Ambient air particulate concentrations were sampled using an RP2300 Sampler (RP 2300, Rupprecht and Patashnick, CO, USA) from March 4 to April 2, 2006, at a sampling site near highway traffic. However particles that have an aerodynamic diameter of less than 10 μm (0.01 mm) are called respiratory particulates or particulate matter (PM10). PM2.5 denotes fine particles with an aerodynamic diameter of less than 2.5 μm (Ohlstrom et al., 2000). Analysis results indicated that the average mass concentrations of fine particles (PM2.5) and inhalable particles (PM10) were 64.43 and 109.20 μ g/m3, respectively, during the day. The average mass concentrations of PM2.5 and PM10 were 69.45 and 110.46 μ g/m3 during the night. Average concentrations of major ionic species, NO2 −, NO3 −, SO4 2 −, and NH4 + during the day were 2.37, 9.16, 13.72, and 7.70 μ g/m3 in PM2.5 and 3.72, 16.42, 16.90, and 8.91 μ g/m3 in PM10. The corresponding values at night were 3.29, 11.77, 11.55, and 8.03 μ g/m3 in PM2.5 and 3.87, 18.13, 14.27, and 9.98 μ g/m3 in PM10. However, t-test results revealed that the concentrations of ionic species (Cl−, NO2 −, NH4 +, Mg2 +, and Ca2 +) in PM2.5 during the day did not differ significantly from those at night. T-test results revealed that the ionic species (NO3 −, SO4 2 −, Na+, and K+) concentrations in PM2.5 during the day differ, significantly from those at night. The concentrations of ionic species (Cl−, NO2 −, NO3 −, and NH4 +) in PM10 during the day did not differ significantly from those at night. The concentrations of ionic species (SO4 2 −, Na+, K+, Mg2 +, and Ca2 +) in PM10 during the day differed significantly from those at night. The concentration of Cl− in PM2.5 is negatively correlated (r = −0.62) with the temperature during the day at this site close to highway traffic. Furthermore, a comparison with previous results (Fang et al., 1999a) revealed that the average concentration of NO3 − increased by 32% and 46% in PM2.5 and PM10, respectively, during the day. Average concentrations of NO3 − were increased by 72% and 65% in PM2.5 and PM10, respectively, during the night. Average concentrations of SO4 2 − were decreased by 10% and 7% in PM2.5 and PM10, respectively, during the day. Finally, average concentrations of SO4 2 − were decreased by 72% and 62% in PM2.5 and PM10, respectively, during the night. This monitoring data may be helpful to establish baseline or background concentrations, which is essential for forensic investigations.
Read full abstract