Introduction: Procrastination is regarded as a behavioral habit which is prevalent in different societies and is increasingly growing. This habit is along with postponing duties and tasks and has unpleasant consequences (Blunt, 1998). Rosario, Costa, Nunez, Gonzalez-Pienda, Solano, and Valle (2009) believe that although procrastination might happen in all daily activities, but procrastination in doing school assignment is more frequent. Solomon and Rothblum (1984) define academic procrastination in postponing academic tasks including preparation for taking exams, preparing paper during the semester, official tasks related to school and continuous presence in classes. Procrastination leads to high degree of anxiety and depression in the student and reduces its self- esteem (Lay, 1992; Lay and Schouwenburg, 1993; Lay and Silverman, 1996). Consequently, the reports of students of their procrastination indicate negative meaningful difference with their academic performance (Beswick, Rothblum & Mann, 1998). Generally the researches done in this filed indicate that procrastinators have less motivation to become successful (Lum, 1960; quoting from Steel, 2007). Burka and Yuen (1982, p. 32) noted that those who have serious problems with procrastination generally tend to attribute their difficulties to personality flaws, such as being lazy, undisciplined, or not knowing how to organize their time (Citing in Senecal, Koestner and Vallerand, 1995). However, according to them, procrastination is a way for expressing inner controversies and preserving self- esteem against susceptibility. Solomon and Rothblum (1984) assert that although students consider different reasons for their negligence, most of them relate it to fear of failure (including anxiety in performance, perfectionism and lack of set- esteem). Recent researches speak of other motivational factors which are related to academic negligence. These studies offer some ways to regulate individual behaviour which is effective on academic achievements and results, among them are the feeling of curiosity, persistence, learning, performance, affect and self-esteem (Vallerand and Bissonette, 1992; .Vallerand et.al. 1992 quoting from Senecal et.al. 1995). The most comprehensive theory about regulation the behavior of people is self-regulation theory mentioned by Deci and Ryan (2000, 1991, 1987, 1985) Steel (2007) considers procrastination a common and frequent form of failure in self- regulation. Self- regulating learning is that kind of learning in which individuals begin and guide their efforts themselves instead of relying and depending on teachers, parents or educational bodies for getting knowledge and skills (Zimmerman, 1989). Unfortunately, students in schools not only lack sufficient basic knowledge of effective guidelines but also they don't know how to select and evaluate these guidelines when have not good educational functioning and correct false guidelines (Dembo and Iyton, 2000; Win Stein, Husman and Dierking, 2000; Zimmerman, 2002). It seems necessary to try to create some solutions which reduce procrastination in students. When adolescents learn self-regulating skills and as a consequence learn how to deal with their procrastination, they gain important skills (Dembo and Iyton, 2000). In this research it is tried to regulate the educational package based on self-regulating solutions of Iranian students which is predictor of educational procrastination (Motiei, Heydari and Sadeghi, 2012), the comments of expert groups of psychologists and research background not based on the researchers done in western cultures but based on Iranian students' functioning.Research Questions- Is self-regulating educational package effective on decreasing educational procrastination?- Is self-regulating educational package reliable and stable on reducing educational procrastination?Research Methods: The sample of the present study is all students educating in first grade of high school in Tehran city. …