SINCLAIR LEWIS REMEMBERED. Ed. Gary Scharnhorst and Matthew Hofer. Tuscaloosa: U of Alabama P, 2012. xiv + 400 pp. $49.95.In Sinclair Lewis Remembered, editors Gary Scharnhorst and Matthew Hofer have compiled accounts of the famous Nobel Prize-winning author by people who knew him. The book includes reports from seventy-eight different witnesses and organizes their material in accord with the chronology of Lewis's life (1885-1951) so that readers can have the experience of an unfolding from childhood to death, conveyed through eyewitness accounts only. Discussions by people who knew Lewis a long time, such as Chicago book reviewer Fanny Butcher, are broken into segments, with each selection appearing in the book at the appropriate time. In the words of the editors, the volume offers an anecdotal account of Lewis's life, a collaborative biography that presents the complexity of his personality in a way no single biographer (9).The editors have done a good job finding sources. Scharnhorst and Hofer include the major sources known to Lewis scholars, which comprise the bulk of the entries, and add two interviews that they identify as new to the field, one from 1915, in which W. D. Inglis records the author giving upbeat self-help advice, and another from 1921, in which Charles Phillips Russell records Lewis in England distinguishing between Main Street America and Main Street Britain. The editors quietly add as well a small handful of unfamiliar items, including an interesting reminiscence by Emile Gauvreau, a young journalist at the New Haven Journal-Courier when Lewis was working there as a Yale student.The new book is welcome not only because it finds fresh sources but also because it is the first one-volume collection of firsthand material on Lewis, and it is certainly the first effort to tell his life story through primary texts. Surveying them all, a reader can feel more closely connected to the record than with a normal biography, in which everything filters through the biographer. A reader can judge the sources on their merits and decide which ones exhibit the most understanding. The difference between the revealing and the less revealing shows clearly. A short recollection by Harold Loeb, though perceptive, is not as insightful as the reminiscence by Charles Breasted, who was closer to Lewis and knew him longer. Loeb suggested that Lewis might have been blind to the stuffiness of Carol in Main Street (1920) because she was so like his wife Grace (108), whereas Breasted knew that Lewis understood Carol's weaknesses and even identified with her himself (103).Another advantage of an assembly of witnesses is the way the collective testimony can confirm essential features of the subject, as, for example, Lewis's interest in performing extemporaneous monologues. At least twelve people who knew him at various times from his twenties until his death report seeing him create characters spontaneously. Witnesses often say these performances were brilliant, though sometimes long. Another essential Lewis quality, confirmed by as many as six witnesses, was his identification with the characters in his novels, not only with relatively positive ones such as Carol Kennicott but also with seeming targets of satire such as George Babbitt and Elmer Gantry. Instead of thinking of them as alien, he thought of them fondly, almost as if they were part of himself. As Alfred Harcourt notes, if Lewis could not feel himself a part of the character, he would give up writing on the subject (185). This insight helps to explain why Lewis never wrote his long-projected labor novel. As many as six witnesses confirm the extended effort he gave to this undertaking. Putting together their accounts with hints from other writers, one can see that the labor novel never materialized because Lewis knew that his sense of the subject was not sharp enough.A highlight of the new book is a story by Budd Schulberg that takes place right after the publication of It Can't Happen Here (1935). …
Read full abstract