Abstract
The paper discusses qualitative findings from an in-depth study of the school choices of 65 parents living in rural and remote areas of Tasmania and their views about the need for their children to move out of the area to pursue education at secondary and post-secondary level. A constructivist analysis of open-ended survey questions and focus group discussions formed part of a broader mixed-methods approach and probed the affective 'subtext' of instrumental survey responses. Findings contribute to our understanding of the interaction of affective, instrumental and structural factors influencing rural parents' educational decision-making in the neo-liberal policy context, especially with regard to decisions perceived by parents as 'risky' with respect to their own future employment and financial expectations. External threats to rural livelihoods, such as economic downturns and natural disasters create parents' feelings of anxiety about children's educational futures and are experienced differently by those living on farming properties or in small rural towns. Parents' perceptions of local and urban school availability, access and quality differ by locality and region. Educational outcomes reflect multidimensional structural, socio-economic and cultural constraints shaping school choice. Membership of voluntary associations, which provides supportive informational networks and develops shared social capital, appears to help parents to overcome socio-economic inequalities and improve their children's prospects of educational success. The interplay of social class, gender and place attachment is examined with reference to Bourdieu's concepts of habitus and disposition, as well as the processes by which parents try to transmit intergenerational advantage through educational choices.
Highlights
MethodsResearch sample Our sample of rurally isolated parents was purposeful (Cresswell, 2008), recruited through the Tasmanian Isolated Children’s Parents Association (ICPA)
Our research aimed to investigate attitudes of Tasmanian parents living in rural and remote areas to their children moving away from the area to attend secondary school or college and to examine the factors that influence parents’ school and college choices
One father commented on the questionnaire: “We didn’t choose our son’s school – he chose it himself!” Parents said they were keen for their children to achieve broad learning goals, rather than merely academic ‘performance’ goals, and to develop new skills, understandings and self-confidence to fit them for an uncertain future (McWilliam, 2008). These findings suggest that affective and instrumental influences worked differently in different situations depending on degree of perceived future ‘risk’
Summary
Research sample Our sample of rurally isolated parents was purposeful (Cresswell, 2008), recruited through the Tasmanian Isolated Children’s Parents Association (ICPA). This Australia-wide voluntary organisation, founded in 1971, is a non-profit, apolitical parent support group with about 4,500 members (ICPA, 2013). The ICPA represents and lobbies for the educational interests and concerns of families living in rural and remote areas. It is a socially diverse group and includes members from a wide spectrum of occupational and educational backgrounds. All 107 memberhouseholds of ICPA Tasmania were invited to participate; of these, 65 members across all branches completed the questionnaire⎯a response rate of 60%.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Australian and International Journal of Rural Education
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.