First-line Treatment For Patients Research Articles

Chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: a single arm phase II trial.

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy, long-term prognosis and safety of combining chemotherapy with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma (BTC). In this single arm phase II trial, twenty-nine patients with advanced BTC were included, all of whom received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy combined with regorafenib and immune checkpoint inhibitors as the first-line treatment. And the study analyzed anti-tumor efficacy, long-term prognosis, and adverse reactions. Among the patients, 0 patient achieved complete response, 18 patients (62.1%) achieved partial response, 8 patients (27.6%) had stable disease, and 3 patients (10.3%) experienced progressive disease. The corresponding objective response rate (ORR) was 18/29 (62.1%), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 26/29 (89.7%). The median overall survival (OS) was 16.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.0 -21.8) and the median progress free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 7.8- 12.6). The 1-year OS and PFS were 65% (95% CI: 0.479-0.864) and 41% (95% CI: 0.234-0.656), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions was 27/29 (93.1%), and the incidence of grade III/IV adverse reactions was 5/29 (17.2%). The combination of chemotherapy, regorafenib, and immune checkpoint inhibitors as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced BTC may has good anti-tumor efficacy without causing serious adverse reactions, and can significantly improve the long-term prognosis.

Economic evaluation of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine regimens for first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma from U.S. perspective

BackgroundThe cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX as a potential new standard of care for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC) has yet to be established. Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of NALIRIFOX vs. nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine in this indication from the perspective of U.S. public payers.MethodsA partitioned survival model was constructed from the perspective of U.S. public payers, drawing on baseline patient characteristics and vital clinical data from the NAPOLI-3 trial. Costs and utilities were sourced from publicly accessible databases and literature. A lifetime horizon was applied, with an annual discount rate of 3%. We calculated and compared cumulative costs, life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). To evaluate the model’s robustness, sensitivity analyses, scenario analyses, and subgroup analyses were carried out. Additionally, a price simulation for the costly liposomal irinotecan was conducted to inform the pricing strategy at the given willingness to pay (WTP) threshold.ResultsIn the base-case analysis, NALIRIFOX provided an additional 0.29 QALYs with an ICER of $206,340.69 /QALY compared to nab-paclitaxel and gemcitabine, indicating it is not cost-effective at a $150,000/QALY threshold. Sensitivity analysis showed the model was most sensitive to the costs of liposomal irinotecan, capecitabine, and post-progression care. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 17.66% probability of NALIRIFOX being cost-effective at $150,000/QALY, rising to 47.48% at $200,000/QALY. Pricing simulations suggested NALIRIFOX could become cost-effective at $150,000/QALY if the price of irinotecan liposome drops to $53.24/mg (a 14.8% reduction).ConclusionsNALIRIFOX may not be cost-effective at its current price as a first-line treatment for patients with mPDAC in the long term. The cost of liposomal irinotecan has the greatest impact. It may become cost-effective only if its cost is reduced by 14.8%, with a WTP threshold of $150,000 /QALY.

Cadonilimab (PD-1/CTLA-4) in combination with lenvatinib in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): A retrospective real-world study

BackgroundPrevious research has shown that combining tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with immunotherapy results in synergistic clinical efficacy. Cadonilimab, the first approved bi-specific antibody targeting PD-1 and CTLA-4, was studied to evaluate its efficacy and safety in combination with Lenvatinib as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). MethodsA retrospective study was conducted on 29 uHCC patients diagnosed at Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, between July 7, 2022, and March 3, 2023. Patients received Cadonilimab (10 mg/kg, IV, every 3 weeks) combined with Lenvatinib (8 mg, orally, daily). The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), with secondary endpoints including disease control rate (DCR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), median overall survival (mOS), median time to progression (mTTP), and safety. ResultsBy April 2023, 29 patients had been enrolled in the study. The ORR was 37.9 %, DCR was 82.8 %, mPFS was 8.1 months, mTTP was 8.2 months, and mOS was not reached. A total of 93.1 % of patients experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE). The most common adverse events were weight loss (51.7 %), increased aspartate aminotransferase (48.3 %), leukocytopenia (48.3 %), and neutropenia (48.3 %). TRAEs of grade 3 or higher occurred in 51.7 % of patients, with no grade 4 TRAEs observed. ConclusionThis study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this combination, potentially improving outcomes as a first-line therapy, and offering a novel therapeutic approach for advanced HCC.

Restriction of salt, alcohol and coffee intake and Ménière's disease: insight from Mendelian randomization study.

Restricting salt, caffeine, and alcohol intake is commonly recommended as a first-line treatment for patients with Ménière's disease (MD). However, it remains unclear whether these interventions effectively improve symptoms of MD. Therefore, we conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to evaluate the relationship between these dietary modifications and MD. Summary statistics for salt added to food, alcohol consumption, coffee consumption, and MD were sourced from the United Kingdom Biobank, GSCAN, and the FinnGen study, involving up to 941,280 participants. The main analyses were performed using the random-effects inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach and were complemented by four additional methods. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to validate the findings, and both forward and reverse MR analyses were employed to address potential reverse causality bias. The primary MR results using the IVW method revealed that salt added to food (OR = 0.719, 95% CI: 0.429-1.206; p = 0.211), alcohol consumption (OR = 0.834, 95% CI: 0.427-1.628; p = 0.595), and coffee consumption (OR = 0.852, 95% CI: 0.555-1.306; p = 0.461) were not significantly correlated with MD. In reverse analysis, no evidence of significant effect was found from MD to salt added to food (OR = 1.000, 95% CI: 0.993-1.007; p = 0.957), alcohol consumption (OR = 0.998, 95% CI: 0.987-1.008; p = 0.682), and coffee consumption (OR = 0.998, 95% CI: 0.985-1.011; p = 0.72). This MR analysis did not identify convincing evidence to support the idea that restricting salt, caffeine, and alcohol intake is beneficial for the treatment of MD.

Budget impact of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel for primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer from a third-party US payer perspective

Aim Dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel (CP) significantly increased progression-free survival in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (pA/rEC) vs CP alone in the RUBY trial (NCT03981796). This analysis estimated the per-member-per-month (PMPM) costs of introducing dostarlimab + CP as a treatment alternative from a third-party US payer perspective. Materials and methods A budget impact model was developed to estimate the costs of introducing dostarlimab + CP into commercial and Medicare health plans over a 3-year time horizon (2023–2025). Costs were sourced from relevant literature and US-specific databases and were calculated using epidemiology data, clinical inputs, treatment costs, and market share estimates. Clinical inputs were sourced from primary clinical trials for each respective treatment (i.e. dostarlimab + CP, CP, pembrolizumab, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib, bevacizumab + CP, and pembrolizumab + CP). Current and future market shares assumed dostarlimab + CP reduced the market share of CP only. Analyses were performed in mismatch repair–deficient/microsatellite instability–high (dMMR/MSI-H) and overall populations using a US 2023 cost year. Results For a commercial plan, the model estimated (dMMR/MSI-H and overall populations) that 7 and 26 patients would be treated with dostarlimab + CP, respectively; average annual budget impacts per patient treated were $118,257 and $116,094; average budget impacts per patient treated per month (PPPM) were $9,855 and $9,675; average budget impacts PMPM were $0.02 and $0.06. For a Medicare plan, the model estimated that 28 and 93 patients, respectively, would be treated with dostarlimab + CP. Average annual budget impacts per patient treated and PPPM were the same as those for the commercial plan in both populations; average budget impacts PMPM were $0.07 and $0.22, respectively. Conclusions Introducing dostarlimab + CP as a first-line treatment for patients with pA/rEC results in minimal budget impact PMPM from a US third-party payer’s perspective. Together with the efficacy and safety results from RUBY, these results support the use of dostarlimab + CP as a treatment option.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line enfortumab vedotin in addition to pembrolizumab for metastatic urothelial carcinoma in the United States.

The EV-302 trial found that the combination of enfortumab vedotin (EV) with pembrolizumab significantly improved survival for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). However, given the high cost of the drugs, there is a need to assess its value by considering both efficacy and cost. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of EV plus pembrolizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with mUC from the perspective of U.S. payers. A Markov model was developed to compare the lifetime costs and effectiveness of EV in combination with pembrolizumab with chemotherapy in the treatment of mUC patients from U.S. payer perspective. Life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted LYs (QALYs), and lifetime costs were estimated. One-way, two-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to evaluate model uncertainty. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed. Compared to chemotherapy, the combination of EV and pembrolizumab provided an additional 2.10 LYs and 1.72 QALYs, at an incremental cost of $962,240.8 per patient. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) is $558,973 per QALY. Subgroup analysis indicated that patients ineligible for cisplatin treatment had a lower ICER compared to those who were eligible for cisplatin. From the perspective of US payers, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY, the combination of EV and pembrolizumab is estimated to not be cost-effective compared to traditional chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of mUC patients.

Outcomes of first-line treatment and their association with pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Insights from a tertiary care institute in Pakistan.

Renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) are renal parenchymal neoplasms that contribute to <5% of cancer cases worldwide. Within the diverse group of renal tumours, clear cell carcinoma is the most common subtype. The recommended first-line treatment for metastatic disease is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor given either as monotherapy or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor, based on improved survival outcomes. These endpoints are not only influenced by the initial risk stratification but also by certain variables such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratio. A retrospective review was conducted to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) with first-line treatment in patients with metastatic RCC treated at our institute from the year 2017-2021. We also investigated the association of PFS with both Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center risk groups and the pretreatment NLR ratio. Overall, 35 patients were enrolled after fulfilling the eligibility criteria. Of these, 25 patients received Pazopanib, 5 patients were treated with Sunitinib and the remaining patients were administered Pembrolizumab with Axitinib. Two-thirds of the study population belonged to the intermediate-risk group. The median PFS for all participants was 16 months. Among the overall population, patients in the favourable-risk group demonstrated superior PFS. Patients with elevated pretreatment NLR experienced shorter PFS compared to the patients with low to normal NLR. This review highlights the prognostic significance of initial risk stratification and pretreatment NLR in predicting the response to first-line treatment in metastatic RCC patients. As this is a comprehensive study emphasizing the outcomes of metastatic RCC in Pakistan, it fills a void in the literature by providing invaluable perspectives on the real-world outcomes of patients. This not only enhances our understanding of disease management in this region but also lays the foundation for future investigations.

Conversion Surgery After Chemotherapy Plus Nivolumab as the First-Line Treatment for Unresectable Advanced or Recurrent Gastric Cancer and a Biomarker Study Using the Gustave Roussy Immune Score: A Multicenter Study.

There are few reports on conversion surgery (CS) after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). This multicenter study was conducted to analyze real-world data on CS after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as a first-line treatment and to identify predictive biomarkers. This multicenter study included 104 patients who received chemotherapy plus nivolumab as primary treatment for unresectable advanced recurrent GC from 12 institutes. We investigated and analyzed patient characteristics and blood test data in the presence or absence of CS, the relationship between the Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-s) and CS, and the characteristics of CS cases. CS was performed in 12 patients (11.5%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) was significantly better in patients who underwent CS (p<0.0001). There were no CS cases with high-risk GRIm-s (0%), however there were 22 non-CS cases (23.9%). No high-risk GRIm-s cases were converted to CS. Minimally invasive surgery was performed in 50.0% of the cases, with R0 resection in all cases and only one case of urinary retention (Grade II) as a postoperative complication, indicating a good postoperative short-term outcome. There were two cases of postoperative recurrence (16.7%), both of which were grade 1b. The short-term postoperative results of CS after chemotherapy plus nivolumab as the first-line treatment for GC were acceptable in this study. There were no high-risk GRIm-s cases among those who underwent CS, suggesting that the GRIm-s may be a predictor of CS.

518MO Update analysis of the randomized phase II study comparing FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus FOLFOXIRI plus RAM as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: WJOG9216G (RECAST)

518MO Update analysis of the randomized phase II study comparing FOLFIRI plus ramucirumab (RAM) versus FOLFOXIRI plus RAM as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: WJOG9216G (RECAST)

Adenomas hipofisarios no funcionantes. Incidentaloma hipofisario

Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (NFPAs) are tumors of the pituitary gland that are usually benign and show no clinical or biochemical signs of excessive hormone production. These tumors manifest clinically when they are large enough to exert pressure on surrounding structures. Among pituitary incidentaloma, NFPAs are the most common, as they are often diagnosed accidentally during imaging tests performed for other reasons. To properly evaluate these tumors and their relationship to other structures, the use of contrast-enhanced MRI is preferred. In addition, it is necessary to perform a hormonal analysis to rule out hormonal alterations and a neuro-ophthalmological examination in those cases in which the adenomas are close to the optic chiasm or cavernous sinuses, or in patients who present vision problems. In cases where the tumors are symptomless, observation is an option. However, transsphenoidal surgery is the first-line treatment for patients with symptoms or large tumors. Other options include radiation therapy and medical treatment with dopaminergic agonists and other drugs that are being explored more recently.

Corporal aspiration and sympathomimetic injection for priapism: “Preprocedure preparation” and “procedural considerations”

Priapism is a prolonged and persistent erection that lasts more than 4 hours and is unrelated to sexual stimulation. Although uncommon, it requires expeditious treatment to prevent erectile function compromise. Corporal aspiration is the first-line treatment for patients with ischemic priapism. This article focuses on contemporary corporal aspiration techniques for the management of priapism. After obtaining informed consent and administering local anesthesia, corporal aspiration was initiated by inserting 2 large-bore butterfly needles into the penile shaft. Aspiration is then performed using 10-mL syringes to decompress the corporeal pressure, flush out clots, and restore the pH balance of the penis. Diluted phenylephrine (100–1000 μg/mL) is injected in 1 mL aliquots every 5 to 10 minutes until complete detumescence is achieved. The results show that the overall resolution rate using corporal aspiration followed by phenylephrine injection is 65% to 72%. Ninety percent of men experience detumescence success if aspiration and phenylephrine injection are performed within 12 hours. Conversely, 85% of patients with priapism may require penile shunt surgery if the priapism exceeds 24 hours, and in the majority of these patients, health care providers will consider placing a penile prosthesis if the priapism exceeds 36 hours. Corporal aspiration is the first-line treatment for priapism. When properly performed expeditiously, patients experience a high rate of detumescence. Ischemic priapism is a true urological emergency that requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The advantages of using corporal aspiration as a first-line treatment include pain relief and the prompt restoration of circulation.

Efficacy of First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab in Unresectable Pleural Mesothelioma: A Multicenter Real-World Study (ImmunoMeso LATAM)

BackgroundThe phase 3 CheckMate-743 trial demonstrated a prolonged overall survival (OS) benefit with nivolumab plus ipilimumab over chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with unresectable pleural mesothelioma (PM). However, given that Latin American (LATAM) patients were notably underrepresented in this trial, we retrospectively assessed the effectiveness and safety of this regimen in this population. MethodsThis retrospective study included patients from 15 centers in LATAM with unresectable or metastatic PM treated with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in a real-world data (RWD) scenario. Demographic, clinicopathological characteristics, and safety data were collected from medical charts. Progression-free survival (PFS), and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. ResultsFrom June 2017, and January 2024 96 patients were included: epithelioid 78% (n = 75), 81% were ECOG 0-1 (n = 78). With a median follow-up of 24.1 months, median PFS and OS were 8 months (95% CI, 6.6-9.4), and 22 months (95% CI, 18.9-25), respectively. No statistical difference in OS was observed between epithelioid versus nonepithelioid histology (median 23 months vs. 19 months, respectively; P = .29). Treatment efficacy was also consistent among different clinical subgroups. Any and grade 3-4 adverse events were found in 43.1% (n = 28), and 18.5% (n = 12) of patients, respectively. Remarkably, no OS impact was observed in patients who had dose delay or treatment discontinuation due to immune-related adverse events, and those who experienced any adverse event. ConclusionsThis multicenter RWD study demonstrated the clinically meaningful benefit of first-line ipilimumab and nivolumab in LATAM patients with unresectable or metastatic PM, and data is consistent with previous trial findings.

628P Efficacy and safety of larotrectinib as first-line treatment for patients (pts) with TRK fusion cancer: An updated analysis

628P Efficacy and safety of larotrectinib as first-line treatment for patients (pts) with TRK fusion cancer: An updated analysis

CLL-247 Venetoclax Plus Ibrutinib As First-line Treatment in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

CLL-247 Venetoclax Plus Ibrutinib As First-line Treatment in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Venetoclax Plus Ibrutinib As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Venetoclax Plus Ibrutinib As First-Line Treatment in Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors in metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with immuno-oncology combination therapy.

Metastatic nonclear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) is a heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis. The clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapy for nccRCC are not well known. This study analyzed patients with metastatic nccRCC treated with IO combination therapy. We retrospectively collected data from 447 patients with metastatic RCC treated with IO-based combination therapy as first-line treatment between September 2018 and July 2023 in a Japanese multicenter study. The primary endpoints were objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS), comparing groups treated with IO-IO and IO-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapies. Seventy-five patients with metastatic nccRCC were eligible for analysis: 39 were classified into the IO-IO group and 36 into the IO-TKI group. Median PFS was 5.4months (95% CI: 1.6-9.1) for the IO-IO group and 5.6 (95% CI: 3.4-12.0) for the IO + TKI group. Median OS was 24.2months (95% CI: 7.5-NA) for the IO-IO group and 23.4 (95% CI: 18.8-NA) for the IO + TKI group, with no significant difference. In univariate analysis, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium scores, Karnofsky performance status, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and the presence of liver metastases were significantly associated with OS, whereas in multivariate analysis, only the presence of liver metastases was significantly associated with OS (P = .035). There was no significant difference in OS or PFS between IO-IO and IO-TKI combination therapy as first-line treatment for patients with nccRCC. Liver metastasis is a poor prognostic factor for such patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Dysphagia in Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer.

Background/Objectives: Recently, pembrolizumab plus 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP), nivolumab plus FP, and nivolumab plus ipilimumab have become the first-line treatments for patients with advanced esophageal cancer. However, the treatment efficacy in primary tumors has not been reported. We assessed the outcomes of these treatments in advanced esophageal cancer, specifically focusing on esophageal dysphagia improvements and the primary tumor response. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between October 2021 and November 2023. We investigated 23 patients with esophageal cancer and dysphagia who received an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus FP or nivolumab plus ipilimumab. Results: The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.0-12.5), and the median overall survival was not reached (95%CI: 13.0-NA). Improvement in dysphagia was observed in 19/23 (82.6%) patients, with a median time to improvement of 26 days (range: 15-77 days) and a median dysphagia PFS of 12.6 months (range: 8.1-NA months). Ten patients experienced immune-related adverse events (irAEs): seven had interstitial pneumonia, and three had thyroid dysfunction, pituitary dysfunction, and rash, respectively. Conclusions: Although there was a high frequency of irAEs, ICI for esophageal cancer achieved high response rates and prolonged survival. The observed improvement in dysphagia suggests the potential efficacy of the treatment against primary tumors.

Risk factors for biliary tract events during elective cholecystectomy waiting time after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis.

Endoscopic lithotripsy and elective cholecystectomy, followed by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, are the first-line treatments for patients with common bile duct (CBD) stones (CBDS) and gallstones. However, this approach entails acute cholecystitis and recurrent cholangitis risk while patients await surgery. We aimed to identify acute cholecystitis and cholangitis risk factors during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy. This study comprised 151 patients with CBDS combined with gallstones who underwent cholecystectomy within 90 days of the first endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographyat two tertiary care centers between January 2019 and October 2021. The incidence of biliary tract events (acute cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, or any complications requiring unplanned cholangiopancreatography) was 28% (43 cases). In univariate and multivariate analyses, plastic stent placement as a bridge to surgery for the first treatment of CBDS was an independent risk factor for biliary tract events during the waiting time for surgery (odds ratio 4.25, p = 0.002). A subgroup analysis among those with plastic stent placement revealed a CBD diameter of ≤ 10 mm as an independent risk factor for acute cholecystitis (odds ratio 4.32; p = 0.027); a CBD diameter ≥ 11 mm was an independent risk factor for acute cholangitis and unplanned re-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (odds ratio 5.66; p = 0.01). Plastic stent placement for CBDS before elective cholecystectomy increases the risk of acute cholecystitis or acute cholangitis during the waiting time for elective cholecystectomy.

Model-informed Evidence for Clinical Non-inferiority of Every-2-Weeks Versus Standard Weekly Dosing Schedule of Cetuximab in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

Cetuximab was initially developed and approved as a first-line treatment in patients with unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) for weekly administration (250 mg/m2 Q1W with 400 mg/m2 loading dose). An every-2-weeks schedule (500 mg/m2 Q2W) was approved recently by several health authorities. Being synchronized with chemotherapy, Q2W administration should improve patients' convenience and healthcare resource utilization. Herein, we present evidence of non-inferiority of Q2W cetuximab, compared with Q1W dosing using pharmacometrics modeling and clinical trial simulation (CTS). Pooled data from five phase I-III clinical trials in 852 patients with KRAS wild-type mCRC treated with Q1W or Q2W cetuximab were modeled using a population exposure-tumor size (TS) model linked to overall survival (OS); exposure was derived from a previously established population pharmacokinetic model. A semi-mechanistic TS model adapted from the Claret model incorporated killing rate proportional to cetuximab area under the concentration-time curve over 2 weeks (AUC) with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status as covariate on baseline TS. The OS was modeled with Weibull hazard using ECOG, baseline TS, primary tumor location, and predicted percent change in TS at 8 weeks as covariates. Model-based simulations revealed indistinguishable early tumor shrinkage and survival between Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab. CTS evaluated OS non-inferiority (predefined margin of 1.25) in 1,000 trials, each with 2,000 virtual patients receiving Q2W or Q1W cetuximab (1:1), and demonstrated non-inferiority in 94% of cases. Taken together, these analyses provide model-based evidence for clinical non-inferiority of Q2W vs. Q1W cetuximab in mCRC with potential benefits to patients and healthcare providers.

A single-arm, exploratory study of disitamab vedotin (DV) combined with camrelizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with HER2 expressing locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

TPS217 Background: Esophageal cancer (EC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) being the predominant histological subtype. PD-1 blockades combined with chemotherapy are now standard-of-care in first-line setting for patients with ESCC. HER2 expression, prevalent in an estimated 7.6% to 28.5% of ESCC cases, correlates with diminished overall survival, suggesting HER2-targeted therapy as a potential novel approach. To our knowledge, there is currently no clinical trial regarding anti-HER2 therapy in ESCC. Clinical evidence has suggested the potential synergistic anti-tumor effect of Disitamab Vedotin (DV) with PD-1 inhibitors in HER2-expressing gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancers. This single-arm, exploratory study aimed to evaluate the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of DV combined with camrelizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in ESCC. Methods: This is a single-arm, exploratory study (NCT06055153). Approximately 20 patients will be enrolled in this study, phase 1 will initiate with a 3+3 dose-escalation scheme (2.5mg/kg to 2.0mg/kg) to identify dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and establish a safe dosage of DV. The expansion cohort will subsequently evaluate this dose for both efficacy and safety. The study population will included both male and female patients over the age of 18 with histologically confirmed ESCC, and locally advanced unresectable, recurrent unresectable or metastatic EC verified by imaging examination. This group also includes those patients who have experienced relapse or progression more than six months post the conclusion of last therapeutic regimen. Required HER2 expression levels in tumor specimens range from IHC 1+ to 3+. According to RECIST v1.1, participants must have at least one measurable lesion, an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, and a minimum expected survival of 12 weeks with suitable organ function. Treatment protocol includes intravenous administration of DV (either 2.5 mg/kg or 2.0 mg/kg on day 1), Camrelizumab (200 mg on day 1), and Cisplatin (75mg/m2) or Nedaplatin (75mg/m2) on a 21-day cycle, continued until disease progression or the advent of unacceptable toxicity. The primary outcomes for evaluation are DLT for safety and the objective response rate (ORR) for efficacy. Adverse events will be monitored in accordance with the CTCAE 5.0 criteria. Secondary endpoints encompass progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), and time to response (TTR). Clinical trial information: NCT06055153 .