Firearm-related Injuries Research Articles

Firearm-Related Unintentional Childhood Injury in Israel.

The rise in demand for firearm licenses in Israel due to the ongoing 2023-2024 Israel-Gaza War, coupled with the easing of regulations for issuing weapons, is expected to lead to a significant increase in the incidence of firearms among civilians. This situation calls for a special awareness of civilian populations of the dangers posed to children by the high prevalence of firearms. We therefore present trends in firearm-related incidents resulting in unintentional mortality and morbidity of children ages 0-17 between the years 2008-2023 in Israel. In total, 202 accidents involving firearms were reported, with an average age of 12.2 (median: 13), and with the youngest child being 2 years old. Of these, 24 cases resulted in fatalities18 of which of children of Arab descent. We provide several recommendations concerning changes and additions to current bylaws concerning firearms licensing and storage in Israel, in order to decrease the risk of child injury due to irresponsible firearm handling.

A 14-Year-Old Child with Craniofacial Injuries Caused by Traumatic Gunshot

Ballistic trauma is an injury resulting from the impact of a projectile on the body. Gunshot wounds to the head are among the most lethal. Although they were rare in civilian practice, their incidence has increased in recent years in the civilian population due to the resurgence of armed conflicts and terrorism. Severe firearm-related head injuries in children are very rare and poorly studied; they are most often due to suicide attempts. CT is the imaging modality of choice. It aids in initial management, monitors progression. We present the case of a 14-year-old child admitted for a gunshot injury. The patient was initially hospitalized in the intensive care unit before undergoing initial imaging in our department.

Pathological Changes and Sodium Rhodizonate Test as Tools for Investigating Gunshot Wounds in Veterinary Forensic Pathology.

Gunshot wound morphology and gunshot residues (GSRs) evaluation have been poorly investigated in veterinary forensic pathology. The aims of the present study were to assess the gunshot wound morphology in animals and evaluate the detectability of lead deriving from GSRs using colorimetric techniques. To these aims, cadavers were divided into four different groups. Group A comprised eight animals who died from firearm-related injuries, while groups B and C included dog limbs shot using different shooting ranges; group D comprised dog limbs stabbed with a screwdriver. Morphological analysis was performed on all entry gunshot wounds. Lead residues were investigated using a Bullet Hole Testing Kit (BTK) and Rhodizonate Sodium histochemical staining (NaR-s). Gunshot wounds in group A showed an abrasion ring associated with hemorrhages and tissue necrosis. Groups B and C showed injuries related to the shooting range. NaR-s showed positive results in both animals that died from gunshot wounds and experimentally shot limbs. However, the number of positive cases and the pattern of lead distribution varied with the shooting range. Positive results by BTK were limited to close-contact shots in group B limbs. Our results suggest that both pathological examination and NaR tests represent valid tools for investigating gunshot wounds in veterinary pathology.

The leading causes of death in the US and Mexico's pediatric population are related to violence: a note on secondary analyses of registered deaths from 2000 to 2022.

our objective was to analyze the trends in the leading causes of death among the pediatric population aged 1-19 years in Mexico and the United States (US) from 2000 to 2022. Methods. Data for Mexico were sourced from the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI), while the US data were extracted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC-WONDER) databases. Homicide has been the leading cause of death since 2017 in Mexico and since 2019 in US youths aged 1-19. In Mexico, it reached 6.5 deaths per 100,000 people in 2022. Despite the overall pediatric mortality decline from 2000 to 2022 in both countries, the pediatric homicide rate has increased by 93.3 and 35.8% In Mexico and the US, respectively, and suicide by 86.6 and 36.9%. In both countries, death by firearm-related injuries had risen in a parallel sense. In the US, deaths by drug overdose and poisoning have increased by 314.8%. Despite advancements in infant healthcare over the past two decades in Mexico, there remains a significant gap in the provision of healthcare services to the adolescent population. Addressing issues related to violence, mental health, and substance abuse through targeted public policies is imperative for both Mexico and the US, especially given their shared border region.

A Student Call for Gun Violence Education in Medical Schools

This Viewpoint discusses the lack of gun violence education in medical school curricula despite the high prevalence of firearm-related deaths and injuries in the US.

Nonfatal Firearm Injury & Subsequent Emergency Department Utilization Among Non-Elderly Adults

IntroductionThe mortality, long-term morbidity, and exacerbated healthcare needs due to firearm injury in the US are significant and growing. However, the relationship between exposure to a nonfatal firearm injury and long-term ED utilization is poorly understood. This study estimates the association between exposure to a nonfatal firearm injury and ED utilization in the subsequent year. MethodsUsing all-payer ED data among non-elderly adults in Georgia and New York, all ED visits for nonfatal firearm injuries from 2017-2018 were identified. Sociodemographic, clinical, and contextual characteristics between nonfatal firearm injury ED patients and the broader population of ED users were compared. ED utilization in the year following a nonfatal firearm injury relative to ED use in the year before, and compared to ED use by a propensity score matched control group was examined, using Poisson and negative binomial multivariable regressions. Analyses were performed in 2024. ResultsNonfatal firearm injury ED patients were disproportionately male, younger, non-Hispanic Black, uninsured, and residents of areas with low median income and high firearm ownership. Compared to a matched control group, multivariable analyses indicated that nonfatal firearm injury ED patients had significantly higher risks of having hospital admissions through the ED (aRR: 1.42), all-cause injury-related ED visits (aRR: 1.47), non-firearm injury-related ED visits (aRR: 1.26), and additional nonfatal firearm injury-related ED visits (aRR: 325.45) in the subsequent year (p<0.001 for all). About one in every eight ED users with a firearm-related injury at index also sought ED care for another nonfatal firearm injury within one year. ConclusionsNonfatal firearm-related injuries contribute to preventable harm, health inequity and increased ED utilization.

Lamellar scleral patch autograft after ballistic accident: A case report

Scleral graft has been used in clinical situations including perforating eye trauma to treat traumatic scleral dehiscence. A 28-year-old male patient presented for a painful left eye following a firearm-related injury few hours ago. Visual acuity was limited to light perception with a 2 mm wide, oval-shaped inferior scleral gap. Due to the size of the scleral defect, we decided to perform a scleral autograft. The graft was fashioned from the inferonasal sclera, deposited over the recipient hole, and secured with 10–0 nylon sutures on the corneal and scleral sides of the surgical bed with favorable anatomical and refractive outcomes.

The State of Firearm Policy Research in the United States.

Firearm-related deaths lead to the most person-years of life lost in the US. There were 48,830 deaths from homicides and suicides in 2021 alone. Firearm access remains at an all-time high in most states - indicated by record manufacturing, sales, employment in firearm industry, taxes collected from sales, and the number of federal background check applications in 2020 and 2021. Yet, firearm injury is a politically contentious topic to the point of stalling progress on an important public health topic. This politicization led to nearly three decades of federal disinvestment in firearm research; reduced surveillance of firearm-related crime, injury, and death; and degraded data quality. This left generations of researchers with limited epidemiologic tools to conduct firearm policy research, jeopardizing the amount and quality of research conducted. Despite these limitations, research has persisted and promising approaches to reduce firearm morbidity and mortality have been identified. Yet the field has struggled to keep pace with methodological advancements and conceptualizations of racial and ethnic disparities as products of systemic racism. In this commentary, we highlight some existing evidence-informed policies, explicate some limitations in the field, and identify opportunities to address the limitations of prior work to strengthen future capacity for evidence-informed prevention.

Firearm Experiences, Behaviors, and Norms Among Rural Adolescents

Rural adolescents are at high risk for firearm-related injury, yet most existing prevention efforts are informed by research conducted in urban areas. Despite the need to account for rural perspectives, few studies have investigated the unique social ecological context of firearms for rural adolescents or have directly engaged with rural adolescents to understand their views on firearm use. To describe rural adolescents' firearm behaviors and perceptions of firearm-related social norms within their communities, peer groups, and families. This cross-sectional study used a convergent mixed-methods design and involved a community-based participatory research approach. Participants comprised 93 adolescents residing in rural Washington state and enrolled in a county or tribal reservation 4-H youth development program as an intermediate or senior age-level grouping (ie, aged 12-19 years). Adolescents completed a survey and participated in a semistructured focus group or interview between September 1, 2021, and September 30, 2022. Data were analyzed using descriptive and thematic analysis. Individual handgun behavior and peer, family, and community perceptions of firearm-related social norms. The sample included 93 adolescents (mean [SD] age, 15.7 [1.7] years; 49 female participants [52.7%]). Approximately half of participants (52 [55.9%]) had carried a handgun at some point in their lives, with a mean (SD) age at first carry of 10.9 (3.1) years. Primary themes across quantitative and qualitative data focused on social norms (specifically, acceptable and unacceptable ways to engage with firearms, reasons for carrying firearms, and places to carry a firearm). In this cross-sectional study, rural adolescents in 4-H programs generally understood acceptable and unacceptable firearm carrying behaviors, which aligned with state laws. Findings provide context for rural adolescent behaviors such as carrying a firearm predominantly for prosocial reasons (hunting, recreation, and sport) and adult behavior such as carrying for protection of person and personal property. Understanding firearm-related social norms in rural communities holds implications for firearm injury prevention efforts, especially related to enhancing training, developing norms-based prevention approaches, and tailoring efforts to rural settings.

Emergency Department Visits Among Adolescents for Intentional Assault, Firearm, Poison, and Self-Harm Injuries Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.

Purpose This study aimed to examine changes in adolescent emergency department (ED) visits for firearm, poison, self-harm, and intentional assault injuries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic and to identify sociodemographic factors influencing these variations. Methods Utilizing the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS), the study analyzes data for intentional self-harm, poison-related, intentional assaults, and firearm injuries from 2019 to 2021 in adolescents aged 10 to 18 years. A difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to investigate the potential impacts of COVID-19 on injury-associated ED visits, accounting for adjustments related to year, patient factors, and hospital characteristics. Results There was a substantial decline in the number of all ED visits from pre-COVID to during the COVID, but we observed increases in the volume of ED visits for firearm-related injuries (13,248 to 20,611; p-value < 0.0001), poison-related injuries (147,812 to 213,753; p-Value < 0.0001), and intentional self-harm-related injuries (153,297 to 229,591; p-value < 0.0001). Conversely, intentional assault-related injuries decreased (167,614 to 154,940; p-value < 0.0001). During the COVID-19 pandemic, ED visits for intentional self-harm increased by 15% (95% CI = 1.09-1.21), intentional assault by 6% (95% CI = 1.02-1.09), and poison-related injuries by 17% (95% CI = 1.11-1.21) compared to pre-pandemic levels. Racial disparities were observed, with Black individuals having lower odds of self-harm (aOR = 0.63) and poison-related visits (aOR = 0.69) but higher odds of assault-related visits (aOR = 1.40) compared to Whites. Hispanic individuals had fewer ED visits across all injury types, while Native Americans had higher odds across all injury types. Disparities between Black and White individuals in assault-related visits narrowed during the pandemic (aOR = 1.40 to 0.94), but disparities for Native Americans in assault-related injuries widened. Insurance status influenced ED visits, with Medicaid recipients having higher odds of self-harm (aOR = 1.11) but lower odds of assault visits (aOR = 0.82) compared to those with private insurance. Uninsured adolescents had lower odds of self-harm (aOR = 0.85) and poison-related visits (aOR = 0.95), but higher odds of assault-related visits (aOR = 1.17). Gender disparities persisted, with females having higher odds of self-harm (aOR = 1.66) and poison-related visits (aOR = 1.42) but lower odds of assault-related visits (aOR = 0.91) compared to males, with these disparities widening for self-harm and poison-related visits during the pandemic. Conclusions The findings underscore the heightened vulnerability of adolescents to certain injuries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Targeted interventions and policies to support mental health, firearm safety measures, and strategies to prevent poisoning are recommended. Addressing socioeconomic disparitiesis necessary to mitigate the impact of intentional injuries among racially/ethnically diverse adolescents during future pandemics.

A multi-state evaluation of extreme risk protection orders: a research protocol

BackgroundExtreme Risk Protection Orders (ERPOs) are civil court orders that prohibit firearm purchase and possession when someone is behaving dangerously and is at risk of harming themselves and/or others. As of June 2024, ERPOs are available in 21 states and the District of Columbia to prevent firearm violence. This paper describes the design and protocol of a six-state study of ERPO use.MethodsThe six states included are California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Maryland, and Washington. During the 3-year project period (2020–2023), ERPO case files were obtained through public records requests or through agreements with agencies with access to these data in each state. A team of over four dozen research assistants from seven institutions coded 6628 ERPO cases, abstracting 80 variables per case under domains related to respondent characteristics, events and behaviors leading to ERPO petitions, petitioner types, and court outcomes. Research assistants received didactic training through an online learning management system that included virtual training modules, quizzes, practice coding exercises, and two virtual synchronous sessions. A protocol for gaining strong interrater reliability was used. Research assistants also learned strategies for reducing the risk of experiencing secondary trauma through the coding process, identifying its occurrence, and obtaining help.DiscussionAddressing firearm violence in the U.S. is a priority. Understanding ERPO use in these six states can inform implementation planning and ERPO uptake, including promising opportunities to enhance safety and prevent firearm-related injuries and deaths. By publishing this protocol, we offer detailed insight into the methods underlying the papers published from these data, and the process of managing data abstraction from ERPO case files across the multi-state and multi-institution teams involved. Such information may also inform future analyses of this data, and future replication efforts.RegistrationThis protocol is registered on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/kv4fc/).

The digital MySteps intervention for abused women at risk for firearm-related injuries and homicides: Findings from the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary efficacy trial

BackgroundFirearms are the leading cause of victimization of abused women by intimate partner homicide and intimate partner homicide-suicides in the US. This calls for evidence-based intervention strategies to prevent firearm-related injuries or mortality and address the firearms-related safety needs of women in abusive relationships. My Safety Steps (MySteps) was designed to comprehensively assess women's firearm-related risks, and current safety needs and to prevent women's harm from their abuser's access or ownership of a firearm through a digitally delivered firearm-focused safety planning intervention. This paper describes the development, feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary evaluation of the digital BSHAPE intervention among women survivors of intimate partner violence (IPV). MethodsUsing a pretest post-test control group design, the study was conducted with 103 participants with 55 women randomly assigned to the MySteps arm and 48 women to the standard of care control arm. The feasibility and acceptability outcomes assessed were enrollment, adherence, and perceptions of the intervention. Preliminary evaluation outcomes included the partner's access to a firearm, women's self-efficacy beliefs, and empowerment. Further, qualitative follow-up interviews were conducted with 30 survivors of IPV in the MySteps arm to follow up on the use and helpfulness of safety strategies provided in MySteps. Results and conclusionThe intervention was found to be feasible, and acceptable and demonstrated improved outcomes for survivors of IPV at risk from their partner's firearm. Women provided feedback for further refinement. The findings of this study will be useful in further refining MySteps and testing it in a full-scale randomized controlled trial.

Firearm injury hospitalizations and handgun purchaser licensing laws: longitudinal evaluation of state-level purchaser licensure requirements on firearm violence, 2000–2016

BackgroundHandgun purchaser licensing (HPL) laws mandate individuals to obtain a license from law enforcement before buying a firearm. Research indicates these laws effectively reduce various forms of fatal firearm violence, including homicides, suicides, and mass shootings. Our study sought to assess the impact of HPL laws on non-fatal firearm violence.MethodsUtilizing the augmented synthetic control method (ASCM), we estimated the average treatment effect on the treated (ATT) resulting from a full repeal of an HPL law in Missouri (2007), a partial repeal in Michigan (2012), and an adoption on HPL law in Maryland (2013) on firearm injury hospitalizations. We utilized RAND's healthcare cost and utilization project-based dataset from 2000 to 2016 for our outcome variable. We conducted in-time placebo testing and leave-one-out donor pool testing as sensitivity analyses.ResultsMaryland’s adoption was associated with a statistically significant 32.3% reduction in firearm-related injury hospitalization (FIH) rates (ATT = − 0.497, standard error (SE) = 0.123); Missouri’s repeal was associated with a statistically significant 35.7% increase in FIH rates (ASCM = 0.456, SE = 0.155); and Michigan’s partial repeal showed no statistically significant associations with FIH rates (ATT = − 0.074, SE = 0.129). Sensitivity analyses confirm the robustness of the estimated HPL effects.DiscussionHPL laws appear to be protective against hospitalizations for nonfatal firearm injuries. These findings align with prior research indicating that HPL laws are effective in reducing fatal firearm violence. States without such licensing systems ought to consider these robust policies as a means to address firearm violence.

Integrating firearm storage and safety devices into health care.

Millions of US children and adolescents live in homes with loaded firearms, with only half of these homes securing their guns. Firearm-related deaths among youth have doubled over the past decade, making firearms the leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the United States. The recent advisory by the US Surgeon General, identifying firearm violence as a public health crisis, underscores the urgent need for responsible firearm ownership, including safe firearm storage. However, the healthcare community currently lacks durable medical equipment (DME) codes for firearm storage devices, limiting the ability of healthcare providers to support responsible gun ownership. We propose the establishment of DME codes for firearm storage and safety devices, which would facilitate insurance coverage of these vital prevention measures. Durable medical equipment codes would empower physicians and other healthcare providers to integrate anticipatory guidance and lethal means counseling of firearm safety into routine care and support hospital- and community-based efforts to prevent firearm-related injuries and deaths among children and adolescents.

Timing of surgical intervention after firearm-related spinal cord injury

Context Surgical management of firearm-related spinal cord injury (SCI) remains controversial, and there are no clear guidelines. Time to surgery, surgical indications, and patient characteristics on initial presentation in this group are not well understood, and these factors may impact the potential for neurologic recovery after operative intervention. Objective To understand the timing and factors affecting the timing of operative intervention after firearm-related SCI Methods In a retrospective cohort study, patients with traumatic SCI from July 2012 to July 2022 (n = 1569) were identified from our level 1 trauma center Trauma Registry. Data was obtained from the trauma registry and chart review. Rates and timing of surgical intervention, initial injury severity measures, and general hospital outcomes were compared between firearm-related SCI and blunt trauma SCI. Results Patients with firearm-related SCI were less likely to undergo surgery compared to other etiologies (24.3% vs. 70.2%, P < 0.0001). Time to surgery for firearm-related SCI was longer than for other etiologies (49.2 ± 92.9 vs. 30.6 h ± 46.0, P = 0.012). Multiple measures of initial injury severity, including Injury Severity Score, Glasgow Coma Score, and emergency department disposition demonstrated more severe injury among patients with firearm-related SCI, and these patients often required other emergent surgeries prior to spine surgery (52%). Conclusions There was a longer time to spine surgery among patients with firearm-related SCI compared to blunt trauma SCI, and patients with firearm-related SCI were more severely injured on initial presentation. Further research is needed to understand the complex relationship between patient injury severity, surgical intervention, surgical timing, and outcomes after firearm-related SCI.

Financial Burden and Outcomes of Firearm Injuries in U.S. Hospitals, 2003–2020

Firearm-related injuries (FRIs) are serious but a preventable public health issue. The objective of this study was to describe FRI inpatient costs by (1) patient insurance payer type, and (2) hospital safety-net mix. FRIs were identified using International Classification of Disease diagnosis codes in the National Inpatient Sample. All admissions between 2003 and 2020 were included. The primary outcome was consumer-price index adjusted inpatient stay costs. Mixed effects generalized linear regressions, with a random intercept at the hospital level, were used to describe costs. Analyses were sample weighted and performed between 2023 and 2024. Among 538,795 FRIs, the median age was 27 years (interquartile range: 21 - 37 years). Injuries by payer type were highest among self-pay (280,161; 39%), followed by Medicaid (182,716; 34%), private (113,650; 21%), and Medicare (30,110; 6%). Inflation-adjusted costs of FRI stays totaled $15.2 billion, with $6.2 billion from Medicaid and $5 billion from the self-pay group. After 2014, FRI incidence declined among self-pay/no-charge patients and increased among Medicaid-covered patients - representing a 127% total increase in Medicaid costs from $169 million in 2003 to $753 million in 2020. Among moderate-high and high safety-net mix hospitals, costs increased from $257 million in 2003 to $567 million in 2020. The incidence and costs of FRIs among Medicaid-insured has substantially increased since 2003. Importantly, these increased costs are disproportionately placed on disadvantaged patients and safety-net hospitals.

Association of pediatric firearm injury with neighborhood social deprivation in Philadelphia

BackgroundFirearm-related injury is the leading cause of death among children and adolescents. There is a need to clarify the association of neighborhood environment with gun violence affecting children. We evaluated...

Conceptualization of Firearm-Related Terms Among Rural Adolescents: Definitions Matter.

Rural adolescents are at risk for firearm-related injury and death. In response, professional organizations have called for communication between adolescents, parents, and providers about firearms. A shared understanding of firearms between providers and families can facilitate effectiveness of health interventions. However, few studies engage adolescents in identifying their perception of common firearm terminology. The current study aimed to understand how adolescents in rural communities defined firearm-related terms including firearm, carrying, and handling, and differences in terms based on prior firearm training. Data were from a mixed methods community-based participatory study of 93 adolescents from rural Washington state. Thematic qualitative coding identified themes for firearm (gun, weapon, projectile, and tool), carrying (on you/your person, transportation, and holding), and handling (actively using, safe use, and holding) and differences between those with prior firearms training. Findings provide insight into perceptions of firearm-related terms for adolescents, an often-neglected voice, and inform rural policy and prevention efforts.

Fatal and non-fatal civilian injuries sustained during law enforcement-reported encounters in California, 2016–2021

BackgroundIn 2015, California passed AB 71 to create a state-wide Use of Force Incident Reporting Database (URSUS) to tabulate law enforcement-reported encounters that resulted in serious bodily injury, death or...

Reasons for Gun Ownership Among Demographically Diverse New and Prior Gun Owners

INTRODUCTION: Pandemic-era social and political tensions may have accelerated pre-existing trends in gun owner diversification and shifts toward protection from people as a primary reason for gun ownership. Specific ownership motivations may shape storage behaviors, use patterns, policy support, and perceptions of safety. This study's objective was to assess the importance of specific reasons for owning guns, including protection from whom and in what circumstances, among demographic subgroups of new and prior gun owners. METHODS: From 1/4/2023-2/5/2023, the National Survey of Gun Policy was fielded among a nationally representative sample of US adults (N=3,096) including gun owners (n=1,002). Respondents rated the importance of 10 potential reasons for gun ownership, including at-home protection, out-of-home protection, protection in ideological conflict, and hunting or recreation. In 2023-2024, respondents’ self-report of important and highly important reasons for gun ownership were compared across political affiliation, race, ethnicity, age, sex, location, income, education, and recency of first purchase. RESULTS: Majorities of gun owners from all demographic groups cited at-home protection, out-of-home protection, and hunting or recreation as “very” or “extremely” important. At least 10% of every demographic group endorsed at least one ideologic reason as “extremely important.” Newer gun owners more frequently endorsed multiple important reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Concurrent, strongly held motivations may produce ambivalence or resistance to public health messaging that narrowly focuses on preventing violent firearm-related injury. Permissive firearm policies may compound behavioral ambivalence, exacerbating conditions that threaten collective safety and civic expression. These conditions call for more nuanced, multidimensional, societal efforts to assure collective safety.