First-line Therapy For Metastatic Disease Research Articles

Central nervous system metastases in women who receive trastuzumab-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma.

Women with HER-2 overexpressing metastatic breast carcinoma benefit from trastuzumab-based therapy, but trastuzumab does not cross the blood-brain barrier. The authors characterized central nervous system (CNS) disease in these women. Using pharmacy records, the authors retrospectively identified 153 women treated with trastuzumab alone or with chemotherapy for HER-2-positive metastatic breast carcinoma at Dana-Farber Partners Cancer Care from June 1998 to December 2000. A study cohort of 122 patients was identified after excluding patients without adequate clinical follow-up or who had CNS disease before trastuzumab treatment. Central nervous system disease was defined as one or more brain metastases or as leptomeningeal carcinomatosis. The median follow-up of this cohort was 23 months. Central nervous system metastases were identified in 34% of patients (95% confidence interval, 26-44%) at a median of 16 months after diagnosis of metastatic breast carcinoma and 6 months from the beginning of trastuzumab therapy. Ninety-three percent of patients with CNS disease presented with clinical symptoms. Five percent of patients with CNS disease had leptomeningeal involvement alone, although 14% had leptomeningeal involvement and parenchymal brain metastases. Fifty percent of patients were responding or had stable disease while receiving trastuzumab at other disease sites at the time of diagnosis of CNS metastasis. The median survival period after CNS metastases was 13 months. Fifty percent of patients died of progressive CNS disease. Patients receiving trastuzumab as first-line therapy for metastatic disease frequently developed brain metastases while responding to or stable on trastuzumab at other disease sites. Metastatic breast carcinoma to the CNS is common among patients receiving trastuzumab-based therapy, including patients responding to therapy outside the CNS. This may be due either to predilection for the CNS by HER-2-positive tumor cells and/or poor penetration of the CNS by trastuzumab or to improved visceral disease control leading to a longer life and onset of late tumor spread to the CNS. Efforts to characterize other risk factors for development of CNS disease, optimal screening algorithms, and new treatment strategies may be warranted.

Developments in breast cancer therapy.

The lifetime risk of breast cancer in women is 1 in 8, with an increasing incidence in each decade of life after age 40. Breast cancer is considered curable with detection and treatment during Stages I and II, but disease-free survival drops in Stage III and is essentially zero in Stage IV. Breast-conserving surgical removal of tumors has been the standard of care for primary local therapy for more than a decade. For prevention of recurrence, tamoxifen is recommended in dosages of 20 mg/day for 5 years. The aromatase inhibitors are now considered first-line therapy in metastatic disease, and use of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab has increased 5-year survival rates.

Update on HER-2 as a target for cancer therapy: herceptin in the clinical setting.

Herceptin is the first therapy for breast cancer which targets an oncogene product. This humanized antibody to HER-2 has been shown to have activity as a single agent in a phase II trial of heavily pre-treated patients with advanced breast cancer and, in phase III studies, its use with chemotherapy is associated with higher response rates, longer time to progression and improved survival when compared with chemotherapy alone. Retrospective analysis of data from these pivotal trials suggests that attributable benefit of herceptin is greater in those patients who express HER-2 at the highest levels, that is 3+ expression by immunohistochemistry. Further analysis also implies that cases which are positive for HER-2 by fluorescent in situ hybridization may also benefit from treatment regardless of whether they express HER-2 at the 2+ or 3+ level. Use of herceptin as first-line therapy for metastatic disease in early studies suggest that response rates and clinical benefit rate similar to chemotherapy may be achievable and that survival using this sequential approach may not be compromized. Other combinations of herceptin and chemotherapy have been investigated with phase II data suggesting considerable activity with weekly taxol and when combined with navelbine. The non-linear pharmacokinetics of herceptin suggest that, as doses increased, half-life increases and may be feasible on a 3-weekly schedule. The role of herceptin in the adjuvant setting in the management of breast cancer will be tested in randomized studies of patients who express HER-2 at the highest levels; two of these studies have already begun.

Single-Agent Gemcitabine Is Active in Previously Treated Metastatic Breast Cancer

Background: This phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with an anthracycline- or anthracenedione-containing regimen as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. Patients and Methods: Forty-seven patients with MBC were enrolled in five French centers. Patients were eligible if they had received one prior chemotherapy regimen with an anthracycline or anthracenedione for metastatic disease, if they had responded to that prior regimen, and if they had relapsed at least 6 months after the first response. Fifteen patients received more than one prior anthracycline regimen; thus, gemcitabine was third-line therapy for 30% of patients. Gemcitabine 1,200 mg/m² was administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle for a maximum of eight cycles after the best response was obtained. Results: Objective responses were seen in 12 of 41 assessable patients (4 complete responses and 8 partial responses), for an objective response rate of 29% (95% confidence interval, 16–46%). The median response duration was 8.1 months (range: 2.5–27.4 months). Serious hematological toxicity was minimal, with grade 4 neutropenia in 2% of the patients (no neutropenic fever), grade 3 neutropenia in 28% of the patients, and grade 3 thrombocytopenia in 6% of the patients. Among the nonhematological toxicities, asthenia was the most common. Conclusions: Gemcitabine given at this dose and schedule is a well-tolerated treatment with definitive antitumor activity in pretreated MBC patients. This result warrants future exploration of the use of gemcitabine as a single agent and in combination in patients with MBC.

First-line, single-agent Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in metastatic breast cancer: a preliminary report

Following confirmation of the appropriate dosage, safety and potential efficacy of Herceptin® (trastuzumab) in small-scale phase I and II trials involving patients with refractory disease, a large trial was conducted in 222 patients with breast cancer who had relapsed after one or two chemotherapy regimens for their metastatic disease. The results showed a positive and durable overall response rate (15% according to a response evaluation committee (REC) assessment) using trastuzumab monotherapy (initial dose 4 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) followed by 2 mg/kg i.v. weekly). In another recently completed phase II trial, 113 patients were randomised to two dose levels (initial dose of 4 mg/kg i.v. dose followed by 2 mg/kg i.v. weekly, or initial dose of 8 mg/kg followed by 4 mg/kg i.v. weekly) of single-agent trastuzumab as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. The preliminary overall response rate was 23% based on investigator assessment, and tolerability was excellent as in previous trials; efficacy was similar in both dose groups, but the side-effects tended to be more frequent in the higher dose group. The preferred dosage is therefore the same as that currently recommended, i.e. an initial dose of 4 mg/kg i.v. followed by 2 mg/kg weekly i.v. until disease progression.

Pharmacology and clinical experience with exemestane

Since the introduction of the first generation aromatase inhibitor, aminoglutethimide, for breast cancer treatment 30 years ago, we now have at hand novel, potent and well-tolerated steroidal and non-steroidal compounds, allowing near complete inhibition of oestrogen synthesis. The third-generation aromatase inhibitor, or more accurately termed inactivator, exemestane, is a potent suppressor of oestrogen synthesis and is shown to be an effective antitumour agent in postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Exemestane has been shown to be effective in patients failing multiple endocrine regimens. A large randomised study has revealed that exemestane improves time-to-disease progression as well as overall survival compared with megestrol acetate as second-line therapy in patients failing tamoxifen. In current studies, exemestane is compared with tamoxifen as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. Sequential therapy with tamoxifen followed by exemestane is also being compared with tamoxifen monotherapy in the adjuvant setting. In addition, the drug may have potential for breast cancer prevention.

Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer

Paclitaxel has emerged as an important agent in the treatment of breast cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of this agent, as well as its lack of cross-resistance with anthracyclines, have spurred intensive clinical investigation worldwide. Optimization of paclitaxel dose and scheduling and evaluation of the drug in combination regimens are a central focus of investigations. Recent clinical evidence suggests that optimal dose of single-agent paclitaxel by 3-h infusion is 175 mg/m². Trials evaluating administration schedule have not found either a 24-h or 96-h infusion to be superior to a 3-h infusion. Weekly moderate-dose paclitaxel administration is also generating much interest, given the high relative dose intensity and dose density delivered, yet very modest myelosuppression and manageable neurotoxicity observed. As first-line therapy in metastatic disease, multiple studies have documented overall response rates in the range of 30%-60%. As second-line or salvage single-agent therapy in metastatic patients, paclitaxel generally affords an overall response rate of 20%-40%, even in anthracycline-resistant patients. The novel mechanism of action and manageable toxicity of paclitaxel has led to successful incorporation into combination chemotherapy regimens. The combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin has been the most extensively studied, with the role of this regimen continuing to evolve. Other combination regimens that appear to hold substantial promise as first-line metastatic treatment are paclitaxel with carboplatin and paclitaxel with trastuzumab (anti-HER2 antibody). The favorable results obtained in the metastatic setting have prompted phase II and phase III investigations of paclitaxel in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. In the adjuvant setting, a recent phase III study has indicated that the addition of sequential paclitaxel to standard therapy affords both disease-free and overall survival benefits. Current investigations with paclitaxel will continue to optimize the role of this agent in the treatment of early- and advanced-stage breast cancer, addressing not only response rates but also survival and quality-of-life issues. The use of paclitaxel on a weekly schedule or with new therapeutic modalities, such as monoclonal antibodies, is also receiving much attention. While it is clear that paclitaxel is a very active agent in the treatment of breast cancer, it is hoped that these innovative trials will further maximize the potential of this agent in patients with breast cancer.

716 Oxaliplatin with high-dose folinic acid and 5-fluorouracil 48 H infusion in pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)

We report a phase II study in pretreated CRC. Regimen (FOLFOX2) was administered every two weeks. It consisted of oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 iv day 1; FA 500 mg/m2 over 2 h, followed by 5FU 1.5–2 g/m2 24 h CI days 1&2. Initial 5FU dose was 1.5 g/m2 for two cycles and increased to 2 g/m2 in case of no toxicity > grade 2. 40 pts have been evaluated: 25 M/15 F, mean age 60 yrs, liver metastasis 33 pts, lung 11, peritoneal 4, other 11, multiple 13, performance status (WHO) 0: 20, 1–2: 20. Previous chemotherapy consisted in different optimal FA-5FU modulations ± hydroxyurea. 16 previously received the same high-dose FA and 5FU CI regimen alone or with interferon-α. All pts had disease progression on first-line therapy for metastatic disease or

Clinical cooperative trials of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group Breast Cancer Site Group.

For more than 10 years, the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG) Breast Cancer Site Group has focused primarily on trials of adjuvant therapy and of investigational new drugs (IND). Four trials of adjuvant therapy in node-positive women have been completed, are active, or are about to begin. Investigational new drug (IND) studies have included Phase II trials of intravenous and oral menagaril, 10-EDAM (edatrexate), taxotere, and mifepristone (RU-486) as well as a Phase I/II trial of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), doxorubicin, and vinorelbine (FAN); a Phase I/II trial of 5-FU, leucovorin, doxorubicin, and vinorelbine (super-FAN), all as first-line therapy for metastatic disease; and a Phase III study of vinorelbine plus doxorubicin versus doxorubicin alone as first- or second-line metastatic therapy. A proposed study with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer in locally advanced breast cancer will compare a standard NCIC CTG regimen of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and 5-FU (CEF) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), a more dose-intensive regimen. In addition, NCIC CTG is preparing a pilot of CEF with G-CSF to examine whether a substantially more intensive dosage can be given without added toxicity. NCIC CTG will also enter patients into a currently active Cancer and Leukemia Group B/Southwest Oncology Group randomized trial of intensive therapy versus more intensive therapy with bone marrow support in women younger than age 60 with 10 or more positive nodes. It is believed that optimizing the combination and timing of adjuvant hormonal and chemotherapy, exploring dose intensive approaches, developing investigational new drugs, studying the role of biologics, and tumor banking in conjunction with clinical trials remain important approaches for the future.

High-dose, brief duration, multiagent chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

The authors evaluated a high-intensity inpatient regimen using augmented but subtransplantation doses of multiple agents in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Two high-dose courses were given in an attempt to improve the efficacy of high-dose regimens using a single course. Forty women received treatment between October 1988 and October 1991. The median age was 38 years (range, 24-56 years). Twenty-five patients were receiving their first chemotherapy for metastatic disease; 15 patients had received one or more prior regimens. The patients received two courses of chemotherapy, which consisted of the following: cyclophosphamide 1500 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 2; doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1 and 2; cisplatin 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2, 3, 8, 9, and 10; 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2 on days 8, 9, and 10 (continuous infusion); methotrexate 100 mg/m2 i.v. on days 15 and 22; leucovorin 15 mg/m2 i.v. or by mouth for four doses beginning 24 hours after methotrexate. Etoposide 400 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1, 2, and 3 was substituted for doxorubicin in 14 patients who had received prior doxorubicin. Twenty-nine of 40 patients (73%) had objective response to therapy, with 10 (25%) complete responses. Four patients who obtained a complete response remain disease-free at 14, 21, 28, and 32 months, respectively; all of these patients received this regimen as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. Myelosuppression was severe, with median durations of leukocytes less than 1000/microliters and platelets less than 50,000/microliters of 15 days (range, 7-48 days) and 13 days (range, 3-49 days), respectively. Moderate or severe mucositis occurred in 56 of 68 courses. Four patients (10%) had treatment-related deaths. This regimen produced high overall response and complete response rates compared with standard regimens. However, only 15% of patients who received this therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer remain disease-free, and median response duration was shorter than that reported using high-dose therapy with bone marrow support. Toxicity with this regimen was greater than anticipated, although myelosuppression and stomatitis would be reduced by the use of cytokines. This regimen does not improve results achieved with standard therapy sufficiently to justify its toxicity and expense.