The World Journal of Surgery represents a global forumfor general surgical matters in all their dimensions andcomplexity, not the least in the problem of the burden ofsurgical disease and the provision of surgical care. Theburden of surgical disease in developing countries has beenthoroughly assessed by Debas and colleagues [1], whohave quantified surgical burden by world area, using costper disability-adjusted life year (DALY) per 1,000 popu-lation. They found that the surgical burden by area, indescending order of disadvantage, was as follows: Africa,Southeast Asia, Eastern Mediterranean, Europe, WesternPacific, and finally the Americas. They went on to definethe requirements and obligations at each of the primary,secondary, and tertiary levels of surgical provision. In2007, at a Conference hosted by the Rockefeller Founda-tion’s Bellagio Centre, surgical focus was brought down tosub-Saharan Africa, and surgical burden and access wasexamined in selected countries there [2]. The participantsdeveloped a program which included advocacy and par-ticularly emphasized evidence building as a roadmap forthe future.Against this background, it is particularly appropriatethat this issue of the World Journal of Surgery carries adetailed and valuable analysis of surgical services inUganda, the first analysis of its kind from that country [3].Uganda is located in Central Africa and has a population of30,262,610 [4]. It is landlocked, and is about the size of theState of Oregon. The economy and population are largelyrural. Its health indicators show a life expectancy of 52years, but a remarkably low (for Africa) HIV prevalence of4.1%. In most ways it reflects the surgical problems ofmany sub-Saharan African countries, and the article issobering reading.The authors calculate that the Ugandan population isserved by 75 specialist-trained general surgeons, with anadditional 12 subspecialists in neurosurgery, plastic sur-gery, and urological surgery. This means there is astaggering surgical ratio of 1/400,000 population. Theauthors then outline the population catchment of nineselected hospitals in Uganda (that includes the main citiesof Kampala and Entebbe). In their outline they provide thenumber of beds and the operations performed, as well asthe make-up of the attending medical staff of the ninehospitals. The information at this point gives a surgeon-reader at this point the first world pause: only four of thenine hospitals have any general surgeons on their staff, twowith one each, and the remaining two with two each. Fivehospitals with over 100 beds and performing several hun-dred operations a year rely entirely on (nonsurgical)medical officers. The problem is that as much as 90% ofthe medical workforce is located in the two cities, thisdespite—in exact contradistinction—the fact that 90% ofthe population is rural. This maldistribution problem res-onates throughout the developing world.The authors identify many challenges to building asurgical workforce: these are the basic and critical trio ofrecruitment, training, and retention. Recruitment to surgeryis challenged by international collaborations and financialsupport for research that draws trainees to the fields ofpublic health and infectious diseases rather than to surgery.It has long been argued that surgical diseases are seen as ‘‘apoor relative’’ of infectious diseases in the assessment,financing, and management of the disease burden in thedeveloping world.Training in medicine has been difficult in Uganda, butimprovements to undergraduate training programs have
Read full abstract