First-attempt Intubation Research Articles

Endotracheal intubation using a spiral endotracheal tube effectively reduces total tube handling time in children aged one month to six years using a McGrathTM video laryngoscope: a prospective randomized trial

Background: Airway management in the pediatric population is challenging because of the smaller size, different proportions of anatomical structures compared to adults, and a higher risk of hypoxemia. Efforts to improve the efficiency of pediatric intubation can be made by manually twisting a spiral endotracheal tube (ETT) using a flexible stylet to manipulate its shape and angle. Methods: This controlled trial randomized and assigned fifty children aged one month to six years who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia into two groups (spiral ETT [sETT] and no-stylet ETT/standard ETT). The sETT was formed by twisting the ETT using a handmade tool. The primary objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the sETT compared to the standard ETT in reducing intubation time. Secondary objectives were ETT placement accuracy, first-attempt intubation success rate, and adverse effects.Results: The mean total tube handling time in the sETT group was significantly shorter compared to the no stylet ETT group (sETT 16.8 ± 3.6 vs. standard ETT 18.8 ± 3.7 seconds; t = 2.0; P = 0.049). sETT placement had a significantly greater central placement accuracy (odds ratio, 4.846; 95% confidence interval, 1.287-18.255; P = 0.015). However, first-attempt successful intubation rate (sETT 80% vs. standard ETT 64%, P = 0.208) and total intubation time (sETT: 46.5±5.2 vs. standard ETT 48.4±4.9 seconds; t = 1.3; P = 0.205) were not significantly different. No adverse effects were observed for either ETT type.Conclusions: This study demonstrated the effectiveness of the spiral ETT in reducing total tube handling time and improving ETT placement accuracy in children using video laryngoscopy.

Comparison of Three Tracheal Intubation Procedures Using Personal Protective Equipment, Direct and Video Laryngoscopes: An Open, Randomized, Parallel Clinical Trial

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, severe respiratory failure is a life-threatening condition, and life-saving tracheal intubation is a high-risk aerosol- and droplet-generating procedure. It is crucial to protect healthcare workers without compromising patient safety during intubation. The use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and different types of laryngoscopes are measures to reduce the risk of infectious transmission that might impact the intubation process. Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different levels of PPE and types of laryngoscopes on the duration of the intubation process and its success rate. Methods: We conducted an open, randomized, parallel clinical trial on non-COVID-19 adult patients scheduled for elective and emergency surgeries under general anesthesia from November 2021 to May 2022. Patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 was intubated using a video-guided laryngoscope with operators wearing level three PPE; group 2 was intubated using a direct laryngoscope with operators wearing level three PPE; and group 3 was intubated using a direct laryngoscope with operators wearing level two PPE. Intubation was performed by 2nd- and 3rd-year anesthesia residents. Results: The duration of intubation varied significantly among the groups, with Group 1 taking the longest time (P = 0.046). Group 3 had a higher success rate for first-attempt intubation (P = 0.056). Conclusions: The use of PPE and video-guided laryngoscopy had varying effects on the intubation procedure, with the most notable impact being on the overall length of intubation. Further research with a larger sample size is needed to validate these findings.

A Comparative Study Between Video Laryngoscope and Video Stylet for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Simulated Cervical Fracture Injury: A Prospective Randomised Controlled Study.

Purpose Video laryngoscopes were being used more often in cases of potentially difficult airways. The Karl Storz video stylet offered clear advantages over conventional laryngoscopes for patients with cervical spine fractures. This study aimed to compare the performance of the C-MAC video laryngoscope with the new Karl Storz video stylet in patients with simulated cervical fracture injuries. Material and methods The study, approved by the Board of Studies and the Ethical Committee of Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital in Aligarh, involved 50 patients undergoing operative procedures under general anaesthesia. It was a prospective randomised controlled study on patients aged 20-60, weighing 30-80 kg, and classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Grades I and II, admitted for elective operative procedures. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups for intubation using different devices: the control group (N = 25) was intubated with the C-MAC (Mac blade) video laryngoscope (CM), and the study group (N = 25) was intubated with the Karl Storz video stylet (VS). The anaesthetic procedure involved a detailed pre-anesthetic check-up for all patients, including a medical history review, physical examination, and necessary tests based on age. Standard monitoring and pre-medication were administered uniformly. Anesthesia was induced and intubation was attempted using appropriate devices, following manual stabilisation of the neck. Parameters such as intubation attempts, time taken, failures, hemodynamic changes, and complications were recorded throughout the procedure. If intubation was unsuccessful, alternative measures were taken, and the operative procedure proceeded. Results The intubation success rates were compared between the two groups, CM and VS. In the CM group, all 25 patients (100%) were successfully intubated on the first attempt, while in the VS group, 23 patients (92%) were successfully intubated on the first attempt, and two patients (8%) required two attempts. The difference in the distribution of the number of attempts between the two groups was not statistically significant (p = 0.4915). The mean intubation time in the CM group was 27.24 ± 2.16 seconds, while in the VS group, the mean intubation time was significantly longer at 30.84 ± 6.81 seconds, with a statistically significant difference (p = 0.0105). Adjustment manoeuvres were required in only 4% of patients in the CM group compared to 0% in the VS group, although this difference was not statistically significant. The occurrence of blood on the device during intubation was recorded, and the distribution of patients with blood on the device among the two groups did not show a statistically significant difference (p = 0.617). Conclusion This study compared the effectiveness of two intubation devices. The C-MAC video laryngoscope showed a significantly higher rate of first-attempt successful intubations and required fewer attempts compared to the Karl Storz video stylet. The C-MAC also had shorter intubation times compared to the Karl Storz device. However, the Karl Storz video stylet demonstrated comparable performance to the C-MAC video laryngoscope in clinical settings, with both devices having similar safety profiles and minimal complications.

A comparative study of head-elevated positions at 25° versus 45° for intubation in obese patients posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia

Background: Obese patients generally present with an increased risk of difficult intubation. The head-elevated position has been shown to improve laryngeal view, reduce airway complications, and prolong safe apnea time during intubation as compared to the sniffing position. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the head-elevated positions at 25° versus 45° for intubation in obese patients, in terms of ease of intubation assessed by first-attempt intubation success rate and laryngeal exposure using Cormack–Lehane grading and to assess intubation time, use of intubation aides, changes in hemodynamic parameters, and hypoxia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 100 consenting patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia were selected who fulfilled the eligibility criteria and assigned to either of the two groups by block randomization: Group A – 25° or Group B – 45° head-elevated positions for intubation in a tertiary care hospital (February 2021–July 2022). Results: The 45° head-elevated position was found to provide a better laryngeal exposure, the mean time to intubate was lesser and the first attempt success rate was also higher. Further, 45° head-elevated position is better chosen as per anesthesiologist comfort, using Likert scale grading. Conclusion: This study concluded that 45° head-elevated position provides better ease of intubation in obese patients as compared to 25° head-elevation.

Comparison of two different positions of an anaesthesiologist for ease of endotracheal intubation in adult patients: A randomised control trial

Background and aimsMaintaining the airway with a cuffed endotracheal tube (ETT) in the trachea remains one of the most essential anaesthesia skills. Many parameters were described to assess the difficulty of intubation in the preoperative period, but none allow the prediction of all difficult intubations. The correct posture of the anaesthesiologist is also an important factor for successful endotracheal intubation. The aim of this study was. This study aimed to compare the impact of two different positions of an anaesthesiologist (sitting vs. standing) at the time of endotracheal intubation. MethodsOne hundred ten American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I/II patients, aged between 17 to 65 years, Mallampati grade I/II, mouth opening 39–70 mm, thyromental distance (TMD) 6–6.5 cm, and sternomental distance (SMD) >13 cm, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were recruited. Patients were divided into two groups; Group I consisted of patients who underwent endotracheal intubation by an anaesthesiologist in a sitting posture, while Group II encompassed patients who underwent endotracheal intubation by anaesthesiologists in a standing posture. Assessment parameters include ease of intubation (IDS score), intubation time, intubation success rate, number of attempts, grade of laryngoscopy (Cormack Lehane score, POGO score), and complications like tooth and soft tissue damage. ResultsThe ease of intubation was higher in group I, 1(0–1), than in group II, 1(1−2) (p = 0.02), and there was a significant difference between the two groups. The Cormack Lehane grade (CL) was I/IIa/IIb/III in 19/23/13/0 in group I and I/IIa/IIb/III in 13/21/18/3 in group II. The first-attempt intubation success rate for groups I and II was 94.54 % and 92.72 % respectively. ConclusionThe sitting posture of an anaesthesiologist at the time of laryngoscopy provides a better intubating condition when compared with the standing posture. RegistrationClinical Trial Registry - India (CTRI) CTRI/2023/03/050371.

First-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate using a hyperangulated unchannelled videolaryngoscope vs. a channelled videolaryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial.

There is uncertainty about the optimal videolaryngoscope for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway. The use of channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopy has been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on which is the best option. We conducted a randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the C-MAC D-Blade® vs. Airtraq® in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airway who required awake tracheal intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. The primary endpoint was the first-attempt tracheal intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall success rate; number of tracheal intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane glottic view; level of difficulty (visual analogue score); patient discomfort (visual analogue score); and incidence of complications. Ninety patients (70/90 male (78%); mean (SD) age 65 (12) y) with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated to C-MAC D-Blade or Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. First-attempt successful tracheal intubation rate was higher in patients allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with those allocated to the Airtraq group (38/45 (84%) vs. 28/45 (62%), respectively; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients' tracheas that were intubated at the second and third attempt was 4/45 (9%) and 3/45 (7%) in those allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with 14/45 (31%) and 1/45 (2%) in those allocated to the Airtraq group (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in overall tracheal intubation success rate (C-MAC D-Blade group 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq group 43/45 (96%), p = 0.494). In patients with anticipated difficult airway, first-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate was higher with the C-MAC D-Blade compared with Airtraq laryngoscopy. No difference was found between the two videolaryngoscopes in overall tracheal intubation success rate.

Selective Use of Positive-Pressure Ventilation for Preoxygenation During Air Medical Rapid Sequence Intubation

BackgroundPreoxygenation is critical to safe performance of rapid sequence intubation (RSI). The use of positive-pressure ventilation (PPV) has been advocated during preoxygenation but may increase the risk of aspiration. ObjectiveTo explore the risk-benefit analysis of using PPV during air medical RSI. MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of the Air Methods Airway Registry using patient data from over 175 bases across the U.S. over a 5-year period. Patients were separated into normoxemic (SpO2 ≥93%) and hypoxemic (SpO2 <93%) and compared in regard to demographics, clinical data, and use of PPV. Primary outcomes were first-attempt intubation success (FAS) and FAS without desaturation (FASWD). Chi-square, t-test, and logistical regression were used to analyze the data. ResultsThere were 9778 patients who underwent intubations during the study period. FAS was 92% (8966 patients). FASWD was 90% (8775 patients). Mean SpO2 was 94.9%. There were 42% (4118 patients) of patients who received PPV prior to intubation and 1% (94) aspirated during RSI. Multivariate logistical regression showed an association between use of PPV and reduced intubation success for normoxemic patients but improved intubation success for hypoxemic patients. The use of PPV was associated with higher risk of aspiration events (p = 0.007). ConclusionThe use of PPV during preoxygenation prior to RSI appears beneficial for hypoxemic but not normoxemic patients due to lower intubation success and increased aspiration risk with PPV. This data supports selective use of PPV prior to the initial intubation attempt in patients undergoing RSI.

The Production, Assessment, and Utility of 3D-Printed Video Laryngoscopes in Eastern India: A Low-Cost Alternative to Conventional Video Laryngoscopes.

Introduction Recognizing the limitations of traditional direct laryngoscopes, particularly in difficult airway situations, video laryngoscopy has emerged as a potentially safer and more effective alternative. This study evaluated the utility of two 3D-printed video laryngoscopes: a standard geometry video laryngoscope (SGVL), resembling the traditional Macintosh blade, and a hyper-angulated video laryngoscope (HAVL) with a more curved design. Their performance was compared to a standard Macintosh direct laryngoscope across various intubation parameters. By leveraging the cost-effectiveness of 3D printing with polylactic acid, the study aimed to assess the potential of this technology to improve airway management across diverse clinical settings and varying levels of physician expertise. Methods This prospective randomized crossover study compared the effectiveness of 3D-printed video laryngoscopes (VL) and a standard direct laryngoscope in intubation. After obtaining IRB approval, physicians from various specialties across multiple centers participated. Participants received training on SGVL, HAVL, and DL intubation using an instructional video and hands-on practice. The training was standardized for all participants. The primary outcome measures were time to successful intubation, number of attempts, and time to visualize vocal cords. Participants were randomized to use all three laryngoscopes on a manikin, with a maximum of two attempts per scope. A 30-minute break separated each laryngoscope evaluation. Successful intubation was defined as the single insertion of each laryngoscope and bougie, followed by endotracheal tube placement and confirmation of lung inflation. Results Ninety-eight doctors, mostly from the EM team (73.5%) and ICU team (23.4%). Teams consist of consultants, residents, and medical officers of the concerned departments. Forty-eight of the participants (49%) were novice operators (<25 intubations). Successful first-attempt intubation in those with <1 year of experience with intubation (n=33) was highest for SGVL (97%) compared to DL (82%) and HAVL (67%). Participants who learned intubation through self-directed learning exhibited a higher acceptance of VL and achieved 100% success on their first attempt. Among those who followed modules or workshops, 97% had successful first-attempt intubation with VL. The average time taken to visualize the vocal cords was lower in SGVL compared to DL (5.6 vs. 7.5 seconds) (p<0.001). The HAVL also had a lower average time compared to the DL (7.1 vs. 7.5 secs) (p<0.001). However, the time taken to intubate using DL (24.2 ±8.7 sec) was similar to SGVL (28.1 ±13 sec). Lastly, the intubation time using HAVL was the longest (49.6 ±35.5 sec). The time to intubate with DL and SGVL had Spearman's rho of 0.64 (p<0.001), and DL and HAVL had 0.59 (p<0.001). Conclusions The ease of use and its cost-effective nature make 3D-printed VLs beneficial in situations where traditional VLs may not be available, especially in simulation and training.

A Nationwide, Prospective Study of Tracheal Intubation in Critically Ill Adults in Spain: Management, Associated Complications, and Outcomes.

Our aims were to explore current intubation practices in Spanish ICUs to determine the incidence and risk factors of peri-intubation complications (primary outcome measure: major adverse events), the rate and factors associated with first-pass success, and their impact on mortality as well as the changes of the intubation procedure observed in the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospective, observational, and cohort study. Forty-three Spanish ICU. A total of 1837 critically ill adult patients undergoing tracheal intubation. The enrollment period was six months (selected by each center from April 16, 2019, to October 31, 2020). None. At least one major adverse peri-intubation event occurred in 40.4 % of the patients (973 major adverse events were registered) the most frequent being hemodynamic instability (26.5%) and severe hypoxemia (20.3%). The multivariate analysis identified seven variables independently associated with a major adverse event whereas the use of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) was associated with reduced odds of major adverse events. Intubation on the first attempt was achieved in 70.8% of the patients. The use of videolaryngoscopy at the first attempt was the only protective factor (odds ratio 0.43; 95% CI, 0.28-0.66; p < 0.001) for first-attempt intubation failure. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the use of videolaryngoscopy and NMBAs increased significantly. The occurrence of a major peri-intubation event was an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality. Cardiovascular collapse also posed a serious threat, constituting an independent predictor of death. A major adverse event occurred in up to 40% of the adults intubated in the ICU. Peri-intubation hemodynamic instability but not severe hypoxemia was identified as an independent predictor of death. The use of NMBAs was a protective factor for major adverse events, whereas the use of videolaringoscopy increases the first-pass success rate of intubation. Intubation practices changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Comparative Evaluation of Ease of Nasotracheal Intubation Using C-MAC versus TuoRen Video Laryngoscope in Adult Surgical Patients: A Randomized Study

Background and Aims: Laryngeal visualization and ease of intubation vary with the use of different video laryngoscopes. We compared the number of attempts taken for successful first-attempt nasotracheal intubation using C-MAC video laryngoscope versus TuoRen video laryngoscope. Ease of intubation and time taken, glottic view, and hemodynamic responses were also compared. Materials and Methods: It was a randomized, single-blinded trial conducted in eighty adult surgical patients with normal airways requiring nasotracheal intubation. In all patients, the protocols for induction and intubation were similar. In Group C, C-MAC video laryngoscope and in Group T, TuoRen video laryngoscope were used. Statistical analysis was done using independent samples t-test and Chi-squared test as applicable. Results: Successful first-attempt intubation was significantly higher in Group C compared to Group T (87.5% vs. 60%). Incidence of fogging was significantly lower in Group C compared to Group T (10% vs. 30%). Time taken for intubation was significantly higher in Group T (34.64 ± 4.38 s vs. 86.25 ± 8.56 s). The view of the glottis obtained was similar in both groups. A significantly higher number of patients in Group C had easy intubation (87.5% vs. 60%). Mean heart rate and mean arterial pressure were significantly higher in Group T after intubation. Conclusion: Successful first-attempt nasotracheal intubation was significantly higher with the use of C-MAC which required lesser attempts and time compared to TuoRen video laryngoscope. The glottic views obtained with both devices were comparable, but the ease of intubation was better and fogging was lesser with C-MAC. The use of TuoRen videoscope was associated with significantly higher hemodynamic responses.

Feasibility of ultrasound measurement of tracheal diameter in patients undergoing severe scoliosis orthopedic surgery: A randomized trial

Objective To explore the feasibility of ultrasound measurement of the transverse diameter of the cervical trachea at its narrowest point in patients undergoing severe scoliosis orthopedic surgery. Methods A total of 110 patients, aged 18-65, who scheduled for elective orthopedic surgery for severe scoliosis were included. Prior to surgery, all patients underwent two types of tracheal inner diameter measurements: (1) CT measurement of the anteroposterior diameter (Dmin,AP) and transverse diameter (Dmin,T) of the cervical trachea at its narrowest point; and (2) ultrasound measurement of Dmin,T. Based on the measurement results, the patients were randomly divided into two groups, the CT group ( n = 55) and the ultrasound group ( n = 55). We compared the Dmin,AP and Dmin,T measured by CT for all patients. Then, we compared CT and ultrasound measurements of Dmin,T. Furthermore, we conducted an analysis to determine the correlation and consistency between the two methods. Additionally, we examined the success rate of first-attempt tracheal intubation and the occurrence rate of tracheal tube being too wide or too narrow between the two groups, and assessed the occurrence of postoperative 24-h pharyngeal pain and hoarseness. Results When comparing the Dmin,AP and Dmin,T measured by CT in all patients, a statistically significant difference was observed ( p &lt; .001). When comparing the measurements of Dmin,T between CT and ultrasound in all patients, no statistically significant differences were found ( p &gt; .05). The correlation coefficient (r) between CT and ultrasound measurements of Dmin,T was 0.849 ( p &lt; .001). The mean difference in Dmin,T was 0.19 mm, and the limits of agreement (LoA) were −2.24 mm to 2.62 mm. Conclusions Ultrasound measurement of Dmin,T in severe scoliosis patients is feasible and provides valuable guidance for the selection of endotracheal tube sizes. It serves as a non-invasive and bedside auxiliary examination method for perioperative airway assessment.

The Efficacy of Utilizing Bougie Vs Stylet in Patients Requiring Endotracheal Intubation: Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: Endotracheal intubation is a high-risk procedure that can be lifesaving for critically ill or injured patients. Assisted devices, such as the bougie and stylet, are commonly used to improve success rates and reduce complications. The bougie facilitates the passage of the endotracheal tube through the vocal cords while the stylet is inserted into the endotracheal tube prior to intubation. However, there is variation in clinical practice regarding the preference for using these devices in difficult airway management. Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of bougie versus stylet in tracheal intubation. Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central of Controlled Trials and Clinical trials.gov were searched for studies discussing the same topic. The primary outcome was the first-attempt intubation success rate between the bougie and stylet. Our secondary outcomes were to compare the duration of intubation and the complications rates between bougie and stylet. Results: A total of 7 RCTs that enrolled participants(number?) were eligible. The bougie approach had a slightly higher success rate on the first attempt, but there was no significant difference between the methods (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.15). The duration of intubation, pooled analysis indicated a statistically significant reduction in the duration of intubation with the stylet approach compared to the bougie approach (MD, 8.39; 95% CI, 2.87 to 13.91). Subgroup analysis revealed lower rates of esophageal intubation (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.26 to 1.61, I2= 0%) and pneumothorax (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.66, I2= 0%) in the bougie group. Conclusion: This study reported that no significant difference between the use of bougie vs stylet in terms of first attempt intubation success rates and the complication rates of endotracheal intubation. However, stylet displayed significantly shorter duration of intubation in comparison to bougie.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) Revealing the Future of Airway Management: Video Laryngoscopy vs. Macintosh Laryngoscopy for Enhanced Clinical Outcomes.

Since the 1940s, Macintosh laryngoscopy (Mac laryngoscopy) has been the gold standard for tracheal intubation, offering visualization of the glottis entrance. However, recent years have witnessed the emergence of various video laryngoscopy (VL) techniques. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the clinical outcomes of VL versus Mac laryngoscopy in an elective setting. We comprehensively searched five medical databases - PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. All the databases were last searched in January 2023. We only included studies with full texts comparing VL to Mac laryngoscopy clinical outcomes. Studies were excluded if they were non-full text or non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and did not compare VL to Mac laryngoscopy. We extracted data comprising author names, publication year, key study outcomes (first-attempt intubation success rate, Cormack and Lehane grade, hypoxia incidence, and glottis view quality), video laryngoscope types, and sample sizes of both VL and Mac laryngoscopy groups. The Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. Statistical analysis was performed using Review Manager (RevMan, version 5.4;Cochrane Collaboration, London, UK), presenting results as odds ratio (OR) and risk ratios (RR) at a 95% confidence interval (CI). This facilitated the identification of relevant and appropriate studies of our analysis. The search produced 19 studies that were included in this review. The evaluated sample size ranges from 40 to 802, with 3,238 participants. The rate of success at the first attempt in the use of VL was 1,558/1,890 (82.43%), while the success rate for Mac laryngoscopy was 982/1,348 (72.85%; OR: 1.98 (1.25, 3.12)) at a 95% confidence interval. Pooled analysis indicated no significant difference for hypoxia concerning the type of device used RR (random effects: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.80-1.29). A video laryngoscope had a higher likelihood of visualizing the vocal cords categorized as category 1 in the Cormack-Lehane system of classification (RR: 2.45; 95% CI: 1.43-4.21). Additionally, considerably better glottis views were attained during VL than Mac laryngoscopy (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.19-2.62). In elective tracheal intubation, VL demonstrates superior first-attempt success rates, offers improved glottis visualization, and reduces instances where the glottis cannot be viewed compared to Mac laryngoscopy.

Comparison of Time to Intubation of a Double-Lumen Endobronchial Tube Utilizing C-MAC® Versus GlideScope® Versus Macintosh Blade: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.

Macintosh blade direct laryngoscopy is widely used for endotracheal intubation. It may, however, provide an incomplete view of the glottis in patients with challenging airway anatomy. Consequently, various video laryngoscopes have been developed to enhance the visualization of the glottis and facilitate intubation. Yet, the effectiveness of these video laryngoscopes for intubation using a double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT), which is longer, larger, and more rigid and has a linear configuration as opposed to the naturally semicircular curvature of a single-lumen endotracheal tube, remains uncertain. We hypothesized that video laryngoscopes would be more efficient for DLT intubation compared to the Macintosh blade in an adult manikin. Ninety-four anesthesia providers, comprising 67 residents, 15 fellows, and 12 attendings, attempted to intubate an adult manikin with normal airway anatomy (Laerdal, Wappingers Falls, NY, USA) using a 37 Fr left-sided DLT. Three different intubation devices were used: the C-MAC® video laryngoscope (Karl Storz GmbH & Co. KG, Tuttlingen, Germany), the GlideScope® video laryngoscope (Verathon Inc., Bothell, WA), and the Macintosh blade direct laryngoscope-were used. Each participant intubated a manikin once with each of the three devices. Participants were randomized via a crossover design with the order of devices determined by using a Latin square design. Time to intubation and the number of failed intubations (esophageal intubation) were compared across the three different devices. Mean times to intubation for the C-MAC®, GlideScope®, and Macintosh blades were 18.57 ± 0.77, 36.26 ± 2.69, and 20.76 ± 0.96 seconds, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference (P<0.001) between the GlideScope® and the other two laryngoscopes. The times for C-MAC® and Macintosh blades were not significantly different. There were two instances of first-attempt failed intubation with the Macintosh. Both the C-MAC® and the Macintosh blades proved more efficient in terms of time to DLT intubation in the manikin with normal airway anatomy, when compared to the GlideScope®. Considering the occurrence of first-attemptfailed intubation, the C-MAC® was the most effective device among the three laryngoscopes for timely successful DLT intubation in the adult manikin. Further studies are needed to confirm these results in human subjects.

First-Pass Success of Video Laryngoscope Compared With Direct Laryngoscope in Intubations Performed by Residents in the Emergency Department.

The video laryngoscope (VL) has been widely used for intubation in the emergency department (ED). However, their effectiveness remains controversial, particularly among airway management performed by residents in the ED. We aimed to examine whether the use of VL, compared to a direct laryngoscope (DL), was associated with higher first-attempt intubation success among intubations performed by residents in the ED. This is a secondary analysis of the data from a prospective, observational, multicentre study of 15 Japanese EDs from April 2012 through March 2020. We included all adult patients who underwent intubation with VL or DL by residents (postgraduate years ≤5) in the ED. The outcome measures were first-pass success and intubation-related adverse events (overall, major, and minor adverse events). To determine the association of VL use with each of the outcomes, we constructed logistic regression models with generalized estimating equations to account for patients clustering within the ED, adjusting for patient demographics, primary indications, intubation difficulty, and intubation methods. Of 5,261 eligible patients who underwent an initial intubation attempt by residents, 1,858 (35%) patients were attempted with VL. Intubations performed with VL had a non-significantly higher first-pass success rate than those with DL (77% vs. 64%; unadjusted odds ratio (OR)=1.20; 95% CI=0.87-1.65; P=0.27). This association was significant after adjustment for potential confounders (adjusted OR, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.06-1.67; P=0.01). As for adverse events, the use of VL was associated with a lower rate of any (adjusted OR=0.67; 95% CI=0.51-0.86; P=0.002) and minor (adjusted OR=0.69; 95% CI=0.55-0.87; P=0.002) adverse events. The use of VL was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate and a lower rate of any adverse events compared to that with DL among intubations performed by residents in the EDs.

Effect of Bougie Use on First-Attempt Success in Tracheal Intubations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The use of a bougie, a flexible endotracheal tube introducer, has been proposed to optimize first-attempt success in emergency department intubations. We aimed to evaluate the available evidence on the association of bougie use in the first attempt and success in tracheal intubations. This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that evaluated first-attempt success between adults intubated with a bougie versus without a bougie (usually with a stylet) in all settings. Manikin and cadaver studies were excluded. A medical librarian searched Ovid Cochrane Central, Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Scopus, and Web of Science for randomized controlled trials and comparative observational studies from inception to June 2023. Study selection and data extraction were done in duplicate by 2 independent reviewers. We conducted a meta-analysis with random-effects models, and we used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence at the outcome level. We screened a total of 2,699 studies, and 133 were selected for full-text review. A total of 18 studies, including 12 randomized controlled trials, underwent quantitative analysis. In the meta-analysis of 18 studies (9,151 patients), bougie use was associated with increased first-attempt intubation success (pooled risk ratio [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06 to 1.17, low certainty evidence). Bougie use was associated with increased first-attempt success across all analyzed subgroups with similar effect estimates, including in emergency intubations (9 studies; 8,070 patients; RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.16, low certainty). The highest point estimate favoring the use of a bougie was in the subgroup of patients with Cormack-Lehane III or IV (5 studies, 585 patients, RR 1.60, 95% CI 1.40 to 1.84, moderate certainty). In this meta-analysis, the bougie as an aid in the first intubation attempt was associated with increased success. Despite the certainty of evidence being low, these data suggest that a bougie should probably be used first and not as a rescue device in emergency intubations.

Comparison of Tracheal Intubation Using King Vision (Non-channeled Blade) and Tuoren Video Laryngoscopes in Patients With Cervical Spine Immobilization by Manual In-Line Stabilization: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Glottic visualization on cervical immobilization with manual in-line stabilization (MILS) might be challenging in individuals with cervical spine injuries. We compared non-channeled King Vision video laryngoscope (VL) (Ambu GmbH, Bad Nauheim, Germany) with Tuoren video laryngoscope (Henan Tuoren Medical Device, Zhengzhou, China) for endotracheal intubation in patients with cervical spine immobilization. A total of 124 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia were included in this study. After induction of general anesthesia, patients were randomized into two groups (62 each): group K (non-channeled blade of King Vision video laryngoscope) and group T (Tuoren video laryngoscope). Cervical spine immobilization was achieved with manual in-line stabilization. The success of the first pass intubation, the time required to intubate, glottic visualization, and intubation difficulty score (IDS) were recorded. The first-attempt success rate of intubation was 95.2% (59 out of 62 patients) in group K and 90.3% (56 out of 62 patients) in group T, which were comparable. The mean glottic visualization time was significantly less with group T (12.74 ± 6.32 seconds) compared to group K (17.92 ± 4.24 seconds). Intubation time was significantly faster with group K (18.79 ± 5.857 seconds) compared to group T (27.21 ± 8.514 seconds). Both video laryngoscopes provided good grades of glottic visualization. We conclude that the performance of the Tuoren video laryngoscope is similar to the King Vision video laryngoscope in terms of first-attempt intubation success rate and glottic visualization score in patients with cervical spine immobilization by manual in-line stabilization. Although glottic visualization time was shorter with Tuoren VL, we could achieve faster intubationwith King Vision VL.

Using a Bougie With C-MAC Video Laryngoscopy Did Not Improve First-Attempt Intubation Success Rates in Critical Care Air Transport

ObjectiveStudies have shown a bougie improves first-attempt success rates when used in combination with direct laryngoscopy during the initial attempt. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of a bougie in combination with C-MAC (Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany) improves first-attempt success rates of endotracheal intubation (ETI) compared with C-MAC with a traditional stylet. MethodsThis study is a retrospective chart review using data collected on 371 intubations completed by a single air medical service using the C-MAC laryngoscope and either a bougie or a stylet. ResultsThe overall success rate using C-MAC for ETI with either a bougie or a stylet was 83%. There was no statistically significant difference between first-attempt successful intubations using C-MAC and a bougie (82%) or a stylet (86%) (χ1 = 0.871, P = .351). There was no statistically significant difference between laryngoscopy grade and the number of attempts that resulted in a successful intubation (χ1 = 0.743, P = .7). ConclusionThere was no difference between first-attempt success rates using video laryngoscopy with a bougie, overall intubation success rates, or difficult intubation success rates compared with video laryngoscopy with a stylet, indicating that the purpose of a bougie as a rescue device did not hold true in the prehospital setting of our critical care air medical service.

Learning curve for flexible bronchoscope-guided orotracheal intubation for anesthesiology residents: A cumulative sum analysis.

Endotracheal intubation with a flexible bronchoscope is a well-recognized airway management technique that anesthesiologists must master. Skill acquisition and knowledge must reach an appropriate level before trainees perform independent practice on patients. There are a paucity of evidence-based outcome measures of trainee competence in performing flexible bronchoscopy. The objectives of this study were to 1) construct a learning curve for flexible bronchoscope-guided orotracheal intubation for anesthesiology residents using the CUSUM method and 2) determine the number of procedures required to achieve proficiency. This study included 12 first-year anesthesiology residents with no previous experience with flexible bronchoscopic intubation. Trainees attended theoretical and simulation training and performed flexible bronchoscope-guided orotracheal intubation in adult patients with normal airways under general anesthesia. Number of intubation attempts, intubation success rate, time to intubation, and incidence of dental and mucosal injuries were recorded. The cumulative sum (CUSUM) method was used to evaluate the learning curve of flexible bronchoscope-guided orotracheal intubation. Trainees performed flexible bronchoscope-guided orotracheal intubation on 364 patients. First-attempt intubation success occurred in 317 (87.1%) patients. Second-attempt intubation success occurred in 23 (6.3%) patients. Overall, the flexible bronchoscope-guided orotracheal intubation success rate was 93.4% (range, 85.3% to 100%). The mean number of orotracheal intubation procedures per trainee was 31 ± 5 (range, 23 to 40). All trainees crossed the lower decision boundary (H0) after 15.1 ± 5.6 procedures (range, 8 to 25 procedures). There was a significant decrease in median intubation time [39s (IQR: 30, 50) vs. 76s (IQR: 54, 119)] (P < 0.001) after crossing the lower decision boundary (H0) compared to before. There were no dental, mucosa, arytenoid or vocal cord trauma events associated with intubation. Learning curves constructed with CUSUM analysis showed that all trainees (anesthesiologist residents) included in this study achieved competence (intubation success rates ≥ 80%) in flexible bronchoscope-guided orotracheal intubation. Trainees needed to perform 15 (range, 8 to 25) procedures to achieve proficiency. There was wide variability between trainees. Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, ChiCTR 2000032166.

Market Analysis of Video Laryngoscopy Equipment for the Role 1 Setting.

Airway compromise is the second leading cause of potentially preventable prehospital combat death. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) remains the most common role 1 airway intervention. Video laryngoscopy (VL) is superior to direct laryngoscopy (DL) for first-attempt intubation, especially in less-experienced providers and for trauma patients. The cost has been a major challenge in pushing VL technology far-forward; however, the cost of equipment continues to become more affordable. We conducted a market analysis of VL devices under $10,000 for possible options for role 1. We searched Google, PubMed, and the Food and Drug Administration database from August 2022 to January 2023 with a combination of several keywords to identify current VL market options under $10,000. After identifying relevant manufacturers, we then reviewed individual manufacturer or distributor websites for pricing data and system specifications. We noted several characteristics regarding VL device design for comparison. These include monitor features, size, modularity, system durability, battery life, and reusability. When necessary, we requested formal price quotes from respective companies. We identified 17 VL options under $10,000 available for purchase, 14 of which were priced below $5,000 for individual units. Infium (n = 3) and Vimed Medical (n = 4) provided the largest number of unique models. VL options under $10,000 exist in both reusable and disposable modalities. These modalities included separate monitors as well as monitors attached to the VL handle. Disposable options, on a per-unit basis, cost less than reusable options. Several VL options exist within our goal price point in both reusable and disposable options. Clinical studies assessing the technology performance of ETI and deliberate downselection are needed to identify the most cost-effective solution for role 1 dispersion.