First-Line Treatment Of Cancer Research Articles

Abstract CT275: A phase 2, randomized, open-label study of onvansertib in combination with standard-of-care (SoC) versus SoC alone for first-line treatment of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)

Abstract Background: Chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) has been a standard first-line treatment for RAS-mutated mCRC patients for the last 2 decades. The prognosis of these patients remains poor. Onvansertib is an orally available, highly potent, and selective inhibitor of Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK1), currently in clinical development. In a Phase 1b/2 study, onvansertib in combination with FOLFIRI + Bev demonstrated safety and promising efficacy in the second-line treatment of KRAS-mutated mCRC patients (NCT03829410). A subgroup analysis showed that patients not exposed to Bev (Bev-naïve) in the first-line setting had superior clinical benefit compared to Bev-exposed patients. Based on this data, we propose to investigate the combination of onvansertib with SoC (chemo + Bev) in the first-line treatment of RAS-mutated, Bev-naïve mCRC patients. Methods: This exploratory Phase 2, open-label, randomized study is designed to assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of 2 doses of onvansertib (20 mg and 30 mg) in combination with SoC (FOLFIRI + Bev or FOLFOX + Bev) versus SoC alone in patients with RAS-mutated metastatic and unresectable CRC in the first-line setting. Eligible participants must have histologically confirmed mCRC, KRAS or NRAS mutation, no previous systemic therapy in the metastatic setting, ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, measurable disease as defined per RECIST v1.1. Exclusion criteria include patients with BRAF-V600 mutations or microsatellite instability high/deficient mismatch repair, prior treatment with a VEGF inhibitor, previous oxaliplatin treatment within 12 months prior to randomization. The primary endpoint is objective response as determined according to RECIST v1.1 by an independent central review. Key secondary endpoints include progression-free survival and duration of response per independent central review. The study will enroll approximately 90 patients. Each patient will be randomized to be treated with onvansertib (20 mg or 30 mg) + SoC or SoC alone. The enrollment period for this study is approximately 12 months. Patients will be followed for overall survival for up to 1 year after the end of treatment. Trial is open and recruiting as of November 2023. This trial is registered as NCT06106308. Citation Format: Heinz-Josef Lenz, Benjamin Kuritzky, Anu Thummala, Stephan Kendall, Ravindranath Patel, Sreenivasa R. Chandana, Alisha H. Bent, Nancy Sherman, Ramanand Arun Subramanian, Fairooz Kabbinavar, Joel Randolph Hecht. A phase 2, randomized, open-label study of onvansertib in combination with standard-of-care (SoC) versus SoC alone for first-line treatment of RAS-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(7_Suppl):Abstract nr CT275.

Predictors of Immunotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Immune-Related Toxicity.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proposed as the standard first-line and subsequent treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study analyzed whether patients with good lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) have a better response to ICIs and the relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response in clinical practice. This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. Patients with stage IV NSCLC between 2016 and 2021 were included in the study. Toxicity was assessed according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST 2.0 and immuno-related criteria. Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted. Degree of toxicity and response to treatment (based on treatment and histology) were assessed. LIPI and response were assessed. LIPI included dNLR (absolute neutrophil count/(white blood cell count - absolute neutrophil count)) ≥ 3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than the upper limit of normal. Patients were stratified into good (G), intermediate (I), and poor (P) prognostic groups. A total of 168 patients were included (130 men and 38 women, mean age 64.3 years). ICI use in the first- or second-line treatment was 65% and 35%, respectively. Fifteen (9%) patients showed complete response (CR), 50 (30%) showed partial response (PR), 39 (22%) had stable disease (SD), 45 (28%) had progressive disease (PD), and 19 (11%) were not evaluated (NE). Patients with good prognostic LIPI (dNLR < 3 and normal LDH levels) showed a better response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months in G, 6 months in I, and 2 months in P. Overall survival (OS) was 27 months in G, 8 months in I, and 3 months in P. One hundred fourteen patients died (56% G, 76% I, 93% P). Patients with adenocarcinoma were 116 (77 with irAEs G1-4 (13 CR, 31 PR, 21 SD, eight PD, and four NE)), and without were 39 (three PR, six SD, 21 PD, and nine NE). Fifty-two patients had squamous carcinoma (27 with irAEs G1-4 (two CR, 12 PR, nine SD, and four PD)), and 25 did not (four PR, three SD, 12 PD, and six NE)). IrAEs appearance was observed in longer PFS (19 vs. 2 months) and OS (27 vs. 4 months; P < 0.0001). LIPI was a positive predictor of response to ICI. The presence of irAEs is associated with a better immune response. In contrast, the absence of toxicity predicted a worse prognosis.

Study Design and Rationale for IFCT- 2203 TAXIO: A study that aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a first-line chemotherapy regimen without etoposide, combined with durvalumab, for patients with extensive disease Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BackgroundStudies have shown improvement in overall survival with anti-PD1/PD-L1 molecules in combination with cisplatin/carboplatin and etoposide as a first-line treatment for Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC). However, first-line efficacy remains limited and well below that observed in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). Etoposide may have a detrimental effect on lymphocyte activation, which could explain the limited benefit of immunotherapy in the first line and the lack of benefit in the second line for patients previously exposed to high levels of etoposide. MethodsWe initiated a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II study of a chemotherapy regimen with durvalumab, combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel for extensive disease SCLC. Eligible patients will receive durvalumab plus carboplatin and paclitaxel every 3 weeks for up to 4 cycles, followed by durvalumab every 4 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. A total of 67 patients will be enrolled in this study, with a 12-month enrollment period and 36-month follow-up. The primary endpoint is Overall Survival (OS) rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are best response rate, OS, OS at 24- and 36 months, progression free survival (PFS), duration of response, quality of life and safety. ResultsThis study aims to establish the efficacy of durvalumab combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel in patients with extensive disease Small Cell Lung Cancer. Clinical trial registrationEU CT: 2023-504670-38-00.

Atezolizumab plus modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil as first-line treatment for advanced anal cancer (SCARCE C17-02 PRODIGE 60): a randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 study

The modified docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (mDCF) regimen has shown efficacy and safety as first-line treatment for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, making it a standard regimen. Inhibitors of programmed cell death protein 1 and its ligand, such as pembrolizumab, nivolumab, retifanlimab, avelumab, and atezolizumab, have shown some antitumour activity as monotherapy in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus that is refractory to chemotherapy. This phase 2 study evaluated the combination of mDCF and atezolizumab as first-line treatment in advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the anus. In this randomised, open-label, non-comparative, phase 2 study, participants from 21 centres (academic, private, and community hospitals and cancer research centres) across France with chemo-naive, metastatic, or unresectable locally advanced recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the anus, aged 18 years or older, and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, were randomly allocated (2:1) to receive either atezolizumab (800 mg intravenously every 2 weeks up to 1 year) plus mDCF (eight cycles of 40 mg per m2 docetaxel and 40 mg per m2 cisplatin on day 1 and 1200 mg per m2 per day of fluorouracil for 2 days, every 2 weeks intravenously; group A) or mDCF alone (group B). Randomisation was done centrally using a minimisation technique and was stratified by age (<65 years vs ≥65 years) and disease status. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed 12-month progression-free survival in the modified intention-to-treat population in group A (35% for the null hypothesis and 50% for the alternative hypothesis). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03519295, and is closed to new participants. 97 evaluable participants (64 in group A and 33 in group B) were enrolled between July 3, 2018, and Aug 19, 2020. The median follow-up was 26·5 months (95% CI 24·8-28·4). The median age of participants was 64·1 years (IQR 56·2-71·6), and 71 (73%) were female. 12-month progression-free survival was 45% (90% CI 35-55) in group A and 43% (29-58) in group B. In participants with a PD-L1 combined positive score of 5 or greater, 12-month progression-free survival was 70% (95% CI 47-100) in group A and 40% (19-85) in group B (interaction p=0·051) Both groups showed high compliance. Adverse events of grade 3 or higher were observed in 39 (61%) participants in group A and 14 (42%) in group B. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (nine [14%] participants in group A vs five [15%] in group B), anaemia (nine [14%] vs one [3%]), fatigue (three [5%] vs four [12%]), and diarrhoea (seven [11%] vs one [3%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 16 (25%) participants in group A and four (12%) in group B, and these were mDCF-related in seven (11%) participants in group A and four (12%) in group B. Atezolizumab-related serious adverse events occurred in nine (14%) participants in group A, including grade 2 infusion-related reaction in three (5%), grade 3 infection in two (3%), and grade 2 colitis, grade 3 acute kidney injury, grade 3 sarcoidosis, and a grade 4 platelet count decrease each in one participant (2%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Despite a higher incidence of adverse events, combining atezolizumab with mDCF is feasible, with similar dose intensity in both groups, although the primary efficacy endpoint was not met. The predictive value of a PD-L1 combined positive score of 5 or greater now needs to be confirmed in future studies. GERCOR, Roche.

Impact of immune-related adverse events on survival outcomes in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have recently become the standard of care in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Although immune-related adverse events have been reported to influence prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer patients, few studies have investigated the prognostic value of immune-related adverse events in small cell lung cancer patients. In this study, we evaluated the prognosis of patients who developed immune-related adverse events after first-line treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. We enrolled 90 patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer who received immune checkpoint inhibitor-based chemotherapy as first-line treatment from September 2019 to December 2022 in six hospitals in Japan. The patients were categorized into groups with and without immune-related adverse events. There were 23 patients with and 67 without immune-related adverse events. Seventeen patients had grade 1-2 immune-related adverse events, and nine (including overlapping cases) had grade ≥3. The most frequent immune-related adverse event was a skin rash. The median survival time was 22 months in patients with immune-related adverse events and 9.3 months in patients without immune-related adverse events. The hazard ratio was 0.40 (95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.83, p = 0.013). The results of this study show that immune-related adverse events are associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

DUSP1 Promotes Osimertinib Drug-Tolerant Persistence by Inhibiting MAPK/ERK Signaling in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, which remarkably improve the clinical outcomes. However, drug resistance has greatly impaired the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs and contributes to cancer treatment failure. DUSP1, a negative regulator of MAPK signaling pathway, was discovered to mediate drug resistance in multiple types of cancers. Our study aimed to explore the role of DUSP1 in NSCLC cell resistance to osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR-TKI.Human NSCLC cell lines PC-9 and HCC827 were exposed to increasing concentrations of osimertinib for over 6 months to generate osimertinib resistant cells (PC-9-OR and HCC827-OR). The viabilities of osimertinib-resistant and parental sensitive NSCLC cells in response to osimertinib stimulation were detected by MTS assay and the IC50 values for osimertinib were obtained. The differentially expressed genes in osimertinib-resistant and sensitive NSCLC cells were identified by analyzing the GEO dataset GSE106765 using bioinformatic tools. DUSP1 expression was knocked down by using the short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs). Then, the effects of DUSP1 silencing on osimertinib-resistant and sensitive NSCLC cell resistance to osimertinib, viability, proliferation and apoptosis were assessed through loss-of-function experiments. The expression of key molecules (JNK, ERK, and p38 MAPK) in the MAPK signaling pathway was detected through western blotting analysis.DUSP1 was overexpressed in osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cells versus parental sensitive cells. DUSP1 silencing attenuated the resistance of NSCLC cells to osimertinib. DUSP1 silencing markedly inhibited osimertinib-resistant and sensitive NSCLC cell proliferation but enhanced cell apoptosis. Mechanically, DUSP1 knockdown increased phosphorylated-JNK, ERK, and p38 MAPK levels in NSCLC cells. Treatment with SB203580, the p38 MAPK inhibitor, reversed the effects of DUSP1 silencing on osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cell resistance to osimertinib, cell proliferation and apoptosis.DUSP1 downregulation restores the sensitivity of NSCLC cells to osimertinib via activating the MAPK signaling pathway.

CONTACT-01: A Randomized Phase III Trial of Atezolizumab + Cabozantinib Versus Docetaxel for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After a Checkpoint Inhibitor and Chemotherapy.

Although checkpoint inhibitors have improved first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a therapeutic need remains for patients whose disease does not respond or who experience disease progression after anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy. CONTACT-01 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04471428) evaluated atezolizumab plus cabozantinib versus docetaxel in patients with metastatic NSCLC who developed disease progression after concurrent or sequential treatment with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 and platinum-containing chemotherapy. This multicenter, open-label, phase III trial randomly assigned patients 1:1 to atezolizumab 1,200 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks (q3w) plus cabozantinib 40 mg orally once daily or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). One hundred eighty-six patients were assigned atezolizumab plus cabozantinib, and 180 docetaxel. Minimum OS follow-up was 10.9 months. Median OS was 10.7 months (95% CI, 8.8 to 12.3) with atezolizumab plus cabozantinib and 10.5 months (95% CI, 8.6 to 13.0) with docetaxel (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.88 [95% CI, 0.68 to 1.16]; P = .3668). Median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 4.1 to 5.6) and 4.0 months (95% CI, 3.1 to 4.4), respectively (stratified HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.92]). Serious adverse events (AEs) occurred in 71 (38.4%) patients receiving atezolizumab plus cabozantinib and 58 (34.7%) receiving docetaxel. Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 73 (39.5%) patients receiving atezolizumab plus cabozantinib and 58 (34.7%) receiving docetaxel. Grade 5 AEs occurred in 14 (7.6%) and 10 (6.0%) patients in the atezolizumab plus cabozantinib and docetaxel arms, respectively (treatment-related in four [2.2%] and one [0.6%], respectively). Atezolizumab plus cabozantinib after disease progression following anti-PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapy and platinum-containing chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC did not improve OS compared with docetaxel. Safety was consistent with known profiles of these agents.

Effect of early dose reduction of osimertinib on efficacy in the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer.

Osimertinib is used as the first-line therapy for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, early dose reduction is often required due to adverse events (AEs). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of early dose reduction of osimertinib on efficacy and safety.This was a retrospective study including patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who were started on osimertinib as the first-line therapy between August 2018 and December 2021. Patients whose doses were reduced to less than 80mg/day within 6 months of osimertinib initiation or started at 40mg/day were defined as the dose reduction group. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Factors affecting PFS were explored using the Cox proportional hazards model.A total of 85 patients were included in this study. No significant differences in patient characteristics were observed between the dose reduction (n = 25) and standard dose groups (n = 60). The median PFS in the dose reduction group was significantly prolonged compared with that in the standard dose group (26.0 months vs. 12.0 months, p = 0.03). Multivariable analysis of 84 patients, excluding a patient with unknown brain metastasis, revealed that EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation, malignant pleural effusion or pleural metastasis, liver metastasis, and dose reduction within 6 months were independent factors affecting PFS.Early dose reduction of osimertinib is an effective therapeutic strategy for prolonging PFS in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with chemotherapy in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A meta-analysis.

Advanced pancreatic cancer is resistant to chemotherapeutic drugs, resulting in limited treatment efficacy and poor prognosis. Combined administration of the chemotherapeutic gemcitabine and erlotinib is considered a potential first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. However, their comparative benefits and potential risks remain unclear. To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with other chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Literature on the clinical efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer was retrieved through an online search. The retrieved literature was subjected to a methodological qualitative assessment and was analyzed using the RevMan 5.3 software. Ten randomized controlled trials involving 2444 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapeutic treatment, erlotinib combined with chemotherapy significantly prolonged the progression-free survival time of pancreatic cancer patients [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.66-0.92, P = 0.003]. Meanwhile, the overall survival (HR= 0.99, 95%CI: 0.72-1.37, and P = 0.95) and disease control rate (OR = 0.93, 95%CI: 0.45-0.91, P = 0.84) were not significantly favorable. In terms of safety, the erlotinib and chemotherapy combination was associated with a significantly higher risk of diarrhea (OR = 3.59, 95%CI: 1.63-7.90, P < 0.05) and rash (OR = 3.63, 95%CI: 1.64-8.01, P < 0.05) compared with single-agent chemotherapy. Moreover, the risk of vomiting (OR = 1.27, 95%CI: 0.62-2.59, P = 0.51), regurgitation/anorexia (OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 0.25-10.31, P = 0.62), and infection (OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.28-1.87, P = 0.50) were not significant in either group. Compared with a single chemotherapeutic modality, erlotinib combined with gemcitabine can prolong progression-free survival in pancreatic cancer, but does not improve survival benefit or disease control rate, and can increase the risk of diarrhea and rash.

Abstract 973: Plasma androgen receptor (AR) copy number gain at progression in patients randomized in the STAMPEDE phase 3 abiraterone acetate, prednisolone (AAP) and enzalutamide (ENZ) trial: An ancillary biomarker study

Abstract Addition of ENZ or AAP to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as first-line treatment for advanced prostate cancer improves survival compared to ADT alone. Genomic alterations in AR associate with resistance to ENZ/AAP when started for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We aimed to test whether early use of AAP/ENZ altered the incidence of AR alterations at progression. Between July 2014 and March 2016, 1976 patients with metastatic or high-risk locally advanced prostate cancer were randomized to ADT or ADT+ENZ+AAP in the STAMPEDE trial (NCT00268476). Consenting patients were given the option to donate blood for the ancillary biomarker study at trial-defined progression and prior to start of the next line of treatment. We focused on patients who progressed within 4 years from the end of recruitment (early progressors), as these patients represent the greatest unmet need. We obtained plasma DNA at emergence of CRPC from 115 early progressors (ADT n=63, ADT+ENZ+AAP n=52). We performed liquid biopsy-focused, custom, high-coverage targeted enrichment sequencing (PCF-SELECT, Orlando et al, NAR Cancer 2022). We used a bespoke computational pipeline, leveraging allelic imbalance and fragmentome analysis, to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in plasma samples and copy number changes. Of 108 samples that passed quality control, 94 were positive for tumor (ADT n=52, ADT+AAP+ENZ n=42). The detection rate and ctDNA fractions were similar between the two treatment groups [ADT: 86.7% (52/60), mean ctDNA fraction 0.18; ADT+ENZ+AAP: 87.5% (42/48), mean ctDNA fraction 0.21; p=0.34]. The proportion of plasma with detectable ctDNA and AR gain was significantly higher with ADT+AAP+ENZ vs ADT alone (15/42, 35.7% vs 8/52, 15.4%, p=0.03). We then implemented the same approach on plasma collected from patients progressing on ENZ started for metastatic CRPC in a prospective Phase 3b trial (PRESIDE, NCT02288247): we confirmed a high prevalence of AR gain in plasma samples with detectable ctDNA (47.7%, 95% CI 38.8-54.9) in the CRPC setting. Significant copy number aberrations in relevant prostate cancer-related genes/pathways (deletions of TP53, RB1, PTEN or DNA repair genes, or gain of PI3K/AKT1) were identified in 9 out of 42 evaluable samples in the ADT group and 18 out of 38 evaluable samples in the ADT+ENZ+AAP group (21.4% vs 47.4%, p=0.014). Treatment with ADT+ENZ+AAP increases detection of plasma AR gain at emergences of CRPC in early progressors compared to ADT alone. Detection of plasma AR gain increases at progression on ADT+ENZ regardless of the treatment setting. The impact of early use of ENZ/AAP on the detection of copy number aberrations, especially homozygous deletions, in other prostate cancer-related genes in plasma requires further investigation. Citation Format: Gianmarco Leone, Francesco Orlando, Suparna Thakali, Sharanpreet Lall, Daniel Wetterskog, Anna Wingate, Noel W. Clarke, Nicholas D. James, Francesca Demichelis, Gerhardt Attard. Plasma androgen receptor (AR) copy number gain at progression in patients randomized in the STAMPEDE phase 3 abiraterone acetate, prednisolone (AAP) and enzalutamide (ENZ) trial: An ancillary biomarker study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 973.

Targeting glucosylceramide synthase induces antiproliferative and proapoptotic effects in osimertinib-resistant NSCLC cell models

The EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib has been approved for the first-line treatment of EGFR-mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients. Despite its efficacy, patients develop resistance. Mechanisms of resistance are heterogeneous and not fully understood, and their characterization is essential to find new strategies to overcome resistance. Ceramides are well-known regulators of apoptosis and are converted into glucosylceramides (GlcCer) by glucosylceramide synthase (GCS). A higher content of GlcCers was observed in lung pleural effusions from NSCLC patients and their role in osimertinib-resistance has not been documented. The aim of this study was to determine the therapeutic potential of inhibiting GCS in NSCLC EGFR-mutant models resistant to osimertinib in vitro and in vivo. Lipidomic analysis showed a significant increase in the intracellular levels of glycosylceramides, including GlcCers in osimertinib resistant clones compared to sensitive cells. In resistant cells, the GCS inhibitor PDMP caused cell cycle arrest, inhibition of 2D and 3D cell proliferation, colony formation and migration capability, and apoptosis induction. The intratumoral injection of PDMP completely suppressed the growth of OR xenograft models. This study demonstrated that dysregulation of ceramide metabolism is involved in osimertinib-resistance and targeting GCS may be a promising therapeutic strategy for patients progressed to osimertinib.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer complicated with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical trial.

The first-line standard treatment option for patients with NSCLC complicated with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is still unclear and relies on the treatment option of NSCLC alone. To date, a limited number of retrospective studies have explored the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC complicated with COPD. We therefore designed this study to further explore the efficacy and safety of first-line immunotherapy in patients with NSCLC complicated with COPD. This study was designed as a single-armed, single-center, prospective, phase II clinical study. It will include 30 advanced (stage IV) NSCLC combined with COPD primary treatment subjects. Each subject's diagnosis will be confirmed by clinical, radiographic, pathologic, and pulmonary function evaluation. A fixed dose of 200 mg pembrolizumab will be administered by intravenous infusion on day1 every 3 weeks (Q3W). The management of stable and acute exacerbations of COPD include home oxygen therapy, and the use of conventional medications are also administered. Imaging evaluation will be performed every 6 weeks for 6 months from the first pembrolizumab dose and approximately every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or early withdrawal. COPD status will be evaluated every 3 months by pulmonary function, GOLD grading, mMRC score, CAT score, ABCD grouping, and AECOPD severity. The primary outcome is Progression-free survival. The secondary outcome measures include objective response rate, overall survival, rate of acute exacerbations of COPD (times/year), lung function, mMRC score, CAT score, impact of treatment on patient's health-related quality of life, antibiotic use (including duration and classes), and adverse events associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Exploratory endpoint is to explore the association between COPD grade and the degree of immune cell (CD4+ T lymphocytes and CD8+ T lymphocytes) infiltration, as well as the association between COPD grade and the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT05578222.

Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched retrospective study.

The prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients is poor, and the standard first-line treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is still chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy. The primary objectives of our study were to confirm the superior efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus etoposide and platinum (EP) for LS-SCLC and find crucial biomarkers. We analyzed LS-SCLC patients from three medical centers, employing propensity score matching for group comparability. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Additionally, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate potential predictive factors. Among 150 patients in our study, we successfully matched 41 pairs. The median overall survival (OS) was 29.5 months in the EP + ICIs group and 20.0 months in the EP group {hazard ratio (HR) =0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-1.02], P=0.059}. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly extended in the EP + ICIs group (14.6 months), compared to the EP group (8.6 months) [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.28-0.63), P<0.001]. After matching, patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy had a median OS of 36.1 months, significantly surpassing those receiving chemotherapy alone (19.0 months) [HR =0.51 (95% CI: 0.28-0.93), P=0.02]. And the patients in the EP + ICIs group also had longer PFS after matching [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.25-0.71), P=0.001]. No significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between the two groups was found (ORR: EP: 81.0%, EP + ICIs: 90.0%, P=0.14; trAEs: EP: grade 1-2, 49.3%; grade 3-4, 42.5%; EP + ICIs: grade 1-2, 40.0%; grade 3-4, 49.1%, P=0.62). The multivariate analysis presented that the history of immunotherapy [EP + PD-1 inhibitors: HR =0.33 (95% CI: 0.17-0.62), P=0.001; EP + PD-L1 inhibitors: HR =0.18 (95% CI: 0.06-0.60), P=0.005] and baseline lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) [intermediate: HR =2.22 (95% CI: 1.20-4.13), P=0.01; poor: HR =2.03 (95% CI: 0.71-5.77), P=0.18] were independent prognostic factors for PFS among all LS-SCLC cases. However, no independent prognostic factor was identified for OS. Our real-world data showed promising clinical efficacy and tolerable safety of first-line programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in cases with LS-SCLC. Additionally, LIPI may serve as a valuable prognostic factor.

Modified FOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab with and without nivolumab for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: phase 2 results from the CheckMate 9X8 randomized clinical trial

BackgroundStandard first-line therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) include fluoropyrimidine-containing regimens with oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan and a biologic agent. Immunotherapy may enhance antitumor activity in combination with standard therapies in...

64P Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of cemiplimab (CEMI) + platinum doublet chemotherapy (CHEMO) + ipilimumab (IPI) for first-line (1L) treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): EMPOWER-lung 3 part 1

64P Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of cemiplimab (CEMI) + platinum doublet chemotherapy (CHEMO) + ipilimumab (IPI) for first-line (1L) treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): EMPOWER-lung 3 part 1

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis

BackgroundPlatinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT).MethodsPatients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects.ResultsA total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis.ConclusionAddition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

KEAP1 promotes anti-tumor immunity by inhibiting PD-L1 expression in NSCLC

Immunotherapy has become a prominent first-line cancer treatment strategy. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the expression of PD-L1 induces an immuno-suppressive effect to protect cancer cells from immune elimination, which designates PD-L1 as an important target for immunotherapy. However, little is known about the regulation mechanism and the function of PD-L1 in lung cancer. In this study, we have discovered that KEAP1 serves as an E3 ligase to promote PD-L1 ubiquitination and degradation. We found that overexpression of KEAP1 suppressed tumor growth and promoted cytotoxic T-cell activation in vivo. These results indicate the important role of KEAP1 in anti-cancer immunity. Moreover, the combination of elevated KEAP1 expression with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy resulted in a synergistic effect on both tumor growth and cytotoxic T-cell activation. Additionally, we found that the expressions of KEAP1 and PD-L1 were associated with NSCLC prognosis. In summary, our findings shed light on the mechanism of PD-L1 degradation and how NSCLC immune escape through KEAP1-PD-L1 signaling. Our results also suggest that KEAP1 agonist might be a potential clinical drug to boost anti-tumor immunity and improve immunotherapies in NSCLC.

Research progress of perioperative immunotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease, and its occurrence and development are the result of genetic factors, environmental factors, and host factors. As one of the main types of cancer in China, radical gastrectomy is the only chance for patients to be cured, but only 50% to 60% of initially diagnosed gastric cancer patients are suitable for radical gastrectomy, especially in locally advanced and advanced patients. The results of MAGIC and ACCORD07/FFCD9703 confirm the status of combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil as the standard of perioperative treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer. Gastric cancer is one of the most common diseases in China, with high heterogeneity and poor prognosis. Immunotherapy has always been a difficulty in medical research. However, the 5-year overall survival rate for gastric cancer patients remains low. Immunotherapy is effective in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. At the same time, immunotherapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor vaccines, and cell therapy also show certain safety and effectiveness in the perioperative treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer patients. This paper reviews the research progress of immunotherapy in the perioperative treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer.

Inhaled delivery of cetuximab-conjugated immunoliposomes loaded with afatinib: A promising strategy for enhanced non-small cell lung cancer treatment.

Afatinib (AT), an FDA-approved aniline-quinazoline derivative, is a first-line treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Combining it with cetuximab (CX), a chimeric human-murine derivative immunoglobulin-G1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the extracellular domain of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), has shown significant improvements in median progression-free survival. Previously, we developed cetuximab-conjugated immunoliposomes loaded with afatinib (AT-MLP) and demonstrated their efficacy against NSCLC cells (A549 and H1975). In this study, we aimed to explore the potential of pulmonary delivery to mitigate adverse effects associated with oral administration and intravenous injection. We formulated AT-MLP dry powders (AT-MLP-DPI) via freeze drying using tert-butanol and mannitol as cryoprotectants in the hydration medium. The physicochemical and aerodynamic properties of dry powders were well analyzed firstly. In vitro cellular uptake and cytotoxicity study revealed concentration- and time-dependent cellular uptake behavior and antitumor efficacy of AT-MLP-DPI, while Transwell assay demonstrated the superior inhibitory effects on NSCLC cell invasion and migration. Furthermore, in vivo pharmacokinetic study showed that pulmonary delivery of AT-MLP-DPI significantly increased bioavailability, prolonged blood circulation time, and exhibited higher lung concentrations compared to alternative administration routes and formulations. The in vivo antitumor efficacy study carried on tumor-bearing nude mice indicated that inhaled AT-MLP-DPI effectively suppressed lung tumor growth.

Niraparib and Abiraterone Acetate (Akeega)

&#x0D; CADTH recommends that Akeega be reimbursed by public drug plans for the first-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) if certain conditions are met.&#x0D; Akeega should only be covered to treat patients with mCRPC who have BRCA mutations, have not been treated with an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor (ARPi) for earlier stages of prostate cancer, and have not received treatments that affect the entire body for mCRPC (except for treatments of less than 4 months with abiraterone acetate and prednisone) or a poly-(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) for mCRPC. Moreover, patients should be in relatively good health.&#x0D; Akeega should only be reimbursed if it is prescribed by a clinician with expertise in treating prostate cancer with systemic anticancer therapy and if the cost of Akeega is reduced. Akeega should not be reimbursed when used in combination with other anticancer drugs.&#x0D;