First Nations and 65% for other Queenslanders, while remote residents were 54% (First Nations) and 58% (other). The absolute survival differential between First Nations and other Queenslanders was often similar, regardless of remoteness of residence. The greatest absolute difference in five-year standardised cancer survival was for head and neck cancers, followed by cervical cancer.The five-year comparative survival ratio (First Nations: other Queenslanders) for urban cancer patients was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90–0.93), similar to outer regional, inner regional and remote areas. The greatest comparative survival differential was for oesophageal cancer.ConclusionFirst Nations’ survival inequalities are largely independent of geographical remoteness. It remains a priority to determine the contribution of other potential factors such as the availability of culturally acceptable diagnostic, management and/or support services.

Survival for endometrial cancer as a second primary malignancy.

BackgroundEndometrial cancer (EC) often occurs subsequently to a primary cancer arising from a different site. However, little is known regarding the survival experience of EC as a second primary (ECSP) malignancy, specifically in relation to the original primary site and prior treatment.MethodsUsing Florida's cancer registry, all EC cases (first, second, or higher‐order) diagnosed from 2005–2016 were analyzed. Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox Regression were used in a cause‐specific survival analysis.ResultsA total of 2879 clinically independent ECSPs and 42,714 first primary ECs were analyzed. The most common first primary sites for ECSPs were breast cancer (BC) (n = 1422) and colorectal cancer (CRC) (n = 359). Five‐year cause‐specific survival was 84.0% (95% CI: 83.6–84.3) for first primary ECs and 81.8% (95% CI: 80.0–83.4) for ECSPs. After adjusting for age, race/ethnicity, histology, and stage at diagnosis, ECSPs had a lower risk of EC mortality than first primary ECs (hazard ratios [HR] 0.88, 95% CI: 0.79–0.97). ECSPs with a first primary CRC had a higher risk of EC‐specific death (HR 1.47, 95% CI: 1.04–2.06) compared to ECSPs that followed BC in multivariable analysis. Finally, women who had chemotherapy for ECSP and preceding BC did not have a higher risk of death (HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.49–1.31) compared to those who only received chemotherapy for first primary EC.ConclusionsECSPs present a complex clinical profile. ECSP survival is superior to that of first primary EC. However, ECSPs following CRC may constitute a population of interest for their worse prognosis. Chemotherapy for a previous BC does not seem to impact the effectiveness of chemotherapy for ECs.

Five-year cause-specific survival after meningioma surgery. A nationwide population-based study

BackgroundSurvival after meningioma surgery is often reported with inadequate allowance for competing causes of death. MethodsWe processed the French administrative medical database (Système National des Données de Santé: SNDS), to retrieve appropriate cases of surgically treated meningioma. Cause-specific survival in meningioma-related death was analyzed with the Fine & Gray (F&G) and cause-specific (CS) Cox models to identify associated factors. ResultsFive-year cumulative incidence was 2.85% for meningioma-related death and 6.3% for unrelated death (P<0.001). In the adjusted F&G and cause-specific Cox regression models for meningioma-related death, gender, age at surgery, co-morbidities, neurofibromatosis type 2, tumor insertion, tumor grade, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt insertion, preoperative embolization and need for redo surgery for recurrence emerged as independent prognostic factors of cause-specific survival (CSS) in meningioma-related death. ConclusionAt 5 years, the risk of meningioma-unrelated death was 2.21-fold greater than the risk of dying from the meningioma disease. Five-year CSS after meningioma surgery was greater in younger adults with benign spinal meningioma with low comorbidity. Those with malignant cranial tumor requiring preoperative embolization or CSF shunting for associated hydrocephalus and with severely degraded overall health status showed a significantly increased risk of meningioma-related death. Redo surgery for recurrence failed to improve the risk of meningioma-related death. We recommend the use of net survival methods such as CSS in meningioma studies where unrelated mortality is predominant, as this approach results in more accurate estimates of disease risk and associated predictors.

Cause of death for patients with breast cancer: discordance between death certificates and medical files, and impact on survival estimates

BackgroundRegistration and coding of cause of death is prone to error since determining the exact underlying condition leading directly to death is challenging. In this study, causes of death from the death certificates were compared to patients’ medical files interpreted by experts at University Hospitals Leuven (UHL), to assess concordance between sources and its impact on cancer survival assessment.MethodsBreast cancer patients treated at UHL (2009–2014) (follow-up until December 31st 2016) were included in this study. Cause of death was obtained from death certificates and expert-reviewed medical files at UHL. Agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient. Cause-specific survival (CSS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the relative survival probability (RS) using the Ederer II and Pohar Perme method.ResultsA total of 2862 patients, of whom 354 died, were included. We found an agreement of 84.7% (kappa-value of 0.69 (95% C.I.: 0.62–0.77)) between death certificates and medical files. Death certificates had 10.7% false positive and 4.5% false negative rates. However, five-year CSS and RS measures were comparable for both sources.ConclusionFor breast cancer patients included in our study, fair agreement of cause of death was seen between death certificates and medical files with similar CSS and RS estimations.

Retrospective study of prognosis of patients with multiple colorectal carcinomas: synchronous versus metachronous makes the difference

PurposeLittle is known about difference between synchronous colorectal cancer (SCRC) and metachronous colorectal cancer (MCRC) despite the relevance for this selected patient group. The aim of this retrospective review was to analyze patients with SCRC and MCRC.MethodsAll patients who underwent surgery for SCRC and MCRC between 1982 and 2019 were included in this retrospective analysis of our tertiary referral center. Clinical, histological, and molecular genetic characteristics were analyzed. The primary endpoint was cause-specific survival, evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Secondary endpoints were recurrence-free survival and the identification of prognostic factors.ResultsOverall, 3714 patients were included in this analysis. Of those, 3506 (94.4%) had a primary unifocal colorectal cancer (PCRC), 103 (2.7%) had SCRC, and 105 (2.8%) had MCRC. SCRC occurred more frequently in elderly (p=0.009) and in male patients (p=0.027). There were no differences concerning tumor stages or grading. Patients with SCRC did not show altered recurrence or survival rates, as compared to unifocal tumors. However, MCRC had a lower rate of recurrence, compared to PCRC (24% vs. 41%, p=0.002) and a lower rate of cause-specific death (13% vs. 37%, p<0.001). Five-year cause-specific survival rates were 63±1% for PCRC, 62±6% for SCRC (p=0.588), and 88±4% for MCRC (p<0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that MCRC were an independent favorable prognostic parameter regarding case-specific survival.ConclusionPatients with SCRC seem to not have a worse prognosis compared to patients with PCRC. Noteworthy, patients with MCRC showed better survival rates in this retrospective analysis.

Improving The Quality of Care for Persons With Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

More than 20,000 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer each year in the United States, most with advanced stage disease.1 With five-year cause-specific survival of 47 percent, ovarian cancer is t...

Abstract PS7-63: Cause of death discordance between death certificates and medical files: Impact on cancer survival assessment in a Belgian case study

Abstract Introduction Accurate information on cause of death is essential for correct breast cancer-specific mortality assessment. However, registration and coding of cause of death is prone to error since determining the exact underlying condition related to the death is challenging. In this study, an expert review of medical files was done to determine the principal cause of death for breast cancer patients of a Belgian tertiary hospital. The retrieved cause of death was compared to death certificate information to assess concordance between both sources. Secondly, the impact of discordant reporting on cause-specific survival (CSS) and other net survival approaches were examined. Methods Breast cancer patients diagnosed and treated at University Hospitals Leuven (UHL) between 2009 and 2014 with follow-up until December 31st, 2016, were included in the study. Information on cause of death was obtained from death certificates (following ICD-10 rules) and medical files. The latter were reviewed by a board of experts at UHL. Agreement was calculated using Cohen’s kappa coefficient, and reasons for discordant reporting were assessed. CSS was calculated based on cause of death information from both sources using the Kaplan-Meier method. These survival estimates were compared to the relative survival probability (RS) using the Ederer II and Pohar Perme method. Results A total of 2,862 patients were included, of whom 354 died after a median follow-up of 54.6 months. We found overall substantial agreement (kappa-value of 0.69 (95% C.I.: 0.62-0.77)) between cause of death reported by death certificates and medical files (Table 1). In 84.8% of cases, there was concordance between both methods. When comparing to medical files, misattribution of breast cancer-specific death in death certificates (4.5% of cases) was linked to the presence of comorbidities (43.7%), metastases (37.5%), or unspecified causes (18.8%). Five-year CSS based on medical files (93.1% (95% C.I.: 91.9-94.1)) was only slightly higher compared to CSS based on death certificates (92.3% (95% C.I.: 91.2-93.4)). RS measures using Ederer II and Pohar Perme were comparable to CSS measures. Conclusions Overall, substantial agreement of cause of death was seen between death certificates and medical files. Attribution of cause death to comorbidities was the most common reason for discordant reporting of breast cancer-specific death. Five-year breast cancer-specific survival was slightly higher based on cause of death information from medical files, compared to death certificates. Periodic reviews and implementation of ICD-10 guidelines for classification of cause of death could improve accuracy in cause of death annotation. Table 1: Discordance for the principal cause of death between medical files and death certificatesmedical filesother causesbreast cancerdeath certificatesother causes136 (38.4%)16 (4.5%)152 (42.9%)breast cancer38 (10.7%)164 (46.3%)202 (57.1%)174 (49.2%)180 (50.9%)354 (100%) Citation Format: Hava Izci, Tim Tambuyzer, Jessica Vandeven, Jérôme Xicluna, Hans Wildiers, Kevin Punie, Nynke Willers, Eva Oldenburger, Els Van Nieuwenhuysen, Patrick Berteloot, Ann Smeets, Ines Nevelsteen, Liesbet Van Eycken, Harlinde De Schutter, Patrick Neven, Geert Silversmit, Freija Verdoodt. Cause of death discordance between death certificates and medical files: Impact on cancer survival assessment in a Belgian case study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS7-63.

Incidence, survival and stage at diagnosis of small intestinal neuroendocrine tumours in Queensland, Australia, 2001-2015.

Multiple studies have observed increasing incidence of small intestinal (SI) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). The aim of this study was to describe incidence, mortality and survival of SI NETs by sub-site and stage at diagnosis. Data on patients diagnosed with SI NETs between 2001 and 2015 were sourced from the Queensland Oncology Repository. Staging algorithms utilising several data sources were used to calculate stage at diagnosis (localised, regional or metastatic disease). We identified 778 SI NETs and of those 716 (92%) had either a documented or derived stage. Incidence doubled from 0.68 per 100000 to 1.42 per 100000 over the 15-year period. Most common site was ileum (49.1%) and 84.2% were of carcinoid morphology type. Stage at diagnosis was calculated for 91.7% of patients with 28.3% presenting with regional involvement and 23.9% with distant metastasis. Risk factors associated with metastatic disease were jejunal and SI site not otherwise specified, neuroendocrine carcinoma histology and residing in a rural area. Increasing incidence of localised disease and a corresponding reduction in metastatic disease was observed over time. Five-year cause-specific survival for patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2005 was 82.5%, increasing to 93.8% from 2011 to 2015. Survival was lowest for those with metastatic disease (74.2%). Survival increased between 2001 to 2005 and 2011 to 2015 for each disease stage. SI NET incidence in Queensland doubled between 2001 and 2015. Survival was high and improved over time.

Does regional lymph node status have a predictive effect on the prognosis of Merkel cell carcinoma?

There is no article that studies whether the regional lymph node (RLN) status affects the prognosis of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). The survival and disease data of MCC patients were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiological, and End Results (SEER) database. The overall survival (OS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were endpoints. A total of 1822 patients were included, with a mean age of 72.5 years. The number of RLN-positive patients was 862 (47.3%), and the number of RLN-negative patients was 960 (52.7%). The regression analysis showed that primary site, sex, and tumor size were statistically significant and independent predictors of RLN status. The five-year OS and CSS of RLN-negative patients were 71.4% and 92.3%, respectively, which were much higher than those of RLN-positive patients (37.5% and 65.8%, respectively) (P <0.001). In univariate survival analysis, positive RLN significantly predicted deterioration of OS and MSS (P <0.001). In multivariate analysis, RLN status had no statistically significant effect on patient prognosis. The prognosis of patients with RLN metastasis is worse than that of patients without RLN metastasis, but RLN status is not an independent predictor of the prognosis of patients with MCC.

Survival and prognostic factors in primary vaginal cancer: an analysis of 2004-2014 SEER data.

BackgroundPrimary vaginal cancer (PVC) is a rare gynecological malignant tumor and we know little about its survival and prognostic factors. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential survival and prognostic factors in women with PVC.MethodsWe used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to identify 1,781 women who had been diagnosed with PVC between 2004 and 2014. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate cases survival and prognostic factors. A stratified analysis was further performed to analyze the prognostic factors in each stage.ResultsThere were 20.0% of patients aged ≥80 years and most women were married, 42.1%, and then widowed, 25.2%. The histology types include squamous (74.5%), adenocarcinoma (16.7%), melanoma (3.3%) and sarcoma (1.5%). Five-year cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were overall: 57.8%, Stage I: 76.4%, Stage II: 61.9%, Stage III: 53.3% and Stage IV: 22.5%. Univariate analysis showed that age, marital status, race, pathological grading, histology, TNM stage, tumor size, surgery and radiation were related to prognosis. The 5-year CSS of married women is 64.4%, while those of divorced/separated and widowed are 56.6% and 44.1%, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that age, histology, TNM stage, tumor size, surgery and radiation were independent prognostic factors. The elderly (≥80) cases and those with melanoma were correlated to worse prognosis at any stage of PVC. As tumor stage progressed, both of the ≥80 years old patients and the melanoma cases showed a decline tendency of mortality risk.ConclusionsPVC is a rare gynecological malignant tumor and more likely to occur among older women. Squamous cell carcinoma is the most frequently observed histological type, while melanoma is extremely rare. Age, histology, TNM stage, tumor size, surgery and radiation are independent prognostic factors. Although marital status does not affect survival rates, married women are likely to live longer than widowed and divorced/separated cases. Age ≥80 years seems to be an important cut point in the survival of vaginal cancer. Older age (≥80 years) and melanoma have greater influences on mortality risk in early-stage disease.

Breast Cancer Incidence and Survival Among Young Females in Queensland, Australia.

Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common cancer diagnosed among adolescent and young adult (AYA) females worldwide, but epidemiological patterns unique to this group are often obscured when results are combined with older patients. This study investigates breast cancer incidence and survival among AYA females, including differences by broad stage at diagnosis. Methods: A retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted using de-identified data for females in Queensland, Australia, aged 15-39 diagnosed with a first primary breast cancer between 1997 and 2014 with follow-up to December 31, 2016. Incidence rate trends were examined with Joinpoint analysis. Cause-specific survival was calculated for key characteristics, and 5-year adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were estimated from a multivariable flexible parametric model. Results: The study cohort comprised 2337 patients, of whom two-thirds (n = 1565, 67%) were diagnosed with advanced disease (tumor diameter >20 mm, lymph node involvement or presence of distant metastases at diagnosis). Incidence rates of localized tumors decreased by 1.9% per year (95% confidence interval [CI] -3.5% to -0.4%) over the study period, whereas the trend for advanced breast cancers remained stable. Five-year cause-specific survival increased from 85% to 92% for 2011-2014 compared to 1997-2001 (adjusted HR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.29-0.65). Patients who were Indigenous from disadvantaged areas or diagnosed with advanced stage experienced significantly worse survival. Conclusion: The high proportion of younger females diagnosed with advanced breast cancer should be the focus of future campaigns to improve awareness and earlier detection. While survival has increased over time, further work is required to ensure that this progress is experienced equitably by all patients.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for patients with pathologic node-negative esophageal carcinoma: A population based propensity matching analysis.

BackgroundThe impact of adjuvant treatment for esophageal carcinoma with tumor‐negative lymph nodes after upfront radical esophagectomy is still uncertain. This study investigated the effects of postoperative radiotherapy in pT1‐3N0 esophageal carcinoma after radical resection.MethodWe retrospectively identified pT1‐3N0M0 esophageal carcinoma patients between 2000 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Patients with upfront esophagectomy were categorized as having received surgery alone (SA) and surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy (SA + RT). Propensity score matching, univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to compare overall survival (OS) and cause‐specific survival (CSS).ResultsA total of 2862 patients were identified, of whom 274 received SA + RT and 2588 received SA. The median follow‐up was 60.4 months (95%CI, 58.7–62.1 months). The five‐year OS and CSS were better for SA group compared with SA + RT group (P < 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, after matching, the OS and CSS were still significantly better for SA patients. For T subgroup analysis, postoperative radiotherapy was an independent prognostic factor only for pT1 patients with worse OS, without survival differences for pT2 and pT3 patients. However, after multivariate cox analysis, postoperative radiotherapy can provide significantly better OS for pT3 patients with tumor length ≥5 cm (P = 0.03; 95%CI, 0.29–0.94).ConclusionsAmong pT1‐3N0M0 esophageal carcinoma patients, postoperative radiotherapy can provide significantly better OS for pT3 patients with tumor length ≥5 cm. However, there are no survival benefits for pT1‐2 patients after SA + RT procedure. This finding may have significant implications on the use of adjuvant radiation in patients with pN0 disease.

Changes in the Clinicopathological Demographics of Vulvar Cancer in Japan: Increasing Oldest-Old, Stage Shifting, and Decreasing Cohort-Level Survival †.

Background: To examine trends in the clinicopathological characteristics of vulvar cancer in Japan. Methods: This is a nationwide retrospective study examining consecutive women with vulvar cancer between 2001 and 2010 in Japan (n = 1061). Temporal trends in demographics, tumor characteristics, and survival were assessed by cohort-level analysis. The National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program was used for external validation (n = 10,154). Results: The number of oldest-old women aged ≥80 years significantly increased (from 18.0% in 2001 to 30.6% in 2010; 70.5% relative increase) in the study period. A stage shift was observed, with stage I disease decreasing from 43.0% to 34.0% (21.0% relative decrease), and tumors with distant metastases increasing from 23.2% to 35.6% (53.3% relative increase, p < 0.05). The number of women who underwent surgical treatment decreased from 84.0% to 69.7% (17.0% relative decrease), whereas utilization of radiotherapy increased from 34.4% to 43.2% (25.7% relative increase) over time (p < 0.05). In the cohort-level analysis, the five-year survival rates significantly decreased from 2001 to 2010 (p < 0.05), specifically, 66.9% to 51.0% for progression-free survival (23.7% relative decrease), 79.5% to 67.9% for cause-specific survival (14.6% relative decrease), and 74.9% to 62.3% for overall survival (16.9% relative decrease). In the patient-level analysis, oldest-old women were less likely to undergo surgical treatment and were independently associated with decreased survival (p < 0.05). In the US cohort, the number of oldest-old women (25.2% to 27.8%) and the five-year cause-specific survival rate (81.8% to 79.9%) remained unchanged during the study period (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Demographics and outcomes of vulvar cancer in Japan significantly changed during the study period. An increasing oldest-old population and a stage shift to more metastatic disease resulted in a cohort-level decrease in survival rates.

Salvage brachytherapy for locally-recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy: A comparison of efficacy and toxicity outcomes with high-dose rate and low-dose rate brachytherapy

BackgroundBrachytherapy (BT) is widely used for salvage therapy in patients with biochemical failure (BF) after radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa). Although low-dose-rate (LDR) and high-dose-rate (HDR) BT are both used for salvage therapy, it is not clear whether there are any differences between these two approaches in terms of efficacy or toxicity in this setting. Therefore, we review the institutional experience of the members of the Urological Tumour Working Group (URONCOR) of the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) to compare these two techniques. Methods and materialsBetween 2001 and 2016, 119 patients with biopsy-proven, locally-recurrent PCa underwent salvage BT (LDR, n = 44; HDR, n = 75) after primary radiotherapy. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and cause-specific survival (CSS) after salvage therapy were analyzed. Toxicity was assessed according to the RTOG scale. ResultsMedian follow-up after salvage BT was 52 months. Overall, the 5-year prostate-specific antigen (PSA) RFS rate was 71% (95% CI, 65.9%–75.9%). No significant between-group differences in RFS were observed (p = 0.063). Five-year CSS for the LDR- and HDR-BT groups were 96.5% and 93%, respectively. Overall, 38 patients (32%) developed biochemical progression (Phoenix definition) after salvage BT: 14 patients (32%) in the LDR group and 24 (32.5%) in the HDR group. On the multivariate analysis, the following variables were significantly associated with progression, time to BF from primary radiotherapy <30 months (p = 0.014); and post-salvage nadir PSA (p = 0.000). There were no significant between-group differences in toxicity. Overall, there were 13 cases of urethral stricture, 22 cases of urinary incontinence, and 13 cases of haematuria. Toxicity ≥grade 3 was observed in 23.5% of patients. ConclusionsThese findings show that both HDR-BT and LDR-BT yield comparable efficacy and toxicity outcomes in patients undergoing salvage treatment for locally-recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiotherapy. Predictors of worse outcomes after salvage BT were post-salvage nadir PSA and time to BF from initial radiotherapy.