The article is devoted to the study of the peculiarities of tax amnesty in Ukraine. In the course of the research, it was found that tax amnesty is not only a need for the socio-economic life of society, but also the implementation of the pre-election program of the current government. It is emphasized that this is the first comprehensive attempt to implement tax amnesty in practice as a tool of financial and tax regulation of the economy. The classification of amnesties in economic activity (tax amnesty, capital amnesty, economic amnesty) was carried out and it was concluded that the Ukrainian version of the amnesty belongs to economic amnesties. The experience of the most successful foreign countries in this field (Indonesia, Argentina, the Republic of Kazakhstan, Italy) was studied. It has been established that world practice proves that the economic benefit of the state during the amnesty can be realized in 3 main ways: depositing legalized funds by declarants in interest-free deposits in state banks for a specified period of time; payment of a one-time tax, which is either equal to the basic rate of income tax, or, as is very often the case in practice, much lower (by 2–3 times) than the basic level; the purchase of government debt securities (usually bonds) with a long period of rotation on the conditions of the absence of fines or the payment of a fixed tax at a small rate. The fiscal, regulatory, investment and social functions of the tax amnesty are characterized and the characteristic features of its implementation in Ukraine are summarized. The opinion was expressed that, despite possible positive benefits in the course of the tax amnesty, it contradicts certain provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine and the principles of taxation, which are reflected in the Tax Code, and may lead to negative expectations among domestic businesses. It was found that according to the results of the tax amnesty, it cannot be considered successful, taking into account the financial expectations that were at the beginning of its implementation and the actual results achieved. this is a long-overdue objective process that requires its implementation in Ukraine. It was concluded that, despite the urgent need to hold a tax amnesty in Ukraine, the failure was due to the incorrectly chosen time of its holding, which fell on the period of the active phase of Russian aggression; lack of significant changes in the current fiscal legislation, trust in the domestic judicial system, effective fight against corruption; conducting active public outreach work among society.
Read full abstract