First-year Undergraduate Medical Students Research Articles

Medical students' essay-writing skills: criteria-based self- and tutor-evaluation and the role of language background.

An exercise is described which aimed to make clear to first-year undergraduate medical students the expected writing skills required for an essay examination in one discipline. Many students were from a non-English speaking background and over one-third of students, regardless of language background, had limited experience in this type of essay writing. For this exercise, a practice essay was written by each student for formative assessment. The essay was rated by a tutor and by the student according to well-defined criteria. This allowed for comparisons to be made in a structured and objective way between the judgements of the student and the assessor. Students found the exercise to be very useful, although whether essay writing skills actually improved could not be established. Students from non-English speaking backgrounds tended to be most harsh in their self-evaluations, yet tutor-evaluations generally showed these students to have better writing skills than other students. Indeed, correlations between self- and tutor-evaluations were quite low. It is evident that students and their educators may be unclear about each others' expectations. By making explicit the requirements of an exercise, misunderstandings may be minimized and it is possible that student performance could improve, though further research is required to verify these hypotheses. It is suggested that students should be encouraged to evaluate their own work and should be instructed in writing skills throughout their medical degree education.

Initial responses of first-year medical students to problem-based learning in a behavioural science course: role of language background and course content

A trial of problem-based learning (PBL) was conducted with first-year undergraduate medical students who had no background knowledge of behavioural science and who included a substantial proportion with a first language other than English. Responses to standardized and open-ended evaluation questions showed greater variability and there was no clear preference for PBL over traditional methods. Students found the PBL exercise time-consuming and felt they needed more guidance. Feedback from clinicians and working in groups were seen as positive aspects of the exercise. Students with a first language other than English reported that language, but not cultural background, was an impediment to effective participation. It is recommended that this group of students be offered extra support for PBL in a subject-based setting, and that all students would benefit from a formal induction session.