First-line Treatment For Patients Research Articles

Sintilimab, doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), synovial sarcoma (SS), myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) and de-differentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS): A single-arm phase 2 trial.

Sintilimab, doxorubicin and ifosfamide (AI) as first-line treatment in patients with advanced undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), synovial sarcoma (SS), myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) and de-differentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS): A single-arm phase 2 trial.

Comparison of chemotherapy to chemo-immunotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with advanced large cell neuroendocrine carcinomas (LCNECs) of mixed histology: A multi-institutional international retrospective study.

8602 Background: LCNECs are a rare subtype of lung cancer, with limited clinical trial data and an unclear consensus on first-line treatment. Even less is known about the optimal treatment approach for pts with mixed LCNECs, a pathologic subtype where tumors contain both LCNEC histology as well as features of adenocarcinoma, squamous cell, or small cell lung cancer. Methods: We conducted an international multi-institutional retrospective analysis (n=13 institutions) of pts with advanced or metastatic mixed LCNECs who received 1st-line systemic therapy with either chemotherapy alone (chemo) or chemo-immunotherapy (chemoIO) between 2010-2023. Clinical outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs). Survival comparisons were made via the log-rank test. Results: Seventy-three pts with mixed LCNECs received either chemo (n=42, 57.5%) or chemoIO (n=31, 42.5%). The most common chemo regimens were carboplatin/etoposide (n=27) and cisplatin/etoposide (n=8), while the most common chemoIO was carboplatin/etoposide/atezolizumab (n=19). Median age at 1st-line therapy initiation was 65 (IQR: 60-72). 64% of pts were male (n=47). The majority were former smokers (n=41, 56.2%), with 22 current smokers (30.1%), and 10 non-smokers (13.7%). Mixed histologies included LCNEC/NSCLC (n=45, 56.2%), LCNEC/SCLC (n=17), LCNEC/carcinoid (n=1), and unspecified mixed LCNEC (n=10). Median PFS for chemo was 5 months (95% CI 2.7-9.2) vs. 6 months (95% CI 4.4-8.3) for chemoIO ( p=0.86). Median OS for chemo was 14.2 months (95% CI 10.4-22.5) vs. 17.2 months (95% CI 9.4-27.2) for chemoIO ( p=0.66). The ORR did not differ between chemo (n=18, 45%) and chemoIO (n=15, 48.4%) ( p=0.81). In the chemo group, 60% (n=25) experienced trAEs of any grade, with 23.8% (n=10) experiencing grade 3+ events and four requiring hospitalizations. For chemoIO pts, 61% (n=19) experienced trAEs, with 25.8% (n=8) experiencing grade 3+ events and six requiring hospitalizations. Neutropenia was the most common grade 3+ trAE for both chemo (n=5) and chemoIO (n=4). Overall, there were no significant differences between chemo or chemoIO groups for ORR ( p=0.81), all-grade trAEs ( p=0.88), grade 3+ trAEs ( p=0.84), PFS ( p=0.86), or median OS ( p=0.66). There were no significant differences in median PFS ( p=0.46) or OS ( p=0.99) for pts with mixed LCNEC/NSCLC vs. LCNEC/SCLC. Conclusions: For mixed LCNECs, there was no significant difference in PFS or OS between first-line treatment with chemo vs. chemoIO, suggesting limited benefit from immunotherapy for these pts. Additionally, survival outcomes did not differ between mixed LCNEC/NSCLC and LCNEC/SCLC, suggesting a biology primarily driven by their neuroendocrine component.

BEAT-SC: A randomized phase III study of bevacizumab or placebo in combination with atezolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC).

8001 Background: Atezolizumab combined with carboplatin and etoposide is approved as first-line treatment for patients with ES-SCLC, based on results from the Phase I/III IMpower133 trial (NCT02763579). The VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab (bev) is approved for the treatment of many tumor types and has synergistic effects when combined with atezolizumab, as demonstrated by the Phase III IMpower150 study (NCT02366143) in non-small cell lung cancer. BEAT-SC (jRCT2080224946) is evaluating the efficacy and safety of bev combined with atezolizumab and platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC from Japan and China. Here, we report the primary analysis for progression-free survival (PFS) and the first interim analysis for overall survival (OS) from BEAT-SC. Methods: Eligible patients had measurable ES-SCLC, were aged ≥20 y (≥18 y for patients from China), had an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 and had no prior systemic treatment for ES-SCLC. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive 4 cycles (21 days/cycle) of induction therapy with bev combined with atezolizumab + cisplatin or carboplatin + etoposide (ACE) or placebo combined with ACE, followed by maintenance therapy with bev + atezolizumab or placebo + atezolizumab, respectively. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS (INV-PFS). Key secondary endpoints included OS and safety. Results: The ITT population comprised 333 patients with a median age of 65.0 y; 82.6% of the patients were male, 57.7% were from China, 91.8% received carboplatin and 87.6% were current or former smokers. At data cutoff (June 30, 2023; median follow-up, 10.2 mo), median INV-PFS was 5.7 mo for bev + ACE vs 4.4 mo for placebo + ACE (HR, 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54, 0.90; P=0.0060; 2-sided α boundary=0.05). Median OS was 13.0 mo for bev + ACE vs 16.6 mo for placebo + ACE (HR, 1.22; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.67; P=0.2212; 2-sided α boundary=0.0079). Among the safety analysis population (n=330), bev + ACE was well-tolerated and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were generally similar between treatment arms (Table). Conclusions: BEAT-SC met its primary endpoint, demonstrating that the addition of bev to ACE significantly increased PFS vs placebo + ACE. OS data were immature at the first interim OS analysis, and the numerical OS improvement of bev + ACE was not shown vs placebo + ACE; OS follow-up will continue. No new safety signals were observed. Clinical trial information: jRCT2080224946 . [Table: see text]

331P Phase Ib/IIa study to evaluate safety and efficacy of priming treatment with the hedgehog inhibitor NLM-001 prior to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel plus zalifrelimab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: NUMANTIA study

331P Phase Ib/IIa study to evaluate safety and efficacy of priming treatment with the hedgehog inhibitor NLM-001 prior to gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel plus zalifrelimab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: NUMANTIA study

Sacituzumab tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870) in combination with KL-A167 (anti-PD-L1) as first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC from the phase II OptiTROP-Lung01 study.

8502 Background: Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (SKB264/MK-2870)is a TROP2 ADC developed with novel linker to conjugate the payload, a belotecan-derivative topoisomerase I inhibitor. The hydrolytically linker permits both extracellular pH-sensitive cleavage and intracellular enzymatic cleavage to release the membrane permeable payload enabling the “bystander effect”. Here, we report the initial results from a phase II study of SKB264 combined with KL-A167 in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC (OptiTROP-Lung01, NCT05351788). Methods: Pts with treatment naive advanced NSCLC without actionable genomic alterations were enrolled to receive SKB264 5 mg/kg Q3W + KL-A167 1200 mg Q3W (cohort 1A) or SKB264 5 mg/kg Q2W + KL-A167 900 mg Q2W (cohort 1B) in a non-randomized manner until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor assessments based on RECIST 1.1 were performed every 6 weeks by investigators. Results: As of 02 Jan 2024, 40 and 63 pts have been enrolled in cohort 1A and 1B. Median ages were 63/63 years; 97.5%/85.7% had ECOG PS of 1; 30.0%/33.3%, 32.5%/30.2% and 37.5%/36.5% of pts had PD-L1 expression < 1%, 1%–49% and ≥ 50% of tumor cells by IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay, respectively. In cohorts 1A/1B, the most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutrophil count decreased (30.0%/30.2%), white blood cell count decreased (5.0%/17.5%), anemia (5.0%/15.9%), rash (5.0%/6.3%) and drug eruption (7.5%/0). TRAE leading to discontinuation of SKB264 occurred in 1 pt of cohort 1B due to drug hypersensitivity, and there were no treatment-related deaths. After median follow up of 14.0 mos and 6.9 mos for cohort 1A and 1B, the ORR was 48.6% (18/37, 2 pending confirmation), DCR was 94.6% and median PFS was 15.4 mos (95% CI: 6.7, NE) with 6-mo PFS rate of 69.2% for cohort 1A ; the ORR was 77.6% (45/58, 5 pending confirmation), DCR was 100% and median PFS was not reached with 6-mo PFS rate of 84.6% for cohort 1B. Additional subgroup analyses are shown in the Table. Conclusions: SKB264 in combination with KL-A167 demonstrated promising efficacy results in treatment naive advanced NSCLC with manageable safety profile. SKB264 Q2W was recommended for further investigation. A Phase 3 study of SKB264 Q2W plus pembrolizumab vs pembrolizumab in 1L metastatic NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥ 50% (NCT06170788) is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT05351788 . [Table: see text]

285P Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: A multicenter, single-arm, phase I/II trial

285P Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: A multicenter, single-arm, phase I/II trial

Amivantamab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment among patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion–mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): PAPILLON Chinese subgroup analysis.

8606 Background: Amivantamab (Ami) is a bispecific antibody targeting EGFR and MET tyrosine kinase receptors with immune cell-directing activity. The phase 3 PAPILLON study (NCT04538664) investigated the combination of Ami and carboplatin/pemetrexed (ACP) vs. carboplatin/pemetrexed (CP) as first-line treatment in patients (pts) with advanced EGFR Exon20ins-mutated NSCLC. ACP improved progression free survival (PFS) in both the overall population and Asian subgroup. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to ACP or CP. The primary endpoint was PFS by blinded independent central review (BICR) and key secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), PFS after first subsequent therapy (PFS2), overall survival (OS), and safety. Crossover to Ami monotherapy was allowed for pts in CP arm following disease progression. Results: Among the 308 pts enrolled, 87 were Chinese, with 39 receiving ACP and 48 receiving CP. Median age was 57/57 years, 46%/63% were female, and 15%/25% history of brain metastases for pts in ACP/CP arms. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. After a median follow-up of 16.4 months (mo), median PFS was 12.3 mo (95% CI: 7.00, NE) in ACP arm compared with 6.7 mo (95% CI: 4.21, 8.57) in CP arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.26-0.85; P = 0.011) (Table). ORR was 71.8% (95% CI, 55.1%-85.0%) for ACP, and 48.9% (95% CI, 34.1%–63.9%) for CP (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.01-5.98; P = 0.048). Median PFS2 was not estimable (NE) for ACP vs 18.8 mo for CP (HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.88; P = 0.021). Interim OS showed a favorable trend for ACP vs CP (HR, 0.58; 95% CI: 0.17-2.02; P = 0.387) despite crossover among CP-randomized pts (n = 24, 50%) who had progressed. Most common AEs (all grades) ( > 50%) in ACP arm were rash, paronychia, hypoalbuminemia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia which were consistent with the known safety profile of the individual agents. Notably, no pts had discontinuation of Ami due to an AE. Conclusions: ACP demonstrated superior PFS compared to CP in Chinese pts. The safety profile was manageable and tolerable. These findings in Chinese subgroup were consistent with those of overall population and Asian subgroup. Clinical trial information: NCT04538664 . [Table: see text]

HB-200 arenavirus-based immunotherapy plus pembrolizumab as first-line treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic HPV16-positive head and neck cancer: Updated results.

6005 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) with no approved treatment specifically targeting human papillomavirus (HPV) 16-positive tumors. In the first-line (1L) R/M setting, only a minority of patients (~20%) respond to pembrolizumab monotherapy, including those with high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in the tumor. HB-200 comprises an alternating sequence of two replicating attenuated arenavirus vectors derived from LCMV (HB-201) and Pichinde virus (HB-202), respectively. HB-200 vectors express a non-oncogenic HPV16 E7E6 fusion protein and induce E6 and E7-specific CD8 T-cell responses. Previously, we reported promising preliminary clinical activity of HB-200 in combination with pembrolizumab as 1L treatment for patients with HPV16+ PD-L1+ R/M HNSCC. Here, we report updated results with a focus on PD-L1 status. Methods: In this non-randomized Phase 2 part of the study, participants with HPV16+ PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 R/M HNSCC were treated with HB-200 intravenously (every 3 weeks [Q3W] then Q6W) in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg Q3W or 400 mg Q6W). Safety, T cell response, and preliminary antitumor activity were assessed. Results: As of 12 January 2024, 42 patients with HPV16+ PD-L1+ R/M HNSCC (41 of oropharynx as primary cancer site) were treated with HB-200 plus pembrolizumab in the 1L setting. Median follow-up time was 5.6 months. Characteristics of this cohort included: median age 66 years (range 50-77), 41 (98%) male, 37 (88%) White, 14 (33%) with ≥ 10 pack/year smoking history, 40 (95%) check point inhibitor (CPI) naïve (2 received CPI in the adjuvant setting), and 21 (50%) with PD-L1 CPS ≥ 20. HB-200 + pembrolizumab were generally well tolerated. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 6 (14%) patients, serious TRAEs in 3 (7%) patients, and TRAEs leading to treatment discontinuation in 2 (5%) patients. No treatment-related death were reported. Among 35 evaluable patients (those with ≥ 1 tumor response assessments), the overall response rate (ORR) was 43% (3 complete response [CR], 9 partial response [PR], 3 unconfirmed PR) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 71%. Notably, among patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥20 (N = 17), ORR was 59% (3 CR, 6 PR, 1 unconfirmed PR) and DCR was 88%. Conclusions: Updated data of HB-200 arenavirus-based immunotherapy plus pembrolizumab continued to demonstrate a favorable safety profile and promising clinical activity as 1L treatment in patients with HPV16+ PD-L1+ R/M HNSCC and confirms previously reported data. The results suggest that the subgroup of patients with PD-L1 CPS ≥20 may benefit more from this treatment, which warrants further development in a randomized pivotal study. Clinical trial# NCT04180215. Clinical trial information: NCT04180215 .

Maintenance therapy with avelumab as the first-line treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A real-world, ambispective RAVE-Bladder study.

Maintenance therapy with avelumab as the first-line treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma: A real-world, ambispective RAVE-Bladder study.

Latest results of a phase 2 study of IMM01 combined with azacitidine (AZA) as the first-line treatment in adults with higher risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).

6510 Background: Patients diagnosed with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have poor prognosis. Azacitidine (Aza) has been shown to prolong survival in patients with treatment-naive, higher-risk MDS compared to a menu of standard of care options. IMM01 is a fusion protein comprising a recombinant signal regulatory protein α (SIRPα) and IgG1, exerting anti-tumor effects by inhibiting the "Don't eat me" signal and activating the "Eat me" signal, leading to robust antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis (ADCP). Methods: This is an open-label, multi-center, phase 2 study (NCT05140811) that evaluated safety and efficacy of IMM01 in combination with AZA as the first-line treatment for patients with untreated higher-risk MDS. Enrolled patients were aged ≥18 years with intermediate to very high risk MDS, as defined by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) score >3.5, and were not eligible for stem cell transplant or intensive chemotherapy. Patients were received intravenous IMM01 at a dosage of 2.0mg/kg/week and subcutaneous AZA at a dosage of 75 mg/m2 on days1-7 per 28-day cycle. Results: By the cutoff-day of Dec 22, 2023, 57 patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 64 (30-83) years, with 41 (71.9%) being male, and 55 (96.5%) having an ECOG of ≥1. Based on risk classification per IPSS-R, 43.9% were high risk (HR) and 31.6% were very high risk (vHR). At baseline, the median levels of blood counts were 69 (35-136)g/L for hemoglobin, 43 (2-409)×109/L for platelets and 0.8 (0.1-8.6)×109/L for neutrophils. The median duration of follow-up was 12.8 months (95%CI:9.7-15.3). Among the 51 efficacy evaluable patients, overall response rate (ORR) was 64.7%, including 29.4% complete response (CR) rate, 15.7% marrow CR (mCR) with hematologic improvement (HI), 5.9% HI and 13.7% mCR alone. The median time to response (TTR) was 1.9 months (95%CI:1.8-2.8) and the median duration of response (DoR) was not reached(NR). The median of progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached, with an estimated 12-month PFS of 54.4% (95% CI, 31.4-72.6). NGS analysis identified common mutations in DNMT3A, ASXL1, U2AF1 and RUNX1. Notably, NPM1 mutations significantly correlate with treatment response, particularly achieving CR. The most common ≥G3 treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) (≥10%) included leukopenia (78.9%), thrombocytopenia (66.7%), neutropenia (66.7%), lymphopenia (56.1%), anemia (43.9%), infection (15.8%) and pneumonia (10.5%). Without using of a low priming dose, the Grade ≥3 hemolysis was rare (only 1.8%). Conclusions: IMM01 (without low-dose priming) combined with AZA were well tolerated and showed exciting efficacy results in patients with treatment-naive higher-risk MDS. Clinical trial information: NCT05140811 .

Advanced renal cell cancer combination immunotherapy clinical trial (ARCITECT; HCRN GU 22-587).

TPS4614 Background: First-line treatment for patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mccRCC) often includes an anti-PD1 inhibitor in combination with either an anti-CTLA inhibitor (IO/IO) or a VEGF receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) (IO/TKI). Although some patients treated with nivolumab/ipilimumab (Nivo/Ipi) (IO/IO) experience durable responses leading to treatment free intervals, over two-thirds experience disease progression. Resistance to Nivo (anti-PD1) monotherapy has been associated with increased presence of a subpopulation of Tregs in the tumor microenvironment. Botensilimab (Bot) is an IO agent that leverages novel FcyR-associated mechanisms of action to enhance T cell priming, deplete intratumoral Tregs and enhance myeloid activation. Combination botensilimab/balstilimab (Bot/Bal) (anti-CTLA/anti-PD1) has shown impressive anti-tumor activity in diseases where Nivo/Ipi has shown little to no efficacy. Methods: ARCITECT is a phase II, multicenter investigator initiated trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of Bot/Bal relative to Nivo/Ipi. Patients with mccRCC (favorable, intermediate, or poor risk), no prior systemic therapy (including adjuvant or neoadjuvant), and at least one measurable lesion as defined by RECIST 1.1 are eligible for enrollment. 120 patients will be randomized in a 2:1 fashion to Arm A (Bot/Bal induction followed by Bal maintenance) or Arm B (Nivo/Ipi induction followed by Nivo maintenance) each for a maximum of 2 years. Stratification factors include IMDC risk groups and sarcomatoid histology. The primary endpoint is overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1. We hypothesize that Bot/Bal will lead to a superior ORR (55%) relative to Nivo/Ipi (40%). This trial has > 90% power to detect the alternative hypothesis while maintaining a one-sided significance level of not more than 0.10 using the exact binomial. The study will be monitored for early stopping in favor of the null hypothesis based on a Simon’s two stage design. In the first stage, 69 patients will be enrolled (Arm A:46 and Arm B:23). If at the end of the first stage, Arm A has either at least 18/42 (42.8%) of eligible patients responding or an ORR at least numerically equivalent to that for eligible patients in Arm B, then the trial will progress to the second stage. The primary endpoint will be met if there are 38/80 responders (ORR > 47.5%) in Arm A. Key secondary endpoints include landmark progression-free survival, treatment-free survival and rates of immune-related adverse events. Correlative studies will explore immune and molecular predictors of response and resistance to IO/IO in tumor and blood. Clinical trial information: NCT05928806 .

Pembrolizumab plus nab-paclitaxel and platinum as first-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC): A prospective, single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study.

6023 Background: Based on KN-048, pembrolizumab combined with PF regimen has become the first-line standard treatment for R/M HNSCC. KN-B10 confirmed pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel has a promising effect with manageable safety. This study aims to supplement the efficacy and safety data of pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and platinum in the Chinese population. Methods: Untreated R/M HNSCC patients were treated with pembrolizumab 200mg, nab-paclitaxel 260mg/m2, plus cisplatin 75 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5 (only if patients have cisplatin contraindications) on day 1 every 21 days for up to six cycles, followed by pembrolizumab maintenance therapy until progression or intolerable toxicity or completion of 35 cycles. Efficacy was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1, and survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were assessed using the CTCAE 5.0. The primary endpoint was ORR. Secondary endpoints include safety, DCR, OS, and PFS. High-resolution sequencing based on probe capture was performed on eligible patients. Results: Between Sep 15, 2020, and Nov 8, 2023, 67 R/M HNSCC patients were enrolled. Baseline characteristics are shown in the table. The median follow-up time was 12.7 months at the data cut-off date of January 8th, 2023, the ORR was 62.7%, and the DCR was 88.1%. The median PFS and OS were 11.6 months and 18.7 months, respectively. The median DOR was 14.7 months. The most common TRAEs of grade ≥3 were leukopenia (22.4%) and neutropenia (28.4%). Grade≥3 immune-related AEs were pneumonitis (1.5%), hepatitis (1.5%), and enteritis (1.5%). Of the 35 patients with sequencing results, the most common alterations were the TP53 mutation (86%), CDKN2A mutation (22%), FGF19 (26%), FGF4 (20%), FGF3 (20%), and CCND1 (20%) amplification. FGF19, FGF4, FGF3, and CCND1 amplification were associated with poor ORR, and CDKN2A mutation was associated with poor OS. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab combined with nab-paclitaxel and platinum shows encouraging antitumor activity accompanied by a manageable safety profile in untreated R/M HNSCC patients in China. CDKN2A mutation was a potential independent prognostic factors for this patient population. Clinical trial information: NCT04857164 . [Table: see text]

Comparison of TKI and CPI strategies as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Real-world outcome data from the German research platform CARAT.

Comparison of TKI and CPI strategies as first-line treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: Real-world outcome data from the German research platform CARAT.

Randomized controlled, open-label, phase IIb/III study of lurbinectedin in combination with doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic leiomyosarcoma.

TPS11590 Background: Lurbinectedin (LUR) is a synthetic chemical entity structurally related to trabectedin that inhibits oncogenic transcription and is active in tumors addicted to transcription. Synergistic activity of the combination of LUR with Doxorubicin (DOX) was found in solid tumors. Preliminary results from two trials showed efficacy for LUR/DOX in anthracycline-naïve advanced Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (1st or 2nd line) at different doses. In a phase 2 trial in soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients (pts) (mostly with LMS: 12/20 pts), a combination of DOX 50 mg/m2 + LUR 2 mg/m2 Day (D)1 q3wk resulted in a response rate (RR) of 35% (4/7 LMS pts responding) and a disease control rate (DCR) at 24 wks of 40% (1). A phase 1b/2 trial in 10 advanced STS pts found a RR of 60% (5 were LMS, with 3 partial responses) treated at DOX 25 mg/m2 D1 or D1,D8 + LUR 3.2 mg/m2 D1 q3wk, (2). The promising results of these trials provide a rationale for further exploring this combination in a phase 2b/3 trial as first-line therapy for metastatic LMS (SaLuDo - NCT06088290). Methods: SaLuDo is a randomized, open-label study evaluating LUR in combination with DOX compared to DOX alone as first-line treatment of pts with metastatic LMS. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) according to Independent Radiological committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, PFS according to Investigator assessment (IA), overall response rate, duration of response, and clinical benefit rate (according to IRC and IA), safety profile, patient-reported outcomes, pharmacokinetics, and exploratory pharmacogenomic analysis. Main inclusion criteria include age ≥ 18 years, confirmed diagnosis of metastatic LMS, and no prior systemic treatment for metastatic disease. Exclusion criteria include prior treatment with anthracyclines, lurbinectedin or trabectedin. The phase 2b part of the study will randomize approximately 120 pts into 3 arms (1:1:1): Control arm (DOX 75 mg/m2 D1 q3wk; experimental ARM A (DOX 50 mg/m2 D1 + LUR 2.2 mg/m2 D1 + 1ry GCSF prophylaxis q3wk), and experimental ARM B (DOX 25 mg/m2 D1 + LUR 3.2mg/m2 D1 + 1ry GCSF prophylaxis q3wk). Stratification will be done according to site of primary tumor (uterine vs. soft tissue), sites of metastatic disease (lung as unique site vs. other) and time from diagnosis to study entry (≤ 12 months vs. >12 months). One of the two experimental arms will be dropped out at the end of phase 2b. The study will then enter the phase 3 part and approximately 120 pts will be randomized 1:1 between the control arm and the selected experimental arm. An Independent Data Monitoring Committee will oversee the conduct of the study. The first patient was randomized in 09/2023. The phase 2b part of the study is ongoing and recruiting patients in Europe and the USA. 1. Cote EJC 2020; 126:21-32. 2. Cote. JCO 2023; 41: Abst 11507. Clinical trial information: NCT06088290 .

Implementing High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy in Medical Wards: A Scoping Review to Understand Hospital Protocols and Procedures.

Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (ARF) is a common cause for hospital admission. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) is increasingly used as a first-line treatment for patients with ARF, including in medical wards. Clinical guidance is crucial when providing HFNO, and health services use local health guidance documents (LHGDs) to achieve this. It is unknown what hospital LHGDs recommend regarding ward administration of HFNO. This study examined Australian hospitals' LHGDs regarding ward-based HFNO administration to determine content that may affect safe delivery. A scoping review was undertaken on 2 May 2022 and updated on 29 January 2024 to identify public hospitals' LHGDs regarding delivery of HFNO to adults with ARF in medical wards in two Australian states. Data were extracted and analysed regarding HFNO initiation, monitoring, maintenance and weaning, and management of clinical deterioration. Of the twenty-six included LHGDs, five documents referenced Australian Oxygen Guidelines. Twenty LHGDs did not define a threshold level of hypoxaemia where HFNO use was recommended over conventional oxygen therapy. Thirteen did not provide target oxygen saturation ranges whilst utilising HFNO. Recommendations varied regarding maximal levels of inspired oxygen and flow rates in the medical ward. Eight LHGDs did not specify any system to identify and manage deteriorating patients. Five LHGDs did not provide guidance for weaning patients from HFNO. There was substantial variation in the LHGDs regarding HFNO care for adult patients with ARF in Australian hospitals. These findings have implications for the delivery of high-quality, safe clinical care in hospitals.

A comparative study on safety profile and efficacy of salmeterol and tiotropium in COPD Patients

Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study is assess the safety profile and efficacy of salmeterol and Tiotropium in patients with COPD. The objective is to compare to evaluate the safety profile and efficacy of salmeterol and Tiotropium in patients with COPD. Methodology: This was a prospective observational study conducted at secondary care hospital in India. In our study, we have included a total of 50 patients who are divided in to two groups based on their treatment and follow-ups was done for 12 weeks. Results: Patients were divided into 2 equal groups to receive salmeterol and Tiotropium (25 subjects each). The mean FEV1 level at baseline was 63.72±3.0210 for Tiotropium group and 64.96±1.645 for Salmeterol group and the mean FEV1 level after 12 weeks of treatment was 72.12±1.423 for Tiotropium group and 70.68±1.973 for Salmeterol group. Tiotropium treatment were associated with significant decrease in FEV1 level from baseline to 12 weeks. (P*<0.05). Conclusion: In our study, by performing the study, we concluded that tiotropium used once daily, produced superior bronchodilation and reduced dyspnea in patients with COPD when compared with salmeterol. Patients treated with tiotropium also indicated more improvement in their symptoms than those who treated with salmeterol. Because of these advantages, tiotropium should be considered first-line treatment in patients with COPD. While performing the safety parameters for a drug, side effects of tiotropium are less when compared to salmeterol.

Lenvatinib rechallenge after failure of lenvatinib and sorafenib in metastatic thyroid cancer.

The oral multikinase inhibitors sorafenib and lenvatinib are currently available as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable or metastatic thyroid cancer. However, treatment options for patients who are refractory to these multikinase inhibitors are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of rechallenged lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in the real-world clinical practice. We retrospectively reviewed the data of consecutive 16 patients with metastatic thyroid cancer who received lenvatinib as a rechallenge after failure of initial lenvatinib and sorafenib treatment at Shizuoka Cancer Center between 2016 and 2023. Of these, the initial lenvatinib was discontinued in 12 patients owing to progressive disease, in 3 patients owing to adverse events, and in 1 patient owing to both. The overall response rate was 6.7%, and disease control was achieved by rechallenge with lenvatinib in all patients with the target lesions. The median progression free survival after rechallenging with lenvatinib was 15.0 months. No new signs of toxicity were observed after rechallenging with lenvatinib. Our findings suggest that rechallenge with lenvatinib after failure of both lenvatinib and sorafenib showed manageable safety and modest efficacy in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer in clinical practice. The strategy of lenvatinib rechallenge may provide an alternative option for patients with no targetable driver genes or when selective kinase inhibitors are not indicated.

The lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio as a significant inflammatory marker associated with survival of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated using nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO + IPI) is the first-line treatment for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). While approximately 40% of patients treated with NIVO + IPI achieve a durable response, 20% develop primary resistance with severe consequences. Therefore, there is a clinical need for criteria to select patients suitable for NIVO + IPI therapy to optimize its therapeutic efficacy. Accordingly, our aim was to evaluate the association between candidate biomarkers measured before treatment initiation and survival. This was a multi-institutional, retrospective, cohort study of 183 patients with mRCC treated with systematic therapies between August 2015 and July 2023. Of these, 112 received NIVO + IPI as first-line therapy: mean age, 68years; men, 83.0% (n = 93), and clear cell histology, 80.4% (n = 90). Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate associations between biomarkers and survival. On univariate analysis, high C-reactive protein and systemic index, a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and a low lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) were associated with shorter overall survival (OS). On multivariable analysis, a LMR ≤ 3 was retained as an independent factor associated to shorter OS with the highest accuracy (C-index, 0.656; hazard ratio, 7.042; 95% confidence interval, 2.0-25.0; p = 0.002). A low LMR may identify patients who would be candidate for NIVO + IPI therapy for mRCC.

Analysis of sequential chemotherapy efficacy in ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma and primary peritoneal carcinoma

Objective: To explore the sequential chemotherapy efficacy of different chemotherapeutic regimens in ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical and pathological data of 100 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma treated at Peking University Peopel's Hospital from January 1992 to January 2019. All patients underwent staging surgery or cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on different postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, patients were divided into the sequential chemotherapy group (70 cases) and the conventional chemotherapy group (30 cases). Clinical and pathological characteristics, chemotherapy efficacy, adverse reactions, and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results: (1) Clinical and pathological characteristics: the age, tumor types (including ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma), pathological types, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, postoperative residual disease size, presence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and total number of chemotherapy cycles were compared between the sequential chemotherapy group and the conventional chemotherapy group. There were no statistically significant differences observed in these characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). (2) Chemotherapy efficacy: the median sum of complete response (CR)+partial response (PR) duration in the sequential chemotherapy group was 80.0 months (range: 39 to 369 months), whereas in the conventional chemotherapy group, it was 28.0 months (range: 13 to 52 months). A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (Z=-7.82, P<0.001). (3) Chemotherapy adverse reactions: in the sequential chemotherapy group, 55 cases (79%, 55/70) experienced bone marrow suppression and 20 cases (29%, 20/70) had neurological symptoms. In the conventional chemotherapy group, these adverse reactions occurred in 11 cases (37%, 11/30) and 2 cases (7%, 2/30), respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both bone marrow suppression and neurological symptoms (all P<0.05). For the other chemotherapy adverse reactions compared between the two groups, no statistically significant differences were observed (all P>0.05). (4) Prognosis: during the follow-up period, the recurrence rate in the sequential chemotherapy group was 73% (51/70) and in the conventional chemotherapy group was 100% (30/30). The median sum of recurrence-free interval was 70.5 months (range: 19 to 330 months) in the sequential chemotherapy group and 15.0 months (range: 6 to 40 months) in the conventional chemotherapy group. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both recurrence rate and median recurrence-free interval (all P<0.01).In the sequential chemotherapy group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 84.0 months (range: 34 to 373 months), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 87.0 months (range: 45 to 377 months). In contrast, in the conventional chemotherapy group, the median PFS time was 30.5 months (range: 14 to 60 months), and the median OS time was 37.5 months (range: 18 to 67 months). Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both PFS and OS (all P<0.001). In the sequential chemotherapy group, the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates were 100% (70/70), 93% (65/70), and 21% (15/70), respectively. In contrast, in the conventional chemotherapy group, the OS rates were 50% (15/30) at 3 years, 3% (1/30) at 5 years, and 0 at 10 years, respectively. The two groups were compared respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions: Sequential chemotherapy significantly prolongs PFS and OS in patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma. The efficacy is superior to that of the conventional chemotherapy, with manageable adverse reactions. The use of sequential chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma is recommended.

Treatment patterns in a real-world cohort of patients with Wilson disease in the United States

BackgroundWilson disease (WD) is a rare and potentially fatal genetic disorder caused by accumulation of toxic levels of copper. Current treatments include chelating agents and/or zinc. We characterized real-world US treatment patterns in patients with WD.MethodsThis retrospective, observational medical chart review utilized deidentified clinical data, including treatment patterns, abstracted from patient medical charts between 01/2012 and 06/2017. Line of therapy was assessed based on disease presentation and aggregated. Index treatment was defined as the first line of therapy, followed by second line of therapy and third line of therapy. Results were summarized using descriptive statistics.ResultsA total of 225 patients were included (mean [SD] age at diagnosis: 24.7 [9.8] years). Initial disease presentation was both neurologic/psychiatric and hepatic in 52.9%, followed by neurologic/psychiatric (20.0%), hepatic (16.9%), and asymptomatic (10.2%). Median (first and third quartiles) duration of follow-up from diagnosis was 39.5 (33.8–60.4) months. The most common first line of therapy was penicillamine monotherapy in 45.5%, followed by trientine monotherapy (26.1%) and chelator/zinc combination therapy (21.2%). A total of 167/222 (75.2%) patients remained on first line of therapy during the follow-up period. Of the 13.5% who switched to second line of therapy, most changed to trientine monotherapy (53.3%). All those who switched to third line of therapy transitioned to zinc monotherapy (100.0%). Unexpectedly, 11.3% discontinued first line of therapy without transitioning to a subsequent therapy. The primary rationale for index monotherapy selection was improved efficacy (61.6%). Most discontinuations were due to side effects/tolerability (40.8%). Treatment patterns varied by initial disease presentation, practice setting, physician specialty, and geographic location.ConclusionThese results demonstrate a lack of consensus in the US regarding first-line treatment for patients with WD. Evidence-based treatment pathways informed by high-quality clinical trials for improved health outcomes are needed.